Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rudyard kipling essay on
Rudyard kipling + biography
Rudyard kipling + biography
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Bud from the novel Bud, Not Buddy and Rudyard Kipling the author of the poem “If” both have similar rules to live by.
Bud and Rudyard Kipling have rules dealing with lies. In “If” Rudyard Kipling wants his son to not deal with lies. In the poem “If” stanza 1 line 6 it says,”Or being lied about don’t deal in lies.” In Bud, Not Buddy, Bud tells lies to keep himself from getting caught. In Bud, Not Buddy, page 11 it says,“If you got to tell a lie, make sure it’s simple and easy to remember.” This shows that Rudyard Kipling’s rule means not to deal with lies unlike Bud, his rule means that when you got to lie make it easy to remember. In conclusion, Rudyard Kipling the author of the poem “If” and Bud the main character from the novel
both have rules to live by but have different meanings. Bud and Rudyard Kipling have rules dealing with hating in different ways. In “If” Rudyard Kipling wants his son to not hate people or be involved in situations with hate. In the poem “If” stanza 1 line 7 it says,”Or being hated, don’t give way to hating,” In Bud, Not Buddy Bud doesn’t say bad things about people he doesn't know. In Bud, Not Buddy page 157 it says,”Never, ever say something bad about someone you don't know -especially when you're around a bunch of strangers. You never can tell who might be kin to that person or who might be a lip-flapping, big-mouth spy.” This shows that Rudyard Kipling’s rule means to not hate people or worry about people hating you and Bud’s rule means to not hate people you don’t know especially when you are around a bunch of strangers.
F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby and Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle both portray drastically different social aspects of the early 1900s in America. Together, they both expose the unfavorable aspects of the new, modern society, that is not often portrayed in history. Although both The Jungle and The Great Gatsby are pieces of fiction, they portray an accurate depiction of the physical and the moral challenges people experienced during the growing industrialization in America. However, The Jungle's plot involved more factual evidence and the environment is a more accurate representation of the time period, whereas The Great Gatsby portrayed a slightly less realistic representation of that era.
...t, optimistic, and affectionate people. J.R. Moehringer wrote an autobiography showcasing how both Bill and Bud helps J.R. achieve his goal of going to Yale, and realizing that anything is possible as long as he tries. The pair [Bill and Bud] is intelligent people, who know everything from Yale's best English teacher, to Yale's famous graduates, such as: Noah Webster, Nathan Hale, Bole Porter. In addition, Bill and Bud are optimistic people, who care about J.R.'s future and are willing to help him reach his goals. Last of all, the pair are loving towards J.R. though the way they help educate him, even though it was not expected from them, out of the three million people living on Earth, not many individuals find each other likeable, however, many teens, youths, and adults would find Bill and Bud likeable, because they are compassionate, intellectual, and optimistic.
In Seamus Heaney’s poetry, there is a recurring theme of his talking of the past, and more predominantly about significant moments in time, where he came to realisations that brought him to adulthood. In “Death of a Naturalist” Heaney describes a moment in his childhood where he learnt that nature was not as beautiful as seem to be when he was just a naive child. Heaney does this on a deeper level in “Midterm Break” describes his experience of his younger brothers funeral and the mixed, confusing feelings he encountered, consequently learning that he no longer was a child, and had no choice but to be exposed to reality. Robert Frost in one sense also describes particular moments in time, where his narrator comes to realisations. However, Frost writes more indirectly than Heaney, and all together more metaphorically. In “A Leaf Treader” he symbolically talks about life and death through the autumn season. He does the same, in “The Road Not Taken” where the two roads are described to be a metaphor for the decisions one makes in life, and the inevitable regrets we face due to those decisions. In “Stopping by a Woods on a Snowy Evening” Frost directly talks directly of a moment in time, however the significant meaning being that in life one needs a moment of solace to appreciate peace and beauty.
First Ericsson discuss white lies, she describes white lies as when a person “assumes that the truth will cause more damage than a simple, harmless untruth” (Ericsson 181). A person decides that it is better to tell the lie rather than to tell the truth because of how they perceive the outcome will be. Ericsson believes that people should not use white lies because they’re “[deciding] what is best for someone else” (Ericsson 181). When people use white lies they’re assuming that what they are doing is good for the other person, even if they do not know for sure that the other person will benefit from not knowing. On the other hand in the book “The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time” by Mark Haddon, the main character, Christopher does not believe in lying but he uses white lies. Christopher says, “A white lie is not a lie at all. It is where you tell the truth but you do not tell all of the truth” (Haddon 48). In this situation, Christopher’s
Some people seem to tell lies for one of two reasons -- to protect themselves or to protect others. In the book The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time both motivations occur: Christopher simply does not lie; his dad, however, concocts a huge lie in order to protect his son.
George and Lennie seemingly contrast each other throughout most of the story, constantly arguing about Lennie’s actions. After the two fight about Lennie needing ketchup for his beans, the author writes, "But I wouldn't eat none, George. I'd leave it all for you. You could cover your beans with it and I wouldn't touch none of it" (12). Lennie’s innocent offer to give up ketchup for his friend, resolving their argument, also establishes that extending acts of friendship is an astounding way to overcome differences. Certainly one must not only be kind in order to gain acceptance, but persistent in attempts to establish friendship. Lennie is another perfect example of this when he befriends Crooks: “Lennie’s disarming smile defeated him. ‘Come on in and set a while,’ Crooks said. ‘ ‘Long as you won’t get out and leave me alone, you might as well set down.’ His tone was a little more friendly” (69). Analogous to Lennie’s tenacious attempts to win Crooks’ trust, one must be resolute in order to accept those with differences. Constant acts of friendship show compassion and clear purpose in actions, ridding any stereotypes or misunderstandings in a
Innocence in Billy Budd There is much to be said about innocence. If one is with innocence than one can do no wrong. But that is not all to be said. Innocence is not always a good thing. It could make one naive or blind to certain evils.
Robert Frost and Edgar Allen Poe two amazing poets, who created many well written poems, for instance “Stopping by the Woods on a Snowy Evening”, by Robert Frost and “The Raven” by Edgar Allen Poe. These two poems have many differences and similarities between them. A big difference between Frost and Poe is there back ground but this is also a similarity, how they took their real life situations and turned them into poetry. Then, their life situations made their tone in “Stopping by the Woods on a Snowy Evening” and “The Raven” completely different. But in these two poems there is a meaning behind them and the meanings are similar. Finally, a difference and similarity
Lying turns into a true issue at the end of the Death of a Salesman. At the end reality turns out about Biffs' falsehood. Biff at last tells Willy that he has been lying for some time. He has truly been in prison while he was away. Towards the end Biff opens up about lying and would like to lie any more. Biff even concedes "We never came clean for ten minutes in this house!"(miller 104). Moreover we get some answers concerning Harpy's falsehood. Cheerful has dependably said he was fruitful, yet we discover that he was never high up at the spot he worked at. He is truly just an aide to a collaborator. Joyful makes himself appear as though he is essential much the same as his father did. So you can see the falsehoods are rejoiced at the end of the play and they were truly the reason for all the assertions thoroughly considered the play.
Instructor Mendoza English 1B 22 July 2015. Robert Frost: Annotated Bibliography. Research Question: What are the common themes in Robert Frost's work? Robert Frost is a very successful poet from the 20th century, as well as a four time Pulitzer Prize winner.
Emily Dickinson and Robert Frost both think that individuality is very important to a person equally like Ralph Emerson. Although they may have a lot in common these poets are different in many ways. Both Frost and Dickinson were American poets and were both from New England. A big similarity between Frost and Dickinson both talk about death. Emily Dickinson and Robert Frost both talk about the power of nature in their poetry. Frost and Dickinson have a reasonable evidence on why human beings should live life to their own agenda but, what if that person cannot stop living somebody else dreams? How can these poems help people break away for society and become a strong confidence individual person?
Comparing London by William Blake and Westminster Bridge by William Wordsworth William Blake was born in London in 1757. He was taught by his mother at home, and became an apprentice to an engraver at fourteen. In addition to poetry Blake spent much of his time painting. Blake lived on the edge of poverty and died in neglect. His poetry receiving little acclaim while he was alive.
Robert Frost is a renowned poet of his time. He took us to new heights with his work, as it often makes us think outside the box. Frost has won numerous amounts of prizes for his works, and also steps out of poetry. Showing us that he is very versatile when it comes to writing. Some loved him, and some didn’t agree with his style of work, but for the most part he was respected. Frost brought something new and very different to poetry, which will always keep him relevant. Robert Frost’s early life and a critiques of his work, give us an idea of what he and his poems are all about.
Authors, William Wordsworth and William Blake convey different messages and themes in their poems, “The World is Too Much with Us” and “The Tyger” consecutively by using the different mechanics one needs to create poetry. Both poems are closely related since they portray different aspects of society but the message remains different. Wordsworth’s poem describes a conflict between nature and humanity, while Blake’s poem issues God’s creations of completely different creatures. In “The World is Too Much with Us,” we figure the theme to be exactly what the title suggests: Humans are so self-absorbed with other things such as materialism that there’s no time left for anything else. In “The Tyger” the theme revolves around the question of what the Creator (God) of this creature seems to be like and the nature of good vs. evil. Both poems arise with some problem or question which makes the reader attentive and think logically about the society.
Robert Frost's view of childhood is much different than that of William Blake, as expressed in their respective poems, "Birches" and "The Chimney Sweeper". Living in the late seventeenth century, Blake saw some hard times; and as such, paints a very non-romantic picture of childhood. Frost, however, sees things differently. The result is two glaringly different poems that goes to prove how very different people are.