Kenya Barris’ Black-ish and Dudley Randall’s “The Melting Pot” reveal how people of minority often try and gain acceptance and fit into the standards set by society, but lose their own individuality and culture in the process. True success can only be achieved when people forget society and focus on simply accepting themselves. Each work shows a shift from requiring the acceptance of others to validate oneself to forgetting others and accepting themselves for who they are. The beginnings of both Black-ish and “The Melting Pot” show how initially, many people of minority feel they must compromise their own identity and individuality in order to achieve acceptance from those around them, but are ultimately unhappy as they are not true to themselves. …show more content…
First, this pressure to fit and resulting unhappiness in can be seen in the show Black-ish. At the beginning of the episode, Junior changing his style to be more likeable to people around him shows he is willing compromise his own personal identity in order to be more accepted by society. After his father throws out his stuff in an attempt to make his son more “cool”, Junior says, “But that’s who I am!”. His father replies, “Not anymore it’s not”(40 Acres and a Vote). To his father, the only way Junior has a chance to be liked by others enough to become the school president is changing who he is, to fit the expectations set by society. Junior is pressured by his father and peers to fit in, and the disconnect between who he is portraying himself to be for society and who he really is ultimately makes him feel outcast and unhappy. Overall, many people of minority may originally feel forced to fit the expectations of society, and change their individuality in order to achieve it. In addition, the theme of fitting into society’s standards is seen in Dudley Randall’s “The Melting Pot”. The speaker attempting to enter the melting pot many times, even after being thrown out, reveals his willingness to lose his individuality in order to become included in society. After being denied entry to the “melting pot” that is his country, the story states, “And every time Sam tried that pot/They threw him out again” (Randall 13-14). Each time Sam tries to enter the pot, he is trying to become an accepted member of society, and is required to lose his individual identity and culture. He is forced to do so because his identity has been deemed “unacceptable” by the people already in the melting pot. around people having a negative view towards their identity, people of minority start to believe these views and think of themselves as a flawed, unacceptable person. All in all, these works show how society forces many people to change their individual identity so they can be accepted by others, but they cannot be happy as they are no longer true to themselves. The endings of both “The Melting Pot” and Black-ish illustrates when societal expectations are put after one’s own self acceptance, people can lose negative judgement and be fulfilled with only who they are as a person.
First, Randall’s “The Melting Pot”shows this transformation from being influenced by society to being gratified by only oneself. The speaker refusing to try and enter the melting pot any more times shows that he has shifted from the start of the poem, and no longer needs the acceptance of society in order to be content with himself. After being thrown out for a “thousand times”, the speaker retorts, “You can shove your old pot. You can like it or not,/but I will be just what I am” (17-20). At the beginning of the poem, the speaker is eager to leave his old culture behind to enter the “melting pot” that represents society, but now he realizes that the most important thing is to be who he is, and not what others think he should be. In conclusion, the speaker’s transformation in “The Melting Pot” demonstrates how self-gratification is achieved when a person focuses on the ideals set only by themselves, and not by anyone else around them. Next, Barris’ Black-ish also reveals how listening to oneself and oneself only will lead to the most happiness and fulfillment. Junior attempting to drop out of the school election in order to be true to himself illustrates he is no longer relying on others to validate himself, and values his own identity over the thoughts of society. After Junior breaks the news to his father that he will no longer be running for president, he admits, “I’ve already pretended to be someone I’m not, and I don’t want to do that anymore. I just want to be me.”(40 Acres and a Vote). Junior realizes that when he changes himself to become more likeable as a the school’s president, he is portraying a false version of himself, and that his true identity is different. Overall, when people forget what others think of them and focus on what they
think of themselves, they can truly be fulfilled with who they are. In conclusion, both “The Melting Pot” and Black-ish shows that people of minority feel like they must fit the standards of society, but in doing so, must lose their culture and identity. It only when society is forgotten and self-acceptance is put first can happiness ultimately be achieved.
All blondes are dumb. Gingers have no soul. All Jews are greedy. All Asians are bad drivers. Imagine living in a world where people are put into a category simply because of their appearance, race, or religion. It limits a person’s chance of expressing individuality through categorization. Desmond Cole’s article, “The Skin I’m In” introduces the struggles faced by black people through racial stereotypes in Canada— a country known for its diversity. Cole reveals the experiences of black people who are stereotyped as dangerous; as a result, they are victimized with prejudice, discrimination, and injustice by society.
It is commonly thought that one has to struggle in order to be black. Black people tend to have a stronger sense of group identification than any other racial group in the United States. The question is whether or not this is helpful or detrimental to the black population. In “Promoting Black (Social) Identity” Laura Papish criticizes Tommie Shelby’s We Who Are Dark. Shelby argues that the black population’s sense of group identity is vital to furthering their collective political agenda. Shelby believes that best way to make sure that their political ideologies are cohesive is for black individuals to have a “thick conception of black identity” (Papish 2).” Having a thick sense of black identity calls for “ African Americans think of themselves as and act as a ‘nation’ constituted not by physical borders, but by a shared ethnic, cultural, or biological trait that imbues the community with a ‘general will’ and this “ will” typically includes political motives (Papish 2). Papish argues that it not part of the duty of a black person to have any sense of loyalty or solidarity with other African-Americans and that not doing so does not make them any less black than those that choose to have a thick sense of black identity. Those who don’t grow up with a strong black group identity in their lives are just as black and go through some of the same struggles that other black people do. In the video “Black Like Who?” Debbie Reynolds did not have a strong sense of blackness because she was raised in a white neighbor. The other ladies in the short film talk about how they thought that she had a “ real problem with [her] ethnicity like [she] had a problem with the fact that [she] born African-American (Reynolds). This along with the documentary on Lacey Schwartz show that a person’s sense of blackness is very much a product of what others around them define blackness as. However, it is not clear
People of different ethnic backgrounds are influenced by both cultural and societal normalities to want to naturally return to their own ethnic groups. In Beverly Daniel Tatum’s book “Why Are All Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?” Tatum tries to explain why in even racially diverse schools, people of the same race tend to gravitate toward one another causing racial separation. Tatum claims that people of the same race, particularly black kids, are likely to turn toward people who understand their shared perspective. Although Tatum effectively uses a conversational tone and emotionally charged words, her overuse of biased interviews and experiences forces the reader to question the validity of her portrayal of race relations.
This model examines the relationship between the dominant culture and one with minority status, such as Latinos. Attitudes towards self, same minority group, different minority groups, and the dominant group are examined through five stages within the model. These include conformity, dissonance, resistance and immersion, introspection, and integrative awareness. The stage most pertinent to Antonio at this time is the Dissonance stage. During this stage, one starts to acknowledge the existence of racism, that he cannot escape his own heritage, and experiences conflict between shame and pride felt for his culture. This same shame versus pride conflict is also extended to members of his own minority group. Held stereotypes about other minority groups are now questioned as well. One in the Dissonance stage is also starting to realize that not all beliefs held by the dominant group are valuable or even accurate (Sue & Sue, 2003). Because of the two incidents Antonio endured during his freshman year and their emotional impact on him, he is becoming aware that even though he has “assimilated,” others of the majority group will still identify him as different. Antonio is also experiencing conflict between what members of the minority group (his parents) and the majority group feel are important; his parents believe he
I am not a targeted minority and I have never felt discriminated against, but I certainly have found my self weighed down, unable to keep up, in the constant rush and roar that is our society. I have felt isolated and left behind by everything around me, and this utter loneliness is not something that is easy to deal with. This loneliness inevitably turns to self-hatred as I ask myself why I can’t keep pace with everyone else when they seem to be doing just fine? Reading James Baldwin has reminded me that I’m not alone, and that there are many ways to deal with the isolation one feels within society. For some, struggling to keep afloat in the mainstream as it rushes along is the most comprehensible way, but for others, like Baldwin, it’s easier to simply get out of the water and walk along the bank at his own chosen pace.
Race and ethnicity is a main factor in the way we identify others and ourselves. The real question here is does race/ethnicity still matter in the U.S.? For some groups race is not a factor that affects them greatly and for others it is a constant occurrence in their mind. But how do people of mix race reacts to this concept, do they feel greatly affected by their race? This is the question we will answer throughout the paper. I will first examine the battle of interracial relationship throughout history and explain how the history greatly explains the importance of being multiracial today. This includes the backlash and cruelty towards interracial couple and their multiracial children. Being part of a multiracial group still contains its impact in today’s society; therefore race still remaining to matter to this group in the U.S. People who place themselves in this category are constantly conflicted with more than one cultural backgrounds and often have difficulty to be accepted.
he argues in support of racial identity and flexibility complementing one another. This proves that the further society evolves, the closer mankind gets to eradicating the idea of a dominant race. However, there are occasions where labels could hinder a person’s opportunity. In fact, culture is the newest label that society takes into account the most, and to a minority, the main goal is to embed the roots of the old generation into the next generation.
concerns racial equality in America. The myth of the “Melting Pot” is a farce within American society, which hinders Americans from facing societal equality issues at hand. Only when America decides to face the truth, that society is not equal, and delve into the reasons why such equality is a dream instead of reality. Will society be able to tackle suc...
For instance, Brooks himself confesses that he has himself in the past gravitated towards places where he believed he could be most comfortable in and where he also felt he could be his true self. He further states, that the majority of his friends are middle-income level Caucasians and conservative Christians. Brooks’ main argument in the essay is that many individuals in the United States often do not even bother to show that they would like to build diverse communities. The essay, Brook says, is about the public discourse on race and is meant to make us ponder about the stereotypes and assumptions we have when we think about diversity or people from other ethnicities. It is also meant to make us look where we fit in the diversity debate? Are we truly for the integration of
This essay will discuss the intrinsic relationship between diversity conceptualization and social integration presenting a response against David Brooks’ essay entitled “People Like Us.” In order to do this I will discuss four crucial elements: the influences of different definitions of diversity in cultural unification, Brook’s ideas about social groups working together and social groups coexisting together, the importance of diversity, and the influence of diversity in social changes. I will examine why some people have the perception that our American society ignore or see as unworthy diversity. Thus, I will dispute Brook’s view stating that our society disregards diversity, and Americans just pretend that it is important to them.
Appiah, Kwame Anthony. “Race, Culture, Identity: Misunderstood Connections.” Ways of Reading: An Anthology for Writers. Ed. David Bartholomae and Anthony Petrosky. 9th ed. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2011. 101-131. Print.
Through the selected readings it becomes clear that race is not only a social construct but also a value that changes depending on the region in which one inhabits. Despite the lack of scientific support for race as a biological phenomenon, race still results in misfortune for many minorities. This present throughout everyday life in terms of job opportunities, education, and life experiences.
Times are changing and I feel like I am forced to conform to the everyday social norms of America, which makes me feel impuissance. Racial identity, which refers to identifying with a social group with similar phenotypes and racial category, is the only experience that I have with life (Organista, 2010). Racial ethnicity was used to build my self-esteem and to keep me in the dark when it came to how society treats individuals of darker complexion. However, once I left the confines of my family and neighborhood, I was forced to befriend and interact with individuals that had different cultural values and beliefs than me. This experience caused me to learn how to appreciate other racial and ethnic groups and their cultural values and belief. This is an accurate definition, of acculturation because I was able to understand and fit in with individuals different from me, while maintaining my own culture and ethnic identity. Therefore, knowing the importance of my ancestry, while acculturating and developing my own identity was all used
Over the years, American culture and values have constantly evolved. This evolution has been aided by the invention of new technologies, gaining new knowledge and discovering new things, and the transmission of foreign items and social practices (D. Kendall 56-57). Immigration can also be a driving force in the evolution of a society for all of the information and practices we have gained from other cultures. America is often called a melting pot because for hundreds of years people from all over the world have come to seek the American Dream. Diversity plays a big part in American culture and is often used as a selling point for communities, workplaces, or even universities. However, people tend to think their racial group is better than others,
In that setting, racial difference and racial hierarchy can be made to appear with seeming spontaneity as a stabilizing force. They can supply vivid natural means to lock an increasingly inhospitable and lonely social world in place and to secure one 's own position in turbulent environments (Gilroy, 430).