More handpicked essays just for you.
George orwell 1984 on free speech
Orwell's 1984 no freedom of individuality
Orwell's 1984 no freedom of individuality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Power goes hand in hand with responsibility. For an individual to enjoy great power they must be able to balance it with the responsibility that follows. This is seen in different ways through Homer’s The Odyssey Book VII and George Orwell’s 1984. In his novel, Orwell portrays a futuristic dystopian world in which a totalitarian government controls every citizen’s public and private aspect of life. Through this novel, he promotes the image of what leadership should not be. In contrast to Orwell, Homer illustrates a flawed leader who is able to make decisions with good judgement even under temptation while allowing his people to make their own individual choices. From this he presents a replica of what leadership should be. Both, The Odyssey …show more content…
and the excerpt from 1984 promote their beliefs about the extent of control a leader can hold over an individual, and the ways leaders should build a relationship with their followers. However, in comparison to Orwell’s vision presented in the excerpt from 1984, Homer’s presentation of his ideas on power and leadership in The Odyssey are far more persuasive due to the ways he projected his thoughts. Despite the fact control plays a large part in the possession of power, a leader must be able to discipline the extent of authority he has over his people.
This is shown in The Odyssey when Odysseus does not execute complete arbitrary power over his men, but instead has them swear an oath, “I made them swear they would only eat the provisions Circe had given us and never touch Helio’s cattle” (Hinds). However, his men are facing starvation under the lure of the cow meat, and not knowing how to stop them, Odysseus goes to pray to the gods. Unfortunately in his absence, his men succumb to temptation and make the wrong choice. Therefore after seeing their act he shows understanding because he realizes there was no way out of it, “I returned to the ship racking my brain for a way to set things right, but there was no use” (Hinds). From this Homer shows that although Odysseus should have stayed with his men he did his role as a leader by having them swear an oath to ignore their desire. Nevertheless, Homer still shows that similar to those in authority Odysseus has his flaws as well as his …show more content…
advantages. On the other hand in 1984, the situation however is reversed due to the fact the government known as “Big Brother” controls every citizen’s public and private aspect of life. One can clearly see that individuals are prohibited of having any thoughts or feelings due to the fact citizens “had to live -- did live, from the habit that became instinct -- in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in the darkness, every movement scrutinized” (Orwell). Orwell goes on illustrating the lives deprived of privacy through the police patrol “snooping into people’s windows” and the “Thought Police” spying on their individual thoughts (Orwell). From this, Orwell shows a scenario of what life would be under a poor leadership. Although managing one’s extent of control is a significant part of power, connecting and building a relationship with one’s followers is essential.
Homer’s interpretation of connecting with one’s followers is more persuasive than Orwell’s because in The Odyssey, Odysseus communicates directly with his men “As soon as I got down to my ship and to the sea shore I rebuked each of the men separately” (Homer). Odysseus voices, honestly and personally, with his men which makes them feel individually respected as his followers. He also is in constant communication with his men and continuously looks out for their well being, “I reminded them of their oath” (Hinds). From this Homer shows a great example of how to communicate with one’s
people. However in contrast to The Odyssey, the government in 1984 addresses their people with dishonest communication in deceitful ways. The government known as “Big Brother” interacts with their citizens through propaganda under the goal to misguide and manipulate them. They use the slogans, “WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH,” which is constructed to leave citizens under the false idea that they live under a safe government (Orwell). Orwell uses “Big Brother” to exemplify an example of how not to communicate with one’s followers. Thus concludes, both Homer and Orwell advocate for leaders to manage their extent of control and to maintain a healthy communication with their followers. Homer justifies his claim through a positive model of a leadership although flawed, is still able to lead and guide his people with responsibility. He suggests that the duty of a leader is to counsel his people to the best of his ability while keeping a noble conscious. However, unlike Homer, Orwell makes his assertion through a negative form of a leadership that holds complete control over his people. He demonstrates what a leader should not do instead of providing what leaders should do. In conclusion, Homer’s message is far more persuasive than Orwell’s due to the fact The Odyssey does not only provide examples for what leaders should not do but for what leaders should do. Through Odysseus it is known that being a leader is not about strengthening one’s self but about strengthening others.
Another way Odysseus shows loyalty is with the lotus eaters. All his men fell for the temptation of the lotus eaters. His men became addicted to the lotus and forgot
Pop culture’s mythology theory is used in many forms of media today, from The Legend of Zelda in video games to “Harry Potter in books. One example of usage of the mythology theory is the 1996 movie, O Brother, Where Art Thou? directed by Joel Coen. This movie is based off Homer’s epic poem, “The Odyssey.” There are many similarities between the two, yet at the same time, there are many differences.
Homer’s Odyssey is the iconic story of a man’s episodic journey home. The film, O Brother Where Art Thou, is a justifiable homage to the Odyssey because of the many parallels between some of the major characters depicted in the movie and the epic poem. The movie is set in the 1930s in the state of Mississippi, changing the characters in social demeanor, but retaining their motivation and major plot points.
Although some could possibly call Odysseus, the protagonist of Homer’s The Odyssey, a great leader, the fact that he fails to earn his men’s respect, endangers his men’s lives repeatedly and allows them to die due to his own selfishness states otherwise.
In The Odyssey, Homer conveys a mixed message about Odysseus’s crew. At times, they seem loyal, whereas other scenes reveal them as disloyal. Homer does this to help center the attention on how Odysseus can fall victim to temptation and stand up to take control of his crew. The critical moments where Odysseus and his crew are in disagreement are significant because they demonstrate how Odysseus is epic, yet still human and flawed.
Most works of literature have their characters embarking on a journey or journeys to reach a desired location whether it is mentally or physically. These journeys do not stand alone but contribute to the piece as a whole. The Kite Runner focuses on Amir taking on life in his suffering country to moving to a land granting great opportunity and ultimately returning home to complete a deed that would stabilize him for the remainder of his life. In the epic The Odyssey, Odysseus or Ulysses in the Latin form takes on many challenges on the dangerous sea attempting to return home to Ithaca after being victorious in the Trojan War. Traveling can also reunite characters once again as it did for Amir and Hassan in The Kite Runner or bring together two such as Telemachus and Pisistratus in The Odyssey. “This journey has brought us together still more closely” (Homer 15.59-60). Characters walk through the journeys authors create on pages and typically change for the better or reach an ultimate goal.
In this long narrative poem, Odysseus changes from being disrespectful to the gods by explicitly saying that he doesn’t need them, to longing forgiveness later by stating that he is nothing without them. After the success with the Trojan Horse, Odysseus considered himself higher than the gods because he, a mortal, was able to accomplish something even the gods couldn’t. He boasted to Poseidon and the others about how he is overpowering, and how his power and abilities were far beyond their limits. His epic boasting to the gods had lead him to create his own obstacles as, he is one who essentially was the cause. This disrespectful attitude is the personality which shows how Odysseus behaved at the beginning of the story. It not only demonstrates what he was once like, but how his obstacles get much more precarious. As this is the attitude in the beginning, by the end of this epic, Odysseus understands the value of gods and their power, even if it’s for good or bad. At the end of book twenty-two, page 1160, on lines 107-109, Odysseus finally accepts the fact that he is not the biggest thing
“Only time will tell”. This common phrase states that the truth and true essence of everything will be revealed as time endures. Written in 700 B.C.E, Homer’s nostalgic epic poem, The Odyssey, has inspired many writers to follow. Nearly 30 centuries later, this classic indirectly influenced Paulo Coelho's writing of The Alchemist. Despite the myriad differences on the surface, The Odyssey and The Alchemist have many connecting parallels. The protagonist in each of the examples of the hero’s journey learned countless lessons along the way that can be taught to everyone. The most prominent of which are the dangers of fear, the importance of perseverance, and the seriousness of pursuing what you love.
In part one of The Odyssey, the last few stories it states, “Odysseus makes them swear not to touch the god’s cattle,” (p 684). This is one of the many secrets he keeps from his men. He doesn’t tell them why they can’t touch the cattle and he is not completely truthful with them. Another secret he keeps from his men is when he doesn’t tell them about Scylla, Odysseus says, “but as I sent them on towards Scylla, I told them nothing, as they could do nothing…” (790-791).
In that regard, it was no wonder Odysseus’s is such an atrocious leader. A great example of Odysseus being disloyal is on Calypso’s Island. “…He lay with her each night, for she compelled him.” (892) This quote shows how Odysseus is disloyal to his grieving wife, and sleeps with a goddess daily. A leader cannot expect loyalty when the leader is notorious for being unloyal. “Now Circe, ‘loveliest of all immortals,’ persuades Odysseus to stay with her.” (903) This is another quote that shows Odysseus cheating on his wife, while his wife is at home is at home distraught over her missing husband. A great leader leads by example. By that philosophy, it should not be expected of Odysseus’s men to be loyal to him, when Odysseus cannot stay faithful to his own wife. Consequently, Odysseus is also extremely selfish, on top of being incredibly
During the conversation between Odysseus and Calypso in book 5, Homer uncovers to us the significance of a man 's mind and the deception of others so as to help yourself, as well as the notability of one’s determination to
Odysseus dealt with his disobedient crew. After an already difficult journey, Odysseus and his crew arrive at Aeolis, where the king Aeolus offers him wind in a bag, which had enough wind to send Odysseus’s ship back home to Ithaca. While Odysseus sleeps, the crew conspires, believing that the bag contained treasure, “Aeolus has lavished these gifts upon him. Let 's have a quick look, and see what’s here, How much gold and silver is stuffed in this bag” (Homer p.142). The crewmen opened the bag and the winds rushed out, taking them back to Aeolis’ island. Due to their curiosity and disobedience, the crew adds years to the journey. But the crew does not learn from the mistake, and the next time they disobey, the consequences were fatal. When they arrive one Helios’ island, Odysseus forbids the crew to consume the cattle of the Sun God. “But swear me a great oath, every last man: If we find any cattle or sheep on this island, no man will kill a single cow or sheep. In his recklessness, but will be content to eat the food immortal Circe gave us” (Homer p.186-87). But while Odysseus is gone, the crew disregards his instructions and feasts one Helios’ cattle. Their consequence was Zeus destroying the ship and the crew, leaving only Odysseus alive. Odysseus wishes to go home, but he cannot control his men’s ignorance. The crew’s disobedience prevents Odysseus from achieving his
Odysseus struggles with self discipline many times during the odyssey. One example of this is when fleeing cyclops island after barley escaping from right underneath the cyclops. " O Cyclops! Would you feast on my companions? Puny, am I, in a Caveman's hands? How do you like the beating that we gave you, you damned cannibal? Eater of guests under your roof! Zeus and the gods have paid you!"(Lines 383-389). This is
In Homer’s The Odyssey, there are a lot of traits displayed that are considered important in ancient Greek culture. These are shown by many different characters, but mostly by Odysseus (he is, after all, the main character in the epic poem). Odysseus is the epitome of a Greek ruler: he has a lot of admirable traits. His only fault is his hubris, but that is overcome and taken care of. Throughout Homer’s The Odyssey, Odysseus displays wisdom combined with strong loyalty and inspiring leadership through the evident trust of his men and the ability to conquer any challenges that he may face along his journey back to Ithaka.
Based on the two essays, George Orwell is a vivid writer who uses a unique point of view and strong themes of pride and role playing to convey his messages. His writings are easy to pick out because of the strengths of these messages. Just like politicians in government, people with power turn corrupt to stay in power and keep their reputations. Anyone who takes on power must be prepared to live with the consequences of his actions. Orwell knows this challenge well and conveys this principle in his writing. After all, his narration is based on real life experiences and not fictional fantasies.