Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Shylock: Villain or Victim
Shylock: Villain or Victim
Anti-semitism in the merchants of Venice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Shylock: Villain or Victim
Shylock in William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice "Shylock is a two dimensional villain who does not deserve our
sympathy"
The above statement makes two main assumptions about Shylock. One is
that Shylock is a two-dimensional villain, a man who is a
stereotypical, one-sided man with no true motive for his actions. This
assumption also implies that Shylock is extremely superficial, an
supposition that we strongly disagree. The second assumption is that
Shylock does not deserve our sympathy as although he is not
superficial, what he has done has outweighed all senses of morality.
In this, we agree to a certain extent only.
Pertaining to the first assumption, Shylock is not a one-sided,
superficial villain but has actually two sides: one of a comic villain
that invokes our dislike, and the other as the helpless victim of the
Christians. Most of the time, Shakespeare portrays Shylock as cruel
and mean, the most striking example being Shylock's reaction after his
discovery of Jessica's eloping with an enemy and the theft of his
belongings. His seemingly pure hatred of his daughter can be seen from
`"I would my daughter were dead at my foot and the jewels in her ear!"
Act 3, Scene 1. This portrayal of a Jew for Christians and readers to
rightfully ridicule and hate is further emphasized when Shylock
laments about his money along with his daughter, as can be seen from
`My daughter! O my ducats! O my daughter! Fled with a Christian! O my
Christian ducats! Justice! The law! My duca...
... middle of paper ...
...ind, generous and follows
the Christian faith, Shylock's interpretation is one who has enough
money such that if the bond is forfeit, he would earn much in return.
This further emphasizes Shylock as a money-loving villain, who views
wealth above some of the more important parts of life.
Thus, pertaining to the second assumption, while Shylock deserves
sympathy as he is a victim of racism and marginalisation, his
unfounded and unneeded crimes must also be taken against him, and he
does not deserve too much pity.
Concluding this essay, we firmly believe that Shylock is a
three-dimensional character capable of deep emotions with more than
one side to him, and deserves pity as the victim of the
marginalisation by the Christians but not too much as he too committed
unspoken crimes that the Christians did not commit.
In Susan Pharr's "The Common Elements of Oppression", she defines "the other" as the outcast of society, the ones who stand up for what they believe in, no matter how `against the grain' it may be, the ones who try the hardest to earn acceptance, yet never receive it. In Shakespeare's "Merchant of Venice", Shylock, the `villain' is portrayed as the other simply because of his faith, because he is Jewish in a predominantly Christian society.
Shylock in William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice An ogre is according to the Collins Dictionary “a monstrous or cruel being” but more significantly as “something or someone who eats human flesh.” Is this how Shylock is portrayed in the play or is he a simple human being, a species capable of showing emotions and feelings such as vulnerability and love. Certainly, Shylock is presented to the audience in so powerful a way that even though he only appears in five scenes, many consider him the central character. Throughout the play Shylock appears to be the butt of all the jokes and many critics see his status in the play as the tragic hero.
‘villain’; he is a complex mix of both. In the first part of the play,
Throughout William Shakespeare’s play, The Merchant of Venice, there is a strong theme of prejudice. Portia has to deal with prejudice against her sex, the Prince of Morocco has to deal with prejudice against his race but the character that is most discriminated against is Shylock. He is hated for being a Jew and a money-lender, but Shakespeare has not made Shylock a character easy to sympathise with. He appears to be mean and cruel and it seems as though he loves money above all things. However during the play there are moments when Shakespeare gives Shylock speeches which show his humanity. In these moments, the audience is made to feel sorry for Shylock. Shakespeare has created a character that the audience’s feelings will change for by the minute.
In "The Merchant of Venice", the Jewish moneylender, Shylock (full character analysis here) seems to fit the stereotype common in Shakespeare’s time of the greedy and unfeeling Jew. Although we are not told ab...
as the play starts and as Shylock is introduced as a Jew it is certain
In this essay I will try to discover is Shylock a villain or a victim, in the William Shakespeare play “A Merchant of Venice”
If he had been more daunted by Christian influence, he might have been forgiven, as Jessica is subjectively exonerated. He is not contrite and it is believed that his appalling birth cannot be absolved (Bonnell). All of the characters are defined by Shylock. Launcelot Gobbo, Shylock’s servant, treats his father disrespectfully, but this disdain is not ill-received by the audience; like the other examples of inequity, Launcelot’s apathetic attitude toward his near-blind father is inexplicably tolerated by past and contemporary society (Picker). Launcelot’s contempt is generally assumed to be a result of his underprivileged upbringing, if it is noted at all.
Everyone who reads The Merchant of Venice must bear in mind that it is, like any other literary work, a creation of a skillful writer, rising a case that can be a subject for many interpretations and not necessarily revealing a specific view of its writer, however it aims to convey a certain moral to the readers. Therefore, the character of shylock, being stereotyped or not, with its controversy is a tool manipulated to convey a moral message: when people live in a society that is open to cultural diversity and that values the contributions of all society members – regardless of cultural and ethnic backgrounds, race, life styles, and beliefs – they will be one step closer to living in a civil society. Works Cited 1) Encyclopaedia Britannica, the definition of "Anti-Semitism". 2) E. E. Stoll, Shylock (an essay in Shakespeare Studies, 1927). 3) John Palmer, Comic Characters of Shakespeare, Shylock. 4) John Palmer, Comic Characters of Shakespeare, Shylock.
Shylock has the reader's sympathy. Still, their desire for revenge ruins them in the end. Works Cited Shakespeare, William. The. The Merchant of Venice. 1967.
The Merchant of Venice is a play that deals with an assortment of issues that range from politics to racial views of the Jewish people. An embodiment of these two issues can be best attributed to the character of Shylock. In a 2004 production of The Merchant of Venice, by Michael Radford, we see the character of Shylock is portrayed in a different light than that of Shakespeare's 1594 villainous Jew. Both productions pose a series of questions in comparison. An understanding of the era that these plays were written in and the audience’s perception of the production attribute greatly to a true analysis. Another aspect of these productions asks who Shylock was to Shakespeare and who he has developed into for Al Pacino and Michael Radford.
to pay it back. We see Shylock as a Villain in this scene as he plans
This is where Shakespeare evokes our sympathy, by making us realise how Shylock has suffered because of the prejudices of the Christians around him. He explains his motives for revenge in a rational way, showing how his actions are no different from the Christians'. Look carefully at the language he uses, as well as the insulting and mocking language used by the other two. At the end of the scene, Shylock mourns the loss of his daughter, although our feelings towards him are a bit mixed, for he seems to care more about the money. He does give evidence, however, of his love for his wife, which again, creates sympathy.
Shylock is a wealthy Jew who invests money into shipments and trades. When Shylock’s enemy, Antonio, requests a loan of 3000 ducats, “Shylock adopts this Christian model of "kind" lending in his bond with Antonio as a means for lawful revenge.” Shylock’s agreement is that if the ducats are not returned, Antonio must repay his loan in human flesh. This is a way for Shylock to either make money or kill a Christian, either will satisfy him. Lee describes Shylock’s feelings towards Christians, “Indeed, although Shylock will neither "eat," "drink," nor "pray" with the Christians, he is willing to "buy" and "sell" with them.” This is where Shakespeare first introduces the devil inside Shylock. Had Antonio been a Jew, there would not have been a payment of flesh. Shylock’s hatred propels the story from start to finish. His hatred causes him to lose his daughter, drives Portia to use her money and wit to save Antonio, and why he ends up losing
I feel that shylock is both a villain and victim as we can see in the