Analytical Essay
The graphic essay “Show and Tell” by Scott McCloud is written in the form of a comic book as he explains the importance of words and images, and how to effectively use the two components when creating a comic. “Show and Tell” explains to the reader how creating a successful comic does not occur easily, as numerous components must be used in the right way and amount in order to create a product that is worthwhile to its readers. This insightful graphic essay portrays to the reader how in a comic, words and images can successfully be used in numerous ways if they are kept in balance with one another. Society traditionally believes that in a piece of literature words and images should be kept apart, whereas McCloud opposes this
…show more content…
belief in “Show and Tell” and aims to prove it wrong using support. The articles, “Scott McCloud: Word-image Combinations” by Lauren Erickson (2011) and “‘Understanding Comics’ Chapter 6 Summary” by Robbie J. Reed (2008) both aid in elaborating upon the ideas McCloud brings forth in “Show and Tell.” By using a graphic essay, or comic, that contains examples of words and images, McCloud is right to express his belief that these two components can indeed collaborate with one another in literature due to his disapproval of society’s traditional belief against this. “Show and Tell” by Scott McCloud primarily focuses upon how words and images can be used in a comic.
McCloud conveys to the reader how in comics there are numerous ways to combine words and images, but if the two components are expressed in varied amounts they will become a recipe for disaster. On pages 742-744 of “Show and Tell,” McCloud describes the numerous methods in which words and images can collaborate with one another in a comic such as, word specific, picture specific, duo-specific, additive, parallel, montage, and inter-dependent. The outcome of McCloud shedding light upon these various methods is that he fuels his disapproval of the traditional belief that words and images should be kept apart in literature. Page 745 of the graphic essay brings forth McCloud’s idea that in order for a comic to be a good read, the words and images it is composed of must be balanced. On page 745, the use of words and images in a comic are compared to two people engaged in dancing. McCloud states, “In comics at its best, words and pictures are like partners in a dance and each takes turns leading. When both partners try to lead, the competition can subvert the overall goals…” By comparing words and images to two dancers who step on each other whenever they attempt to lead at the same time, McCloud conveys his belief that words and images must be used in balance with one another in order for the comic to be a good read. Overall, McCloud’s essay, “Show and Tell,” is persuading …show more content…
readers that although if words and images are used out of balance in a comic and become a disaster, it is still possible for them to work together in a piece of literature. “Show and Tell” by Scott McCloud is not just a mere comic for reader’s entertainment, it is a comic that contributes to a greater context. McCloud makes the point in “Show and Tell,” that words and images can successfully collaborate with one another in literature. McCloud does this so that he can disprove the traditional belief that society beholds and persuade readers to adopt his own personal belief. McCloud hints at this traditional belief on page 740 of “Show and Tell” where he states, “Traditional thinking has long held that truly great works of art and literature are only possible when the two are kept at arm’s length.” This quote explains to the reader that in our society today, it is believed that in order for a work of literature or art to be truly great, words and images must be kept at bay. In the world we live in today it is controversially believed that in works of literature images should be used in abundance when composed inside younger levels of reading for children, and that in higher levels of reading for adults, words should be used as the entirety. McCloud creates “Show and Tell” to convey his disagreement with this traditional belief, and to persuade readers to understand that writers are capable of effectively using words and images in their work. McCloud explains his belief that the combination of words and images is designed for all audiences and not to be separated and subjected to audiences depending on their age. This graphic essay by McCloud holds a place in our society today as it reinforces the idea that when images and words are used in harmony in literature, they should be kept to infantile use and that the use of images in higher levels of reading should be ridiculed. Educators across the nation are concerned with this topic as they encourage students to express their ideas in writing form, such as essays, and writing form only, without the use of images. It is possible to see how “Show and Tell” contributes to the significant picture of the world by being McCloud’s attempt at disproving a traditional belief constructed and established by society over many years. McCloud emphasizes his beliefs throughout “Show and Tell” through various statements and images.
One such statement McCloud uses to emphasize his beliefs can be found on page 750 where he states, “The mixing of words and pictures is more alchemy than science.” This statement generally means that in creating comics, the mixing of words and pictures is similar to alchemy as it is the process of combining the two components to create an interesting comic. The article “Scott McCloud: Word-image Combinations” by Lauren Erickson (2011) supports the idea that McCloud voices which is that creating comics is like alchemy. Erickson states, “His argument made me feel that perhaps writing comics is more complicated than it seems. Utilizing the wrong ‘combination’ could send the wrong message to the reader, causing them to become disengaged with the text.” This quote by Lauren Erickson conveys the enlightenment she received after reading “Show and Tell” by Scott McCloud where she began to see how if the components of words and images are used incorrectly, as in alchemy, they will cause the reader to lose interest in the comic, or as in olden times, create something other than
gold. McCloud does not stop at statements to get his point across as he further conveys his beliefs through image depiction. “Show and Tell” opens on pages 738-739 with a vignette of a child presenting his toy to his class during show and tell. McCloud conveys the young child in such a way where he is in a confused state as he struggles to find the words to describe his toy. McCloud follows this vignette with a statement on page 739 where he states, “It’s considered normal in this society for children to combine words and pictures. So long as they grow out of it.” Looking at this statement it can be seen that McCloud disagrees with the belief that in our society the only acceptable time to combine words and pictures is when we are infants and that we should grow out of this infantile behavior eventually so that we can adopt a more socially acceptable words-only approach. The article “‘Understanding Comics’ Chapter 6 Summary” by Robbie J. Reed (2008) supports McCloud’s belief that it is wrong to deem the combination of words and pictures in literature as immature and childish. Reed states, “And while images and writing separately can easily be considered ‘high art’, the combination of the two is often overlooked and seen as childish and not seeing how useful it can be. It is in fact the combination of words and images that are propelling comics forward in style and content. Through it ideas can be connected in unlimited ways.” This statement by Robbie J. Reed proves that McCloud is not the only soul to believe that the combination of words and pictures in literature is not infantile and is capable of being incorporated into higher level readings of improving comics in the aspects of style and content. “Show and Tell” by Scott McCloud is a graphic essay that enlightens its readers upon the importance of words and images inside literature. “Show and Tell” does not solely focus on the individual significance of words and images in literature but, on the combination of the two components and how to use them together effectively. Scott McCloud speaks to the younger generation and to comic book readers everywhere as he explains to his readers that they must balance the words and images in their comics effectively in order to transform their comic into a final product that will appeal to society. McCloud works to shun the traditional belief society has established, which is that words and images should be separated in literature, by clarifying the different methods comic book writers’ worldwide use to combine words and images in their pieces. The articles, “Scott McCloud: Word-image Combinations” by Lauren Erickson (2011) and “‘Understanding Comics’ Chapter 6 Summary” by Robbie J. Reed (2008) both aid in elaborating upon the ideas McCloud brings forth in “Show and Tell.” By using a graphic essay, or comic, that contains examples of words and images, McCloud is right to express his belief that these two components can indeed collaborate with one another in literature due to his disapproval of society’s traditional belief against this.
In this speech he expresses the significance of creating comics for children and how comic books have evolved into a much more sophisticated nonrelation to children industry. This is where producers and illustrators can express themselves through art and other near adult expressions. The gory and dark themes of today comics appeal themselves to a more adult audience However, in this process the audience for children has resulted in a loss. He wants the comic industry to bring it back to the children. His solution is this: to give children stories to hold on to. To let the imagination of children, soar to new heights with stories
“ The horizon was the color of milk. Cold and fresh. Poured out among the bodies” (Zusak 175). The device is used in the evidence of the quote by using descriptives words that create a mental image. The text gives the reader that opportunity to use their senses when reading the story. “Somehow, between the sadness and loss, Max Vandenburg, who was now a teenager with hard hands, blackened eyes, and a sore tooth, was also a little disappointed” (Zusak 188). This quote demonstrates how the author uses descriptive words to create a mental image which gives the text more of an appeal to the reader's sense such as vision. “She could see his face now, in the tired light. His mouth was open and his skin was the color of eggshells. Whisker coated his jaw and chin, and his ears were hard and flat. He had a small but misshapen nose” (Zusak 201). The quotes allows the reader to visualize what the characters facial features looked like through the use of descriptive words. Imagery helps bring the story to life and to make the text more exciting. The reader's senses can be used to determine the observations that the author is making about its characters. The literary device changes the text by letting the reader interact with the text by using their observation skills. The author is using imagery by creating images that engages the reader to know exactly what's going on in the story which allows them to
Alison Bechdel's graphic memoir, Fun Home: A Family Tragicomic, documents the author's discovery of her own and her father's homosexuality. The book touches upon many themes, including, but not limited to, the following: sexual orientation, family relationships, and suicide. Unlike most autobiographical works, Bechdel uses the comics graphic medium to tell her story. By close-reading or carefully analyzing pages fourteen through seventeen in Fun Home one can get a better understanding of how a Bechdel employs words and graphic devices to render specific events. One can also see how the specific content of the pages thematically connects to the book as a whole. As we will see, this portion of the book echoes the strained relationship between Bruce Bechdel and his family and his attempts to disguise his homosexuality by creating the image of an ideal family, themes which are prevalent throughout the rest of the nook.
Chris McCandless lived a life in which he disgusted by human civilization, and left it, eventually being led to his death in Alaska. McCandless entered the Alaskan wilderness severely unprepared, a brutal error that cost him his life. In the novel, Into the Wild by John Krakauer, Chris glances into his mindset by they way of his journal, history, and analysis of his life reveals that Chris McCandless as an arrogant and judgemental narcissist, while not mentally unstable, had a condescending attitude towards society and perished not only from his reckless stupidity but also from his unparalleled ego. Chris McCandless was immune to love and had an obsession with nature and society, him showing characteristics that created the appearance of McCandless
Piper’s use of imagery in this way gives the opportunity for the reader to experience “first hand” the power of words, and inspires the reader to be free from the fear of writing.
imagery and connotation to create pathos and logos to strike fear into the readers, and
In the essay “Kids’ Stuff” Michael Chabon argues that comic books have become too centered around adults and need to be more focused on youth readers like they were during his childhood. Chabon claims that the authors goal audience has changed over the years.Comics that were once written for children are now written to appeal to adults. Throughout the essay, Chabon disagrees with the authors choice to aim comics toward adults instead of children. He feels that authors should write children stories for children.
...s own wounded self, unaware of the unconscious connection to the depression of his mother and the unconscious recognition with the danger of his father. This text within a text is another chapter in Art Spiegleman's life that ends in tragedy from the death of a loved one and a piece of him. Artie's emphasis in this section of Maus is illustrated through the creation of a gloomy illusion when he outlined the four pages of the comic in black and illustrated the characters in a darker, more realistic manner from the mice and cats throughout the rest of the book. The purpose of this text within a text was to inform the reader that there was more to Art's story than what his father had to say. The death of Art's mother had a horrific impact on his father and himself, and this small cartoon was a way for Art to tell the story while coping with his memory of the incident.
Though people can look into color and composition, others can still even look into the source of the art itself. Cole goes deeper, delving into the source of the art, looking in particular into the idea of cultural appropriation and the view a person can give others. Though it is good for people to be exposed to different opinions of a group or an object, sometimes people can find it difficult to tell the difference between the reality and the art itself. Sometimes art can be so powerful that its message stays and impacts its audience to the point where the viewer’s image of the subject of the art changes entirely. Cole brings up an important question about art, however. Art has become some kind of media for spreading awareness and even wisdom at times, but in reality, “there is also the question of what the photograph is for, what role it plays within the economic circulation of images” (973). Cole might even be implying that Nussbaum’s advertisement can sometimes be the point of some media, and that sometimes the different genres of art can just be to make someone with a particular interest happy. One more point that Cole makes is that “[a]rt is always difficult, but it is especially difficult when it comes to telling other people’s stories.” (974) Truthfully, awareness and other like-concepts are difficult to keep going when a person or a group is not directly involved.
Alexie, Sherman. “The Joy of Reading and Writing: Superman and Me” Writer’s Presence: A Pool of Readings. 5th ed. Ed. Robert Atawan and Donald McQuade. Boston:Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2006. 73-76. Print
My intention here is to acknowledge two problems that I believe all scholars of "the visible" will encounter at some point in their work. Both showed up early in my research on commemorative artworks, but I suspect that they crash everyone's party at some point. I have no "solution" to these problems, but I believe they should, actually must, be addressed in work on visual rhetoric. The first, "readability," is both a practical and theoretical problem having to do with the possibilities of interpretation in visual culture. The second, which I'll simply label "materiality" for the moment, has a presence in numerous arenas beyond the study of visual culture, but remains nearly unaddressed and nearly unacknowledged in rhetorical work on visual images.
Even though certain works are designated to certain periods in time, many works from say, the Victorian period have similar controlling images when compared to works from the Twentieth century. Each writer presents an image that is repeatedly used throughout the work. The same image is used in each work even though they were written during different periods in time. Sometimes, even the location of the image, where it was placed in the text, helps to develop the image within the work. It may be used to convey the writer’s opinion on the subject but a lot of images are familiar and carry over from generation to generation and are continually discussed in works of literature. The only thing that changes is the way in which it is being presented and discussed.
When you think of comic books, what do you think of? If you were to ask your parents they would probably tell you Superman or Spiderman, maybe even Batman or Wonder Woman. Some might mention something more, something that appears to be a comic book, but once opened is revealed to be a work of literary genius; a comic such as Watchmen, or perhaps even V for Vendetta. An author and artist of renowned recognition and admiration wrote both masterpieces.
“The Golden Age of Comics” PBS. PBS, 2011 Web. Retrieved on February 11 2014 from http://www.pbs.org/opb/historydetectives/feature/the-golden-age-of-comics/
When students learn how to read in elementary school, teachers would teach students how to read comic books and as students we see that the comics would give the animals multiple human traits. Many comic books substitute animals and give them human-like characteristics, such as the ability to talk and walk upright. However, the debate rages on as to what type of animal makes a good character and what type of animal makes a bad character. Comic writers would often use different types of animals that are naturally seen in the real world and they would determine what type of role they would have in the comic book. Also the cartoonist would determine who should prevail, who should not, and their emotions towards one another.