More handpicked essays just for you.
Us foreign policy in cuba
Effects of cuban independence on american foreign policy
Cuba in the global political arena
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
American international relations with Cuba have almost always been tense. The cold war solidified the growing negative relations, and the embargo embodied it. But now that the cold war is over, as is the Cuban missile crisis, we’re left to wonder if the embargo is really necessary. Should the United States lift the embargo of Cuba? All of the evidence, be it economic, diplomatic, or social, points to yes. We should lift the embargo. The United States embargo of Cuba has its roots planted in 1960, 53 years ago, when “the United States Congress authorized President Eisenhower to cut off the yearly quota of sugar to be imported from Cuba under the Sugar act of 1948… by 95 percent” (Hass 1998, 37). This was done in response to a growing number of anti-American developments during the height of the cold war, including the “expropriation of United States-owned properties on the island… [and] the Soviet Union [agreeing] to purchase sugar from Cuba and to supply Cuba with crude oil” (Hass 1998, 37). Bad sentiments continued to pile up as Cuba imposed restrictions on the United States Embassy and especially when, after the United States “officially broke off diplomatic ties with Cuba, and travel by United States citizens to Cuba was forbidden ... Castro openly proclaimed his revolution to be ‘socialist’” (Hass 1998, 38). The day after this, the Bay of Pigs invasion occurred, but it failed in its job to topple Castro (Hass 1998, 38). Left with no diplomatic options and a failed military attempt, the United States decided that the only way to end Castro’s socialist regime was to sever all ties, and from 1961 to 1996, a series of acts were passed prohibiting the majority of trade and interaction with Cuba. (Hass 1998, 38). According to the... ... middle of paper ... ....org/publications/speeches/trade-democracy-peace-virtuous-cycle (July 11, 2013). Haass, Richard. 1998. Economic Sanctions and American Diplomacy. New York. Brookings Institution Press. Haven, Paul. 2013. "Kerry, Hagel On Cuba: Cabinet Nominees Could Help Ease Relations, Lift Trade Embargo". Huff Post World. January 26 Oppenheimer, Andres. 2013. "Cuba celebrates 60 years of involution". The Miami Herald. July 27 Pepper, Margot. 2009. "The Costs of the Embargo". Dollars&Sense. 09 March. http://www.dollarsandsense.org/archives/2009/0309pepper.html (November 08, 2013) U.S. Department of Treasury. 2009. "CUBA What You Need To Know About The U.S. Embargo." July 26. http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/Documents/tab4.pdf (November 08, 2013) White, Robert E. 2013. "After Chávez, a Chance to Rethink Relations With Cuba". The New York Times. March 7
The 1966 Cuban Adjustment Act grants Cubans a unique place in U.S. Immigration Law and Policy by declaring that all those who arrive in the United States are accepted as political refugees, and are eligible to become legal permanent residents after one year (Marc R.). It was created to offer protection to Cubans escaping oppression from their Communist government. As might be expected, this law is always the debate of Cubans who think about coming to America seeking freedom and a better life. For many Cubans to reach American territory is all a dream, mostly because of the chances of attaining a better economic situation for themselves and their families. A lot of them also pursue to reunite with their families in the United States after many years of separation. Some others are opponents of the Castro regime. Because they don’t have freedom of speech and can see their lives threatened if they speak out against the government, seek for more political freedom and a democratic form of government, in a land of capitalism where there are fewer restrictions and more opportunities.
In 1898, three big events got in the way of any peaceful resolution in Cuba. The New York Journal received a letter from the Spanish minister in Washington, Enrique Dupuy de Lo...
Long before our involvement, the Cubans had been leading revolts and revolutions against Spain. The Spanish empire considered Cuba to be its jewel, not only for its beauty but also for its economics. Cuba’s main source of income was from its expansive sugar plantations that greatly contributed to its wealth (more so to the Spanish Empires wealth). Ironically, even due to the high regard to Cuba, it was neglected and oppressed, as the Spanish Empire began its decline in the middle of the nineteenth century. The Empire was falling due to it slowly loosing its control over its territories, closer to the US then to Spain, because of a lack of industrializing. The Spanish would claim ownership, but never contribute back to their land. This opened the door for what is known as the 10-year war and the struggle for Cuban Independence. The United States never got directly involved, but it sympathized greatly with the Cuban’s cause, for ...
The U.S.’s relationship with Cuba has been arduous and stained with mutual suspicion and obstinateness, and the repeated U.S. interventions. The Platt agreement and Castro’s rise to power, served to introduce the years of difficulty to come, while, the embargo the U.S. placed on Cuba, enforced the harsh feelings. The two major events that caused the most problems were the Bays of Pigs and Cuban Missile Crisis.
Should Elian Gonzalez go back to Cuba or stay in the United States? This seems to be the question drenching the media on a constant bases. Every newspaper, news broadcast, and magazine seem to have a story about Elian. Titles like “Elian’s Grandmothers are coming to the US”, seems kind of silly if you read the headline literally. I don’t mean to be cold but why do we care if Elian’s grandmother is coming to the US?
Is the Cuban Embargo a cruel reminder of the Cold war, or is it an important factor of American Democracy fighting the spread of Communism? The Cuban Embargo was a declaration issued by American President John Fitzgerald Kennedy. The embargo was issued because of the threat that the Communist government of Cuba, led by Fidel Castro in 1959, had on American security, assets and democracy at the height of the Cold War. Some 1.8 billion worth of industrial assets were lost with Cuban communist nationalization. (Mr. D’Angelo personal interview) In support, constant influence of the Soviet Union during the early 1960s, particularly the time between 1961 and 1962, led to the creation of the embargo. In addition, the Soviet Union had planned to build a missile base on the island, which drove the Cold War to its height and made nuclear destruction a real possibility. Consequently, The Embargo called for total economic sanctions for Cuba and the institution of a blockade around the island, as shown by the seven-day stand off that followed the embargo with the USSR. Unfortunately, this blockade completely restricted any trade to foreign countries and even restricted travel to and from the island. The shattering of The USSR, or Soviet Union, should have called for the end of the embargo, but instead the federal government, in 1992, further restricted the embargo with the 1992 Cuba Democracy Act and the 1996 Helms-Burton Act. The Cuban Democracy Act was a bill presented by U.S. Congressman Robert Torricelli and passed in 1992, which prohibited foreign-based subsidiaries of U.S. companies from trading with Cuba, travel to Cuba by U.S citizens, and family remittances to Cuba (Lee). Most importantly, the Helms-Burton Act extended the territoria...
Perez L, 2nd ed, 1995, Cuba : between reform and revolution, Oxford University Press, New York
Relations between the United States and Cuba had been steadily declining since Castro seized power in early 1959. The U.S. officials were convinced that Castro's government was too anti-American to be trusted, and they feared that he might lead Cuba into the communist alliance. The Eisenhower administration began financing and training a group of Cuban exiles to overthrow the Cuban leader. Castro responded by increasing his program of nationalizing foreign property and companies. In return, the United States began to implement cutbacks in trade with Cuba. The relationship between the United States and Cuba was one of the chilliest of the cold war (History Chann...
The tropical island of Cuba had been an object of empire for the United States. Before the Missile Crisis, the relationship between Castro and the US were strained by the Bay of Pigs occurrence in 1961. This was where counterrevolutionary Cubans were American funded and tried to invade Cuba and overthrow Castro. However, the counterrevolutionaries failed. Castro then found an alliance with the Soviet Union and an increase of distrust that Castro had on the US. On January 18, 1962, the United States’ Operation Mongoose was learned. The objective would be “to help the Cubans overthrow the Communist regime” so that the US could live in peace. Consequently, Castro informed the Soviet Union that they were worried about a direct invasion on Cuba, thus longed for protection against th...
However, the US played a much larger role in Cuba’s past and present than the building of casinos and the introduction of the first taints of corruption. In the past, even before Batista, Americans were resented by Cubans because the Americans made a lot of Cuba’s decisions. Under Batista, 80% of Cuban imports came from the US, and the US controlled at least 50% of sugar, utilities, phones and railroads. If Cuba was a business in the stock markets, then the US would have been close to owning 50% of its shares. When combined with a long history of US-backed leaders, and US involvement, it is understandable that Cubans begrudged the Americans....
The United States embargo against Cuba is a commercial, economic and financial embargo imposed by the United States on Cuba. In other words, the US basically stopped all trades including medicine, spices, oil, sugar, and traveling to and from Cuba to the US. The Cuban embargo should stay in place and this is why. When the embargo was set in place in 1960, the US stated that there would be some requirements that Cuba would have to meet in order for the embargo to be lifted. However, Cuba has not done anything necessary in order for the US to even consider lifting the embargo.
Paterson, Thomas G. Contesting Castro: The United States and The Triumph of the Cuban Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Just ninety miles of the coast of the United States in the Caribbean Sea lies the communist ruled island of Cuba. Ruled by dictator Raul Castro, tensions between the United States and Cuba have been relaxed in the past years, but there was a time where tensions were high. When dictator Fidel Castro took over in Cuba in the late nineteen-fifties, he abolished a US established government and adopted one that replicated the one in the Soviet Union. During this time, the people of Cuba became increasingly aware of how the new dictator was ruling, and became afraid of what the new regime meant for their future and their safety. The United States during this time was also placing economic sanctions, which included halting most of all trade to Cuba.
The U.S. and Cuba has not had good relations, but After a fifty three year embargo on Cuba
“Promoters of free trade argue that the best way for countries like Cuba to improve their lot is to lower their barriers to free trade and investment and to implement economic policies based on free market economics (Hill, & Hult, 2015).” Another obstacle that hinders Cuba from thriving is the amount of debts it owes to other nations. In 2016, Cuba paid $5.2 billion in foreign debts. Even with the increase in tourist, Cuba still struggles to thrive and still finds it’s nation in a red zone. The U.S has also maintained a trade sanction against Cuba in hopes that the economic hardship will lead to the downfall of the Communist government. This tactic has not helps much because other countries like Canada and Germany has stepped in and trades with Cuba. While every nation can’t be governed by the rules that govern us in the United States, it is also important that a system is