Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of youth in election process essay
Consequences of lowering the voting age
Consequences of lowering the voting age
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of youth in election process essay
Some countries and states think voting age should be lowered. It a certain age in the United States to vote it was 21 then it went down to 18 years old. Since the voting age has been lower before it can be lower again. They want to go further and change the voting age to 16 years old. In recent years, the issue about voting age has been talked about in some countries and states. Some people think the voting age shouldn’t be lowered because they think kids that 16 years old don’t know nothing. Kids that are 16 years old do know something about the government and elections because they go to school and the teachers teach them some 16 years old should have the right to vote they know what they doing and it gone be their responsibility
The voting age should be lowered so 16 years old can vote as well. The major problem is that some people think voting age should not be lowered but other people think it should be lowered. It should be lowered because they gave 18 years old a chance to vote at elections. This issue about voting age have been in the society for about 45 years. The issue affect all the 16 years old kids that really want to vote for the next president. Some kids are a very big part of their community and their neighborhood. “At 16, a young person is very much part of their community and it is an easier time in which to start voting than at 18 when young people start to move out of home, to college or to work - setting out on their own journey in life” (Bryne). 18 years old really don't think about voting or elections they just want to start their life. Also, 16 year olds still live with their parents so they basically are part of the community that they are in. Some 18 years old sometimes forget what they learn about the government but 16 years old still in school and learning about the government and presidents. 16 years old is affected by it because they want to be part of voting and also it give them a chance to say their opinions by voting for whoever they want to be president. Lowering the voting age can be better for democrats. “ Some experts even say that lowering the voting age might even lower the proportion of young voters that vote for Democrats” (Lee). Democracy can benefits from a larger more electorate. Democrat would have more percent of the 16 years old voting for them and the Republicans would have least percent of the 16 years old voting for them (Brodey). Democrat basically have more a chance to win then the republicans if 16 years old was able to vote. It also possible that republicans can have a better chance to win then the Democrat because 16 years old can vote either for a democrat or
... equal system. The lower age could also encourage and interest youth much more in political processes and parties as now they would actually be able to impact the way they are governed and who is governing them. Politics would be much more noticeable in schools and the general knowledge of politics and the political process would drastically increase. The youth would also be more likely to develop earlier the skills and potentials needed in later life politically and even socially. In conclusion when all is said and done I, personally would like to say the voting age lowered to sixteen for many of the reasons above. There will be many people opposing this movement but I think it is time for the youth of Canada to be heard and if they wish they should have the opportunity to vote and express their opinions and choices.
In “You’re 16, You’re Beautiful and You’re a Voter,” author Anya Kamenetz states her belief that the voting age should be lowered to sixteen. Kamenetz gives several premises to her argument.
Should America Lower the Legal Drinking Age to 18? When it comes to the discussion over lowering the legal drinking age to eighteen, people express various different ideas and beliefs concerning the issue. Some believe that the drinking age for alcohol should be lowered and others believe that it should stay the same. Those that do believe lowering the drinking age is the best route to take, do have valid points. However, there are others who argue that changing the law will not change things for the better.
As becoming the age of 18, people has the chance to start voting. People 18-24 have a lower percentage of voting than other ages. This is because the youth vote has changed over time and the reasons why the youth vote doesn’t want to vote. I will vote in the upcoming elections when I turn of
If the voting age is lowered, it is true that a higher voter turnout would be a result. Other countries such as Belgium, Germany, and Austria have a lower voting age and enjoy a higher percentage of voter turnout. Belgium ranks at 93% voter participation, while the U.S. trails behind at just 38% turnout in congressional elections. These facts seem to indicate that a lower voting age has a direct impact on voter participation. However, there is no concrete proof that a lower voting age directly impacts voter turnout. I believe the problem lies deeper than age.
Should the United States follow other countries in their quest to end the debate on the drinking age? The United States can take a look at other States such as: Germany, the Netherlands and France, and see how successful they are. Many teenagers would jump on the bandwagon of lowering the drinking age just because they want to have the ability to drink, the argument of being able to die for the United States but can’t drink and it would take away the “Forbidden Fruit” of drinking. Much of the older generations would jump on the bandwagon of keeping the drinking age the same because they had to wait to drink, because drinking has adverse effects on the brain and drinking could lead to binge drinking.
The legal age limit to drink in the U.S. is 21 years old currently. Even though the legal age limit is 21 to drink, there are many people who are abusing this law and drinking illegally. I believe that the legal age limit should be lowered to 18. In order for this to happen other U.S. citizens will have to vote to lower the age limit. I am interested in this because if it was lowered it would make it legal for my age group. Although there will possibly be more alcohol related incidents resulting in injury and possibly death. Lowering the legal age limit will allow people who do it illegally now to be able to do it in a safer environment. This will result in less alcohol related incidents. The age limit to drink alcohol should be lowered because the benefits overtime will out way the harm it will cause.
Turning 18, one becomes an adult, however there are still many things that are restricted and not allowed until one reaches an even older age. The most controversial today is the minimum legal drinking age. Much like in the 1920s, when prohibition was established by the 18th amendment and all alcohol was banned from the United States, underground binge drinking occurred resulting in the opposite of what the law was intended to do. Then in 1933, the 21st amendment overturned that law, making alcohol legal again. Further down the timeline, in 1980 Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) was founded to stop drunk driving, support those affected by drunk driving, prevent underage drinking, and overall push for stricter alcohol policy. From their efforts, the federal government put in place a law that would revoke ten percent of any states highway funding who did not have their minimum legal drinking age set to 21. Immediately in 1984, all states raised their legal drinking ages to 21 in fear of being withheld the funding. Today, 30 years later, the law is still in place, however a debate has sprung up in support of lowering the drinking age back to 18. The group Amethyst Initiative, which has gained support from prestigious universities such as Dartmouth, Duke, and Virginia Tech, started this uproar. Through this, the question emerged, should the legal drinking age be lowered back to 18, and what would result if it happens? There are three positions on this issue. Position one wants to keep the drinking age as is, like Matt Nagin in “Top 3 Reasons Why the Drinking Age Should Not be Lowered.” Position two wants the legal drinking age to be lowered back to 18, like Dale Archer M.D. in “The Pros and Cons of Drinking at 18.” And position th...
Should the legal alcohol drinking age be lowered to eighteen? At the age of eighteen years old, you are eligible to vote, you can legally purchase cigarettes, you are eligible for the military draft, you are willing to die for this country, you are even able to serve on a jury, and you are titled as an adult at the age of eighteen. Why can’t someone at the age of eighteen not drink alcohol? Who is to say that just because someone is twenty-one years of age means that they are wise enough to drink alcohol in an accountable conduct? There are several explanations why one ought to be able to drink alcohol at the age of eighteen.
The issue being discussed is whether the drinking age should be lowered or not. It is being discussed because some think it should be lowered because most of the younger kids are doing it anyway. There is no background info in need of understanding for this topic.
Although the United States conflicts with other countries in many ways, one of the most controversial is the legal drinking age. Over the years, there have been many arguments on whether the age should be raised or lowered. Some citizens feel that twenty-one is not mature enough to handle the effects of alcohol, while others feel that twenty-one is too long to wait. Should the legal drinking age of the United States be raised to try and ensure more responsibility and maturity? One could think that the drinking age of twenty-one should be old enough for everyone to be responsible enough to handle the effects of drinking. However some people are also not against lowering the drinking age because if eighteen is old enough to vote on decisions in your community and country, why is it not old enough to decide if you want to consume alcohol or not?
Have you ever wondered if the legal driving age should be lowered? Well, I have, and I think the driving age is already perfect as it is. One reason is because kids might not be mature enough. Another reason why I think this is because they could be too short to reach all the pedals. The last reason kids should not drive cars is because they could not be heavy enough. As you can see, these are my three reasons why I think the legal driving age should not be lowered.
Hello, I am RJ Dearing. I am a sophomore at Washington Virtual Academies and I am writing to you to tell you why you should change the minimum age to vote to be at least closer to sixteen years of age. The younger generation of teens and young adults who also have a few opinions on politics like myself would love to voice our opinions on our own ballets. The only problem is the minimum age to vote right now is eighteen. A whole two years of waiting for our voices to be heard, when all you have to do is change the minimum age and let us have our voice heard on political matters.
The voting age should not be lowered because teenagers have not fully matured and there is no proven benefit of gaining teenage voters.
If we lower the voting age we wont get the out come we are looking for, mainly because 16 year olds are nessairly worried about the major issues. Do we really want a 16 year old helping deciding who is on office. How about we let them be 16.