Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of cutting education budget
Education budget cut
Effect of cutting education budget
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of cutting education budget
Cutting Towards Education
Education is considered to be a very important step toward a person’s future success. But the Saskatchewan Party is cutting the education funding budget, they believe cutting the education budget would help balancing out their budget but in reality, these cuts created job layoffs, rise in both tuitions and education taxes and most importantly impacting the future university student lives because it will be harder to payoff their post-secondary debts.
The Saskatchewan Party believes that their budget will be balanced if they consistently cut the education fundings and dramatically increasing the taxes on education then it will help with the province deficit; “The budget says Saskatchewan's pre-kindergarten-to-Grade-12 school system will receive $1.86 billion in school operating money in 2017-18, which is $22 million less than the previous fiscal year” (O’Connor). According to budget documents, property tax revenues on residential properties will go up 10.6
…show more content…
It is not right to cut the education funding budget because it will result in increasing tuitions and most importantly job layoffs; “ it’s getting more difficult as a student…. It’s going to be a big harder to pay for the costs of tuition, and top that with textbooks, it’s going to be tougher….We can’t really afford a whole bunch of cuts, we’re kind of struggling. Peterson said” (Dao). This indicates that university teachers have a higher chance to get layoff; “if layoffs are part of that, then layoffs would be part of that — we're not taking that off the table at all," Doherty said” (CBC News). To conclude, the government might not see the effects to their bad judgement but it directly affect the citizen's life; job layoffs and an increase in tuition will make citizens or students life much more
CPS, with a $6.6 billion FY2013 budget, is now taking a new strategy based upon a flawed “Student-Based Budgeting System”. The Board of Education is also struggling to solve the debt they have reached, and with their FY2014 plans, this year’s budget book is argued to be “one of the most poorly written budgets”. The way CPS is handling their budget is not benefiting the lives and education of students and is leaving CPS at a loss with giant financial issues. Parents want the best for their children, no question, and the highest educational standards will be something that parents have at the top of their list. There is enough support to say that people who have received better education have gotten further in life.
In “End Them, Don’t Mend Them,” P.J. O’Rourke vehemently argues that the public school system needs to be shut down and ended for good due to a monumental increase in spending per pupil with no significant standardized test score improvements made in the past forty years. O’Rourke describes his view of a typical public school family that the public school system has marred with quirks and educational flaws to open up his essay. He then contends that putting a child through public school costs a fortune by pointing out that the average cost per pupil from pre-K through 12th grade is $11,749. O’Rourke cites an annual Gallop Poll conducted from 2004-2007 to explain that Americans find insufficient spending to be the top problem with public schools.
(Bruenig). This is because students from well-off families already enjoy a disproportionately successful future than students from poor families, State budgets could become strained, which might lead to cuts and decreased access to programs that students want to take. Budget cuts may also need to take place, or pulling from other departments to make up for the loss of tuition. These could come from high schools, middle schools, and elementary schools. This could result in many teachers, administrators, and other school district employees losing their jobs due to schools needing to save money.
Opponents of free post secondary education tend to believe that the establishment of free post secondary education will never happen because it will be too expensive for the federal and state governments to maintain in long-term. As a result, free post secondary education can lead to a great impact on Canadian economy, students’ success in life and environmental issues.
It is no secret that the cost of tuition has been increasing since the millennials have arrived. High school graduates try to find themselves after graduating from high school. Some have no idea what they want to do, but those that want to further their education and have a better career will be the successful ones. One of the main reasons why college tuition should be reduced is so that students will not be in debt. Yes, there is FASA but not everyone is eligible for that. High school graduates don’t have enough money to pay for college, they barely have any money at all. College tuition should stay reduced at an affordable cost so students can afford it and not have debt.
Budget cuts are a menace to schools and children it limits potential and closes the gate around the arts not allowing our children to experience everything they can. School should be place where our children can learn be creative and have fun, they should be enjoying their stay. Just like Barry it should be a sanctuary that allows them to forget all the problems at home and have fun in
With this many students, both state and federal representatives have made efforts to adopt reforms designed to make a solution to the funding inequality. The disproportion of funds first and foremost effects the amount of programs offered to children that vary from basic subjects such as: English, Math, and Science. This created the motivation to improve the quality of education for low-income neighborhoods by targeting resources other than property taxes and redirecting the states budgets. The goal the school districts all shared was the need to increase instruction, add after school activities, promote a well-rounded education, physical innovations to facilities and classrooms, and to update the academic resources. The popular demand that the funding to public education needs to correspond throughout all the school districts. Wealthy tax payers often argue that a region that depends on property taxes is the “American way.” This argument derives from the ideology that American success relies on perseverance and hard work, but if the playing field is uneven the higher born student has an advantage. “High property taxes—the burdens and perverse incentives they create, the rage they generate, the town-to-town school funding inequities they proliferate—…represent an endless New England nightmare…” (Peirce and Johnson, 2006). In the attempt to
...making class size smaller. If the school itself cannot afford to educate its students, then the government needs to provide the school with the money to do so. They’re America’s children too.
Allan and Davis mention the spike of college cost since 1995 has increased by 150 percent; student debt has increased 300 percent since 2003, and with education, second to the mortgage industry in the nation’s debt, America needs to redirect their attention to the future and focus on education (Allan n. pg). Budget cuts from national to state
Defense receives the most support and money. Politicians support military spending, mainly because it is “the only form of large-scale public investment that can consistently win political support” (Pollin). However, the heavy support for military spending is counterproductive for our nation’s economy. Since military spending increased in 2001, several industries and programs have had to “bite the bullet.” The Department of Education often gets fewer funds each fiscal year to cover the military budget. Then again, the United States leads all countries in money spent on education. The U.S. education system is well funded, but that statistic is very misleading. If the high cost of college is excluded, the United States ranks slightly above average in education spending (OECD). Per the OECD, U.S. spending is decreasing at a 1% average (OECD). This doesn’t seem like much, but it is still a step in the wrong direction. Only Mexico, Iceland, and Ireland have cut more (OECD). Coincidentally, the percentage of teachers that quit within five years is extremely high at 46% (OECD)! This isn’t surprising considering all teachers in the U.S. work so many hours and are still underpaid. U.S. primary school teachers spend the most time in the classroom amongst all PISA countries
As colleges’ funds dry up, colleges must turn to the public to further support higher education. By raising state taxes, colleges can collect funds to help improve the school’s budgets. The state provides funds from the taxes for colleges to receive a certain amount for each student currently enrolled. All community and traditional four year colleges collect these funds in order to maintain the school’s budget. As reporter, Eric Kelderman states, “less than a third of colleges’ budget is based from state taxes”. The school’s budget is how colleges are able to provide academic support programs, an affordable intuition, and hire more counselors. Colleges must now depend on state taxes more than ever for public colleges. Without collecting more funds from state taxes, as author, Scott Carlson explains how Mr. Poshard explains to senators “our public universities are moving quickly toward becoming private universities…affordable only to those who have the economic wherewithal to them” (qtd. in.) Public colleges must be affordable to anyone who wishes to attend. If colleges lack to provide this to students, it can affect dropouts, a student’s ability focus, and cause stress. The problem of lack of funding is that colleges have insufficient funds. Therefore, the best possible solution for the problem of lack of funding would be increasing and collecting more funds from state taxes.
Education is losing the battle towards helping generations achieve higher potentials to receive that so called impossible degree. Due to the administration, education is losing money where is most needed. With so many people losing their education due to the lack of funds, many high paying jobs are being left vacant. As Americans, we need to realize that we cannot and will be forced to sit and be silent about this treatment. Why are the nation's leaders forcing our educators to be sitting and be silent about what they are receiving?
Budget cuts are continuously present and affect the way state governments are able to manage their funds. Researcher Michael A. Rebell has found, “‘A survey of forty-six states with available data indicated that… thirty-seven are spending less on education in 2011-2012 than they did last year, thirty are spending less than they did in 2008, and half of them have cut funding by more than ten percent since the 2008 recession’” (Rebell, “Safeguarding the Right” 1859). In all states, budget cuts are resulting in a reduction in the quantity of resources, educat...
Independent.Leadership.Equality. All of these are three characteristics as to what free university education can provide to citizens.Higher education should be free of charge for the citizens of the United States.In the US the average cost for colleges per year is $8,893. Many middle class and under class people cannot afford such costs. It is true that the government will give you grants but most of the time students never get funding from them (Emmons 3). Most people of today can hardly afford a car let alone the fees and tuition of college. Also, it could provide equality to all people. Allowing everyone an equal opportunity to go to college and make something of themselves. It provides a way for poorer families to break free from their social strata that they have been put into (“This House Believes University Education Should Be Free” 4). This is why it is important to make university education free.In the end citizens of the US would benefit from university free education.
This was especially true for Italy when the worldwide recession took place. In 2008, expenditures for public education in Italy only composed of around 6.8 percent of Italy’s total yearly budget (Salerno). As if this wasn’t bad enough, soon after, a cut of eight million euros from public educational funding was established from 2009 until 2012 in Italy. Even though this may not appear to be a huge budget cut for a country, the size of Italy’s public budget is much smaller than the United States federal budget. So, this particular budget cut will have much greater affects in Italy than the United States would have experienced if a similar cut was put into place (Salerno). During the course of 2009 to 2012, over 120,000 teachers were laid off and 750 schools had to be merged with other schools. In addition, 450 high schools also had to be closed due to these financial setbacks