Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Morality of capital punishment
Morality of capital punishment
Morality of capital punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Morality of capital punishment
“My objection to the death penalty is based on the idea that this is a democracy, and in a democracy the government is me, and if the government kills somebody then I'm killing somebody”- Steve Earle. The death penalty is an issue where many individuals had agreements and disagreements. Whether if one agrees or disagrees, you can not deny the fact that the system is flawed and innocent people can be sacrificed for another's crime. I believe that the Death Penalty should not be re--enacted in Canada for the following reasons, its immorality, due to high cost of executions, and the death penalty goes against the Canadian law.
First, the death penalty proves to be an inhumane act of moral justice. Whether the individual is guilty or innocent,
…show more content…
deciding who deserves death and who doesn't should not be an option. According to an article written by Kourosh Zakeri “He was injected with a triple-drug cocktail, and at the point where he should have gone unconscious, he instead experienced a seizure. Struggling against the restraints, he said, “Something’s wrong.””. This states that the individual went through physical and mental torture. Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law. The death penalty goes against the universal declarations of humans rights, such as no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. Like Gandhi said “An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind”. An eye for an eye, is like death for a death, is the type of justice that most countries still holds on to. Individual can not be punished by the same crime he/she is guilty of. The death penalty is a way of taking revenge and calling it punishment. Which should not be morally accepted. Second, the death penalty costs more than life without parole. Death penalty cases are more expensive due to attorney pay, experts and housings. It is Less expensive to imprison criminals for life than to execute. “It's 10 times more expensive to kill them than to keep them alive,” though most Americans believe the opposite, said Donald McCartin, a former California jurist known as “The Hanging Judge of Orange County” for sending nine men to death row. NBCNews. According to a recent study on NBC shows that total Estimated Death Penalty Costs is $1,733,443 which includes Court, $1,028,700, Prison $606,928, Execution $97,815 and this does not include the costs of Attorney trials and prosecution costs. Killing is a crime, and by executing criminals the government involves its own citizens in this barbaric act financially. The government does not pay for each of the executions that occur, this money comes from citizens and taxes. Due to which, taxes could be raised to support the executions. I personally would not be happy with paying taxes just to support executions, there had been reported cases of innocent individuals getting executed in the past, that had been hidden prob the public eye. Third, the death penalty goes against the Canadian Law and should not be re-enacted in Canada.
The Canadian charter of rights and freedom states that Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. Therefore every individual has the right to life, and has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment. Capital punishments are cruel and unnecessary punishment that should not be supported. Speaking of rights, if the government is dealing with issues or problems of its own, cannot be trusted with the life of its own citizens. According to Samuel Gross, lead author of the study and a University of Michigan Law School professor said “The great majority of innocent people who are sentenced to death are never identified and freed.” How can the citizens maintain their trust in a government where the majority of such cases are hidden from the public eye. As it has been said that two wrongs don't make right. Sending someone on death row, and when proven innocent , it's hidden from the public eye. This goes against all the rights and freedoms of an individual. An eye for an eye should not exist in the government because that encourages more cruelty. The world is not perfect, by reintroducing the death penalty would not help in stopping crimes. Instead the the families of the victims will thirst for revenge. I believe the punishment for crimes such as pre-meditated murder, serial killing, raping and killing a child, killing a police officer should be lifetime in prison. Many argue, for intense crimes the punishment should be death. If everyone believed in such reasons, then peace and harmony would be out of this world. This could also lead into individuals thinking , that if such crimes are punished by death they might as well take matters into their own hands. Therefore promoting more crimes then stopping
crimes. In conclusion. conducting the Death penalty may bring in fear in society but will not maintain a crime free society. We as a society become the murderers by murdering the murder sending a message that it is okay to take an individual's life due to them deserving the punishment. Therefore Capital punishments should be outlawed due to being an inhuman act or moral justice, high costs of executions and it goes against the rights and freedom of an individual.
The Canadian Justice system is run like a well-oiled machine. It is based on the fair and humane treatment of suspects who remain innocent until proven guilty. There is one big question that has been debated since July 14th, 1976 - should the death penalty have been abolished in Canada? The new younger generation of Canadians seems to agree with me that the death penalty should be resurrected in Canada.
Canada has been a fully abolitionist country since the 10th of December 1998, and has since continued to maintain a strong anti-death penalty attitude (Amnesty, 2015). The last death penalty sentenced under Canada’s Criminal Code was given in 1962 to two convicted felons charged with first degree murder (Amnesty 2015). After the two were hanged, it brought the total number of people executed in Canada to 710, marking the end of an era (Amnesty, 2015). The death penalty has been a fiercely debated topic spanning even before 1867, Canada’s establishment. Notably however, Canada’s Prime Ministers have long opposed the death penalty starting with John Diefenbaker (Amnesty, 2015). Only the second most recent Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, has
A man is standing there with a noose around his neck. When there is a signal, the rope is cut, and the man’s body is dropped through the trap door. He is hanged like that in front of a crowd, which is even including old people and small kids. Is there anybody thinks about how would a child react if he had to witness such a horrible scene? An execution takes one’s life to warn the community with the hope that the crime rates would go down. But it is extremely cruel, and it makes people feel like they are living in the ancient world when there are no human rights. Now the world is evolving in the way of civilizing, so execution should be kicked out of this society because instead of bringing benefits to the community, the execution brings a lot of more destruction.
Capital punishment is crime's most dreaded consequence, death. Hanging was Canada's form of capital punishment up until 1976 when it was abolished. Webster's Dictionary defines capital punishments as: "The penalty of death for the commission of a crime." (Webster's, 1994, 43). The chance of capital punishment being reinstated in Canada has been very slim up until now. Recently the Canadian Alliance Party has put forth efforts to reinstate it, which has put the controversial topic back up for debate. This has divided many Canadians concerning their beliefs. Capital punishment should never be reinstated in Canada as it is a barbaric practice that is unjust. This essay will clearly demonstrate that reinstating capital punishment would be illegal as it would violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canadian Bill of Rights and the United Nations Universal Deceleration of Human Rights. In addition, this paper will show that capital punishment is a cruel and barbaric punishment. Finally, this paper will examine how capital punishment does nothing to deter people from committing crimes.
In conclusion, I believe that capital punishment should never be reinstated in Canada. It is a cruel and unjust punishment, where it violates the rights of life and makes amend within the world and may lead to an innocent person executed with the suspect untouched. Also, why ruin a good thing where Canada’s murder/violent crime rate is slowly decreasing within the years because of the abolishment of the death sentence? With the reasons stated above, as well with the fact that the cost of capital punishment is higher and that it is rejected and shunned upon within many religions such as Catholic and Protestant, I think that capital punishment is something that should never even be considered to be reinstated as it is unnecessary and unjust.
Is the death penalty fair? Is it humane? Does it deter crime? The answers to these questions vary depending on who answers them. The issue of capital punishment raises many debates. These same questions troubled Americans just as much in the day of the Salem witch trials as now in the say of Timothy McVeigh. During the time of the Salem witchcraft trials they had the same problem as present society faces. Twenty innocent people had been sentenced to death. It was too late to reverse the decision and the jurors admitted to their mistake. The execution of innocent people is still a major concern for American citizens today.
Since 1973 there have been a total number of one-hundred and fifty-one death row executions. (10 Reasons…, 1). Out of all of these executions only eighteen of them have ever had any further evidence to show that the guilty party was innocent. Many people argue that this is enough to make it to where the death penalty should not be used. However, that leaves one-hundred and thirty-three death row executions that have not been proven to have been the wrong person. If each individual that is sentenced to be executed has killed only one person than that is one-hundred and thirty-three people that have been killed. The fact remains that if there were no death penalty executions then there would be one-hundred and fifty-one people that have not been justified by their death. Although having eighteen innocent people put to death because they were wrongfully accused is a terrible thing, it does not even begin to oppose the one-hundred and fifty-one people that were killed because of the hate and fear that causes a person to bring this harm upon other people. Also many of these people have affected more than just one person. They may have killed or harmed multiple people. The people who oppose this are simply stating that the murderers’ lives are worth more than the people that they killed.
Over many centuries, the act of killing has been very controversial as it is argued to be barbaric but at the same time, a part of life. Many will disagree on whether killing can be even be justified, let alone condemned and permitted. Killing a person as punishment for the same offence is difficult to justify and essentially says that killing is allowed. Although the practice of the death penalty exists still, many societies argue how it is barbaric and is part of the past. In Canada however, the topic comes up fairly often as the United States still practices capital punishment in many states. Extensive research shows that capital punishment is unethical, has many flaws, and has a much larger cost than imprisonment. Therefore, through an examination of the ethical relationship, all the possible errors, and the costs, it is evident that
Two major claims: death penalty serves as a deterrent and death penalty is morally justified because murderers can’t live and you have a right to kill them.
The death penalty is the lawful killing of a human being after a trial by
The Death Penalty should be discontinued to the families, human rights, and statistics. The families of the victim and the family of the one, who committed the crime, have no closure at all. The death penalty is killing a human for being convicted of a terrible crime one family may think its right but both suffer by their lost ones. “Although true closure is never really possible for the families, studies have shown that the continual process, along with the returning to court for many years, force families to confront the gruesome details of the crime many times over, making it impossible to get on with their lives. As difficult as that is the question is weather the victims needs are met effectively by killing someone else and causing another family grief and pain as well as adding to the cycle of violence.” (Progress) As both families do not want to see each other because they all have pain and hate for one another. They both relive the last memories of their loved one and they can’t help but cry and stare at the pictures they were once happy in. The families both have sadness when its their loved ones birthday. If the victim is married or have kids, their kids suffer and the husband/wife suffer as well. Although the families will never get there loved one back they still suffer on what had happen. Both families blame one another for having to take flowers, to their dead family member or visit their family member in a cemetery because of what happen. None of them is truly happy that they lost a family member. The families miss the person who seemed so happy, and also know that they are in a better place watching over them. Although the families aren’t happy about losing them, but are relieved to know that nothing else can hurt them. As one family feels sorry for the other family, there could be the family that doesn’t care what happens but wants everyone to suffer the way they are suffering about the tragic death of one family member.
Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished Why should the death penalty be abolished? The death penalty should be abolished for many reasons. Many people believe the saying, 'an eye for an eye'. But when will people realize that just because someone may have killed a loved one that the best thing for that person is to die also? People don't realize that they are putting the blood of another person's life on their hands.
Ethics and morality are the founding reasons for both supporting and opposing the death penalty, leading to the highly contentious nature of the debate. When heinous crimes are com...
The heaviest punishment towards convicts is death penalty in law. It means to atone for an offense is dead. Of course, it will not execute for every criminal. Death penalty is only for felons. For example, a people who murdered someone would not get the death penalty. The death penalty is for murders who related to the smuggling of aliens or committed during a drug-related drive-by shooting. Sometimes, however, the felons also can avoid the death because some countries (or actually states) don’t allow death penalty. Then, what decision would the convict get? It is a life sentence, which means the prisoner should be in a prison until he or she dies. However, it is not good idea to keep felons. Death penalty should be allowed and get more active because life sentence is costly, unsafe, and insincere for a victim and the family.
Capital punishment is the punishment of death for a crime given by the state. It is used for a variety of crimes such as murder, drug trafficking and treason. Many countries also have the death penalty for sexual crimes such as rape, incest and adultery. The lethal injection, the electric chair, hanging and stoning are all methods of execution used throughout the world. Capital punishment has been around since ancient times; it was used in ancient Rome, and one of the most famous people to be crucified was Jesus Christ. Capital punishment is now illegal in many countries, like the United Kingdom, France and Germany, but it is also legal in many other countries such as China and the USA. There is a large debate on whether or not capital punishment should be illegal all over the world as everyone has a different opinion on it. In this essay, I will state arguments for and against the death penalty, as well as my own opinion: capital punishment should be illegal everywhere.