Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Athlete salary
Social inequality in sports
Social inequalities of sports
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Athlete salary
Should student athletes be paid at the college level. Athletes should be paid at the college level because there is a lot of money being made in the NCAA. Student athletes are being considered amateurs because of the forth of effort to the business for no pay. Students spend up to 50 to 60 hours per week.Which limits there ability to find a good job that will match their schedule. Statistics show that 11 million dollars are being made a year and none of this money is seen by the players. That is very eccentric because the players play a important role in the sports business. Players also promote the business and bring more viewers and money to the business as well. The organization should give the players the benefit of the doubt because with out the help of the players the organization would significantly fall. The huge amount of money have left people questioning whether athletes should be paid. Another supporting detail is that students athletes would be able to buy safe and reliable equipment to play sports with a safe environment. Many players suffer injuries and could also use the money to pay for there surgery or medical expenses. The risk of playing sports in college is very high because if you get hurt and have no funds from the league it could be very hard trying to get back on your feet. Especially …show more content…
if it is the end of their career in college they could either finish school or if the league gave them pay could use the money to build themselves back up again. Paying players would be very beneficial to players in varieties of ways. Not being paid could be very hard on players at some point of there college careers.
They could come from a poor family and their family could have to use their funds to pay for his college expenses which could cause his family to struggle. Players would want to do other things other then football at some point of time and using there own money could help out others . Athletes in college also have books and other educational expenses and could use some of the money made from the league giving to them could be beneficial and not worry about would they be able to afford things for next year. Money made in college by athletes could determine their
destination. If students made money and college they could just use it for school only and this will be a very supporting action not only to the players but to their families as well. The money could pay tuition,books,housing and more. It would save their families money as well allowing them to be comfortable and not worry about the amount of money they need for the following year. The players play a big role in the NCAA and should be rewarded in some type of way other then just a national championship trophy. It will benefit the entire team including the coaches. Student athletes should be paid at the college level because the money could benefit not only them but their family also.
To pay or not to pay college athletes, that is the question. It seems like it would be a simple yes or no answer, but there are many underlying factors as to why paying athletes would be a negative. All universities vary in size and popularity, so how would it be possible to pay all athletes the same amount? Student is the leading word in the term “student-athlete”. They are not considered employees, which is what paying athletes would make them. While universities are making some profit off of the abilities of their athletes, college athletes make the personal choice to play a sport. Due to the differing popularity and size of universities and their athletic programs, there would be no fair way to pay all athletes. In addition, many athletes already receive compensation in the form of publicity, scholarships, and access to a high education, and therefore the NCAA and universities should not pay athletes.
through scholarships, these scholarships will help them get money later on in life using their degrees. The podcast by Doug Merril also said "being a college athlete is a choice it defiantly isn't a mandatory thing." Becoming a college athlete is a decision each player has to make the individual player chose to play a particular sport this does not warrant the right for a player to get paid if they want to be paid be good enough to play after college
College athletes are undoubtedly some of the hardest working people in the world. Not only are they living the life of an average student, they also have a strenuous schedule with their specific sport. One of the most discussed topics in the world of college athletics is whether or not student-athletes should be paid money for playing sports. The people who disagree with the idea have some good arguments to make. Primarily that the athletes get to go to school for free for playing sports. Another argument is that if student-athletes were to get paid then it would ruin the amateurism of college sports. People who are against paying the athletes do not want to see the young people become focused on money. “Paying student-athletes would dramatically shift their focus away from where it should be - gaining knowledge and skills for life after college” (Lewis and Williams). This is very understandable because one of the biggest reasons college sports are so popular is because the athletes play for school pride and for bragging rights. They play because they enjoy the game, not because it is their job. Most people that disagree with the idea of paying the athletes fail to realize what really goes on behind the scenes. At most Universities around the country the bulk of the income the school receives is brought in through the athletic programs. In fact the football and basketball teams usually bring in enough money to completely pay for the rest of the athletic programs all together. To get a better understanding of how much has changed in the world of college sports a little history must be learned.
Considering the amount of money made annually by the athletic department, one would think that the college can give the college athletes more than just a few thousand dollars in scholarship money. Students should not be left with a medical bill due to services rendered on the field of a college team, nor should they be left penniless after giving their all to a college sport. Works Cited ESPN.com. The. " College Athletics Revenue and Expenses."
College athletes should be paid because of the huge amount of money being made off of the use of their athletic ability. The college basketball and football games that everyone watches on TV is no longer just a game, it is a business. The colleges and arenas hosting such events are not doing it solely for the love of sport, they are doing it for the money that will flow generously into their banking accounts. The coaches also, they are not volunteers, they are not there just for their love of the game, coaching is their job. The athletic directors, coaching staff, and event staff are all doing their job to put food on the table. The fans are watching the game, the players, the ones who are making huge sacrifices to be on the court. The athletes are the only ones in this circle of business who are putting in the hours, maybe even the most hours, and not getting a paycheck. It is time for a change, the fans, the players, and the NCAA is ready for it, it just has to be done. However, there are those out there fighting the other side of this battle, saying there is no need for these student athletes to be paid. Both sides have good points but one of them has great points.
A football prodigy will choose a school best fit for him regardless if he gets a bigger bid. For example, if the football prodigy had a choice to go to a school where they had a better business program because he wanted a backup plan incase he did not get drafted or there was something unfortunate to end his football career, he would choose a that school instead of a school that presented a bigger amount but did not have as a business program as the other school. In my opinion, paying those student athletes in the highest revenue earning sports will encourage them to do better in the classroom. There is an uncertain future for college athletes, very few reach the professional level and these student-athletes are sacrificing their time and bodies to reach this goal. Underclassmen are keen on making the leap to become professional athletes because the graduation rates of college athletes are not very encouraging. With no extra money for these student-athletes, they may also turn to fast (usually illegal) ways to earn money, such example may be to sell drugs. So paying student-athletes might be a way to keep these athletes eligible and safe.
College football has been a sport in American society for decades. Yet the players playing the sport are not receiving their fair cut of the prize. It has been debated whether or not college football players should get paid for playing. The supporters say that the players are not being compensated fairly and the non-supporters say that the education the players receive is payment enough. They also say that the universities the players attend are providing them with the basic necessities so they should not get paid. College football players should be paid though because they put their bodies at risk, make a lot of money for their school, and the play to entertain audiences.
On the issue of college athletes getting paid, I believe they should. When I mean getting paid I only mean a stipend or weekly check, not thousands or millions. All the hard work and dedication they put into their sport and academics are worthy enough. I have had a chance to play collegiate sports and it takes a lot out of you mentally and physically. The student athletes deserve at least enough money to have a normal student life. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities. All this does is replace the notion of the athlete getting a job for a source of income. This will also help reduce the rate at which athletes accept money, cars, and gifts from boosters. When athletes get caught accepting something from a booster it looks bad on the athlete and the college. So, in my opinion yes college athletes should get paid, there is too much money that the universities have earned floating around going unanswered for the athletes not to get their cut.
One of the strongest arguments against student athletes getting paid is that many people feel they already are getting paid, through their financial aid package. Sports Illustrated author, Seth Davis, states in his article “Hoop Thoughts”, that “student athletes are already being payed by earning a free tuition. Which over the course of four years can exceed $200,000, depending on the school they attend. They are also provided with housing, textbooks, food and academic tutoring. When they travel to road games, they are given per diems for meals. They also get coaching, training, game experience and media exposure in their respective crafts” (Davis, 2011). This is a considerable amount of income. While the majority of regular students are walking out of school with a sizeable amount of debt, most student athletes are debt free. Plus they get to enjoy other benefits that are not made available to the average student. They get to travel with their teams, t...
Colleges make a plethora of money off of the sports teams and the players do not see any of that money at all but if they do then their performance would be poor on the field and off the field as well. According to Fred Bowen, “only football and men’s basketball are money-making college sports. Most others, such as field hockey, wrestling and swimming, do not attract big crowds or make big bucks.” (Should college athletes get paid?). Also the sports team that give out the most money for athletes to come and play for them, are football and men’s basketball. “Critics of paying college athletes note that only a small number of them compete in sports or on teams that actually generate revenue. They argue that if players were paid, a handful of exceptional athletes would receive large salaries while most players would receive a pittance, and would probably no longer be offered valuable athletic scholarships” (Paying College Athletes). It is not a surprise to anyone that the main athletes that do want to be paid is football and basketball players. They want to be paid because they bring in all of the money for the school and the...
College athletes should be paid because they are basically working for the school. When a student gets a scholarship to a college for a sport they are expected to practice with the team and without the team, so on their free time. College athletes go way over the maximum amount of hours they are allowed to practice with the team. A 2011 survey, from the article Should College Athletes Be Paid?, states “The NCAA has a limit of 20 hours of training per week, D1 football players on average practice 43 hours a week, baseball 42.1 hours a week, and men’s basketball 39.2 hours a week”(Walch). With
Emil Zatopek once said “An athlete cannot run with money in his pockets. He must run with hope in his heart and dreams in his head.” This quote applies to every college athlete. The quote means that an athlete may not be getting paid in college, but if they put in the hard work and dedication they can make it to the big leagues. College football is the second most watched sport in America. And the athletes playing the game do not even get paid a penny to play the game. In the sports world. this has been talked about for an extremely long time. College athletes put their body on the line for injury. They put their grades in on the line because of the hours they put on the court, or field (Keolanui). They also sell their apparel at the game and at stores and they get no money at all (Keolanui).
Should college athletes get paid while in school? The schools are allowing the athletes to enroll because of their athletic talent of playing football. They got his uniform and practice gear covered because of high academic achievements. Also, they are looked at by college scouts based on what they see on a football field. College football should be paid because of the time and energy they devote on and off of the football field, so they can play at the college/university he desires.
In 2012 the profit was somewhere north of a BILLION dollars. Roughly 60% of all the profit made goes back into the program to pay for new uniforms, upkeep of their million dollars stadiums, and to give out scholarships. The other 40% are paying for people’s yachts and ridiculous salaries. For example, Jim Harbaugh, former coach of the San Francisco 49’s, left the NFL for a much more lucrative coaching job at University of Michigan. And nobody can blame the guy. In 2015 alone he made seven million dollars (Gaines). Meanwhile the people actually bringing in all the money, the athletes themselves, are getting
No sports no money. Some athletes get scholarships, so if they were to be paid to play it almost is as if they are stealing from other students. Some scholarships give students free books, free food, free dorms, basically a free education. Paying these athletes would take away from other students who aren’t on scholarships, the money that is supposed to go and help their education would be taken away because they’re not an athlete. College athletes tend to be looked more upon around campus than your average student, paying them would just make it even more