Should Shakespeare Be Taught In Schools Essay

DING!!! Some students dread the moment when the ear-piercing sound of a school bell rings over the loudspeakers, signaling that they must once again endure an hour of English. However, with Shakespeare in place, many students exemplify a completely different reaction. To illustrate, ever since we started reading Romeo and Juliet students have been bolting into the classroom as soon as possible in order to sign up for their favorite character to read aloud. In other words, Shakespeare’s works have allowed students to interact with text and each other. Examples include how teens wonder if there will be a video clip, what take it will be, and are in constant anticipation to perform with their peers. Shakespeare- in terms of its presence in curriculum-

By means of explanation, that is like saying if you don’t want to do something then you shouldn’t have to. To demonstrate, this ideal was also stated in an article from The Independent, “If we want Shakespeare to be for all time as well of age, we must let students come to him when they are willing and able to make the effort needed to enjoy him” (Robshaw 402). By that logic, students shouldn’t have to take any subject for that matter if they don’t feel like it. For instance, this is similar to how countless students despise mathematics, yet it is indisputable that we still need to learn about it in order to have a successful future. Going with Robshaw’s reasoning though, we would be offending the idea of math by forcing students to study it. To add on, reading Shakespeare helps students interpret difficult writing in both a relatable and entertaining way whereas other novels do not share the same effect. Furthermore, in society’s current vacuous culture of communication, teenagers send and receive an average of 3,339 texts per month, as a result they have no time or motivation for actual reading (Ferguson 398). Overall, by not exposing students to classic literature then they’ll never want to make an effort to read