Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Public and private schools differences
Effect of sports on academic performance
Public and private schools differences
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Should Schools get rid of Sports Imagine this, Friday night, bright lights, the smell of popcorn, your classmates in the stands cheering you on, and the coolest thing of them all, the name of your own school on your jersey, representing the whole school. Some schools think sports cost too much money, but being a student is harder than ever. You are being held to tougher academic standards-and so is your school and that's why it is more important than ever for schools to keep sports because private and club sports are too expensive for most families and sport programs in school can affect and improve academic skills. My first reason is schools should not get rid of sports because private and club sports are too expensive for most families. According to the scholastic news magazine, “Should Schools Get Rid of Sports” it states, “If we cut back school sports, some kids will find themselves shut out of sports completely. Yes, club sports-that is, private leagues outside of school-would be an option for some, but fees, equipment, and travel …show more content…
expenses can add up to thousands of dollars, per season. Many kid’s parents can’t afford that. Another reason is, “In the United States parents spend $671 on an average per year to cover the costs of uniforms, registration fees, private lessons, and coaching” Sports Illustrated. Too fix this we could have school sports and then we don't have to go to club sports and then when we go to the school sports we wouldn’t have to pay fees. My second reason is school sport programs can improve academics.
One piece of evidence is from scholastic news magazine, “Should Schools Get Rid of Sports” “A 2013 report from the Institute of Medicine, physically and active kids have more focus, are better problem solvers and score higher on tests.” Also from the scholastic news magazine, “Should Schools Get Rid of Sports” it states, “A 2012 study by the Datalys Center found that young athletes have higher scores on math and english than those who don't participate in sports.” And finally from scholastic news magazine, “Should Schools Get Rid of Sports” is says, “Today studies show that schools with big athletic programs tend to have lower dropout rates.” If we want these kind of academics we could bring back school sports. In conclusion, even though sports cut down school budgets they are a big tradition to school. “If you don't go to school, you can't play sports.”-Scott
Caan
Amanda Ripley argues in The Atlantic in her article “The Case Against High School Sports”, that the United States place too much attention on sports rather than academics. Ripley argues that sports programs at schools should be reduced, maybe even cut out completely. She states that there are a lot of countries that outperform America on international tests, and it is because they put more of their emphasis on academics, where the United States puts more of an emphasis on athletics. Ripley says that high school sports negatively affects academics. (1). I disagree with Ripley on this topic; I think that sports are important for young kids because it teaches them very valuable life lessons and it keeps them out of trouble.
Athletics in American schools have always been controversial for many reasons. Some of these reasons include health concerns, safety precautions, and academic significance. Daniel H. Bowen and Colin Hitt wrote an article titled, “High-School Sports Aren’t Killing Academics” to present the factors of positive correlation between success in athletics and academics. I believe that athletics in high schools not only benefit students socially, but also academically.
After reading " The Case Against High School Sports" by Amanda Ripley started to make me think. There were many strong points about how the priorities of the sports are beginning to be more important to students than their education. Another great point was that the financing and budgeting is unfairly distributed throughout school districts and is spent more on athletics and clubs and not enough on classes. And I Believe that schools should put certain restrictions on the spending and promoting or in school sports and clubs because of the major drop in national and world comparisons.
Playing a school sport enables you to bond with your teammates, making lifelong friends. Sports are fun and thrilling; they help kids get into shape. For years now there have been kids who play sports who also are very good in academics. Sports help kids get organized and teach them to balance their school work with sports. The article to start all the buzz about no sports in high school is written by
A common denominator that successful people share is the involvement of playing a varsity sport in high school. Every high school in the United States is different, however all encourage students to get involved. Most commonly, students decide to join sports. High school sports can cause profitable effects because students live healthier lives, achieve higher grades and learn life lessons.
Football is possibly too dangerous of a game for young boys and girls to be playing. I am not talking about all forms of football, but more specifically tackle football. Yes, football may possibly be one of America’s loved sport because of the brutality that it consists of; although I believe that there should be an age where kids should start playing such a horrific game. At the age of ten young boys, and girls, should be worrying about who they are going to be playing with outside at recess. Kids should not have to be worried about their friends having to miss school because of a concussion, or worse him or herself.
When students have to pay to play on their high school team, they not only have to do that, but also pay for any other expenses for that sport. A high school sport can cost a great deal of money without paying to play. Paying for warm-ups, gear, and other related equipment, can add up very fast along with paying to play for a sport. “Paying for equipment, facilities, uniforms, transportation, and coaches’ salaries results in a cumbersome financial burden.”(Cerling & Herman,
I believe schools should not force students to participate in organized sports. Medical conditions, such as asthma, prevent students from being able to participate. Family situations may leave the student with no ride to or from practice. Students may not have time to be able to
At the end of each year there is a significant amount of money spent on athletic programs, which would be reduced for school districts if sports were cancelled. In the article “Should Your School Get Rid of Sports?” Amanda Ripley states that “by suspending sports, the superintendent of Premont High School, realized the district could save $150,000 in one year,” this is because “no one realizes their actual cost” (11). Ripley goes on to state that “yes, even though there are concessions at games to help with the cost, there is rarely enough to cover the massive amount spent to begin with” (11). This shows that there is way more money spent on athletic programs than there should be. This is important because if the extracurricular activities are cut, more money can be saved for schools and can be used for academic purposes.
Are high school sports beneficial or not for students? I personally believe if a student is in a high school sport they’re forced to prioritize between school and their sport, and at a young age I believe the student would decide to use his time to improve in his sport instead of school. Which in the long run would affect his academics, unless they decide to stay up late and work on their homework to keep up with both school and their sport. But, even like that, in time, the lack of sleep would catch up to them, and cause them to do even worse in both academics, and sports. High school sports are like the lotto in my opinion, many play but only a few get rewarded for their work.
Sports have been the center of attention in schools for a long time, and their popularity keeps growing. Although people use after school athletics as a way to get exercise; they are actually bringing down test scores. Therefore, schools should not keep after school sports because they cost enormous amounts of money, students will get better grades, and kids and will not be distracted from school.
Sports have a lot of fees involved that need to be paid and not all families and students can afford to pay for them. Because of the cost of sports, not all students can afford to pay for mandatory sports. Though some families and students are able to pay for sports fees, many families are not able to pay for mandatory sports. Students
I honestly think sports should not be banned in schools, reason being people rely heavily on them, some can even keep people out of trouble. I strongly agree with Kevin Kniffin and his article about athletes gaining lifetime benefits. His article really hits every spot about student-athletes, sports offer life-long lessons that will forever stick with you. Being a Basketball player seeing this really doesn’t make you feel
Now My first reason for it is physical exercise and health. The rate of diabetes and obesity in children is skyrocketing at fast rates, if we get rid of sports, this number will continue to be at such a high number. According to New york times, Diabetes in children has increased by 18% since 2003 (New york times page 2). This is because of new electronics. If we get rid of sports, it will only get worse, Kids will only go on video games and not be active.
As www.huffingtonpost.com said, “Data shows that high school students who play sport are less likely to drop out. Furthermore, participation in sports also has been associated with