Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative impact of radio and television on youths
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative impact of radio and television on youths
Have you ever been jamming to your favorite song on the radio and every swear they put a beep or some random word? For example, “Walk up to the club like, 'What up? I got a big (beep).' I'm so pumped about some (beep) from the thrift shop.” It tends to get very annoying. So the question is, should radio stations censor songs? Most parents will say yes. They do not want their children to hear those words. I have respect for these parents. Except, my opinion is different. I think radio stations should not censor songs but they should have warnings.
There are a couple of different ways that I can think of for radio stations not to censor songs without parents worrying about their children hearing swears. One of which is to put a warning before inappropriate songs. Before a bad song comes on the radio station should put in a voice recording that says, “Parental discretion is advised.” Or something like that. Sometimes on Kiss 95.7 the people on the station announce a song before it comes on. When they do this before a bad song they could simply say, “This song contains inappropriate language. Parental discretion is advised.” Some parents will still be against my argument. Children today have access to the radio without having their parents around. I understand that they might ignore the warning and listen to the song anyways. However, I see no harm in a child hearing a bad song if they know that they should not go out and use that kind of language. I think it partially has to do with how a child is raised.
Another way I can think of for radio stations not to censor music, is to have certain stations to play non censored music. Just like on television when some channels can say inappropriate words that other stations can not say. Y...
... middle of paper ...
.... My three year old even watched me give birth. LOL!” So all parents really do have their own views on censorship. It is also pretty true that children are going to learn inappropriate language somewhere. I think it is better if their parents just let them hear it and explain the meaning of it. Or at least tell them that it is a bad word and if they say it they could get in a lot of trouble.
I do not know if this will ever be a valid argument. However, I do know that there are other arguments out there that I am sure parents should be more concerned about. Like the debate on legalizing Marijuana. If any arguments ever come to a conclusion, they will never really be closed. People will always have different opinions on what they want for themselves and their families. I think that what ever you opinion may be on censorship, you should abide by it the best you can.
Without the proper oversight, however, the FCC might just be doing the complete opposite. As the technologies associated with communications have evolved, so have the messages that are being transmitted. In an effort to shield citizens from offensive speech, the United States government passed the Communications Act of 1934, which created the rules that a broadcaster would have to obey to remain on the air and restricted broadcasters from “utter[ing] any obscene, indecent, or profane language by means of radio communication” (Scalia 2). This ban on obscene language was only to be in effect from the hours of 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. in an attempt try to limit children from hearing the offensive speech.
The authors first reasoning to help support his claim was “Censorship can also protect us from the circulation of dangerous information.” Another reasoning the author had stated was “It is also wrong for information that is false or misleading to be easily available for anyone to find.” The author gives logical reasoning to support his claim, but does not give sufficient support. Not only does the author give insufficient support, but he also doesn’t organize the passage clearly, so that the reader can understand his reasoning clearly. If the readers were trying to detect the supporting evidence he used to back his claim up, they would take longer than they should. The author also uses exaggeration in his article. They say “Parents have no power at all over the entertainment.” This is exaggeration because they say “no power at all,” by saying this that means there is no possibility of any parent in the world having any control over entertainment. How about the people that work for entertainment industry? What if they are parents? Technology these days also allow parents to block
Censorship in music is a very controversial subject in today’s society. What is considered a form of artistic expression to some is also considered vulgar and inappropriate to others. But who ultimately gets to decide what is considered vulgar and what is not? Who decides who hears what in the music industry? The RIAA is responsible for applying the Parental Advisory stamp on every album that is released in the United States. The FCC is responsible for making sure that no vulgarities or controversial comments are aired on radio or television. But why is some content edited and other content not? I will try and explain these questions in our article.
There are still people that go to church and don't cuss and cares about there family vale and try to keep that away from their kids as long as they can.they want the censor stuff for there kids.Cursing
1. Furritus , David. "Advantages and Disadvantages of Music Censorship." Entertainment Scene 360. RR Donnelly , 23 Jan. 2008. Web. 6 Dec. 2013. .
...from the other side of this argument is the fact that profanity and sexually explicit material shouldn’t be exposed to young children without their parental permission. But telling teenagers and young adults who are mature enough to choose what they want to listen to is completely wrong and unjust. The key word here is choice. As stated earlier, the thing that makes this country truly great is the idea that we have the right to listen to whatever we choose we want to listen to, not what a censor thinks you should be exposed to, it’s ridiculous.
The music industry gets a lot of criticism about the music that they put out on the market. Most of the criticism comes from the parents. There are bills passed, such as the "Parental Advisory Program," which enforce that CD's with explicit lyrics have to have a label on them that state, "Explicit Lyrics" or "Explicit Content" (Parental Advisory). This sticker cautions the person who buys the CD that there is bad language or content. The recording industry takes serious responsibility to help parents identify the music with explicit lyrics.
In today?s society, we value and learn to tolerate different cultures and people. Sometimes people end up expressing themselves differently as well. This country is based on the idea that we may express ourselves any way we want to, be it religion, organizing, writing, or speaking. Music has been a popular form of expression for centuries. These days, in the country best known for freedom, some people are trying to censor it the freedom of music. Music should not be censored along with any other form of expression otherwise what we and artists say are being controlled. If we value freedom, then that includes what we may say and how we say it even in musical form.
Many bills have been passed to stop explicit messages in music from getting out. Censorship limits the amount of lyrics that get out to the community about violence. (History of Music Censorship) It may also limit anything in music that a community might find offensive to its values or beliefs. The lyrics presented in some songs are not appropriate for young adults. Some say music censorship goes against the First Amendment. It stops artists from expressing how they may feel. The profit on albums often goes down because of censorship. Censorship constantly targets rap and hip hop, and they are usually hit the hardest. (Forms of Music Censorship)
In schools around the nation, many books have been banned from the teaching curriculum. Some of them deserve to be banned due to the explicit content only suited for adults. Some books like the Harry Potter series, The Catcher in the Rye, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and The Hunger Games. Granted, there are language issues in Catcher and Huckleberry Finn, but that language exists everywhere. The censorship should not be as strict as it is because many great books are being banned that students should be reading in order to gain an understanding on who some great writers were. Some of the banned books should be reconsidered on whether they should be censored or not.
Censorship is “the restriction or removal of information, or the prevention of free expression” (Taylor 8). There are many things that can be censored such as books, movies, TV shows, newspapers, and the way people dress. People censor things for a number of reasons- they do not agree with it, find it offensive, or think that it is just inappropriate in general. Different people consider different things inappropriate, so the content of what is censored varies. Anyone can censor, including parents, teachers, school officials, and board members (Taylor 8-10) Many things are censored in schools and places where children are present because parents do not want their kids to be exposed to inappropriate content (Taylor 10). Students are entitled to their First Amendment rights just as much as adults are, but schools still censor things like newspapers, books, and clothing.
Teens and the human populous have been draw to music, and the relief it gives off. As recent as the 1990’s, we’ve seen an increase in explicit and violent lyrics and deviant behavior in the music industry surrounding such genres as heavy metal, rock, rap, and gangster rap. During this past decade, lyrics are becoming more violent and sexually explicit. It is approximated that teens listen to an average of 40 hours of music a week, and somewhere along the way, a child will hear something derogatory, or cruel. Along with this, teens don’t necessarily interpret what is said through lyrics in the right manner.
... labels of Explicit Lyrics. However Carma Haley Shoemaker says that “no standards or criteria of what was considered "explicit" were given” (What). This has led to the labeling of hundreds of albums each year. The issue that arises with censorship is infringement on the second amendment right to freedom of speech. Also any censorships of inappropriate performances on TV can only be regulated if it is broadcasted networks and not paid for cable television. Despite the conflict there has been many complaints.
middle of paper ... ... A. The "Music and Censorship" Noise Between Stations. Dec. 1, 1991. Web.
Head, Tom . "Radio Censorship." About.com Civil Liberties. About.com, n.d. Web. 10 Dec. 2013. .