Should Prisons Be Abolished In The United States?

1540 Words4 Pages

Should Jails and Prisons be abolished in the United States? Prisons are usually referred to as correctional facilities in the United States. Their main function is to correct people who have been termed as lawbreakers by a court of law. Imprisonment can be described as the limiting of a person’s liberty as a result of a crime committed or a law broken. Some of the prisons in the United States are for profit, which means that they aim to make money out of the prisoners. Others are purely for justice and do not usually have any monetary implications attached to them. These serve as correctional facilities and help to maintain law and order in a typical US set up.
Despite some of these obvious benefits, I am of the opinion that it would be possible …show more content…

For example, most prisoners are not offered medical care while at the prisons. The diet is also sometimes not balanced, and for some of the prisoners who may need specialized medical care, it is not always available. In my opinion, it is not fair to have human beings suffer while these rights could be provided outside the prison facilities. Imprisoning people just to deny them basic medical care makes no sense to me. However, this isn’t always the case. In Arizona a lawsuit settlement was underway between the American Civil Liberties Union and the Arizona Department of Corrections. The lawsuit had to do with the improving of health care, mental health care and dental care for the inmates. The controversy was that people in prison were getting health care when there are people in the world who never committed any crime but don’t have health care. When a person is sent to prison it's like adopting them. The State of Arizona agrees to give them shelter and feed them. They’re responsible for them. They keep them locked away so they can’t harm anyone. They stay locked up for as long as the courts declare. The State of Arizona can't let them die from an illness they contract while behind bars. Doing so would be cruel or unusual punishment, something the U.S. Constitution finds problematic or unlawful. Arizona makes a strong point and …show more content…

However, one key difference exists. Jails are usually rather short term and are meant for crimes that may be considered petty. Prisons on the other hand are more long term and are for crimes that would be considered main (Jails and Prisons, 2011). Given these differences, the life in prisons is usually better than that in jails.
Inmates and repeat offenders will prefer a prison sentence to a jail term. In prison, there are more regular programs, established rules and better facilities. Jail on the other hand is unstable and could only be suitable for a person staying there only a few hours. Long-term people will complain that in jail, it is even impossible to get a goodnights sleep since the place is constantly being opened to let new inmates in and out.
Despite jail being such a short term issue, there are some reasons to object to its existence. One of the main ones is that sometimes people are put there while awaiting trial. This means that they may come out innocent yet still have faced the consequences that they did not

Open Document