Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should parents be held responsible for the crimes of their children
Juvenile court system
Juvenile court system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Parents should not be held responsible for their children committing unlawful acts with a firearm. The parent of the juvenile that commits a felony with a firearm should not be held responsible unless the parent specifically gave the juvenile a firearm or encouraged them to commit a felony or knew about the unlawful acts the juvenile was going to commit. State laws allow juveniles charged with serious felonies to be treated as adults and prosecuted in traditional criminal courts rather than a juvenile court. If a juvenile can be prosecuted as an adult for serious felonies, then they should be capable of taking accountability for their unlawful acts with a firearm. In most cases where a child commits a felony, it has been unaware by the parental …show more content…
No matter how many times people say a parent should know exactly what their child is doing at all times, it doesn’t happen. It is impossible to constantly know what an individual is doing every moment of the day and what they are thinking. A child can be planning a homicide and no one would ever know if they do not tell someone. How do you expect a parent to be held responsible for a crime their child made without them being aware of the situation? That is like saying the parent is responsible for their child stealing a vehicle and killing multiple people and being charged with vehicular manslaughter. If the child steals a firearm from the house or obtains it off the street or a friend then how is the parent the one responsible? Unless the child is mentally retarded then they are aware of their actions and should be held accountable for their actions and serve the proper sentence for their actions. Whether that sentence is being placed in detention prior to an adult trial, indicted into a juvenile facility, or be placed in placement for counseling followed by a psychological assessment to be conducted to determine the psychological state of mind of the
Within the last five years, violent offenses by children have increased 68 percent, crimes such as: murder, rape, assault, and robbery. Honestly, with these figures, it is not surprising at all that the Juveniles Courts focus less on the children in danger, and focus more on dangerous children. This in fact is most likely the underlying reasoning behind juveniles being tried as adults by imposing harsher and stiffer sentences. However, these policies fail to recognize the developmental differences between young people and
As recent events and studies show, there is an obvious problem in this country with juvenile crime and the increasing number of these crimes that involve the use of firearms, but t say that guns are the problem is a failure to look at the big picture. Actors within the political community...
Unfortunately, these two cases are not uncommon in the justice world. As a matter of fact, “by 2010, Florida had sentenced more than a hundred children to life imprisonment without parole for non-homicide offenses,” (Stevenson 153). One of the primary reasons for this originated in the idea that harsher punishments will act as a deterrent for kids who want to break the law. However, recent studies have suggested that because the prefrontal lobe of the brain is still in development until the age of twenty, children don’t have the mental capacity to make the best decisions, especially under stress. Additionally, children normally wouldn’t have access to weapons or drugs, which allows the argument that adults should be held responsible for making such objects available to them in the first place (Reaves).
The fact that this was allowed is shocking. If there are laws that prohibit things like this they should be followed. This is one of the many examples of why the justice system needs help. Though the corruption of Antonio’s case is evident, this does not hold true for all. In a different case, an 11-year-old boy in Tennessee is facing first-degree murder charges in the death of an 8-year-old he shot after he asked to see her puppy and she said no. The boy used his father’s 12-gauge shotgun, taking it form an unlocked closet. In this instance, the father and the boy are both at fault. Children learn from what they see and hear all the time. There should have been no reason as to why the closet was unlocked and how he knew where the weapon was. Though this is true, the child still should be charged, but not as an adult. In the article “Walk Line a Man: Do Juvenile Offenders Respond to Being Tried as Adults” Benjamin Hansen and Glen R. Waddell state “Due to the large number of violent crimes, many states have adopted laws that allow youth under age 18 to be prosecuted, tried, and sentenced as adults for particular violent crimes” (Hansen, Waddell). Before a case
According to the article of “Should Juveniles Be Tried as Adults?” at Buzzle.com, “It is a proven fact that when a child is at the age around nine or ten that they do not have the mental accessibility to think as an adult” (Borkar). Citizens see this statistic as a reason as to why children should not be tried as adults. “Children are five times more likely to be sexually assaulted in adult prisons than in juvenile facilities” (Equal Justice Initiative). These juveniles are subject to much harsher punishments which includes life sentencing (Michon). These people do not feel that these children should be in a prison for the rest of their life for something they did when they were 13. Broken families can be a reason for a child to rebel and become trouble. “Psychology speaking, it is said that there are no ‘problem children’ but only ‘problem parents’” (Borkar). Parents roles are to guide their kids in the right way. Children will not know what is right or wrong if parents do n...
Juveniles are more than just kids. They are capable of doing anything an adult is capable of doing. One has probably heard the saying, “If you want to be treated like an adult, then act like an adult.” If they’re going to do crimes that “only” adults are capable of doing, then they should treated like an adult and be tried and sentenced like one. Imagine being close to a murder victim, wouldn’t you want them to feel hell? “How would you feel if you never got to see your child alive again while their killer served only a short sentence before being released from jail?” (hchs1259). This quote hits hard. One can only imagine being in the position of a parent whose child was murdered.
In today’s society there is a lot of crime going on that involves minors and the first thing that some people do is blame parents for the misbehavior. What if the minor lives in the home with an alcoholic mom, and a drug addict father, and the minor feels as though he/she is in the world alone. The definition of a minor is “an infant or person who is under the age of legal competence”. (http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/minor) The minor starts hanging with the wrong crowd to feel wanted and decides to rob a bank, he goes to jail, and is sentenced to prison. Now there are clearly things that contributed to the way the minor committed this crime but it does not make it okay either. He was not getting any attention at home so he
once the minor has committed a violent crime, they are no longer a kid. The minor had the ability to know right from wrong, but he still chose to commit the heinous crime anyway. Choosing to commit this violent crime means that the minor chose to act as an adult and must be held accountable. Once the minor has made the decision to act as an adult, they must be treated as an adult. If we do not teach minors that what they did has consequences they will never learn. Arguments can be made that minors should not be treated as adults and while these arguments do have merit, they are not my beliefs. In my opinion, minors who commit violent crimes need to be tried as adults. Justice does not discriminate when it comes to age. Right is right, and wrong is wrong and the wrong should be punished equally.
“Children younger than three have gotten a hold of guns and shot someone at least 59 times in 2015”; a trend first reported by Christopher Ingraham add the Washington Post in October. A solution to this would be proper gun storage; adults owning a gun must be more aware of the fact of toddlers or children being at the risk of obtaining weapons and causing mischief. They should place their firearm in a safe place where a child cannot reach it or find the way to create themselves or anyone else an injury or further tragedy, including unwanted accidents. For example “Caroline Starks was two years old. Her 5-year-old brother was playing nearby with his birthday present: a.22-caliber Cricket rifle.
In this day and age the media is always covering breaking stories about juveniles and violence. It seems that every other day there is a headline about shootings or stabbings. There are many things that need to be taken into consideration when analyzing juvenile violence and more specifically juveniles and gun violence. Gun violence is the intentional use of a weapon against a person, group or community that can possibly result in injury, death or psychological harm. There are many factors that need to be analyzed in order to come to a decision about the proper course of action to reduce gun violence amongst juveniles. The things that need to be taken into consideration are gun laws, different uses of a firearm, how youths attain firearms, causes of gun violence and most importantly, the options to combat juvenile gun violence.
To begin with, some people may argue that juveniles are young and their minds aren't fully developed so their actions are not all their fault. To elaborate, on his website Totenberg states, "The court said that because of their youth, their brains are literally less developed, they are more impulsive, more subject to peer pressure and less able to see the consequences of their acts." However the fact is, nobody forces the children to perform these actions they do it all on their own. They thought they were so mature and better than everyone else when they killed someone so they should be able to handle the consequences. Imagine one of these children killing one of your loved ones, wouldn't you want them to be faced with the proper consequences? In addition, "All crimes committed by juveniles should be treated in the same regard and must if not to punish heinous acts, then to provide justice to the families" (UNLV Press). What this means is, that the child who committed the crime should face the consequences in order to allow the
For example, In Georgia, a three-year-old shot and killed his 18-month-old baby brother in the head on a Saturday afternoon at 3:00pm (Time, 2016). The key question in this case is where were the parents when the gun went off. How did the three-year-old found the gun? Why did the three-year-old shot his baby brother in the head with the gun? Why was not the gun put up in a safe place away from the three-year-old? The three-year-old cannot be charge with the wrongly crime that have been committed. However, the three-year-old must get a mental examination done, and protective services (Argosy University Online, 2016). In this case, there was no charges that have been filed
For thousands of years until today, the best way to officially be the partner of someone is through marriage. People have practiced marriage for thousands of years. Many cultures see marriage as the best method to celebrate the love of a couple until death tears them apart. “Marriage establishes and maintains family, creates and sustains the ties of kinship, and is the basis of community” (Rowe 2). Marriage is a concept bigger than ones happiness and it is the basic for creating a peaceful home for the family. According to Rowe, “This sense of home requires the dynamic participation of both women and men--the women to mother and the men to father--to fulfill the daily roles of teaching, nurturing and protecting children” ( 2). Parents have an obligation to take care for children, so that when they grow up they are able to become a person who is strong enough to support himself. But there are different opinions whether raising a child should be shared equally between parents. One group thinks that it is essential for a child to grow up with the love and care of both parents. Meanwhile, others believe that child raising should be shared in a way that suits the family. While single parents argue that even without one parent they can give their children the needed love and care.
The first article; “Adult Crime; Adult Time.” by Linda J. Collier is about how the juvenile delinquents of the world should be thrown right in with the hardened criminals. She talks about the Jonesboro, Arkansas incident in which 11-year-old Andrew Golden and 13-year-old Mitchell Johnson, slaughtered their classmates as they ran from the school building. They pulled the fire alarm and began their assault with a barrage of bullets. In this particular situation, “they are still regarded by the law as children first and criminals second.”(Pg. 620). This has not been the first time that young children have committed such crimes, but the average of violence committed by children has risen by 60% since 1984. She claims that because of these statistics, we need to update the juvenile justice system. “In recent years many states have enacted changes in their juvenile crime laws and some have lowered the age at which a juvenile can be tried as an adult for certain violent crimes.” (Pg. 620) According to this author, she feels that it is a start in the right direction. She claims that she has represented children as a court appointed guardian and is humbled trying to help children out of their difficulties which often due to circumstances beyond their control. Still, for violent crimes, she feels that “children who knowingly engage in adult conduct and crimes should automatically be subject to adult rules and adult prison time.”
If parents are held accountable for the actions of their children does that send a message that the children themselves are blameless for their actions? My belief is that these two ideas are not mutually exclusive, and that children and parents can both be held liable. I see no reason why the children and the parents and the teens shouldn’t share in the responsibility for criminal behavior on the part of the child.