Should Net Neutrality Be Banned

666 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Internet government regulation

Net Neutrality
One of the most conversed topics being discussed all around the world is net neutrality. Everyone seems to have a different perspective of it, but people don’t realize how much it’ll impact us when the wrong decision is made. Should net neutrality be banned or not? Net neutrality under no circumstances should be banned at all from restricting individuals to do things they want to do. This affects the constitution, businesses, and people overall who are tech savvy.
Net neutrality affects people worldwide because currently everyone can use it with the proper technology and internet provided. Businesses have access to the internet and use it for their benefit to gain a large amount of profit from it. The businesses usually show off their product to attract and persuade individuals to buy it, but in order for it to benefit them there has to be other people who can view it with no hassle. If people are being charged to use the internet, or the service is super slow, then that would result negativity towards the company. People might not be able to afford or even want to use it any longer …show more content…

Freedom of expression is illustrated in the first amendment within the bill of rights. The first amendment is the right to have freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. In order to have a well working constitution the government shouldn’t even consider the thought of net neutrality. There are several court cases that justify freedom of press and expression. For example, the the case of John Zenger was charged with seditious libel but then later found innocent because the things he voiced in his writing was all valid information and did not violate them in any way. If net neutrality is ever banned then that would mean the government is removing our right to freedom of expression, which violates everything the constitution even stands

Show More
Related

  • Net Neutrality

    1150 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Internet came to be because of the user. Without the user, there is no World Wide Web. It is a set of links and words all created by a group of users, a forum or a community (Weinberger 96). The concept of net neutrality is the affirming concept behind the openness of the net (Vinton Cerf). Vinton Cerf stated, “The Internet was designed with no gatekeepers over new content or services. A lightweight but enforceable neutrality rule is needed to ensure that the Internet continues to thrive” (Vinton Cerf). Moreover, consumers would be protected under a monopolistic market due to network neutrality (Opposing Views). The Open Internet Coalition on Opposing Views.com state that in a perfect world there would be a variable amount of high-speed broadband competitors offering consumers plenty of choices. This would provide a market-based check on violations of Net Neutrality so consumers could pick a provider that respected the open concept. However, the world is imperfect and a mediator is needed to ensure networks remain open and the incentives to innovate and invest will continue to exist (Opposing Views). Lastly, there is an existence of fast and slow lanes without the implementation of network neutrality (Owen 7). This ...

    Read More

  • The Theme Of Freedom In Fahrenheit 451

    439 Words  | 1 Pages

    Net Neutrality requires to give everyone access to everything on the internet. This means that your internet provider won’t charge you for using specific websites. But with this, companies will have the ability to charge you for using basic things such as email, Spotify and even YouTube. Fast and slow lanes will also be included which may vary depending of what packages you paid for. But that is just the beginning, being that with this they will be able to control what you are able to see and not, ending Freedom of Speech in the

    Read More

  • Censorship, Free Thought, Free Speech

    1466 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Free speech is the whole thing, the whole ball game. Free speech is life itself." The basic rights guaranteed to Americans in the Bill of Rights is what holds the United States together. When Salman Rushdie wrote Guardian, he knew this. Unfortunately, the majority of congress and the President himself have forgotten the basic rights of Americans. When President William J. Clinton signed the Communications Decency Act that was proposed but the 104th Congress, he severely limited the rights of Americans on the Internet. The internet, just like books, magazines, artwork, and newspapers, should not be censored.

    Read More

  • Behind the Stop Online Piracy Act Bill (SOPA): Copyright, Censorhip, and Free Speech

    1548 Words  | 4 Pages

    middle of paper ... ... Everyone has the right to express their point of view. Free speech gives online communities abundant resources that broaden viewers’ horizons and keep people updated on ideas from different perspectives. A free community gives people the freedom to actively choose what they want, rather than accept what authority thinks is good for them passively.

    Read More

  • Ethical Issues Of Net Neutrality

    1891 Words  | 4 Pages

    They assert that failing to uphold it endangers rights of free speech and allows ISP’s to push their companies’ agendas, whether political, monopolistic, or otherwise detrimental to the consumer in a real or perceived way. Politically, an ISP might be within its current rights to throttle political opponents websites. Monopolistically, it is within the realm of possibility for an ISP to throttle competitors and discourage customers from moving to a different ISP. Additionally, users are known to have an intolerance for slow-loading webpages, thus, throttling of any website will most likely decrease the traffic to that service noticeably. This side of the argument tends to apply a Laissez-faire philosophy in describing their vision of how the internet should

    Read More

  • Costs and benefits of free speech and press

    812 Words  | 2 Pages

    Freedom of speech and press, or freedom of expression, are "fundamental rights". Without these freedoms a truly free society cannot exist. By definition, they allow the citizens to communicate their ideas both verbally and in print. There are many advantages, as well as disadvantages, that an individual receives these rights. However, as with most constitutional freedoms, free of expression can be limited under certain circumstances.

    Read More

  • Censorship of the Internet

    913 Words  | 2 Pages

    “If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” - George Washington. Freedom of speech is one of the universal declarations of human right, created on the 10th of December 1948. It is the complete opposite of what censorship of the internet entails. “This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by a public authority and regardless of frontiers.” Censorship of the internet not only goes directly against this, but it prevents a free flow of information, our ability to communicate as a society and places governments in control of our rights of expression.

    Read More

  • Net Neutrality In Canada Essay

    873 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States only recently introduced net neutrality legislation. Prior to these regulations, the internet functioned in a healthy and fair manner. The rules put in place in 2015 by the Obama administration were attempting to fix a problem that didn’t exist. These rules have limited consumers options rather than protecting them. The FCC under the Obama administration used legislation from the 1930’s and the 1990’s to regulate modern telecom companies. These rules are outdated and ill fitted to regulating modern telecom companies.

    Read More

  • Internet Censorship

    2830 Words  | 6 Pages

    The rights put forth by the first amendment protect the Internet. The first amendment states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (Wallace). In layman’s terms, this means that the government does not have the right to take away freedoms that involve speech or the press of the American people. The Internet’s lack of censorship encompasses Americans’ freedom because of the first amendment.

    Read More

  • The Harm In Hate Speech By Jeremy Waldron

    1414 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Case Against Censorship Under the first amendment of the Constitution, the Founding Fathers granted and promised all citizens of the United States of America the right to free speech. Free speech may seem like it only covers the most obvious form of the phrase; it allows the people to say anything they wish to say. In actuality, free speech headlines a broad category of rights. For instance, by being guaranteed the freedom of speech, the American people are also granted the freedom to write what they wish to write, criticize the government without repercussion, participate in symbolic speech, and protest political issues (Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts N. pag.). Typically, it can be observed that the people as a whole accept the

    Read More

  • Pros and Cons of Freedom of Speech on the Internet

    748 Words  | 2 Pages

    Taking these arguments into consideration, I believe that citizen do have the right freedom speech and expression through any media, besides, the freedom speech on the Internet has been examined on the promotion of democratization and civilization. However, these benefits based on the basis of rational, considerate and unmalicious remarks on the Internet. The liberty of speech is not the privilege to raise any comments, include those attribute negative influence to the public. Therefor, the only ladder to assure the effective management of Internet is a nation-impose censorship. It is also the guarantee of the constructive improvement generated by the Internet. The constraint is neither an autocratic tool nor a deprival of the right freedom speech, and will profit public while surfing the Internet.

    Read More

  • Internet Regulation

    1274 Words  | 3 Pages

    Most of the Internet regulation is imposed by the Government in an effort to protect the best interest of the general public and is concerned with some form of censorship.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Internet Censorship

    1557 Words  | 4 Pages

    Internet is a powerful tool that allows users to collaborate and interact with others all over the world conveniently and relatively safely. It has allowed education and trade to be accessed easily and quickly, but all these benefits do not come without very taxing costs. This is especially true when dealing with the likes of the Internet. Countries in the European Union and Asia have realized this and have taken action against the threat of net neutrality to protect their citizens, even at the cost of online privacy. Internet censorship is required to protect us from our opinions and vices. Every country should adopt Internet censorship and regulation since it improves society by reducing pornography, racism/prejudice, and online identity theft.

    Read More

  • Freedom Of Speech On Campus Essay

    496 Words  | 1 Pages

    Freedom of speech, which is the civil right of every American citizen, is guaranteed by the First Amendment. People have the right to express themselves. Also, freedom of expression can generate more ideas and make the contribution to the improvement of the society.

    Read More

  • Responsibilities of the Media

    1576 Words  | 4 Pages

    to the first amendment, the expression of free speech is applied to the internet. With all the

    Read More

More about Should Net Neutrality Be Banned

Open Document