Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The journey of nasa to space essay
Space exploration in america
Space exploration past and present
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Space, a vast and cold vacuum that much is yet to be explored. It all started in 1957, when the Soviet Union launched the first satellite, Sputnik into space. This launch caught the attention of people all around the world. As a result, it sparked the space race between the U.S and U.S.S.R. Since then, there have been many missions to space, but all these missions come with a cost. In 1981, NASA launched the first reusable space shuttle which was subsequently used for thirty years, however this cost about $209 billion over the years to keep maintaining it. The launch of a single space shuttle costs approximately $450 million and over the years there have been 135 launches. So why should governments and taxpayers spend billions of dollars on organizations like NASA, when so many problems already exists here on Earth? Although space exploration and research may cost a lot of money, I believe it is worth the cost as it has benefited humankind. …show more content…
In 2012, under the Obama administration the total budget was $3.73 trillion and $18.7 billion of that money went to NASA. Now this may sound like a considerable amount of money, but if the U.S budget were to be represented by one hundred pennies, then merely half of a penny would be given to NASA. Since landing the first man on the moon, NASA’s budget has gone down from 4.5% of the Federal budget to 0.5%. According to a survey, most Americans think that NASA receives 20% - 25% of the U.S yearly budget. In reality, they only receive 0.5% of the budget. It is amazing to see how the space agency has benefited people on Earth with this budget, but imagine the possibilities if they received a larger portion of the budget each year. How close would we be to colonizing Mars, or what other types of technology would have been
Such as poverty and health-care, but in fact NASA 's funding is only a half a cent on the dollar, and the U.S. spends most of its deficit on war and other barbaric acts. About 2.9 trillion dollars are used on health-care alone (Millman). The U.S. government spends a mere $17.7 billion on NASA and spends more than 36 times that on defense $647 billion, with nearly $20 billion alone in 2011 spent on air conditioning tents. Since NASA’s Cold War glory days, the budget has gone from 4.41% of the total budget in 1966, to less than 0.45% today, its lowest ever. NASA helped to usher in a promising new future in the 1960s and it was rewarded with a rapidly-eroding budget. The U.S. should invest more money in NASA and less on unnecessary health care and military. The budget cuts are affecting our technology development. Evidently, Increasing NASA 's to 1 percent of the federal budget will not hurt the economy. But instead it would benefit it by creating jobs here on earth, especially for the next generation of American scientists and engineers. By increasing funds it would support cutting edge aeronautics and space technology innovations, education, and development that will help fuel the nation 's economy for years to
According to Space.com the Federal Government approved a budget of $16.6 billion for NASA in 2014. Approximately 1/3 of that will be spent on space exploration.
“NASA Should Be about Space,” says that Obama has cut money off NASA, for Earth Science. Even though Earth Science has raised up to 63%, according to “NASA Should Be about Space,” NASA will have not enough money to send people to the moon or Mars. Since space has not controlled by anyone, really, the U.S should start to take into advance to complete mission no man has done back then. The state of Texas is willing to help fund NASA, and hope to find what is needed.
Colonizing Mars, it seems like a distant achievement. Some say impossible, some say it will happen soon. Since Elon Musk has entered this field of exploration colonization of Mars has seemed even more plausible. Still, problems have surfaced to make this much more difficult than it has to be. This makes some believe this to be impossible or unlikely for the time. Despite what side you are on we can both agree that we want to advance in space exploration.
Should We Go To Mars? Mars is a planet that is very cold and barren. NASA says it will bring new answers into the scientific world by exploring Mars from human eyes. We should not put forth a human mission to Mars because of the lack of requirements it has to support life.
The moon landing is one of America's greatest accomplishments, not only showing that we were capable of doing something so great but also bringing America together as a whole making everyone feel united and patriotic, if you try to tell anyone who witnessed the moon when it was broadcast in July of 1969 that it was a hoax, they will be quick to correct you and then they might tell you about how they saw it with their own eyes a man walking on the moon, but with the advancements in our scientific knowledge we have more proof than ever that the moon landing was a hoax.
On (Preposition) February 21, 1967, the Apollo 1 capsule ignited (Verb) while still on the launch pad, killing three of NASA’s most prestigious astronauts. Incidents like this leave many analysts wondering: why is NASA (Noun) still being funded? NASA being defunded is only logical. After all, money spent on NASA could be spent on other, more productive causes. Also, private corporations are quickly (Adverb) replacing government agencies. Lastly, space is extremely dangerous. NASA should be defunded.
I think we should continue to use government money to fund NASA and it’s space exploration. In my opinion I think that we should continue to use government money because it is good to find and learn a new thing about ours solar system. Learning new thing can help and change are future in a better way.
Even if we disregard the economic value of the space program, the achievements of NASA speak for themselves. The ability to send humans onto the moon, survey the surface of Mars using the Curiosity rover, and even find water on a foreign planet is astounding. Even looking at the International Space Station, it seems abundantly clear that the space program brings more unanimity between nations than the military will ever hope to achieve, while the military has a budget 33 times that of the space program. Hence, blaming the costs of the space program is an absurd argument, as the budget that is put into the program is used very proficiently.
The human population continues to skyrocket, and the rate increases every year. Scientists say that the world population will reach 11 billion by 2100 (BBC). Overpopulation expands as a major problem across the globe. Several cities today already experience this problem. Cities like Beijing, Moscow, Shanghai, and numerous more experiencing problems like keeping up with providing enough resources and space to support their population (borgen). As the population increases, the rate of increase expands dramatically. Soon cities all over earth will posses this problem, leading to large amounts of poverty and disease. The world needs more space. Building more living space upward makes this possible, but this costs an abundance of money and cause many problems to the environment. The other option: colonize other planets. Currently, humans remain very far from this, but in every journey a person must start somewhere. In this instance, NASA is the first step. NASA has already proven to accomplish great things. A few examples: the lunar landings, missions on Mars, etc (science channel). After many years of exploration and research, humans will contain the ability to colonize other planets. This results in more space to live, enabling the human race to expand without consequences. The only way for this expansion to start is for the U.S. government to keep funding NASA. Funding NASA enables the human race to
You get off the spaceship and see casinos, homes, supermarkets, and malls. This was the barren wasteland Mars? Soon Mars might be open to the public. At first this may seem like an amazing thing, but it isn't. I believe that Mars shouldn't be open to the public. Humans cant live on Mars the way we do on Earth, there is a possibility that this will never happen, and its all a huge ploy for money.
What I really want to try to achieve here is to make Mars seem possible, make it seem as though it's something that we can do in our lifetimes - - and that you can go. So first of all, why go anywhere, right? I think there are really two fundamental paths.
Dreams of exploring regions of the cosmos have been a vision for hundreds of years. The twentieth century signaled a shift from dreams to reality. By World War II, Germany’s “rocket would grow from an experimental plaything to a weapon of war” (Sparrow 11). Following the war, global superpowers, the United States and the U.S.S.R, raced to develop advantages over each other using discovered German rocket research. In turn, the events ignited the United States’ efforts toward space.
Benefits in Space Exploration Thesis: Space exploration is beneficial for anyone because of long-term survival of humanity in the future, new technologies/understandings, and increase in job opportunities. President John F Kennedy once said, “We chose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win.” In 1962, in Texas the Address at Rice University on the Nation's Space Effort speech was delivered by Kennedy to a large crowd. This speech is about how sending astronauts to the moon is very important. Also, it showed that when humanity was smart enough, they realized that we are able to achieve impossible things like
Most people think that the costly downside to funding space exploration is a reason to avoid spending money on sciences and instead spend it on problems here on earth, but such funding for space exploration actually promotes economical as well as scientific benefits. Space exploration is an important expenditure for the high cost because of the potential for numerous benefits such as the possibility to find useful resources to cultivate, space exploration and satellites produce many thousands of jobs in our economy, and it creates and discovers newer and better technologies through research and development.