Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Extracurricular activities help students
How do sports affect success in education
Impact of sports in school
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Extracurricular activities help students
People who want to be forced to run out of money should consider sports. Sports cost a lot of money. Some families and students can not afford to pay for them. Students are forced to participate in mandatory sports which they have to pay for. Along with money, they take up lot of time which can be spent by doing things and activities that students chose and enjoy to do. Injuries happen a lot in sports as well. They force students to stop certain activities that they enjoy doing to heal from injuries. High school sports should not be mandatory because they take up a lot of time, money, and cause a lot of injuries.
Sports cost a lot of money. Sports have a lot of fees involved that need to be paid and not all families and students can afford to pay for them. Because of the cost of sports, not all students can afford to pay for mandatory sports. Though some families and students are able to pay for sports fees, many families are not able to pay for mandatory sports. Students
…show more content…
The time commitment to sports take up so much time that you lack spending time doing other things. Because of the huge time commitment you would have to give up other things you enjoy for something you are being made to do. There is a big time commitment to sports. Not everyone wants to fill their time with sports, especially if it is mandatory. Student have other things and activities that take up a lot of time that they would like to do and are more important to them than sports. Student have a lot of activities that they participate in which need time to focus and do whatever is needed in the activities or hobbies. If sports are made mandatory, students will have to focus on sports instead of activities that they chose and enjoy doing. Sports can take time away from activities and hobbies that are important to the student, which can lead to lower grades and less time to enjoy activities and other things they enjoy
Sports are a crucial part of an individual 's character. Counter arguments made against having sports at schools are getting more and more public. The arguments make people, think again about having students play sports. Sports are useful because they give players skills they can use on and off the field: strength, leadership, and confidence.
Money Hurts College athletes attend post-secondary schools in order to receive an education and to participate in sports. “Student athletes participate in an organized competitive sport sponsored by the educational institution in which he or she is enrolled. Student athletes must typically balance the roles of being a full-time student and a full-time athlete” (“Student athlete” 1). Additionally, some people believe athletes should receive a salary. However, paying college athletes hurts the school, the sports, and the athletes.
On a new developed average, it can take up to ten years or more for a student to pay off their debt (Lazarony). Because of this, students have to be more frugal in deciding which school they want to attend. But, students who are athletes can get up to a full ride to the college of their choice if their sport has a team there. For an NCAA athlete, their schooling is paid for in turn for the student to be a dedicated athlete to their sport’s team. For one of the athletes to not only go to college for free, but also be paid extra money just for competing is unjust.
When students have to pay to play on their high school team, they not only have to do that, but also pay for any other expenses for that sport. A high school sport can cost a great deal of money without paying to play. Paying for warm-ups, gear, and other related equipment, can add up very fast along with paying to play for a sport. “Paying for equipment, facilities, uniforms, transportation, and coaches’ salaries results in a cumbersome financial burden.”(Cerling & Herman,
There are many cost related to being a university athlete that the schooling doesn’t cover (Rivers). There are crucial expenses that aren’t covered by scholarships (Rivers). For instance, athletes who spend 90 hours every week coaching and studying will typically find themselves starving, well after the university’s dining facilities have closed (Rivers). University sometimes do not pay for textbooks, school supplies and clothes for going to football banquets more often than not have to come out of the players’ pockets (Keolanui). It is not fair that players have to put in extra time to keep up with their studies but also have to worry about being able to afford the extras that other students have to buy (Keolanui). If the NCAA paid its athletes, the scholars wouldn’t have so as to add additional stress worrying about where they’ll get their money from (Keolanui). If students didn’t need to worry about their funds, they might spend more time specializing in their game and their classes (Keolanui). This helps prevent drained and burnt out athletes from underperforming in their games
Should soldiers or athletes get paid more money? I say the soldiers should get paid more because they protect our country and plus too soldiers represent the United States. Athletes get paid more in a day than a soldier gets a year. The average salary the soldiers get in a year is 99,000. Soldiers don’t get that much like they should get. That's why they need to be paid more money.
Athletes are being paid hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars to entertain us. They work less hours than the average person and make considerably more. Athletes all around the world are paid handsomely because they are talented and have extensive knowledge of their sport. But, is that knowledge and talent really worth what they are earning every season? Compared to some of the most common and needed professions are athletes really earning their paychecks? It’s time to take a deep look into what requirements besides natural ability athletes really need? How many hours are they expected to put in a week and what their job really is.
Many high schools today face the dilemma whether to have their student athlete’s pay-to-play or cut all funding for sports. Tremendous amounts of high schools across the country have put the pay-to-play act into effect. All schools should put this act into action for many reasons. First, it creates more capital for the school’s athletic budget. Second, students can set up fundraisers to reduce the fees charged to play each sport. Lastly, high school sports are a privilege not a right.
Some schools force students to participate in organized school sports. However, I believe that schools should not make this a requirement. Some students may have medical conditions, family situations that don't allow them to participate in organized school sports, or they simply may not have the time.
Should college athletes be paid? That’s the million dollar question. Throughout the past decade more and more people are complaining about college athletes not getting paid. This has become a major issue in the NCAA and around the country. Now, because of all the complaining, college athletes are close to getting paid. This has been debated and fought over through recent years. The NCAA president doesn’t like the idea of this either. Taking away athletes' amateur status would be the "end of college sports as we know it," says NCAA president Mark Emmert. College athletes should be grateful for the ability to play college sports, instead of worrying about money. Many people have different opinions about the issue and recently, it has been proposed
Many college athletes ask for pay in sports and want to know why they are not getting paid. Basketball is just one of the sports for which students are asking to get paid. There are valid reasons for this request but the negative effects of this should prove that these athletes should not be paid. Students should not be paid for college athletics because of these three main negative effects. First, these student-athletes are young adults, most of them in their teenage years or early twenties which means that most of them have little experience managing money in their lives. They may not know how to save money to spend in the long-term and also how to balance that with short-term desires of a normal college
One major topic of controversy in today’s society is whether or not the NCAA should allow college athletes to get paid. As of right now, the closest thing to payment athletes can receive for playing sports is an athletic scholarship. Although some people believe that an athletic scholarship is enough compensation for college athletes, the NCAA should start allowing colleges to pay athletes for playing sports at their school because it would help control the salaries of college coaches, athletics are a major source of revenue for schools, and it could help keep athletes on the right track.
One of the most popular debates in collegiate sports is whether or not student athletes should get a cut of revenue that they produce. There are many pros and cons to each side, but one side stands out more than the other. Student athletes should not get paid simply because it would detract from the purity and passion of the game, basketball and football are the only ones bringing in money, and colleges give out scholarships.
It would rob many students of the chance not only to compete but also to learn the life skills that participating in sports”(Nocera 22). Even though the sports analysts have their opinions, they are not the only
One of the best part about college sports is the competitiveness and the passion the players have. Most of the competitive nature and passion comes from everyone trying to prove themselves to be good enough to play at the next level and start to get paid for it. now once they start get paid they would feel like they do not have to play as hard because they are already getting paid to play and there is no need for them to go pro. Now that do not mean that the athletes will not work as hard because they could, but it is less likely. If a they are getting paid to compete it takes the passion out of the game and the player are no longer playing because they love the game but because they want to be paid.