Should High School Athletes Be Paid?

1787 Words4 Pages

The Problems of High School NIL Deals High school athletes are being paid thousands of dollars just by posting on social media, but how? High-profile student-athletes can sign contracts with brands, allowing the brand to use their name, image, and likeness (NIL). This allows the brand to make jerseys of the player, use his or her name for products, and pay them to promote their products by posting on social media. But high school athletes should not be paid NIL deals because athletes can get trapped into unfair contracts, very few athletes would benefit from it, and it would disrupt high school sports. One common opinion surrounding high school NIL deals is that high school athletes should not be paid because they can get trapped in unfair contracts. The first way these contracts could trap the students is by making them lose eligibility for …show more content…

Steve Siebold, a business advisor, writes that there are many negative and derogatory names people call the rich (Independent News). Many people perceive the rich to be uncaring, self-centered, and snooty. These perceptions may be from feelings of jealousy or could be from how many rich people present themselves to the general public. In short, although high school athletes could gain lots of money from high school NIL deals when these athletes become rich, they could gain lots of negative personality traits and may be negatively perceived by many. It has become clear throughout this essay that high school athletes should not be paid NIL deals because players could be tied into unfair contracts, very few athletes would benefit from them, and because NIL deals would throw the dynamics of high school sports into disarray. NIL deals can cause players to lose NCAA eligibility and get trapped into lifetime contracts. Only high-profile players would benefit from NIL deals, and NIL deals would disrupt how both the team and the sport

More about Should High School Athletes Be Paid?

Open Document