Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
College athletics should be paid
College athletics should be paid
Benefits of paying college athletes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Should college athletes be paid just because people make money off of them? The answer is yes, the amount of work college athletes put into their sport when their sport is in season is more than the average worker in america. The NCAA makes more money of their college athletes than the NBA and the NHL combined. The athletes get none of this profit that they so dearly deserve. At least the professional athletes are making money off of them being broadcasted on national television weekly and sometimes dailey.
College athletes are having big money made off of them. 11 billion dollars a year to be exact. The money that is being made could be found in their jerseys that anyone can buy, or off of the constant video and radio broadcasts being aired daily. The college athletes have absolutely no say in this matter. The NCAA just makes money off of them depending if they're really that good. For example Johnny Manziel, the man is a natural at football, and the NCAA knows that. Anyone who has the money could buy a Johnny Manziel jersey, and guess who gets the profit, not Manziel. These are the athletes that make the number what it is when people go out and buy specific players jerseys. It's because of the hard work and dedication that these athletes put in. This is just taking away from the athletes and what they worked so hard to eventually achieve. To be able to be that big of a name and not make any money off of your performances is just absurd.
Some people believe that college athletes already do get paid. They believe that the college athletes get paid through their scholarships that they have deserved and worked hard for. Contrary to popular belief, not every single college athlete comes out of college debt free. The av...
... middle of paper ...
... be more money going back into the economy because they wouldn't be used to having that money to spend now. They would actually have money to buy their own things instead of their parents buying things for them constantly. The money that would be put back into our economy would have a great effect in contrast with the 11 billion dollars of revenue that the NCAA rakes in per year.
Works Cited
Edelman,Marc “21 Reasons Why Student Athletes Are Employees and Should be Allowed to Unionize” Forbes Magazine
(2014)
Hartnett, Tyson “College Athletes Should Be Paid” Huffington Post
(2013)
No Author “Pro Athletes Way Overpaid” Daily Herald
(2013)
Rovell, Darren “NCAA President No Pay For Players On Jersey Sales” CNBC
(2011)
No Author “The Value Of College Sports” NCAA
(2014)
Daugherty, Paul “No Pay For College Athletes” Sports Illustrated
(2012)
If there’s one thing we dread in the summer more than the heat, it’s the afflicting sentiment that surrounds oneself when one is inhibited from experiencing the thrills of football for six long and gruesome months. National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football is a part of many Americans’ Saturdays, but to fewer does it mean their lives. Recently coming under debate, many sporting fans and college athletes believe that players should be paid more than just tuition, room, board, and books. Two articles on this issue that bring up valid points worth discussing are Paul Marx’ “Athlete’s New Day” and Warren Hartenstine’s “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid.” From these articles I have found on the basis of logical,
Daugherty, Paul. "College athletes already have advantages and shouldn't be paid." Sports Illustrated. Sports Illustrated, 20 Jan. 2012. Web. 25 Apr. 2014. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/writers/paul_daugherty/01/20/no.pay/
College athletes should not be paid it will ruin college sports forever. Some people believe that college athletes should be paid by the school because of all of the hard work they put in however they shouldn’t be paid because there is no fair way to pay every college athlete. There are many reasons that college athletes shouldn’t be paid one of the main reasons is that colleges don’t have enough money, the second reason is that they already get money in the form of scholarships, and there is no fair way to pay each college athlete.
Woods, Al. “College Athletes Should Be Paid.” Sports and Athletes: An Anthology. Ed. Christine Watkins. Greenhaven Press, 2009. 87-94. Print.
First lets explore the history behind the paying of college athletes. Over the past 50 years the NCAA has been in control of all Div.1, 2 and 3 athletic programs. The NCAA is an organization that delegates and regulates what things college athletes can and can’t do. These regulations are put in place under the label of ‘protecting amateurism’ in college sports. This allots
Posnanski, Joe. “College Athletes Should Not Be Paid.” Norton Sampler: Short Essays for Composition, 8th ed. Pages 584-590. 2013.
These athletes are being cheated out of money by the people who should be looking out for their best interest. The corruption going on with the NCAA must be fixed, and these athletes deserve to be paid. They do so much for their university and the NCAA; there is no reasonable explanation as to why they shouldn’t be fairly compensated. The NCAA has to recognize what they are doing to these athletes is unjustifiable. There must be a change in this system.
8) Wade, Don. “Colleges: NCAA Gives Athletes a Chance—not the time—to Make Money.” Scripps Howard News Service. Nando.Net. Oct. 21, 1996 Vol. 148. NO. 19.
Eitzen, D. Stanley. "College Athletes Should Be Paid." Sports and Athletes. Ed. James D. Torr.
Abstract: Collegiate athletes participating in the two revenue sports (football, men's basketball) sacrifice their time, education, and risk physical harm for their respected programs. The players are controlled by a governing body (NCAA) that dictates when they can show up to work, and when they cannot show up for work. They are restricted from making any substantial financial gains outside of their sports arena. These athletes receive no compensation for their efforts, while others prosper from their abilities. The athletes participating in the two revenue sports of college athletics, football and men's basketball should be compensated for their time, dedication, and work put forth in their respected sports.
On the issue of college athletes getting paid, I believe they should. When I mean getting paid I only mean a stipend or weekly check, not thousands or millions. All the hard work and dedication they put into their sport and academics are worthy enough. I have had a chance to play collegiate sports and it takes a lot out of you mentally and physically. The student athletes deserve at least enough money to have a normal student life. $300-$400 a month should give athletes enough money to get the required necessities. All this does is replace the notion of the athlete getting a job for a source of income. This will also help reduce the rate at which athletes accept money, cars, and gifts from boosters. When athletes get caught accepting something from a booster it looks bad on the athlete and the college. So, in my opinion yes college athletes should get paid, there is too much money that the universities have earned floating around going unanswered for the athletes not to get their cut.
College athletes generate millions of dollars for their schools each year, yet they are not allowed to be compensated beyond a scholarship due to being considered amateurs. College athletes are some of the hardest working people in the nation, having to focus on both school courses and sports. Because athletics take so much time, these student-athletes are always busy. College football and basketball are multi-billion dollar businesses. The NCAA does not want to pay the athletes beyond scholarships, and it would be tough to work a new compensation program into the NCAA and university budgets. College athletes should be compensated in some form because they put in so much time and effort, generating huge amounts of revenue.
The debate on whether college athletes should be paid to play is a sensitive controversy, with strong support on both sides. College athletics have been around for a long time and always been worth a good amount of money. This billion dollar industry continues to grow in popularity and net worth, while they continue to see more and more money come in. The student-athletes who they are making the money off of see absolutely none of this income. It is time that the student-athletes start to see some of this income he or she may by helping bring the National Collegiate Athletic Association. There are many people who do not think this is in the best interest of the student-athletes or Universities, but that being said there are also many people who are in favor of the change.
College athletes should be paid because they are basically working for the school. When a student gets a scholarship to a college for a sport they are expected to practice with the team and without the team, so on their free time. College athletes go way over the maximum amount of hours they are allowed to practice with the team. A 2011 survey, from the article Should College Athletes Be Paid?, states “The NCAA has a limit of 20 hours of training per week, D1 football players on average practice 43 hours a week, baseball 42.1 hours a week, and men’s basketball 39.2 hours a week”(Walch). With
...can’t help the athletes not even a little bit. So like I said paying college athletes some money would help them in the future and make their life way easier. Without money they are nothing and won’t last in the world.