Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Child soldiers should not be given amnesty
Psychological impact of war on children
An essay on child soldiers
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Child soldiers should not be given amnesty
Many children are given the choice to die or to kill others. They should be prosecuted to an extent, otherwise they should be given amnesty. Some think children should be given amnesty, others think they should be prosecuted. There are many people who think rehabilitation is a good first step. Some, think they should be sent to jail for their crimes. Many children that were previously child soldiers were either killed or orphaned (Child Soldiers pg 1). People believe the states should be responsible for deciding what happens to the children, not the country. Many people have said that rehabilitation is the right way to go. They believe the children should be given a second chance. After rehabilitation they should take several tests to identify if their mental health is ideal for interacting with others. Most of the recruits are children ages 11-14, because they are easily intimidated, which makes them vulnerable (Should Child Soldiers be Prosecuted? Pg 1). …show more content…
A large group of people believe the children are replicas of criminals that have committed acts of terror or any other unlawful crimes. They believe they should be sent to jail and stay there for as long as they live. While that may seem cruel to some, others believe it is the only way to stop it. For example, a child soldier from Guantanamo Bay was prosecuted. He was 15 when he made it to the U.S. and pleaded guilty. At the age of 24 he was brought back into court, to be given the punishment. They did not punish him when he was 15, because they thought he was underage. Until, he turned 24 they kept him in custody, until they felt it was the right time to issue a punishment (The Child Soldier on Trial at Guantanamo Bay Pg
There is no exact known number of children currently being utilised in warfare worldwide. The issue of the military use of children is so widespread that no figure can be calculated, although it is estimated that there are currently over 250,000 child soldiers across the world. Many are drugged and brainwashed into murder, many are forced to sever all ties with their family or watch them die. Most are faced with a simple choice: kill or be killed. Although the notion of child soldiers is vastly alien to contemporary Australian society, it is a reality in many parts of the world. ISIS have been known to employ the use of children in warfare and over 30,000 children have been abducted into the Lord’s Resistance Army for military purposes. It
As defined by Timothy Webster, author of Babes with Arms: International Law and Child Soldiers, a child soldier is “any person under the age of eighteen who is or has been associated with any kind of regular or irregular armed group, including those who serve as porters, spies, cooks, messengers and including girls recruited for sexual purposes (Webster, 2007, pp.230). As this definition reveals, a child soldier is more than simply a child with a gun. It is estimated that there are approximately 300,000 children under the age of 18, being used as soldiers in 33 conflicts currently, and this figure continues to rise (Webster, 2007, pp.227). Similarly, in 1999 it was estimated that more than 120,000 children, under the age of 18, were used as soldiers to fight ...
The first reason these kids shouldn’t be prosecuted or punished in any way is because it wasn’t their choice to be a soldier to begin with. According to Child Soldiers, Prosecution, most kids were forced to fight and had no choice of weather to enlist or not. There are about 200,000 child soldiers worldwide state's Armed and Underage, (Gettleman) and these kids are doing things their adolescent brains
...t they are easy to access; they are low cost, and easy to manipulate. When children are on the battlefield fighting for their lives, they become more violent and tend to do more killing than usual, raping girls, and torturing others. The armies, militia, and rebel groups recruit the children and separate the community to resist the conscription. The child is being forced to commit murder and turn against their family and friends because this proves that the child is recognized and implicated in the violence they have created. Child soldiers are known to be criminals, traitors, or even terrorists, so they would be held in military prisons. When either girl or boys are captured they go through abusive interrogation procedure, torture, isolations, rape, and death threats. These are the consequences of children being on the battlefield and shortly after being captured.
Having them prosecuted and go through detention has been proven to be unsuccessful as said in the article Ex-Child-Soldier (Barnett). All it does is puts them in jail and makes them more angry and aggressive, but does not fix the deep problem. Instead, child soldiers should be sent to a rehabilitation center. To demonstrate in the articles Child Soldiers and Ex-Child- Soldier they both explain how rehabilitation programs are comprehensive, successful, and help the people reconnect to who they were (Barnett). Thus, rehabilitation centers are way more effective in helping to fix the problem, not cover it up. As you can see, child soldiers deserve to have a second chance so they can go to these rehabilitation centers and gain the ability to have a new
Children have been used as soldiers in many events, however two that stand out are the use of child soldiers in the Sierra Leone civil war and the drug cartels in Mexico. Most people agree that forcing children to be soldiers is wrong and not humane. The people that make them soldiers transform them into belligerent beings by force. Child soldiers of drug cartels and the armies of Sierra Leone were threatened with their lives if they didn’t become soldiers. The lives of these child soldiers are lives that nobody should live. Situations in both countries are horrible because of the high number of youngsters that are forced to take part in drug use and are transformed into extremely belligerent and inhumane people; in addition they are deprived
Children are usually viewed as young people that do not have very much to think about, or have much responsibility. That is not the case for these individuals. In fact, child soldiers/suicide bombers are almost the exact opposite. A child soldier is defined as “anyone under the age of 18 who is part of any kind of regular or irregular armed force or armed group in any capacity” (Human Rights). They are put through hardship in which they do not deserve. Kids should not have these images in their head this young. They should not have to go through this abuse either. Children are abused and mistreated all around the world, and child soldiers/suicide bombers are one of the worst circumstances.
Placing them in prison with adults will hinder their treatment because it is not appropriate to their age or legal status. If we take their age and the fact that we need to promote their rehabilitation children should be commit but focusing on positive measures like education and not so much punishment. Children tried as adults are treated as adults rather than by their age, then given adult sentences, life without parole is mandatory where you are twelve or fifty-five when the crime is committed. Sentencing them at the age of twelve will show there is nothing that can be done to help the child once they become a member of society. It will banish the child and not give them an expression that is places with peers, hard work and time could promote a positive change in the child. The sentence could tell the child as well as society that this child will be rejected and there is no hope they may change their life. So then what do you expect from the child once released into the world, after being held in jail with adults for the entire life there punishment must be appropriate to the age and legal status in order for the punishment to fit the crime and age for rehabilitation. I don’t question the right of society for justice against a child that committed murder. But we have to think about the child and what we will put back in to
“Children, you call them? They can pull a trigger just as well as veterans …” (Colonel Marcus Cullen, War Hammer 40,000). People should question the world in which they live when a child is forced to become a soldier. Especially when the children are under the age of 18, they should not be required to fight. Many children who are demanded to fight are taken from their families. These young adolescents are mistreated; malnurtured, abused and the girls are usually used for sexual purposes.
Some people argue that in certain situations, child soldiers are too volatile to be let free and therefore not given amnesty. While this is indeed a problem, child soldiers should be taken to a center where they can receive adequate treatment until their psychological state is acceptable for living in the world by themselves. Another reason some people believe child soldiers should not be granted amnesty is because some child soldiers have said that they enjoyed harming others. While this may be true, this is not the true nature of the child and you can hardly blame them for these thoughts because they have been brainwashed and drugged to think this. This should not stop them from receiving amnesty and with the proper psychological treatment, it is nothing to worry
The sheer thought of children growing up to be killers is not something a state should be proud of be proud of. Contrariwise, there should be set standard of ages in the event of release. In the article “Kids are Kids-Until they Commit Crimes” by Marjie Lundstrom states “This is not to say that boy’s crimes were not heinous, or that they should go unpunished.”. Everyone of course deserves a second chance, especially children, but this extent should be literal in a case of murder. A child might not have the mentality to think, but they can comprehend bad actions, so if after the second chance was given, then they should be sentenced to life in
By definition, a child soldier is any person below 18 years of age who is recruited or used by an armed force in any capacity, including but not limited to children, boys and girls, used as fighters, coo...
Although not everyone knows it, there is a huge tragedy that is, and has been, going on even in this exact moment. That tragedy is children being taken out of their ordinary lives, whether by force or not, away from their families and into battle. No matter how much these children went through in the wars, the question still remains: once the war is over, should they be granted amnesty, or be prosecuted? The answer to this comes from thorough research. Child soldiers should be granted amnesty because they are unaware of what they are doing, they need help rather than prosecution, and many are forced to fight.
Nowadays juveniles are sent to jail with life sentences without parole for committing serious crimes. Some people wonder why it's even allowed? They say that they are only children and that their brains aren't fully developed. Well, the juveniles abandon their right of being a child when they take another person's life away.
hey may be baby-faced but many of them are committing crimes associated with adult criminals (Renee Vielaris, 2014). Juvenile crime is an issue within our country and the trouble of trialling and sentencing a ‘child’ has had many ask should children younger than 10 be held criminally responsible for their actions? When should the law dictate the age at which a ‘child’ is a child and criminally responsible for their actions? The capability of the children who are committing these crimes is underestimated.