Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The portrayal of women in literature
Depiction of women in literature
Depiction of women in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The portrayal of women in literature
In Hemingway’s short story “Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber,” Hemingway uses the writer’s technique of perspective to show readers the characterization of the three main protagonists in this story. Hemingway creates a multipart claim using perspective as well as dialogue to show readers a pervasive, negative tone carried throughout the story. Wilson, Margaret, and Macomber are characterized by multiple perspectives with multiple traits and negative aspects to their characters. In this story, readers are introduced to Robert Wilson as a extremely critical and selfish hunter who takes Mr and Mrs. Macomber on a hunt to be their safari guide and ends up having a change in judgement. In the example, “Now what in hell were you going to do about Margaret is Mr.Macomber’s wife who is exceedingly dramatic and finds joy in putting others down but toward the end of the story she has a shift and gains fear. Margaret says, “I suppose I could,” she said, “since you put it so prettily”. In this example, Margaret is shown to be dramatic and flirty. A reader can see that she is dramatic and flirty because she flirts with Wilson by talking about how he talks “so prettily”. This shows that she is disloyal to her husband and doesn’t care how he feels. She is a flirt because she goes around flirting and sleeping with whoever she wants. Through this example, readers can see Margaret’s perspective toward Mr. Wilson and how she likes to flirt with him. Subsequently, Margaret puts down Mr.Macomber and makes him feel worthless when she goes and sleeps with Wilson. She continues to call him a coward as the reader progresses through the story. Through this example, Margaret uses her internal dialogue to make Macomber feel useless by calling him a coward so she can make herself feel better. This example shows how she enjoys making Macomber mad and finds happiness in putting people down. This only continues to make her look worse to Wilson because she puts others down for her advantage. With this example, readers can see through Margaret’s perspective that to her, Macomber is nothing but a “bloody coward” and isn’t a real man. Toward the end of the story, Margaret starts Macomber and he first comes off as a coward and insecure, but soon after he opens up and becomes fearless and courageous. Toward the beginning of the story, Macomber says, “‘Yes, we take a beating,’ said Macomber, still not looking at him. ‘I’m awfully sorry about that lion business. It doesn’t have to go any further, does it? I mean no one will hear about it, will they?’” In this example, Macomber is seen as a coward because he is afraid of what others will think. He fears that Wilson will tell other people that Macomber does not kill the lion and everyone will know that he isn’t brave enough to kill a lion. Through Macomber’s dialogue, readers can see how he is a coward because he is constantly asking questions out of fear. Macomber’s perspective helps to develop his character traits of being fearful and cowardly. Subsequently,Macomber says,“No, I want to go…I want to go”.Through this example, readers can see that Macomber is insecure. He seems insecure because he immediately says he does want to hunt when Wilson asks if he still wants to go out and hunt. He only says yes because he does not want to look like a coward in front of Wilson and Margaret. Macomber only wants to fit in because he is always the coward in the situation. Macomber’s perspective helps to develop traits of insecurity through this example. At the end of the story, Macomber says, “You know, I’d like to try another lion,” Macomber said. “I’m really not
Louise, the unfortunate spouse of Brently Mallard dies of a supposed “heart disease.” Upon the doctor’s diagnosis, it is the death of a “joy that kills.” This is a paradox of happiness resulting into a dreadful ending. Nevertheless, in reality it is actually the other way around. Of which, is the irony of Louise dying due to her suffering from a massive amount of depression knowing her husband is not dead, but alive. This is the prime example to show how women are unfairly treated. If it is logical enough for a wife to be this jovial about her husband’s mournful state of life then she must be in a marriage of never-ending nightmares. This shows how terribly the wife is being exploited due her gender in the relationship. As a result of a female being treated or perceived in such a manner, she will often times lose herself like the “girl
One observation that can be made on Hemingway’s narrative technique as shown in his short stories is his clipped, spare style, which aims to produce a sense of objectivity through highly selected details. Hemingway refuses to romanticize his characters. Being “tough” people, such as boxers, bullfighters, gangsters, and soldiers, they are depicted as leading a life more or less without thought. The world is full of s...
Ernest Hemingway was an intricate and dedicated writer who devoted a significant portion of his life to writing multiple genres of stories. Throughout his stories, the similarities in his style and technique are easily noted and identified. Two of the short stories he wrote contain themes and motifs that specifically explain the plotline. The first story, “The Snows of Kilimanjaro,” sets its scene in the depths of a desolate area in Africa, where the main characters, Harry and his wife, decide to make their home. After living there for a few years, Harry ventures out and falls into a thorn bush, thus infecting his leg with gangrene. A few weeks later, he finds himself on the brink between life and death, unable to treat such a severe infection. Throughout the whole story, his life is flashing before his eyes as he recalls all of the major events that occurred in his past. By nightfall, Harry is acting unusual, and he begins to feel as if life is not worth living anymore. After he drifts off to sleep that evening, his wife goes to check on him and discovers that her husband has passed away (Hemingway 52-77). The second great work of Hemingway, “The Short, Happy Life of Francis Macomber,” is also set in a deserted section of Africa. Francis and his wife, Margot, are on a safari adventure along with their tour guide named Wilson. The way these three characters interact with each other creates tension and provides an adequate plot for the story. The trip begins with the couple intending on hunting big game. At first they track down a lion that continuously roars throughout the night, and later decide to chase after buffalos. To add to the complications of the trip, Margot has an intimate relationship with their tour guide. The story c...
In The Heath Anthology of American Literature, Volume II. Edited by Paul Lauter et al. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company, 1991: 1208-1209. Hemingway, Ernest. A.
Francis Macomber is a thirty-five years old man, on an African safari. He is also there with his wife he is feminine as well as a coward. Macomber is considered a coward because when faced with his first lion, he bolted and fled, increasing hatred from his wife. She has been disapproving of him for a while. She is basically a snake in the grass and cheats on Macomber. Macomber decides to have a brave moment in his life for a chance and in the process, is killed. Gender roles and masculinity played a major part in the story; whether, it was Margot or Frances Macomber, and even more.
However, Hemingway mistakenly sets up an equivalence of character and caricature in an attempt to highlight the difference between a character and a living person. It does not follow necessarily that being a caricature negates the possibility of also being a living person. To clarify this idea, more meaningful conceptions of the terms living person, character, and caricature must be established. Milan Kundera contends, “A novel that does not discover a hitherto unknown segment of existence is immoral” (3).
For an instance, Lorraine tells us that John would be "the last person on earth" (2).Another difference is that John has a much greater amount of confidence compared to Lorraine.John uses his intelligence, good looks, and charm to manipulate people.Lorraine describes John "extremely handsome" (2), and John immodestly agrees: "Like Lorraine told you, I really am very handsome and I do have fabulous eyes".John also believes strongly about his future dream of being an actor even tough his parents are against it.On the other hand, Lorraine’s self-confidence seems to be ruined.Her mother's constantly makes harsh criticisms, such as: "You're not a pretty girl, Lorraine" (2). According to John, The way her old lady talks you'd think Lorraine needed internal plastic surgery and seventeen body braces, but if you ask me, all she needs is a little confidence. Lorraine, in fact, is afraid of her mother who frequently verbally abuses her and even slaps her. In conclusion Lorraine and John in many ways have tremendous dissimilar
The reader reads in order to feel sorrow for the protagonist in a manner the reader can assimilate. Yet, it seems that the nature of Margaret’s thoughts is inherently dialogic or, to work with Duke’s terms, empathic: neither Margaret nor the reader uses the text in order to solicit pity from the other. What function would a “pity party” serve a reader by herself? To the contra...
The characters begin telling the stories of their life, and how the love triangle affected them. The language is colourful, although filled with bitterness, jealousy, and frustration. They each feel they have been tortured by the other two, and speak as if they are trying to justify their own actions towards the others. M is angry that he was caught, and that he admitted, saying, "Adulterers, take warning, never admit." He does not feel guilt for the adultery, but rather frustration at not being able to please both women. It appears that he accuses both women of playing with his emotions, rendering him unable to choose between them. Miller's The Ride Down Mount Morgan features the same displacement of guilt in Lyman's polygamous tale. In Play, W1, as the wife of M, feels she has been mistreated by M's adultery. She uses her ange...
We notice, right from the beginning of his life, that Ernest Hemingway was confronted to two opposite ways of thinking, the Manly way, and the Woman way. This will be an important point in his writing and in his personal life, he will show a great interest in this opposition of thinking. In this short story, Hemingway uses simple words, which turn out to become a complex analysis of the male and female minds. With this style of writing, he will show us how different the two sexes’ minds work, by confronting them to each other in a way that we can easily capture their different ways of working. The scene in which the characters are set in is simple, and by the use of the simplicity of the words and of the setting, he is able to put us in-front of this dilemma, he will put us in front of a situation, and we will see it in both sexes point of view, which will lead us to the fundamental question, why are our minds so different?
Hemingway packed plenty of theme, symbolism, and overall meaning into this short story. However, the story would not have been nearly as meaningful had it been written from another point of view.
When a writer picks up their pen and paper, begins one of the most personal and cathartic experiences in their lives, and forms this creation, this seemingly incoherent sets of words and phrases that, read without any critical thinking, any form of analysis or reflexion, can be easily misconstrued as worthless or empty. When one reads an author’s work, in any shape or form, what floats off of the ink of the paper and implants itself in our minds is the author’s personality, their style. Reading any of the greats, many would be able to spot the minute details that separates each author from another; whether it be their use of dialogue, their complex descriptions, their syntax, or their tone. When reading an excerpt of Hemingway’s A Moveable Feast one could easily dissect the work, pick apart each significant moment from Hemingway’s life and analyze it in order to form their own idea of the author’s voice, of his identity. Ernest Hemingway’s writing immediately comes across as rather familiar in one sense. His vocabulary is not all that complicated, his layout is rather straightforward, and it is presented in a simplistic form. While he may meander into seemingly unnecessary detail, his work can be easily read. It is when one looks deeper into the work, examines the techniques Hemingway uses to create this comfortable aura surrounding his body of work, that one begins to lift much more complex thoughts and ideas. Hemingway’s tone is stark, unsympathetic, his details are precise and explored in depth, and he organizes his thoughts with clarity and focus. All of this is presented in A Moveable Feast with expertise every writer dreams to achieve. While Hemingway’s style may seem simplistic on the surface, what lies below is a layered...
Through the characters' dialogue, Hemingway explores the emptiness generated by pleasure-seeking actions. Throughout the beginning of the story, Hemingway describes the trivial topics that the two characters discuss. The debate about the life-changing issue of the woman's ...
Earnest Hemingway’s work gives a glimpse of how people deal with their problems in society. He conveys his own characteristics through his simple and “iceberg” writing style, his male characters’ constant urge to prove their masculinity.
She hides her actions and attempt to justify them until she is expose by the letter from the paper regarding her novel entry. She is ignorant to her unrealistic judgements about Cecilia and Robert and attempts to fix the problem when she made it worse. She realizes her mistake when the letter questions the conflict of her novel and she witnesses her attempt to hide the true horror behind her decision. While she attempts at hiding her problem in the draft, she made it more noticeable to the paper and drain the luster of the plot. Her realization of her ignorance honor the lovers’ romance and made her strive to atone her former