Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The current effect of colonialism
Effects of colonialism
British imperialism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are many history books that discuss British Imperialism. However, I have not come across many writings on personal experiences during that period. In “Shooting an Elephant” George Orwell discusses his involvement with Imperialism. Orwell served as a European police officer in Burma during the time of Imperialism. In his writing of “Shooting an Elephant” Orwell describes an incident of an elephant on the loose, and what he had to do to control the situation. Orwell was successful in conveying his experience due to his use of dichotomy, imagery, and cause and effect.
George Orwell writes with a strong use of Dichotomy. Essentially, the definition of dichotomy is a contrast between two things that are entirely opposite. In “Shooting an Elephant” the two opposing forces were the Burmese citizens and the European authorities. During the time of British Imperialism, Orwell served as European police officer over the people of Burma. Ultimately, Orwell and the British people were powerful and the Burmese citizens were
…show more content…
powerless. This sense of Dichotomy caused the residence of Burma to loathe the European guards. As Orwell states, “I was hated by a large number of people. . .as a police officer I was an obvious target and was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so”(Orwell 784). In this quote Orwell was describing the feelings of hate the Burmese felt towards him, simply because he was employed by the British government. Furthermore, the use of imagery by Orwell in “Shooting an Elephant” is extremely effective.
“It was a very poor quarter, a labyrinth of squalid bamboo huts, thatched palm-leaf, winding all over steep hillside”(Orwell 785). In this quote Orwell describes a village quarter in which he was passing while searching for an escaped elephant. One can certainly picture the homes built from bamboo and thatched palm-leaf, and the placement of the huts on the steep hill. Similarly, the imagery used by Orwell to describe the throng of Burmese citizens who came to watch the excitement of capturing the escaped elephant was fantastic. “The crowd grew very still, and a deep, low, happy sigh, as of people who see the theatre curtain go up at last, breathed from innumerable throats”(Orwell 788). In this quote, Orwell describes to the reader the excitement the crowd felt. This description allows the reader to visualize the anticipation exuding the Burmese
people. Moreover, Orwell effectively brings across the message of “Shooting an Elephant” with cause and effect. After discovering the escaped elephant, Orwell originally wanted to wait for the elephant’s trainer to retrieve it; however because Orwell felt pressure from the mass of people watching him, Orwell shot the Elephant. Orwell writes, “For at that moment, with the crowd watching me, I was not afraid in the ordinary sense, as I would have been if I had been alone. . .The sole thought in my mind was that if anything went wrong those two thousand Burmans would see me. . .trampled. . .and if that happened it was quite probable that some of them would laugh. That would never do. There was only one alternative” (Orwell 788). In this quote Orwell depicts how if he was alone, he would not be able to shoot the elephant. Simply because there was a crowd of people who would rejoice in his death, Orwell suddenly developed bravery and shot the elephant. “I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool” (Orwell 789). In this quote Orwell openly writes that the sole reason he shot the elephant was because he did not want to look foolish in front of the Burmese people. “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell effectively describes his experience as European police officer in Burma. Three methods successfully used by Orwell were dichotomy, imagery, and cause and effect. The use of these writing methods allowed the reader to get a clear sense of the power the British held over Burma, provided the reader with distinct description of Orwell’s encounter of the elephant, and showed the accuracy of how people can cause others to do things they normally would not.
The short story “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell take place in Moulmein, in Lower Burma. The narrator is hated by the people in his town because he is a police officer. He hates his job because he works under the empire and hates the british. One day at work he
When he finial find the elephant Orwell say “I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him.” But when he lays his eyes on the crowd he changes his stance to “but I did not want to shoot the elephant.”(Orwell 199). He felt guilty for shooting the elephant when he describe that the elephant worth more alive than dead, but despite the many reason not to shoot the elephant, he took a shot. Orwell describes “when I pulled the trigger I did not hear the bang or feel the kick …I fired again into the same spot…I fired a third time. That was the shot that did it for him.”(199) the shooting of the elephant represent the Burma people trying to stay alive and over powering by the
George Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” is a short story that not only shows cultural divides and how they affect our actions, but also how that cultural prejudice may also affect other parties, even if, in this story, that other party may only be an elephant. Orwell shows the play for power between the Burmese and the narrator, a white British police-officer. It shows the severe prejudice between the British who had claimed Burma, and the Burmese who held a deep resentment of the British occupation. Three messages, or three themes, from Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” are prejudice, cultural divide, and power.
The 1800’s staged the universal dissemination and climax of British imperialism, thereby destructing and reconstructing the world into a new order. It is ordinary to depict the British as overindulgent consumerists, and the natives as magnanimous servers of the Empire, though history suggests that imperialism was not a mere black and white affair. It is certain that imperialism unjustly exhausted global resources and is therefore deserving of its condemnation. Yet, actual experiences of the time, as told by British men propel the reader to reevaluate the role of British moral authority during colonial times. The Man Who Would Be King (1888) by Rudyard Kipling and Shooting An Elephant (1936) by George Orwell are two such commentaries on imperialism in British India. The former is a novelette, narrated by a newspaper man and tells the journey of two determined Englishmen (Carnehan and Dravot) from inconspicuous “loafers” in India to godlike kings in Kafiristan. The latter recounts the story of a young British officer (Orwell), who served as a police to the Indian Imperial Police in Lower Burma. Kipling and Orwell narrate similar overarching themes such as the injustice of British imperialism and its inflicted misery both on the conquered and on the conqueror. Their motives and reactions to imperialism, however, are highly varied given their external conflicts with the Empire and the natives also vary. These stories by Orwell and Kipling conclude as symbolic mockeries of imperialism and its ultimate failure, thereby portraying the mixed elements of British nationalism during imperialism.
Some two thousand Burmese were trailing right behind Police Officer Orwell, expecting to get vengeance for the man that the elephant killed. Orwell is first pressured just by their mere presence. Only a few moments pass before Orwell comes to terms with what he thinks is the best alternative as he stated, “And suddenly I realized that I should have to shoot the elephant after all. The people expected it of me and I had got to do it; I could feel their two thousand wills pressing me forward, irresistibly.” (327) In addition, he felt subjected to shoot the animal; the Burmese were finally supporting him, and he couldn 't give that up even if that meant doing something against his better
A police officer in the British Raj, the supposedly 'unbreakable'; ruling force, was afraid. With his gun aimed at a elephant's head, he was faced with the decision to pull the trigger. That officer was George Orwell, and he writes about his experience in his short story, 'Shooting an Elephant';. To save face, he shrugged it off as his desire to 'avoid looking the fool'; (George Orwell, 283). In truth, the atmosphere of fear and pressure overwhelmed him. His inner struggle over the guilt of being involved in the subjugation of a people added to this strain, and he made a decision he would later regret enough to write this story.
“Shooting an Elephant” By George Orwell reflects Orwell’s emotions of hatred, bitterness, and guilt felt due to oppression of Imperialism.
In the essay ?Shooting an Elephant? by George Orwell, the author uses metaphors to represent his feelings on imperialism, the internal conflict between his personal morals, and his duty to his country. Orwell demonstrates his perspectives and feelings about imperialism.and its effects on his duty to the white man?s reputation. He seemingly blends his opinions and subjects into one, making the style of this essay generally very simple but also keeps it strong enough to merit numerous interpretations. Orwell expresses his conflicting views regarding imperialism throughout the essay by using three examples of oppression and by deliberatly using his introspection on imperialism.
The importance in the shooting of the elephant lies in how the incident depicts the different aspects of imperialism. In this essay, the elephant and the British officer help prove that imperialism is a double-edge sword. The shooting of the elephant is the incident that reveals that imperialism inflicts damage on both parties in a imperialistic relationship. The British officer, Orwell, displays many aspects of the being the "absurd puppet" under the institution of imperialism.(3) He is the evidence that "every white man's life in the East, was one long struggle not to be laughed at."(3) His experience with the natives conveys how imperialism harms the imperialistic countries as well as their colonies. To give reason to their forceful colonization, the imperialists must strip themselves of their own freedom as they constantly try to "impress the natives" to prove the superiority of the white man.(3) Colonists find the need to become racist against the natives because it is convenient for the colonists to patr...
He illustrates the effects that imperialism can cause on a society. He creates an abominable diction through words such as “hatred,” “rage,” “evil,” which are feelings that according to Orwell “are normal by products of imperialism.” (Orwell, 1101) Through his diction he appeals to pathos as he creates a feeling of appalment among his audience. Orwell utilizes the appeal to ethos as he recounts the shooting of an elephant, which becomes a metaphor for imperialism. Orwell claims that this event “was enlightening” (Orwell, 1101) as it allowed him to understand the nature for which humans take some of the actions they carry. During the event of the elephant on the loose in the streets of Burma, Orwell uses the rhetorical device of imagery to describe the crowd of “yellow faces” who demonstrated enthusiasm for the killing of the elephant. As Orwell contemplates the action point of shooting the elephant he realized that he would “have to shoot the elephant after all” (Orwell 1103) since the people expected him to do so. “two thousand people marching at my heels, and then to trail feebly away, having done nothing- no that was impossible.”(Orwell, 1103) Like Thoreau had stated, the
In “Shooting an Elephant” writer George Orwell illustrates the terrible episode that explains more than just the action of “shooting an elephant.” Orwell describes the scene of the killing of an elephant in Burma and reveals a number of emotions he experienced during the short, but traumatic event. Effectively, the writer uses many literary techniques to plant emotions and create tension in this scene, leading to an ironic presentation of imperialism. With each of the realistic descriptions of the observing multitude and the concrete appeal of the narrator’s pathos, Orwell thrives in persuading the audience that imperialism not only has a destructive impact on those being governed under the imperialists’ oppressive power, but also corrupts
I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool." So ends George Orwell's poignant reminiscence of an incident representing the imperialist British in Burma. Unlike Soyinka, who wrote about colonialism from the African's point of view, Orwell, like Joseph Conrad in Heart of Darkness, presents the moral dilemmas of the imperialist. Orwell served with the Imperialist Police in Burma while it was still part of the British Commonwealth and Empire. His service from 1922 to 1927 burdened himwith a sense of guilt about British colonialism as well a need to make some personal expiation for it (Norton 2259). "Shooting an Elephant" chronicles an incident in which Orwell confronts a moral dilemma and abandons his morals to escape the mockery of the native Burmans. He repeatedly shoots and kills an elephant which had ravaged a bazaar and scared many Burmans even though "As soon as I saw the elephant I knew with perfect certainty that I ought not to shoot him" (6).
The character, himself, is part of the British rule and is supposed to have all of the power. The Burmese, though, dangle the power in front of him. He is weak and unsure of himself, stating that he “wears a mask, and his face grows to fit it” (60). The character is not able to stand up for what he believes in -- that is, not shooting the elephant. There is a back and forth struggle in his mind about whether or not the elephant needs to be killed. Orwell’s character is fully aware that it is wrong and immoral to shoot an innocent creature, but eventually secedes to the demands of the Burmese, attempting to prove his cooperation and loyalty to those watching. In a way, the Burmese represent the pressures of society. Because of this, the audience can sympathize with the main character. There are always times when we, the readers, are unsure of ourselves, but we eventually make a decision. Whether we make the decision for ourselves or are assisted by others, in the end, we must take responsibility for our own actions. In a broader sense, Orwell’s character represents the internal conflict that everyone faces: should we conform to society or should we be our own
In the story, “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell, the author appears to be in some internal conflicts. Orwell introduce the reader about how the people in his village hated him, underestimate by his job because of the British Empire and how he had to kill an Elephant. In the beginning of the story, Orwell writes “ I was hated by large numbers of people --- the only time in my life that I have been important enough for this to happen to me” this show the acknowledgment that he have within himself and surrounding by his environment that he is not accepted. Because he wrestles with competing a difficult decision, he was in a psychological conflict whereas, he had to adjust his cognitive thinking whether he can risk his life to kill an Elephant. In paragraph 5, Orwell said that he had no intention of shooting the elephant and he had a rifle for self-defense.
In “Shooting an Elephant” , writer George Orwell describes a scene of an elephant being killed and describes the sensations that he goes through during the short but extremely dramatic event in the small city of Burma and articulates the sensations of a police officer goes through during this brief but very dramatic event. Rhetorically,George Orwell uses various literary techniques to convey the emotions in the scene, which ultimately leads to a detailed presentation of imperialism. Through descriptions of the crowd and a direct appeal with the narrator, Orwell succeeds in convincing the audience that imperialism has a negative impact on those being governed , but also to those that are exercising that power. As an adversary of political