Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Professionalism and ethics in patient care
Medical practice and ethics
Medical practice and ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Professionalism and ethics in patient care
As the lead prosecutor, the first fact that I would convey to my investigators is that the system was broken. Shipman was fired from the Todmorden Medical Center for forging prescriptions in order to support his addiction to pain medicine. He should have lost his medical license from the General Medical Council (GMC) and that would kept him from being able to practice ever again (Batty, 2005). Instead, the GMC only sent him a stern letter denouncing his actions, but allowed him to continue to practice medicine once he completed rehabilitation. As a result of the negligence of the GMC, anyone who ever looked into Shipman’s medical history, his forgery and addiction would not have been revealed by the GMC. Shipman resumed his medical profession in Hyde, England in which his patient’s high death rate came into question. The police failed to properly investigate the coroner’s concerns by not even running a criminal history on Shipman, which could have revealed his …show more content…
I feel that had the GMC not been so forgiving on a doctor that abused his authority, many innocent lives could have been saved. I also feel that the police department failed to do the basic things such as running a criminal history or checking to see if Shipman had an arrest record. Shipman was an experienced document forger, so looking at his patients medical records should have been done with the assistance of personnel who are familiar with medical records. Luckily, Grundy’s daughter was persistent and adamant enough in questioning her mother’s untimely death and changing of her will that it led to the arrest of Shipman. I feel that any of these facts could have been enough to convict Shipman. He was convicted early on in his career but he was still allowed to practice
The wrongful conviction of Tammy Marquardt was also aided by the misconduct of the parties involved. Goudge (2008) claimed that Smith, other medical experts and prosecutors operated with a “think dirty” mindset, which presumes guilt first, rather than the ‘innocent until proven guilty‘ doctrine highly valued in the justice system. “The Goudge Commission found the actual words ‘think dirty’ in instructions from Ontario’s chief coroners, pathologists and police chiefs in 1995” (Shapiro, 2011). In Ms. Marquardt’s case, there is no way to conceal the fact that the professionals of the adversarial system did not satisfactorily perform their roles. It has already been demonstrated that Dr. Charles Smith “saw his role as supporting the prosecution,
I believe that asset misappropriation by accounts payable fraud is occurring at Wayland Manufacturing Company due to a lack of proper internal controls. Making the company’s Chief Accountant responsible for additional day-to-day functions provides him with opportunity to commit by creating fictitious vendors with his information and then creating fictitious invoices. Newbaker can then conceal his fraud by approving the invoices for payment. Employees working at an organization for more than five years are more likely to commit fraud. Therefore, Newbaker’s six-year history with the company has made him trustworthy and very knowledgeable, which could indicate involvement in asset misappropriation. The high employee turnover could represent a past fraudster leaving before getting caught or employees refusing to continue with the asset misappropriation. In addition, the varying monthly accounts payable transactions ranging from the lowest being April 2014 and
Being an investigator to Apollo Shoes, the financial statement fraud scheme likely to be present is dependent on the nature of the company. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99 (“SAS 99”) requires to focus on two broad areas of fraud:
A landmark case in Australia remains Ridgeway v R, a case considerably substantial as it caused a vast echo sufficient enough to cause legislation to be enacted. The facts in Ridgeway revolved around John Anthony Ridgeway, participating in controlled importation of 140.4 gram of Heroin into Australia. An informant remained unscathed by customs and delivered the drugs to Mr Ridgeway, leading to an arrest by the Australia Federal Police. Chief Justice Mason delivered a decision of Ridgeway not guilty, due to no evidence of the heroin being imported into Australia. The effect of the Ridgeway decision was that all evidence of the commission of an offence is liable to be excluded if that offence was the product of entrapment by law enforcement officers or agents. Presently in Commonwealth common law and statute systems it must be clarified that there is no defence for entrapment. Ridgeway caused an implementation of numerous statutory protections for police officers at Queensland and Commonwealth levels of government. Since Ridgeway, the Crimes Act 1994 has been amended to enact a scheme to authorize participation in otherwise unlawful activities for investigative purposes. Section 15G of the crimes act seeks ‘to provide for the authorisation, conduct and monitoring of controlled operations; to exempt from criminal liability and to indemnify from civil liability law enforcement officers.’ Consequent to this
An ethical dilemma that is currently happening in the medical field regards pain management. Doctors and other medical professionals are faced with this ethical decision on whether to prescribe strong pain medication to patients who claim to be experiencing pain, or to not in skepticism that the patient is lying to get opioids and other strong medications. “Opioids are drugs that act on the nervous system to relieve pain. Continued use and abuse can lead to physical dependence and withdrawal symptoms,” (Drug Free World Online). Opioids are often prescribed to patients experiencing excruciating pain, but doctors are faced with prescribing these drugs as an ethical issue because only a patient can measure the pain they are in, it is simply impossible
Forrester, K., & Griffiths, D. (2010). Essentials of law for health professionals. Sydney: Mosby Elsevier. Retrieved from Google Books.
Most of medicine and health care laws were reviewed and significantly modified as direct and indirect result of Shipman’s crimes, specially after the results of investigations into Shipman.
Player: case report and emerging medicolegal practice questions. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 6(1), 40-46. doi:10.1111/j.1939-3938.2009.01064.x
On the morning of July 4, 1954, Marilyn Sheppard was violently beaten in her home in Bay Village, Ohio, on the shore of Lake Erie. She was four months pregnant and had been felled by 35 vicious blows (Quade). Right away Sam Sheppard was accused of being the victim to do this. Sheppard had told investigators that he had been asleep downstairs and was awakened by his wife’s screams. Sheppard said when he went upstairs and entered the room he was knocked unconscious by the intruder. He denied any involvement and described his battle with the killer he described as “bushy-haired” (Linder). After a police investigation, Dr. Sam Sheppard was convicted of second degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. With the hectic media covering it, they were quick in decision that it was him that committed the murder. This was an unfair trial, ruined a man’s life, and gave him no time for a career.
In the first case the judge would like to show the 3 men sympathy but he believes he isn’t above the law, he sentences the death penalty. The philosophical label of this judge is legal positivism. One thing that the judge says to back this up is “As much as I would personally wish that these men could return to their families and put this tragic event behind them, I cannot permit them to do so. I am not free to make the law”. This quote showed that this judge was a legal positivist because he says that he wants to show them sympathy and let them return to their families, but he is not free to make the law and he is not above the law. Another quote to back this up is “I have sworn an oath to apply the law that authorized legislators have enacted”. Similar to the last quote, the judge is showing that whether he wants to be sympathetic or not he cannot because he has sworn an oath to the law that he cannot break. One weakness of this theoretical approach is that it is very ruthless. These men did not have a choice, killing Ozzie was the only way for the men to
“Nurse Practitioner Criminal: How to Avoid Being One” by Bupport (2016), posts the problem of how did a nurse practitioner get into a situation of imprisonment for illegal prescribing, and could it have been avoided? The topic of illegal prescribing is extremely important when thinking about my future personal practice.
Wayne Thiebaud (T-bou) was rejected multiple times as an artist. But finally he met Robert Mallary, a spectacular lawyer\Artist. Mallary helped Wayne get his art into museums and shows. It wasn’t before long that Wayne became a famous artist for drawing food.
Guisti was able to commit the fraud because he was a trusted 14-year employee, previous internal auditor, and manager of a Greater Providence Deposit and Trust. He was authorized to make consumer loans up to a certain dollar limit, starting at $10,000 and increasing to $15,000 and then $25,000, without loan committee approvals. He used this authority to create 67 fraudulent 90-day notes requiring no collateral or the applicant’s credit history report which should have been purchased from an independent credit rating firm. As the scheme progressed, he was able to bypass the loan committee approval as some of his loans exceed his loan limit.
Volkswagen’s diesel fraud case is one scandal that has shook the company leading to billions of dollars in losses. However, one issue that arises from the incidence is business ethics and the role of the management in ensuring that business practices are ethical and meet other set standards. For the case of VW, the issue appears to be deeper than initially believed with all board members seemingly compromised. This essay examines VW’s fraud case and the associated blame game.
There were lots of problems in our society that we absolutely have no ways to prevent. One of the most serious problems in today 's society is that there are lots of swindlers around the world. Fraud is when a person intended to deceive others to get money, as today 's techniques have gotten better and better everyday; the cheaters get the advantages of it. They use those network communication techniques to get people’s information and use those information to cheat your money. There was no age limit for the target people, whom the teenage, middle age and old people can become their targets. The cheaters will use different ways to cheat money. Mostly the cheaters will use the Internet to cheat the teenagers since all the teenagers are chatting