Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The life and works of sir arthur conan doyle dissertation
Importance of suspense
The life and works of sir arthur conan doyle dissertation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Sherlock Holmes & The Speckled Band / Lamb To The Slaughter
"Lamb to the slaughter", by Roald Dahl, and "The Speckled Band" by
Arthur Conan Doyle share many features, despite the difference in eras in which they were written.
Each story has its own distinctive style when creating both tension and an atmosphere of suspense.
"The Speckled Band" has a sense of urgency about it, yet manages to build up suspense until the climax of the story.
"I have reasons to know....which tend to make the matter even more terrible than the truth."
This quote, found in the first paragraph, immediately begins creating an atmosphere for the story, and intriguing the reader as to what the narrator (Dr. Watson) is talking about. The reader will
…show more content…
Holmes. It is terror." At this point, the events have not been explained - this character
(Miss Stoner) describing how she is feeling inceases the tension, as the readers do not yet know the full situation; only that they should be scared of whatever it is. The use of the word "terror" helps to emphasise the point - 'fear' may not be strong enough, but following it with 'terror' helps to reinforce the situation to the reader.
"You must not fear...we shall soon set matters right."
As Sherlock Holmes says this, it may cast a doubt over the reader's mind - if a character issues a statement proclaiming that things will turn out well, there is a concept that the opposite may happen instead. All this further adds to the need to read more, as the reader will now want to see if Holmes is indeed correct.
"The very horror of my situation lies in the fact that my fears are so vague, and my decisions depend entirely upon small points."
Miss Stoner declares this when asked about her problem, and her reply only enhances the mystery. The fact that she has no proof, nor any idea of what is actually going on means that anything could happen in
the
…show more content…
"...as he spoke, he did an unusual thing."
The idea that a character is performing differently to the way they normally do lets the reader know straight away that something is not right in the situation.
Both stories contain twists in them, which helps build the overall atmosphere and sense of mystery - they suggest that you may not know as much as you think.
In "The Speckled Band", the means of death is a snakebite. This is unexpected as no-one would randomly expect this to be used as a murder weapon. The author uses the situation well though - using the murderer's own weapon against him brings the story to a successful climax. Thw twist in "Lamb To The Slaughter" also involves the murder weapon - in this case, the disposal of it. The author here also manages to end the story in a fitting manner, by having the investigating officers eat the murder weapon. The atmosphere and overall tone changes at the climax - from a serious murder story to a black comedy, using the line: "Personally, I think it's right here on the premises." "Probably right here under our very noses."
The irony is that the men are being unknowingly correct - they
It was a normal evening in the Maloney home. Mrs. Mary Maloney sat sewing, while waiting for her husband to return home after an involved day as a police officer. Around 5 o’clock Mr. Maloney returns home with shocking news and… Bang! …a leg of lamb hit over his head and Mr. Maloney falls to the ground dead. All evidence and theories, point to Mrs. Maloney being the killer of her husband, but why? Mrs. Maloney did not kill her husband out of anger after the recent marriage incident, but she did it as a result of mental anguish, self defense and trauma inflicted upon her by her husband. All these events explain exactly why Mrs. Maloney murdered her husband out of reasonable measures.
Having to take your anger out on someone isn’t fair or good, especially if you’re being killed with frozen lamb. Based on everyone’s understanding, when you kill someone you’ll have to pay the price and consequences. Apparently this lady didn’t. But are we sure she’s going to marry another man and kill him too? In “Lamb to the slaughter”, I’m going to be talking about Mary Maloney and how madly crazy she is.
head. She might just have hit him with a steel club.' As you can see,
My essay has shown that both stories conform to a certain extent to the conventions of the detective story. Both show views of the woman, hero and villain, and in ‘The Speckled Band’ this highlights the complacent, satisfied attitude of the Victorians, while ‘Visitors’ shows the less complacent, worried, changing attitude of the late twentieth century, influenced by the social devastation of two world wars.
Mary has a lamb cooked, so she invites the police to eat the lamb.Without knowing it, the police eat the evidence of Mrs. Maloney’s offense. There are many examples of irony in Lamb to the Slaughter. One time, Mrs. Maloney calls the police and acts as if she just found him dead on the floor. Another time is when Mrs. Maloney asks the police to eat up the leg of the lamb. Throughout the story Lamb to the Slaughter, Roald Dahl uses dramatic irony effectively to help enhance the plot and help the reader understand the story
‘Upon the flesh’ is a story about a murder committed in an alleyway by a group of teenagers up to no good. John Franklin provided appropriate detail and used techniques that engaged the audience in a correct manner. The other story listed, ‘Fresh bait’ also fits well into the crime fiction. This story is about a man/woman who is trying to solve a murder while hitchhiking. During his/her investigation he/she is picked up by a man driving along the road who almost suits the picture of the suspect. Several times the victim becomes odd and the driver starts to get suspicious but before anything else happens, he/she arrives at their destination and all of a sudden the investigation stops. The technique that Sherryl Clark used really engaged the audience because the story was never giving answers to the investigation, each scene just became more suspicious and
To conclude, the two short stories, “Lamb to the Slaughter” and “Charles” demonstrate that the truth can be right in front of you. Although the two stories have a similar theme they do it in a completely different way. In “Lamb to the Slaughter” there were cops trying to find out a murder, who committed it and what the murder weapon was, while in “Charles,” it was not a mystery until the end. So remember, sometimes smiles are just put on to cover up the truth that is
First, Holmes is the first scientific detective. Second, all of his cases ended up solved so therefore there are no flaws in his method. Well after researching in and out of books and web sites, I finally found the "true" way Holmes solved crimes. The site I found such spectacular information is Sherlockian.Net. This sight was helpful and it made me understand most of the stories by Conan Doyle.
In 1887, Sherlock Holmes made his first appearance in A Study in Scarlet by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, but only in 1891, in A Scandal in Bohemia that Holmes’ stories became very famous, and eventually, Holmes’ adventures got adapted for film. Lately, in 2010 BBC made a series called “Sherlock”, and the first episode is called “A Study in Pink” referring to the first book where Sherlock Holmes was introduced. The TV adaptation is significantly more effective in showing the relationship between Holmes and Watson with changes made to the plot and characters.
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle writes a short story about how innocence gets victimized by a royal subject. When a royal figure clashes with someone who is not equal in social class, he will do anything to hide his mistake. This is when the King hires Sherlock Holmes. Arthur Conan Doyle based Holmes off of a man named Dr. Joseph Bell, who was a friend of his in medical school. When Doyle saw that medical practice was not a success, he began writing Holmes stories for money. The public became infatuated with not only the stories, but mainly Sherlock Holmes. When Doyle wanted to write in more respectable genres (Duncan 3), he made one enormous mistake.
The word honor parallels words like loyal and respect. War heroes and judges are associated with being honorable. A man who considers himself to be extremely antisocial and lacking a conscience does not mirror these traits. However, Sherlock Holmes’ ability to solve the most baffling crimes brings justice to many who would otherwise get away with their crimes. Just as war heroes sometimes give their lives for a greater cause like keeping their countrymen safe, Sherlock sacrifices himself to save others. Trust, fighting for justice, and self-sacrifice are all characteristics associated with honor, too. Sherlock Holmes is an honorable man in Sherlock, despite what most of the other characters think and say about him.
“The world is full of obvious things which nobody by any chance ever observes,” states Sherlock Holmes (Doyle, The Hound of the Baskervilles loc 1238). According to TV Tropes, mystery is a genre of fiction where the plot revolves a mysterious happening that acts as the driving question. With any given problem there is a solution; however, and the question is “how does one come about to that solution”? Extremely high intelligence level, keen observation, creative imagination and sensitivity to details are just some of the qualities that Holmes possesses. In the process of solving mysteries, there is always a borderline between mere guessing, a coincidence, and a scientific approach that Holmes calls deductive reasoning. In Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's 1902 novel, The Hound of the Baskervilles, Dr. Mortimer seeks advice from Holmes as he explains the curse that has been plaguing the Baskerville family. With the power of deduction, Holmes realizes that Mr. Stapleton is actually a Baskerville descendant and has been planning to get rid of the other members of the family to claim the family fortune. Conan Doyle tells the reader what their mind is capable of doing by incorporating Holmes through his novels as he uses observation, deduction and knowledge in solving his cases. One important key that makes him different from most people is that he sees everything that people often neglect to pay attention to. A remarkable proof which shows that Holmes holds an extraordinary analytical mind and is uniquely capable of solving a mystery through his great sensitivity to minute details and the ability to draw connections from it was shown as he observes and deduces information from the letter received by Sir Henry Baskerville the moment he arrived...
The Appeal of Sherlock Holmes The purpose of this assignment is to determine the appeal of Sherlock Holmes, a fictional detective mastermind, first written by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle in 1887. Arthur Conan Doyle was in 1859 in Scotland, Edinburgh. Doyle's Irish mother and English father sent him to be raised and educated at very strict Jesuit schools Austria and Scotland. It was not until the year 1876 that Arthur Conan Doyle arrived at Edinburgh University with the passion of studying medicine in his mind. It was during his stay at Edinburgh University that he met Doctor Joseph Bell, one of the professors who taught him there.
The Character Of Sherlock Holmes In this essay I will explain why the Victorians found Arthur Conan Doyles' Sherlock Holmes character quite so compelling and why the stories are still so popular today. Victorians will have found Sherlock Holmes' very interesting because he was an upper class educate4d gentleman and this was the sort of person who was very well respected in Victorian times, and they would also have loved how he solved all his crimes, because there police force were so unreliable. The stories are still so popular today because we modern readers enjoy the thrill of a mystery and the tension of a case, which Conan Doyle creates.
The next character introduced is the narrator. He is both complex and interesting. He thinks he is not crazy. As he goes out of his way to prove that his is not insane, he does the exact opposite. His relationship with the old man is unknown. However, he does say he loves the old man. “I loved the old man.” (Poe 1).