Sherlock Holmes In The Adventure Of The Speckled Band

Given the circumstances in the story “The Adventure of the Speckled Band”, Sherlock Holmes is not guilty of Dr. Roylott`s passing away. In the story, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the author, characterized Sherlock Holmes as a hired investigator who uses his skills to help solve Helen`s terrorizing case, yet he was at no means there to kill Dr. Roylott. Foremost, Sherlock Holmes could not predict that Dr. Roylott could be bitten by the snake. Furthermore, Sherlock Holmes was hired to protect Helen Stoner. Finally, Sherlock Holmes was certain that Dr. Roylott killed Julia Stoner and wanted to murder Helen due to money. Essentially, Sherlock Holmes was not the cause of Dr. Roylott`s death, given the fact that he could not predict the snake biting Dr. Roylott.

During the passage, along with while Sherlock investigated, he could not forecast that Dr. Roylott would be bitten by the snake. First and foremost, Sherlock did not come into contact with the snake, until he heard Dr. Roylott`s death yell, then saw it around the snake`s neck. To proceed, even though Holmes concluded the death of Julia to be caused by Dr. Roylott with a deadly snake, he could not do anything about the snake coming back into contact with Dr. Roylott. Nevertheless, Holmes was in the house to discover the cause of Julia`s death, not to guess that Dr. Roylott would be bitten by this snake. Formerly,

Sherlock was not predicting Dr. Roylotts death, subsequently he was closing the case with Julia, not thinking about Dr. Roylott`s death coming in the future. Yet once again, Sherlock was in no state of predicting Dr. Roylott`s death, from which he did not know how Dr. Roylott handled the snake, but that it would kill him. Then again, Sherlock is not guilty for the murder of Dr. Roylott as he was there to guard Helen.
In all regards to support Helen Stoner, Sherlock was appointed to defend her. Originally, Sherlock Holmes went to the Roylott manor in order to investigate all that had went wrong. While he was there he addressed the bell rope in Helen and Julia`s room, along with the bed clamped to the floor. Subsequently, Sherlock was defending Helen by staying in her room overnight to find out the cause of Julia`s death. Besides, after investigating the house, Sherlock had come to his conclusion that a snake went down the bell rope to kill Julia. Likewise, Sherlock Holmes came into the home to find out the cause of Julia`s death, but while doing that never came into contact with this snake to cause it to kill Dr. Roylott. The snake ended up wrapped around Dr. Roylott`s neck; in essence Dr. Roylott killed himself. Nevertheless, Sherlock Holmes went out of his way to help solve the case by immediately showing up at the Roylott household, but more importantly never made it apparent that he wanted anything negative to happen to him. Overall, Sherlock did not commit the crime, nonetheless he was sure Dr. Roylott murdered Julia with money being a factor involved.
Following much investigation, Sherlock was optimistic that Dr. Roylott was the murderer of Julia Stoner in this case, as a result of various clues Sherlock discovered. While examining the Roylott home, Sherlock searched Dr. Roylotts bedroom; in doing so he came across a worn stool, and a milk saucer. After all he concluded that Dr. Roylott used a deadly animal to kill Julia, due to the bell rope in Julia`s room for which it would have climbed down. Then, Helen informed Sherlock that Dr. Roylott previously killed somebody back in India; this further developed Sherlock`s idea that Dr. Roylott murdered Julia since he murdered someone else as well. Additionally, Dr. Roylott is into exotic animals given the reason why he has a baboon and cheetah living on his property with him. This proves the reason for him using the poisonous snake to kill Julia. Moreover, Helen continues to tell Holmes that Julia was killed prior to her wedding. If she would have gotten married she would have gotten a sum of money, but Dr. Roylott did not want that to happen, so he killed Julia. After all, Dr. Roylott definitely killed Julia, since he was in his room when this happened. In the meanwhile he sent the snake throught the ventilator, then it went down the rope to kill Julia. After all, Sherlock is not the murderer of Dr. Roylott, since Dr. Roylott used the snake to kill Julia, it got wrapped around his neck causing his death.
All in all, Sherlock is in no way responsible for Helen Stoner`s death.

In all regards, Sherlock was not able to foretell the snake biting Dr. Roylott. Coincidingly, Sherlock Holmes was brought along in order to help Helen Stoner with the frightening case, not have any part in the demise of Dr. Roylott. Moreover, Sherlock Holmes was more than positive Dr. Roylott murdered Julia by reason of money. Though, Sherlock Holmes did not know how Dr. Roylott passed away. In summation, Sherlock Holmes was not to be blamed for the death of Dr. Roylott, as to the coinciding points that sum up the

situation.