Shakespeare Universal Questions Essay

783 Words2 Pages

Shakespeare and Universal Questions Universal questions are present throughout most major works of literature. The tentative answers the authors write in response are the reason why modern readers can relate to pieces written decades, centuries, or even millennia after they were published. Likewise, Shakespeare’s plays are relevant today because he attempts to give an answer to these universal questions, such as the morality of murder in The Merchant of Venice, where killing is justified if one is the protagonist; the question of how life should be lived in Romeo and Juliet, which argues that existence should be lead with freedom rather than limitations; and whether or not true villainy or true nobility exists in The Merchant of Venice, where …show more content…

In particular, Antonio is described as a wonderful, kind, and benevolent person. Shylock receives a different side of him, claiming, “You call me misbeliever, cutthroat dog / And spet upon my Jewish gaberdine” (I.i.109-110). Antonio, the man who is supposed to be, “kind quote” (kind quote), treats Shylock as if he’s not even a person. In 16th century Venice, anti-semitic views like Antonio’s were fairly common, but Shylock’s later monologue criticizes this discrimination and the audience begins to empathize with him. *lead in to quote* “He hath disgraced me and / hindered me half a million, laughed at my losses, / mocked at my gains, scorned my nation, thwarted / my bargains, cooled my friends, heated mine / enemies—and what’s his reason? I am a Jew. Hath not / a Jew eyes? Hath not a Jew hands, organs, dimensions, / senses, affections, passions?” (III.i.53-59) By writing this monologue, Shakespeare opens up discussion for whether or not Shylock is a real villain, thus putting the roles of each and every character into question. Therefore, the label of nobility cannot be truly applied to Antonio, nor can the label of true evil be attached to

Open Document