Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Women objectification in commercials and advertisement examples
Hegemonic Representation Of Gender In Advertisements
Gender advertising roles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As time evolves, media has become more prevalent. It has been designed to shape and influence the perceptions of the viewers. Women’s participation in the media began much later than men, who initially played the primary character. Even so, women’s roles have greatly been domesticated by popular culture, especially in advertisements. They have varied from cooks, maids, and as of the late 60’s, women have been exploited in the marketing world as sexual objects to sell products. This raised a cause for concern of the portrayal of women in the media (Shrikhande, 1). However, even since the 60’s until now, the objectification of women in the media has not simmered down, but gradually increased. A good example of this is the Carl’s Jr’s advertisement …show more content…
for the Super Bowl, which aired in 2015. Carl’s Jr. aired this commercial to promote the sales of their first ever “all natural” burger, but instead materialize women through the use of commodification and objectification similar to what they have done in all of their past commercials. In the beginning of the advertisement, Charlotte McKinney, a well-known model, who appears to be naked, is stared at by men in a sexual manner, which can ideally be called the ‘male gaze’. Male gaze was a concept coined by feminist film critic Laura Mulvey in 1976. It describes the tendency in visual culture to depict the world and women from a masculine point of view and in terms of men's attitudes (Wikipedia). While the model struts her self through a vegetable market enjoying the glares of the men surrounding her, she uses a seductive tone and quotes, “I love going all natural.” From this, it can be depicted that being naked means “natural,” justifying Carl’s Jr.’s use of a nearly nude model for the advertisement of their new beef burger. When the model has her back turned towards the camera, two tomatoes, cover her behind, where a man squeezes the tomatoes as she teasingly reacts with acceptance. Similarly, two cantaloupes cover her breasts. In this manner, the female body is dismembered to give focus to specific body parts – the breasts and the behind. Commodification can be defined as the process of turning people into things, or commodities, for sale, i.e. the commodification of women’s bodies through advertising and media representations (Kirk and Okazawa-Rey, G-2). Where as, objectification is the attitudes and behaviors by which people are treated as if they were “things” (Kirk and Okazawa-Rey, G-4). These two key terms play an important role in the method of advertisement used by Carl’s Jr. The advertisement uses a nearly nude model to sell the burger, which is unnecessary because nudity and the sale of a burger are not correlated. Yet, it has become a common trend in today’s media to follow such advertising methods, as it is the best way to attract the male species. Kirk and Okazawa-Rey discuss the use of women in advertising. They said that the “dominant U.S. culture often reduces women to bodies, valuing us only as sex objects or bearers of children.” Carl’s Jr. is well known for their controversial commercials because of the sexual objectification of female models as a method to draw attention to their fast food chain. Not only do they gain more views on YouTube and other forms of social media, but also successfully increase awareness by manipulating men to buy their products through their racy commercials, thereby increasing sales, calling it a “win-win” situation (Linsey Davis, abc). In previous commercials, Carl’s Jr. has used models such as Paris Hilton and Kate Upton in a vulgar manner, which has sparked critics to create the hashtag #WomenAreMoreThanMeat (Davis, abc). This is important for women all over the world, because commercials as such degrade the value of women. According to Kirk and Okazawa-Rey, “the objectification and commodification of women in advertising pave the way for women’s dismemberment (literal and figurative) in pornography. This demonstrates that the sexually objectified models used in commercials as such are dehumanized and are seen as less competent by both men and women (Caroline Heldman, Part 2). In Caroline Heldman’s article Sexual Objectification, Part 1: What Is It?, for Ms.
magazine, sexual objectification is described as the process of representing or treating a person like a sex object, one that serves another’s sexual pleasure (Heldman). She also devised a Sex Object Test (SOT) to measure the presence of sexual objectification in images in the form of seven questions. Two questions that can be applied to this advertisement, “Does the image present a sexualized person as a stand-in for an object?” and “Does the image show a sexualized person as a commodity that can be bought and sold?” (Heldman) for which both answers will be yes. The model is used as stand-in for the burger that is only introduced at the end of the commercial. Although the advertisement makes it seem as though the model is the subject, she is merely degraded as a sexualized object to present the final commodity, which is the beef …show more content…
burger. An aspect that cannot be ignored is that objectification and commodification does not apply only to women in media. Today, men are objectified more than women. However, the negative effects of it are higher on women than men. When women are objectified, “you perpetuate the idea that her worth lies exclusively in her appearance. This leads to excessive victim-blaming, unwelcome catcalling, mortifyingly high rates of sexual assault and rape (Alaxia LaFata, Elite Daily).” But for men, it is not the same. A comment on their appearance does not carry a heavier weight than it actually is, compared to women. This is where society is to blame because the world is a place where a comment on appearance systematically engineers the attitudes of society towards people. In conclusion, Carl’s Jr.
has always been producing commercials that upraise the levels of commodification and objectification of women with a goal to increase the sales of their fast food products. It is very evident that the main focus of this commercial is the nudity and exposure of the woman in the advertisement. This has deterred from the purpose of the commercial, which is the introduction of Carl’s Jr.’s all new natural beef burger. By objectifying and commodifying women in all their commercials, Carl’s Jr. succeed in capturing their target audience, and also succeed in degrading the value of women. Women are not meant to be exploited as sexual objects, instead should be used in advertisements with a more positive
purpose.
The documentary Killing Us Softly 4 discusses and examines the role of women in advertisements and the effects of the ads throughout history. The film begins by inspecting a variety of old ads. The speaker, Jean Kilbourne, then discusses and dissects each ad describing the messages of the advertisements and the subliminal meanings they evoke. The commercials from the past and now differ in some respects but they still suggest the same messages. These messages include but are not limited to the following: women are sexual objects, physical appearance is everything, and women are naturally inferior then men. Kilbourne discusses that because individuals are surrounded by media and advertisements everywhere they go, that these messages become real attitudes and mindsets in men and women. Women believe they must achieve a level of beauty similar to models they see in magazines and television commercials. On the other hand, men expect real women to have the same characteristics and look as beautiful as the women pictured in ads. However, even though women may diet and exercise, the reality...
Cornyetz’s approach to the concept of women as meat in My Year of Meats can also be compared to how women and meat are advertised in popular culture. Popular fast-food chain Carl’s Jr. has been promoting their products for years using commercials starring barely clothed women sensually eating their menu items (Davies). In February 2015, their “All-Natural – Too Hot For TV” (Appendix 2) commercial to promote a natural, antibiotic, hormone, and steroid-free burger (Kain). The commercial featured a nude woman sensually saying the
Sex is everywhere is America. In 2010 Kim Kardashian modeled in a commercial for the fast-food chain Hardees. The commercial features Ms. Kardashian on a bed seductively eating a salad while in a silk robe. At the end of the commercial Ms. Kardashian eats the salad in the bathtub because she dropped some dressing on herself while eating in bed. Kim Kardashian is one of the sex symbol of the 21st century, and the Hardees commercial used her status to sell their salad. Kim Kardashian 's Hardees commercial is not unique in it 's philosophy of using sex to sell a product seeing as almost every company, excluding children’s products, uses sex to sell their product. Being a sexually active person is seen as extremely important in main-stream American
Bordo’s essay shows the way that women are constantly being bombarded with commercials. Advertisements portray the idea that you are what society envisions you being, if you don’t make a certain choice regarding to the kinds of food you eat, and the amount of food you eat. They say that if you don’t eat a certain kind of cereal, that you will be fat, or that you look unattractive eating that thick, burger, and instead, you should have some
To sum up, it is often said that advertising is shaping women gender identity, and some have been argued that the statement is true, because of the higher amount of sexual references of women that advertisement show and the damages that occur on women’s personality and the public negative opinions of those women. As well, the negative effects that those kinds of advertisements cause to young generations and make them feel like they should simulate such things and are proud of what they are doing because famous actors are posting their pictures that way. Others deem this case as a personal freedom and absolutely unrelated to shaping women gender identity. On the contrast, they believe that, those sorts of advertisements are seriously teaching women how to stay healthy and be attractive, so they might have self-satisfaction after all.
The objectification of women is a huge issue in society and is often led by advertising. However, many men still believe that the adverts depicting women in a sexual and often passive posture are not very offensive, but rather very funny or sexy. However, how would they feel if it were their daughter or sister being advertised throughout the world as a sexual object? The Tiger Beer advertisement shown in the appendix is a clear example of the objectification of women in advertising. The Tiger Beer advert was made to appeal to men from the age of 20 to 60.
Women are bombarded by images of a thin-ideal body form that is extremely hard, if not impossible, to emulate. Comparing themselves to these women can lead to feelings of inadequacy, depression, and an overall low self-esteem. (Expand on, need a good opening paragraph to grab the reader’s attention)
Curry and Clarke’s article believe in a strategy called “visual literacy” which develops women and men’s roles in advertisements (1983: 365). Advertisements are considered a part of mass media and communications, which influence an audience and impact society as a whole. Audiences quickly begin to rely on messages sent through advertisements and can create ideologies of women and men. These messages not only are extremely persuasive, but they additionally are effective in product consumption in the media (Curry and Clarke 1983:
In today's world, what we see in the media dictates our world. Media, by definition, is a form of mass communication, such as television, newspapers, magazines and the internet. Since the beginning of this media phenomenon, men and women have been treated very differently, whether it be through advertisements or news stories. As women have gained more rights and social freedoms, the media has not changed their views on women. They are often viewed as objects, whether for a man's pleasure, or for as a group to sell only cleaning products to.The portrayal of women in the media has a highly negative impact on the easily shaped young women of today. Women of power are often criticized, others hypersexualized. The media also directs advertisements for household things at women.
Often times, companies use a social group in society and turn them into objects to enhance the impact of their advertisement. A social group that is commonly targeted is women, as they are used to attract both men and their own gender to different products. In Burger King’s ‘Seven Incher’ burger advertisement, American woman are objectified. Burger King is attempting to reel in customers through standard appeals, diction, and images, but in turn is blatantly marginalizing women.
Sexualization and objectification involves taking something and making it out to be an object rather than a living thing, and making it seem like it is a sexual thing when it really isn’t. Everyday, people frown upon women for breastfeeding in public because their breasts are supposedly too “sexual” to show any part of in public. There are also chain restaurants, or “breastaurants” that require waitresses to wear revealing outfits to show off their bodies. However, in other types of establishments, such as bars, strip clubs, or burlesque bars, women are degraded and frowned upon for showing off their bodies. Honestly, the sexualization and objectification of women’s bodies is a problem and needs to stop.
In the essay “Beauty (Re)discovers the Male Body,” author and philosopher Susan Bordo discusses the history and current state of male representation in advertisements. While using her feminist background, Bordo compares and contrasts the aspects of how men and women are portrayed in the public eye. She claims that there has been a paradigm shift the media with the theory that not just women are being objectified in the public eye, but also men too. Since the mid-1970s, with the introduction of Calvin Klein commercials, men have started to become more dehumanized and regarded as sex symbols. In a similar fashion to how Bordo describes gender, race plays a similar role in the media. People of all different ethnicities and cultures are being categorized into an oversimplified and usually unfair image by the media over basic characteristics.
Since the production of newspapers, media has always reported in a manner that grabs the attention of their audience. Through tailoring stories, media has an influence on what people think, how they should act, and who they should be. Media has played a strong role in society through its ability to set an agenda for the public. Considering this, it is no surprise that the portrayal of females through television shows, radio, magazines, and advertisements was enough to brainwash women into satisfaction with the life of a housewife. Women were constantly being assured through magazines that “the kitchen was their realm and that loving food preparation for their families was the way to fulfillment.” Advertisements targeted women, depicting them in the
4) Kilbourne, Jean. Killing Us Softly 3: Advertising’s Image of Women. Dir. Sut Jhally. DVD. Media Education Foundation, 2000.
You can see in the media in almost all occasions women being sexualized. From beer to burger commercials women in the media are portrayed as sexual beings. If they are thin and meet society’s standards of beautiful they are considered marketable. Over the...