Sex Trafficking Thesis

Examining the several statistics specified above, a person soon believe that slavery that was once abolished and deemed as a legal system, has been masked by a newer name, human sex trafficking. The sex trafficking industry is predominantly filled with women and children of color, while the majority of White people are classified as wealthier or the upper class of prominent countries. Domestically, race is an important concept that is often diminished. People of color are often stricken with poverty, diseases, judicial penalties, or death. Human sex trafficking furthers the dehumanization and degrading of people of color. It forces them to subject to slavery like mentalities and not having self-agency. The United States has to start recognizing

racial implications and stereotypes cause numerous of people to become victims of inhumane systems, such as sex trafficking.
The purpose of this essay is to inform Americans about the detrimental effects of sex trafficking and how it negatively affects people to be captivated in this system with little to no help.

Furthermore, this research is to demonstrate how human sex trafficking affects the United States domestically and internationally. Due to the lack of convictions, stipulations, and regulations of traffickers, there needs to be an urgency and foreign policies established to combat the reoccurring of sex trafficking. The United State needs to analyze these statistics and conjure up a plan to progress towards eliminating this modern day slavery. The government should unify with other countries to combat this industry growth financially. The United Nations has several policies and agencies created to fight the productivity of sex trafficking; however, there has not been much implementation of resources that have been established to eliminating human sex trafficking. Through an analysis, this research will provide structured solutions the United States should implement by using the Level of Analysis approach. State, System, and Individual levels are the three concentrations that will guide government officials and the President to eradicate human sex trafficking in the United

States.
Defining Levels of Analysis
To study international relations, there must be a clear understanding of the definition on what the levels of analysis is. Kenneth Waltz developed levels of analysis. In the book, Levels of Analysis: A method for Studying International Relations Theory, it defined Levels of Analysis (LOA):
a method for examining international relations theory based on three different “units of measure,” in purely scientific terms, or “levels.” These levels are—from broad to narrow in scope—system level, state level, and individual level. That is, each theory or set of theories associated with a given level emphasizes the characteristics, conditions, and confines of that particular level in understanding and explaining world events and relations between states” (LOA).

This explanation of LOA provides a well-defined understanding of what this international relations’ theory is about. LOA must include an application of the three levels to fully execute solutions to world issues and crisis. Each level is beneficial to the positive outcomes of resolving disputes.
The system - level of analysis focuses on the relations that occur between states. This level concentrates on the overall international system. System-level depicts the interactions that happen amongst non-state and states to achieve an outcome that is beneficial internationally. This is the broadest perspective out of all three levels because it steps out of one nation’s sole decisions. It involves multiple viewpoints from various countries, which requires cooperation between states to solve conflicts. Depending on what type of approach a nation takes, it will affect the overall decision(s) that happen at the system-level. The primary theory approaches for the system-level is realism and liberalism.
The realist theory focuses on the power that is distributed on the international level forms certain behavior from states (LOA). There are realists that argue there is no legitimate international foundation for states to follow, which leaves states without guidance to be under leadership of international authority. If there is no overarching international authority, states will act in their self - interests and do what is beneficial for their specific country than the international system. Realists have a more pessimistic view than the other theory types. In the LOA book, it explained if there is no international authority set regulations for states, then states will have no stability or international obligations to abide by (LOA). It is ideal for there to be an international environment that urges a goal to achieve global peace and resolve various conflicts; however, the realists’ outlook hinders this occurrence. The LOA book emphasized how realists believe the lack of governmental authority is an anarchy, which eventually forces states to become “self-reliant” (LOA). States will begin to establish relationships and alliances with other states to maintain their independence (LOA).
Regarding the liberals theory approach, they tend to be more optimistic of results with other states. Similar to the realists, liberals do believe that the world is a made of an anarchic structure. However, liberals do believe progression can occur if states cooperate with each other. The LOA book specified, “Liberals base this assumption on the notion even the absence of an overarching government in the international system, a harmony of interests does exist among nations” (LOA). This quote suggests that liberals will agitate cooperation amongst states rather than cause international conflicts. On the system level, liberals will push towards incentives to establish stronger alliances, creating organizations and law to result in effective relations between states (LOA).
In the state-level, there is a focus primarily on the domestic factors of a certain state. Political culture, types of government, public opinions, or types of economies affect the state-level decisions. The decisions stemming from this level specifically focuses on the necessities of that particular state. In the book of LOA, it described two theories that are associated with state-level: political regime and decision-making process (LOA).
Political regime theory is concentrating on the type of impact a nation has on foreign policies (LOA).

Under this theory, a nation that is under a authoritarian regime of democracy, will be more involved in wars or conflicts than forcing democracies on other states. The book emphasized Francis Fukuyuma’s beliefs regarding political regime theory, and he argued, “the political ideals forming the basis of democracies incorporate a great respect for human rights, the value of international law, and the resolution of conflict through negotiation” (LOA). This theory involves the needs of the country by considering all aspects of domestic desires. Democratic countries tend to implement policies in favor of their citizens and what is popular to the

nation.
The decision-making process theory focuses on the “characteristics” of the government itself (LOA). Within the state level, this theory urges political officials and leaders to fulfill establishments for the country. The book gave an example of the influence the United States military-industrial has on companies that manufacture weaponry and hardware for militaries (LOA). It further explained that the military of a particular nation plays a significant role. It provides defense, securing domestic borders, maintain international power, and assists in implementing foreign policies.
Individual-level, the final level of analysis emphasizes the impact individuals have on decisions regarding domestic or international policies. Groupthink, personal experiences, or personality types are included in the individual-level. This level examines that “human nature” aspect to look for reasoning on decisions. Certain people as individuals implement foreign policies in distinctive ways than others. The LOA book specified there are a few approaches under the individual-level, which are needed to fully comprehend the analysis of this level.
In the first approach, there is an emphasis on human nature’s characteristics (LOA). The book specified Thomas Hobbes theories on individualistic behaviors, which he argued are “naturally secure and aggressive” (LOA). Individualistic behavior forms and redefines societies and governments to adapt to human characteristics. While understanding this approach, it is important to correlate human characteristics to the implementation of foreign and domestic policies. One person that is a political leader or president will apply policies in a certain way that adapts their human behavior. Hobbes argued individuals have a pessimistic viewpoint, and they may establish laws or policies in self-interest. One president may have an executive order on one issue, while another president may not discuss that particular issue at all. It depends on preference of the individual for what type of action will occur.
The second approach raises the notion of “single leaders” and “personalities” (Genest). He elaborated that one leader can affect and alter the nation’s actions (Genest). Examples of individualistic personalities affecting a nation’s state, Presidents Barack Obama, George W. Bush, and Abraham Lincoln. These are a few influential United States leaders that have not only effected change on the nation, but they shifted the entire nation through implementation of their policies, laws, and domestic decisions.
The last approach Genest discussed was individuals having an optimistic standpoint on domestic and international relations. Some individuals do spend a substantial amount of time emphasizing the need for domestic and global peace. They implement various foreign policies to initiate peace to diminish conflicts. This approach focuses on establishing “harmonious relations among individuals and states” (Genest). This establishment will limit financial hardships that would go to wars or aiding countries due to disparities from conflicts. Some individuals want to be viewed as a peacemaker, so they can build stable relationships with other countries.
Overall, Waltz three levels of analysis emphasize making decisions regarding international relations. All three levels are necessary for a country to have beneficial results. Each component focuses on certain aspects for a nation, and they fulfill the complete outcomes. These levels of analysis establish an advantageous environment for country’s to be successful in the future.