Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is Patriotism
In many societies, patriotism is a must-have value. It is seen as a quality that everyone tends to have. In politics, when one refers to patriotism, it is meant not to be discussed; referring to patriotism is referring to something good according to common sense. However, History teaches that patriotism can rapidly and easily slip toward nationalism and militarism and become a reason to hate foreigners. In light of this observation, philosophers have studied the moral grounds of patriotism. One can wonder what the object of patriotism is and whether this object is morally acceptable: is it a country whatever that country is standing for? Some will argue that being a patriot is not about questioning your country; it is only following the motto “my country, right or wrong” and blindly loving it; others will say that patriotism should be avoided for this very reason. But a patriot can also favor the welfare of his country by attempting to make it respect moral standards and it seems that to make patriotism morally acceptable, a country has to keep up to certain high moral principles that give a satisfying reason for a patriot to support it, so is the object of patriotism a valuable country? Or is the object of patriotism simply a political ideal? Does the object of patriotism intrinsically entail a moral obligation toward itself? Alasdair MacIntyre (1994) argues for the first option. He looks at patriotism through a communitarian point of view; he considers that patriotism is morally not only acceptable but also central to any moral system. For him, patriotism is legitimate because one must build one’s moral values within a certain community. Others favor a more moderate view of patriotism. It is the case of Stephen Nathanson (1989)... ... middle of paper ... ...ism of Ernest Belfort Bax’, History of European Ideas, 30 (2004), nr. 4, 463–484. MacIntyre, Alasdair, ‘Is Patriotism a Virtue?’, E.H. Lindley Lecture, (University of Kansas, 1984). Nathanson, Stephen, ‘In Defense of “Moderate Patriotism”’, Ethics, 99 (1989), nr. 3, 535–552. —, ‘Is Patriotism Like Racism?’, APA Newsletter on Philosophy and the Black Experience, 91 (1992), nr. 2, 9–12. Primoratz, Igor, ‘Patriotism–Morally allowed, Required, or Valuable?’, Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict: Philosophical Perspectives, ed. by N. Miscevic, (Chicago and LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court Publishing Co., 2000), 101–113. —, ‘Introduction’ to Patriotism, ed. by I. Primoratz (New York: Humanity Books, 2002), 9–23. —, ‘Patriotism: A deflationary View’, The Philosophical Forum, 33 (2002), 443–458. —, ‘Patriotism’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by E. Zalta, (2013).
Working sort of opposite to patriotism is emulation. Emulation works by giving the audience a role model that they idolize, someone containing vast quantities of ethos in their eyes. This is the most positive of the three emotions intended to get the audience up. Inciting anger
Nationalism has been a potent force for change since the development of human civilization. However, opinion about the extent to which nationalism may be appropriately pursued is highly diverse, a factor that has led to immense tragedy and suffering in countless regions worldwide. While it is both appropriate and sometimes encouraged to take pride in being part of a nation, it is of the utmost importance that it is done without harming or subjugating people of another. Uniting a people by force and potentially eliminating or destroying those who may oppose it or not belong to it is unacceptable ethically, morally, and socially.
Patriotism is defines as love and devotion to one's country, usually out of self devotion. Nationalism is an adulterated version of patriotism where aspirations for national independence in a country under foreign domination is forced upon the people by society, or an authoritative figure.
“The Bushmen are primitive and naturally so, but we are primitive in an artificial sense, and by virtue of the utmost effort” (274). This quote written by Erich Maria Remarque in All Quiet on the Western Front calls attention to the division and inhumanity of the masses in the first World War. Ordinary people hated others that were across a non-physical border because they were convinced that they were the enemy. However, Paul argues that the people who the soldiers are killing are not the enemies. The enemies are the people who don’t risk their lives on the battlefield yet think they can make decisions about a war where thousands are brutally killed everyday. The concept of nationalism is a prime example of the values and misconceptions of European people at the start of the 20th century.
“Nationalism(n.) - loyalty or devotion to a nation, especially an attitude, feeling, or belief characterize by a sense of national consciousness” (The War of 1812 and the Rise of Nationalism 1). Nationalism was a crucial part of America’s success during the War of 1812; nationalism was reflected in the post-war period through increased national pride, emphasis on national issues, increase in power and scope of the national government, and a growing sense of American identity (The War of 1812 and the Rise of Nationalism 1). The first to arise which was the driving force behind American victories against the British was nationalism. This nationalism was expressed in four ways; patriotism, political, economical and cultural. American patriotism
For example, Mark Twain expressed his hatred by stating, “A patriot sets himself apart in his own country under his own flag, sneers at other nations and keeps an army of uniformed assassins on hand at heavy expense to grab slices of other people’s countries and keep them from grabbing slices of his. In the intervals between campaigns he washes the blood off his hands and works for ‘the universal brotherhood of man’ with his mouth.” Twain makes many valid points by bring up how patriotism encourages hatred and distrust for other countries, promoting war by having an army of assassins, and washing away wrongful violations within the country. Numerous Americans have shown similar controversy in regards to whether they should support patriotism. Despite the fact that patriotism can bring social culture and bonding together, it can ultimately become destructive and does more harm than
Simon Keller argues in his essay "Patriotism as Bad Faith" that patriotism is not a virtue but it is actually a vice. Keller begins by splitting the views on this philosophical debate into three different representations. The first being the "communitarian patriot", where patriotism is not only a valued virtue to someone's self but that it is actually an essential virtue. The second representation is a radical contradiction of the first, known as the "hard universalist. The hard Universalist sees patriotism as a vice instead of being any type of positive virtue. They think that everyone should be valued the same, and that there should be no favoritism. The third representation is the idea of the first two combined, to form what is called the "soft universalist." This view is understood as patriotism is allowed, and is not seen as a vice, but also that one has an obligation to the rest of the world, almost to try and treat them as a loyalty that you would have towards your own country. (p.112).
Throughout the years, humans have constructed many unique civilizations; all which follow a distinct social, economic, and political structure. Even so, there is one characteristic that prevails among these societies, the concept of nationalism. In short, nationalism refers to the feelings people have when identifying with their nation. This simple notion possesses the ability to divide or unite collective groups, and has played an important role in many historical events.
In times of war, such as these, the importance for everyone to know where they stand on the idea of patriotism so they can voice or enact their opinion to the government and the people around them in a more clear and fair fashion is multiplied. The idea of patriotism can often be an obscure one, and during times of heightened security patriotism is a more spoken upon subject. Discussing the many different views of what patriotism means is a key step in better defining patriotism for all people. Barbara Kingsolver says in her article, “My patriotic duty is to recapture my flag from the men now waving it in the name of jingoism and censorship” (Pg. 2). What she means by this is that the idea of patriotism is being morphed into something it is not. She believes patriotism should encourage free speech and criticism of our leaders in times of difficult decisions. Instead, what is happening is patriotism is suggesting more fascist ideals than democratic ideals. Barbara believes her duty is to recapture the true meaning of patriotism and let everyone know what that meaning is. She wants everyone to feel open towards voicing t...
Nationalism has a long history although most scholarly research on Nationalism only began in the mid-twentieth century. Some scholars point to the French Revolution of 1789 as the birth of Nationalism. The French Revolution is seen...
Nationalism has played a crucial role in world history over the past centuries. It continues to do so today. For many, nationalism is indelibly associated with some of the worst aspects of modern history, such as the destructive confidence of the Napoleon’s army and the murderous pride of Nazi Germany. Large numbers of people, descent in their hearts, have carried out unbelievable atrocities for no better reason than their nation required them to. Authoritarian and totalitarian regime have crushed dissent, eliminated opposition, and trampled on civil liberties in the name of the nation.
In the turbulent political cycle of 2016, it has become apparent that many people have replaced their Patriotism with Nationalism. Patriotism is doing what is best for your country regardless of the consequences to yourself; Nationalism is doing what is best for your country regardless of the consequences to others. Nationalism was largely the mindset of the Nazis, and it has now become the mindset of many of the American people. Nationalism is a dangerous mindset that must be stopped quickly, lest it become a permanent stain upon the American legacy.
"Blind Patriotism Is Rampant,” by Ron Sparks, explains what blind patriotism is and how it divides us Americans, we choose our own definition of patriotism, and this is what hurts us, we are all wrong, because everyone has their own answer. This divide of right and wrong is what hurts patriots and people, being patriot nowadays have been split into the political parties, "Patriotism Is Alive and Well—If We Let It,” even addresses “Political Views Should Not Be a Factor in Patriotism“ and this is true, the divide had been created because of political views, we have people in America who are anarchists that want to destroy America because they are not in favor of patriotism and American ideals, while we have the far left who want to stray away from patriotism as its arrogant, even the far right use patriotism to blackmail people into groups. Patriotism should not make people hate each other it should be used to get people together to show why we Americans are the best at what we do, hating each other because we do not like each others views does not solve anything, the problems it causes is a bigger divide in us
Nationalism is the idea that a people who have much in common, such as language, culture and geographic proximity ought to organize in such a way that it creates a stable and enduring state. Nationalism is tied to patriotism, and it is the driving force behind the identity of a culture. Nationalism had many effects in Europe from 1815, The Congress of Vienna and beyond. In the following essay I will describe many of the consequences of nationalism on European identity, as well as some of the conflicts that it created.