Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Serving in florida by barbara enrenreich critique
Serving in florida by barbara enrenreich critique
Serving in florida by barbara enrenreich critique
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Serving in florida by barbara enrenreich critique
Work. How many different ways can there be to write about work? Well, the author of "Serving in Florida", Barbara Ehrenreich, lives a privileged lifestyle which gives her the option to leave her low income job allowing her to be more critical and judgmental of low income jobs in comparison to Lars Eighner, the author of "On Dumpster Diving", who is trapped, being homeless, so he is more accepting of people who have low income jobs, or no jobs at all. Although, there are many similarities between these two pieces, the author's background plays a large role in their writing style and opinions of similar topics.
Throughout her chapter, Ehrenreich maintains a degrading tone on low income workers. She explains how "Work is what you do for others."
…show more content…
Therefore, suggesting that people who work low income jobs have no self-confidence, and just work for others, not for themselves. Also, one of the first sentences of her chapter, "Serving in Florida" says, "Only here every bite must be paid for, in human discomfort." When she uses the word "here", she is referring to the diner that she is working at, as an experiment, where she makes minimum wage. Throughout Lars Eighner's essay, "On Dumpster Diving", he maintains a passionate tone. He is very adamant about the fact that people who work low income jobs, or have no job at all, do have skills other than just working for others. "I think of scavenging as a modern form of self-reliance." In this particular quote, he is suggesting that people who have to dumpster dive are self-reliant and do not need the help of others, as Ehrenreich suggests in "Serving in Florida". In addition to tone, Ehrenreich and Eighner both address their similar audiences in different ways, depending on their background.
For instance, Ehrenreich's indirect audience is the higher class of people, and Eighner's audience is the people who look down on dumpster divers, which is more than likely to be the higher class people who Ehrenreich addresses in her essay. However, although Ehrenreich and Eighner both have the same audience, Ehrenreich is more judgmental of her subject, people who work low income jobs, than Eighner is. Ehrenreich states, "He accepts my resignation with a shrug..." She states this when she is reflecting on the moment that she resigned from the diner where she was working. In this particular passage, she seems very judgmental of the boss of the diner where she worked, almost as if suggesting that people quit constantly. Therefore, in one way or another, saying that low income workers can't commit. In comparison to Ehrenreich, Eighner is more informing of his audience when it comes to people who don't necessarily make enough to live off of. In one paragraph, he states, "After all, the finding of objects is becoming something of an urban art." Because Eighner has experienced the lifestyle of low income workers, he is more appreciative of the skills they have, leading him to be more accepting of their lifestyle. Eighner uses this passage to inform his audience of the skills that 'dumpster divers' have. The way that both writers address their …show more content…
audience is directly connected with the background that they came from. Ehrenreich was more judgmental because she has a privileged background, and Eighner was more informational because he had to live the lifestyle he is describing, he couldn't leave. Both Ehrenreich and Eighner also appeal to logos and ethos while providing their opinion and experience in low-income jobs.
Ehrenreich is a privileged author, who didn't need to work a low-income job to live. Therefore, she uses very advanced and distinguished language when explaining her ideas, advanced and distinguished language that is critical and condescending. "The regulation poster in the single unisex rest room admonishes us to wash our hands thoroughly, and even offers instructions for doing so, but there is always some vital substance missing..." The manner that Ehrenreich uses "admonishes" in this sentence is very condescending. However, it seems condescending to her because she grew up with money and now leads a privileged lifestyle. Eighner is more accepting of people because he had to live the lifestyle that Ehrenreich was just experimenting with. Eighner was forced to live the impoverished lifestyle, he was homeless. Therefore, Eighner uses more accepting and optimistic language compared to Ehrenreich. "I live from the refuse of others. I am a scavenger. I think it a sound and honorable niche..." The manner that Eighner uses in saying, "a sound and honorable niche" he is very accepting of the people who scavenge, like he does himself. He is more accepting in this manner because he was homeless for three years. The different languages that they use is their appeal to logos and the reason they use those languages is the appeal to ethos. The languages that the
two writers use is a result of their background, and their lifestyle. Although both authors have very similar styles at times, styles of tone, appeals to ethos and logos, and addressing their audiences, the way in which they use those styles is vastly different. Ehrenreich uses her style to be condescending, and Eighner uses his to be more optimistic, and accepting. With similar topics, and very similar audiences, they both have completely different viewpoints and thoughts on how to portray it.
She blames capitalism for the injustices of the world, slightly more than easy bad management techniques. A company should be shown that would benefit from a union and it will be shown to all around that one that will promote even better from decent, gentle management decisions. Most irritating, she’s constantly negative about the whole lot, even the positive experiences she has. When one of her colleagues offers to allow her move in with her and her family, not only does Ehrenreich turn the proposal down, but she still describes it sneeringly as a "touched by an angel moment." Does she have to dribble with irony when writing about an authentic type deed?
For example, She notes that “ One of the women explains to me that teams do not necessary return to the same houses week after week, nor do you have any guarantee of being on the same team from one day to the next.” What this quote means is it explains the way the company tries to prevent the groups from making social contact. I can relate to Ehrenreich’s argument because while I was working at Jewel as a bagger. I had similar routines and experienced some of the ways that the system tried to work my body more than my mind. For example, while working there I was ordered to do many tasks to keep me busy and from interacting and making friendships with fellow employees. If this was allowed then we would be able to talk about how unfair our job is and how we are treated. The author tries to argue that her job keeps her mind busy and she won't be able to have time to think or react., in other words, this blue collar job is
In 102 Minutes, Chapter 7, authors Dwyer and Flynn use ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the readers’ consciences, minds and hearts regarding what happened to the people inside the Twin Towers on 9/11. Of particular interest are the following uses of the three appeals.
Ehrenreich’s use of statistical information also proves to her audience that she in fact has done her research on this topic. She admits that poverty is a social topic that she frequently talks about. She researched that in 1998 the National Coalition for the Homeless reported that nationwide on average it would take about a wage of $8.89 to afford a one bedroom apartment and that the odds of common welfare recipients landing a job that pays such a “living wage” were about 97 to 1. Ehrenreich experiences this statistic in first person when she set out job hunting in Key West, Florida when she applied to 20 different jobs, ranging from wait tables to housekeeping, and of those applications, zero were responded to.
It is safe to say that work comes in many different forms. Whether it be a fast food or a corporate, the people that surround an individual make a great impact on the way he or she may work. Singapore, by Mary Oliver, is about a young woman working as a custodian in an airport who although works alone, enjoys her work and the people she meets. Dorianne Laux’s What I Wouldn’t Do, introduces another young woman reviewing the jobs she has had throughout time and reflects on those that she liked and disliked. Hard Work, by Stephen Dunn, exemplifies a young boy working in a soda factory during his summer break. Searching for happiness in life and work is just what these individuals are doing.
The biggest appeal that Ehrenreich makes is after she ends up walking out of the housekeeping job/waitress job because she cannot handle it anymore." I have failed I don't cry, but I am in a position to realize, for the first time in many years, that the tear ducts are still there and still capable of doing their job." (Ehrenreich, 48) This is the biggest appeal because Ehrenreich is quitting on the whole project. She is basically telling the readers that it is impossible for her, a "well-off", woman to live the life of a low wage worker.
Ehrenreich’s “biting humor” gives off the sense of her stereotypical views, bluntly stating her biased opinions. Some of these views are understandable, and sometimes even excusable, considering her background of high education and/or lack of personal experience that is like majority of the people she encounters throughout her journey. However, there are points in which her wisecracks go too far. During her time in Florida, there is a point when four of her tables fill up at once. When a customer from a table of British tourists complains, she states, “Princess Di refuses to eat her chicken strips with her pancake and sausage special since, as she now reveals, the strips were meant to be an appetizer.” (p. 47). She also refers to another table of customers as “yuppies” (p. 47). When making these stereotypical judgments of people, she puts herself on a pedestal, almost as if she disregards the fact that she may fall under the same category of those whom she is making the comments about. When she references the food at the location of second job she takes in Florida, she begins describing it with: “Picture a fat person’s hell, and I don’t mean a place with no food.” (p. 29)....
We all know that most people hate their jobs. Work is seen as something we have to do, and very lucky few seem to find a job that we enjoy. How we feel about work, and what we do for a living, in many ways helps to define who we are and who we are going to become. Having seen actual people share their perspectives and view points on “working for a living” helps us see ourselves and rethink our future. Overall, Studs Terkel helps flash- back into America's history and see the changes that America ans it’s people have gone through.
She sets out to explore the world that welfare mothers are entered. The point was not so much to become poor as to get a sense of the spectrum of low-wage work that existed-from waitressing to housekeeping. She felt mistreated when it was announced that there has been a report on “drug activity”, as a result, the new employees will be required to be tested, as will the current employees on a random basis. She explained feeling mistreated, “I haven 't been treated this way-lined up in the corridor, threatened with locker searches, peppered with carelessly aimed accusations-since junior high school” (Ehrenreich,286). The other problem is that this job shows no sign of being financially viable. Ehrenreich states that there is no secret economies that nourish the poor, “If you can 't put up the two months’ rent you need to secure an apartment, you end up paying through the nose for a room by the week” (286). On the first day of housekeeping, she is yelled and given nineteen rooms to clean. For four hours without a break she striped and remake the beds. At the end of the experience she explained that she couldn 't hold two jobs and couldn 't make enough money to live on with one as where single mothers with children. She has clarified that she has advantages compare to the long-term
Curry touches on how labors tried to push for workers to work less and declares, “For more than a century, a key struggle for the labor movement was reducing the amount of time workers had to spend on the job” (15). It is an obvious fact that people work very long hours and there has been several pushes to reduce these hours, while at the same time increase hourly pay, but many of these attempts have failed. Ehrenreich goes into detail about how there are no breaks at one of her jobs and writes, “The break room summarizes the whole situation: there is none, because there are no breaks at Jerry’s. For six to eight hours in a row, you never sit except to pee” (21). Ehrenreich is forced to work these hours due to financial issues and is not even allotted any breaks. These long hours would be easier to do if a break was added in between, but the idea of breaks are just imagination. Curry’s argument that workers have too many hours is backed up with the fact that Ehrenreich works numerous hours, while at the same time getting paid with bare minumum wages Working long hours have become a norm of society, though there have been movements to push for the shortage of hours, it is a battle that is slowly being
The juxtaposed contrasts that she often uses are seen explicitly in anecdotes or implicitly in conscious thoughts. Such contrasts first appear in the first paragraph. Even before Ehrenreich makes any substantial effort to join the poor working class, she is hit with this sudden unease of being recognized. At that time, it is clear that she has not relinquished her middle class status since she feels ashamed of being identified as a poor worker. In the world that the author originally belongs to, name and reputation are considered important to one’s standing in society yet in the working class realm, as Ehrenreich later finds out, one is often “unnoticed” and names are “unuttered.” Not only are names forgotten but one’s ability and education are also ignored when looking for jobs. Oblivious to the “rule” for hiring for unskilled jobs, Ehrenreich initially worries about her over-qualification but only to be shocked when she realizes the employers are not even interested. Whereas jobs for the middle class often demand higher education and past accomplishments, jobs for the low-wage workforce are simply depended simply on luck or as Ehrenreich claims “ being in the right place at the right time.” One can convey this as part of a corporate scheme to ensure the
During the middle of the book, Ehrenreich writes, "Maybe, it occurs to me, that I 'm getting a tiny glimpse of what it would be like to be black (p. 100)." I found this interesting because African Americans continuously face inequality due to race, which correlates with the inequalities that lower classes in society face. Throughout Nickel and Dimed, Ehrenreich emphasizes that there are "hidden costs" to being poor, which includes those in poverty who cannot find a way out. The working poor, who Ehrenreich gets to know through work, live in hotels paying daily. These people in the book describe to Ehrenreich that that would rent an apartment, but they cannot afford the security deposit and starting costs. The working poor in the book also must buy unhealthy meals at fast-food restaurants because they cannot afford kitchen appliances or food to cook with. People suffering in poverty often believe they are stuck there and cannot get out, so they
Pollan’s article provides a solid base to the conversation, defining what to do in order to eat healthy. Holding this concept of eating healthy, Joe Pinsker in “Why So Many Rich Kids Come to Enjoy the Taste of Healthier Foods” enters into the conversation and questions the connection of difference in families’ income and how healthy children eat (129-132). He argues that how much families earn largely affect how healthy children eat — income is one of the most important factors preventing people from eating healthy (129-132). In his article, Pinsker utilizes a study done by Caitlin Daniel to illustrate that level of income does affect children’s diet (130). In Daniel’s research, among 75 Boston-area parents, those rich families value children’s healthy diet more than food wasted when children refused to accept those healthier but
In this book, Ehrenreich tries to work in three different places to see what it is like to work as a minimum wage worker. Ehrenreich worked as a server in Florida, housekeeper in Miami, and sales person in Minnesota, and still she didn’t make enough money to live comfortable. As she says, “Something is wrong, very wrong, when a single person in good health, a person who in addition possesses a working car, can barely support herself by the sweat of her brow. You don’t need a degree in economics to see that wages are too low and rent too high”(Ehrereich’s 199). She notices how hard it is for poor people to try to survive when they have to work with a minimum
The poem, “What Work Is” by Philip Levine is an intricate and thought-provoking selection. Levine uses a slightly confusing method of describing what work actually is. He gives the idea that work is very tedious, however necessary. It is miserable, however, it is a sacrifice that is essentially made by many, if not all able-bodied members of society. Many have to sacrifice going to a concert or a movie, but instead works jobs with hardly a manageable salary. This poem seems to have a focus on members of the lower-class or middle-class who live paycheck to paycheck and are unable to put money away for a future for their children or for a vacation and how difficult life can be made to be while living under this type of circumstance. Levine