Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Court cases quizlet
1.) List the sequence of events in a typical trial.
Typically, before trial occurs the pretrial process takes place. During the pretrial process a defendant is arrested on probable cause and makes their first appearance in court. Following the first appearance an arraignment is set within thirty-three days. Pre-trial motions are brought before a judge in order to discuss what evidence and information should be used at trial. Before going to trial defendants or prosecutors have the opportunity to make plea bargains in an effort to overt going to trial. Once all pretrial duties are done, then the trial process occurs. The first step in going to trial is “voir dire”, selecting individuals for a jury through questioning. Both the prosecutor and defense attorneys are given a certain number of strikes during the jury selection. Once a jury is completely selected the actual trial process beings with opening statements begins. Any evidence that wants to be used during the trial is present by the plaintiff “case-in-chief”. Witnesses are questioned and cross examined once questioning is done closing arguments are made trying to persuade the jury to
…show more content…
favor their side. The jury is then instructed on the law once informed of the jury then proceeds to the deliberation room to review the information presented during the trial in order to reach a verdict. The verdict is then read to the judge and the defendant and the judge makes the final decision. 2.) How much proof is necessary for a criminal trial? How is this different from the amount of proof necessary in a civil trial? Our legal system is created from two different types of cases civil and criminal.
In order to have a criminal trial there has to be proof beyond a reasonable doubt. In civil cases proof is needed but at a lower standard “preponderance of evidence”. Typically a judge decides civil cases, but for some instances a jury is allowed, as for criminal cases there is almost always a trial by jury. Because criminal trials can result in jail time it is important to make sure that the situation is proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Civil trials can result in a defendant receiving monetary damages. With criminal cases defendants are entitled to have an attorney and if that individual cannot afford an attorney one is given to them. Civil cases do not require an attorney unless the defendant would like to pay for one or represent their
self. 3.) What is the difference between a jury trial and a bench trial? During a jury trial the jury is simply individual on the jury making a decision on whether or not a defendant is guilty or not guilty. With a jury trial the jury is selected during the process of “voir dire”, once selected the process of the trial takes place. Once all information is expressed to the jury the jury then proceeds to the deliberation room to agree upon a sentencing. A bench trial is a trial that is decided by a judge and a judge only. In this type of trial there is no process of picking a jury, because a jury is not needed. The Judge is the finder of facts and the official decision maker.
This stage is an examination of potential jurors to ensure a fair trial for the defendant. Ideally, voir dire will result in an impartial jury for the trial of the accused. On March 4, 2004 jury selection began for the trial of Scott Peterson. Nearly 100 potential jurors began answering questionnaires about their views on the death penalty and their opinions on extramarital affairs. The nearly 30-page questionnaire given to prospective jurors also included questions as whether they read Field and Stream, what stickers grace their car bumpers and whether they have lost a child. On April 14, 2004 Judge Alfred A. Delucchi dismissed an unidentified Redwood City woman after a brief meeting in his chambers. Defense attorney Mark Geragos two weeks early had accused the retired secretary of bragging to her friends on a bus trip to Reno, Nevada, that she has "passed the test" to get on Peterson's jury and that Peterson was "guilty as hell" and would "get what's due him." May 28, 2004 six men and six women were selected for Scott Peterson's murder trial all said they would be willing to sentence him to death if they convict him of killing his wife and the couple's fetus.
In the film, A Civil Action, Trial Procedure was shown throughout the entire movie. There are many steps that need to be completed before a verdict and judgment can be reached. These steps are the pleadings, methods of discovery, pretrial hearings, jury selection, opening statements, introduction of evidence, cross examinations, closing arguments, instructions to the jury, and the verdict and judgment. The case in this movie was actually called Anderson v. Cryovac. The plaintiffs are the Anderson family, the Gamache family, the Kane family, the Robbins family, the Toomey family, and the Zona family. The plaintiffs’ attorneys are Jan Schlichtmann, Joe Mulligan, Anthony Roisman, Charlie Nesson, and Kevin Conway. The two co- defendants are W.R. Grace and Beatrice Foods. The two co-defendants’ attorneys are William Cheeseman, Jerome Facher, Neil Jacobs, and Michael Keating.
After this happens, both sides of the trial select which jurors they want to represent their side with the hopes that their picks will help win the case. Voir dire occurred towards the beginning of the movie. About fifty jurors were selected to appear at the questioning but only twelve were selected to participate in the trial. The prosecuting side wanted jurors who were against gun violence, had families, and had lost a family member. The defense wanted jurors who believed in the second amendment and were all for guns. Before the questioning of the potential jurors, both sides did research on them all in order to see if they fit the criteria of what they were looking
This chapter is mainly devoted to the jury selection process and how it is taken care
Now that we have discussed the pretrial occurrences, we get into the trial portion of the court process. This is the portion of the process in which both the defense and the prosecution present their cases to the jury, the judge, and the rest of the courtroom. To select a jury, the bring in potential jurors and ask them questions,
People are represented in court by two kinds of lawyers, court-appointed lawyers and public defenders, which mean "hired lawyers" (Green, 2001). People that have higher income can hire their own lawyers. The lower and middle-income people are mainly the ones who rely on court appointed lawyers. These people don't have the money to hire a lawyer. Court appointed lawyers are not working in your best interest for many reasons.
A study found that public defenders have an “average sentence … [that] was almost three years longer than the average for clients of private lawyers” (Hoffman). In addition, the same study found that most criminal defendants are “marginally indigent,” or afford to hire a private lawyer with their friends and family pitching in to pay the costs (Hoffman). As a result, the accused opt for hiring a private lawyer to represent them in court. This doesn’t mean that a private lawyer could secure a win for the defendant, with more time and resources dedicated, a stronger argument could be made to prove the defendant’s
The criminal trial process is able to reflect the moral and ethical standards of society to a great extent. For the law to be effective, the criminal trial process must reflect what is accepted by society to be a breach of moral and ethical conduct and the extent to which protections are granted to the victims, the offenders and the community. For these reasons, the criminal trial process is effectively able to achieve this in the areas of the adversary system, the system of appeals, legal aid and the jury system.
The grand jury is not like the preliminary hearing, it is private and only the approved people are allowed in. The people who are allowed in for the grand jury is the prosecution, the witness who will testify against the offender, and the court reporter, besides the judge and offender. Once the witness(es) have testified, all evidence has been presented by the prosecution, and the prosecution has given the reasons why the case should go to trial, the jurors are then presented with a formal indictment letter from the courts for an examination. Then everyone inside the hearing must leave the room so the jurors can deliberate. The only way for the case to go to trial is that there must be at least 12 jurors in agreement to indict and then they will sign a true bill along with a formal indictment. Afterwards, the true bill and the indictment is given to the judge and the granted to set up more court proceedings that are
Trial by Jury and Alternatives to It In order to decide whether or not trial by jury should or should not
Long-drawn out trials that go on for years cause psychological stress, tension in the family of those involved in the case, and these trials make a huge dent in the money supply of the court system in the government. Each day members of the jury have to be accounted for and must receive money for their services. Using a judge is both cost-effective and smart. Additionally, judges usually don’t take as long to make decisions in court as they are both efficient in what they do and are well-informed of the subject, the particular person on trial, and they have the know-how to execute the correct sentence. “In 2010, 2,352 federal criminal defendants had a jury trial and 88% of these criminal jury trials ended in a conviction.” (Document A) Now on the one hand some...
In the United States, a trial involves an essential division of labor between a judge and jury. The judge is the determiner of the law and the jurors are the sole judge of the facts presented in
The courts have the function of giving the public a chance to present themselves whether to prosecute or defend themselves if any disputes against them rise. It is known to everyone that a court is a place where disputes can be settled while using the right and proper procedures. In the Criminal court is the luxury of going through a tedious process of breaking a law. Once you have been arrested and have to go to court because of the arrest, you now have a criminal case appointed against you. The court is also the place where a just, fair and unbiased trial can be heard so that it would not cause any disadvantage to either of the party involved in the dispute. The parties are given a chance to represent themselves or to choose to have a legal representative, which is mostly preferred by many.
Criminal and Civil Law – Criminal law is the law through which public commitment of crimes are prosecuted by governing bodies, whereas civil law is the law through which private parties may bring lawsuits against one another for real or imagined wrongdoings. E.g. criminal law would deal with the prosecution of a crime such as one person hitting another with their car, and civil law would deal with the lawsuit, as the person hit would sue the driver of the car for monetary compensation.
be the stage in the process where the defendant has his or her day in