Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The problem of gun control
Benefits of the 2nd amendment
The problem of gun control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The problem of gun control
The second amendment is a great help though. Remember the military will probably be extremely split on this. (Sorry if I'm remembering any of the following information incorrectly but it should be accurate) Bush conducted polls in the mid 2000s within the military finding that around 20% of the military would carry out orders to fire on US civilians. We can assume and flip this number around if we want to be cynical leaving 80% of the US military to be against us if we wish. Now personally seeing how the National Guard operates its likely that many of them would support the theoretical resistance making it a somewhat more even fight. It's important to note that with the second amendment even if you don't want to train civilians (which truthfully many of the gun owners you wouldn't need to teach much other than basic phrases and things such as the NATO phonetic alphabet) the sheer amount of guns and ammo they have would ensure no supply shortages in terms of those items. …show more content…
Making extremely rough estimates from the active personnel the government forces would instantaneously have 1.025 million troops and assuming a 65/35 split with the reserves in favor of the resistance (pure speculation but reasoning being here 35 real hardcore Trump supporters the rest reaching their breaking point, though it would probably be safe to make it more 75/25 or even up to 85/15) the total mobilized force of the government would/could total about 1.155 million troops while the resistance would be left with (assuming all states join in) 936,000 troops (From active duty: 256,000 From reserves: 240,000 From Air and Army guard:
Imagine having to partake in a war. What would you do? What do you think will happen? In
...o stress on Southern citizens, it would be a waste of money and time. The troops could spend this time training, instead of wasting it. The money that would need to be spent to feed, house, and cloth them would be huge, and the nation needed to devote all of its money to helping the south get back on its feet, not by paying soldiers to stand around.
The debate at hand is due to an apparent opposition to the rights granted by the second amendment to the United States Constitution. This amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Being as the article was ratified in 1791, the language used is far different than that which is commonly used today. For this reason, the amendment itself is a source of debate between those with liberal and conservative points of view. For those who take a libe...
Not only will it be expensive, but it will be time consuming. The average gun safety class offered by the National Rifle Association is “six hours long, with 11 students, and costs $130” (Yamane 5). Using President Trump’s data-less statistic, let’s say that 10% of teachers in a particular district are eligible to receive gun safety training. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, on average, “there are 254 teachers in a district in Texas” (NCES). Rounding down, that means that 25 teachers in a district would receive the training. About $3250 of money would be spent on gun safety. That is money that could be used in other ways. Another aspect of gun safety training is the time commitment. As stated above, the typical gun safety course is six hours long. Personally, I would not be comfortable with only six hours of gun safety. I do not think that six hours is enough time to train teachers how to defend
On December 15, 1791, the Bill of Rights was ratified effective by Congress. These first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America promised the states certain rights and freedoms which could not be infringed by the government. After all, the founding fathers knew from experience that men in their weakness were often tempted by power. They had become all too familiar with this when under the control of King George in England. Therefore, in order to protect the future people of their beautiful country, they promised certain liberties which could not be taken away. Every single one of these freedoms is important for the United States of America. However, the second amendment is especially important to our nation because it allows the people to protect their freedom and defend themselves and the common good against an overreaching government.
The Second Amendment states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This statement basically means that people should be able to own guns for their own security and that right should not be taken away. The Second Amendment was added to the Constitution because the creators of the Constitution wanted to make sure that it protected basic rights, including the right to bear arms. It was also added to the Constitution because shortly after it was ratified, James Madison wanted to give more power to the state militia and to give more power to the people to give them the ability to fight back against the Federalists and the tyrannical government they were creating. After fighting off the British, the Second Amendment was created to give citizens the opportunity to fight back against controlling government and protect themselves with their own weapons.
The second amendment grants all Americans the right to bear arms. The ability to hold a firearm at any time as long as the firearm is registered. In the United states, all it takes to hold a firearm is a background check and a safety class. In a short reading from the “American Now” book a short article By Christina Tenuta called Responsible gun ownership saves lives she asks “do Americans really need guns?”, but are the guns really the problem? Although the second amendment requires some decent documents , the qualifications to obtain a firearm needs to be revised to a mental check, a family history check , and also to make it a priority for reinforcement to check on the registered firearm every six to twelve months.
Throughout the years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in favor of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be reduced and thus save lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals’ access to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law; these citizens make up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument. These people argue that the law was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to guarantee citizens free access to firearms. One major group that is in strong opposition of stricter gun control laws is the National Rifle Association (NRA). The NRA argues that having stricter gun control laws will only hinder law-abiding citizens. The final outcome on this debate will mainly depend on how this Amendment is going to be interpreted.
In “Vulnerable Schools Need Protection: Guns, Training For Teachers may be the answer”, published in a 2008 edition of the Chicago Tribune, David McGrath argues that some teachers should be allowed to carry a concealed weapon for protection. First, McGrath states that if a random psychotic gunman were searching for someplace to attack, his classroom would make an easy target. He feels that if he was trained and armed, his class would not be trapped without a chance of survival because he would be able to defend against the gunman. Sec...
America is the most well-armed nation in the world, with American citizens owning about 270 million of the world’s 875 million firearms (Marshall). Indeed, this is more than a quarter of the world’s registered firearms. The reason why Americans own so many guns is because of the Second Amendment, which states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (Rauch) This amendment guarantees U.S. citizens the right to have firearms. Since this amendment is relatively vague, it is up for interpretation, and is often used by gun advocates to argue for lenient gun laws.
Wars and military battles are always viewed as violent and power hungry things. We never fully grasp the politics of most wars and understand what is going on behind the scenes. Troops in the Middle East are a present day, debatable issue. Most Americans question whether or not they are there for good or for evil. Social aspects of our military also come in place with the current event refugee problem. About half of the United States fears that if we let foreigners in we might also be letting ISIS in. ISIS (Islamic State of Iran and Syria) is an extreme terrorist group that seeks to eliminate America and all of our allies through bombings and attacks. Many people do not know that the military takes up 53.71% which is $598.49 billion tax payer’s dollars. There are great pros and cons of the armed forces. They ensure our safety but also force us to cut down in education spending but increase the spending of our army. Recruitment is more ensuring present day than it was in the past. The military welcomes all patriots that would put their life on the line for their country and their people. Considering there are five different departments in the service, it is easier to
The National Rifle Association (NRA), recognized today as a major political force and as America's foremost defender of the Second Amendment, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a Free State the Right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” The NRA adheres to the belief that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of individuals to bear arms. Recent U.S. Supreme Court cases have confirmed those beliefs. In spite of whether one personally adheres to these interpretations of the amendment or not, the fact is there are over two hundred million guns in this country. Moreover, there are over seventy-five million firearm owners. In addition to the NRA’s political activity for second amendment rights, it has fulfilled a service, as since its inception, it had been the premier firearms education organization in the world by providing firearms safety and training.
Americans, for fear of their lives from the evil Arab, or the manic ethnic minority (as influenced by shows like cops and world’s scariest police chases) will arm themselves to the teeth and even join the army to fight overseas for what they are brainwashed to believe is liberation.
Another argument is that police kill 330 innocent people every year. These are skilled and trained individuals with handguns. So you can imagine the assumptions made for citizens who have no adequate training. It is your responsibility to get this training. Here are some courses that are offered to help you have adequate training. You can take a hunters safety course. The NRA offers safety and training courses. Some junior colleges offer handgun training. You can also learn about it in the military. Most states will not allow licensing of a handgun without one of the courses.
The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution consists of "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The function of The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution allows the general population to keep and remain the right to bear weapons. Many argue if this amendment is still relevant in the 21st century? . The major reason for issuing this amendment was to allow, "The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms (2nd amendment) is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." -Thomas Jefferson. However this amendment was issued a long time ago as in created and adopted