Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Cons of seatbelt laws
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Cons of seatbelt laws
IIn 1978, a seatbelt law began in Tennessee for infants and young children. By the middle of 1985, all 50 states and the District of Columbia had enacted any child restraint using seat belts, and then New York extended this law for other ages. The law starts requiring all front seats to use safety belts on December 1987 (Williams & Lund, p. 1438). According to 625 ILC 5/12-603.1, driver and passengers are required to use safety belt (Public). The penalty from this law, depending on the states such as New York’s fine is 50 USD and 25 USD for Illinois states. Does the safety belt help save people’s life? Absolutely, using the safety belt is an option to save a driver and passengers life from any accidents but should it be a law? Should people obligate to pay fines if they don’t want to use a safety belt? According to Human rights, people should hold their freedom to choose, if they want to use the safety belt or not on liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Furthermore, police officers can save their time to do other duties instead of enforcing the seat belt law. Human rights are equal rights of human that held by all people (Rodger). The human rights include liberty, the pursuit of happiness, right to own property, and right to life (Friedman). According to seat belt law, this law infringes the human rights by force the people to use seatbelts. If people ignored, it cause of penalty. The normally, people should retain their freedom to decide their own safety and do with their happiness without harm or infringe on each other. Right to own property, the people should have right to use their own properties in any way that they would like and fit for them, also without harm to each other or infringe in rights. For example, when a perso... ... middle of paper ... ...ica. Farmington Hills: Thomson Corporation. Psychology of Poverty And Its Impact On Mental Health. (n.d.). Retrieved May 05, 2014, from Best MSW Program: http://www.bestmswprograms.com Public Act 093-0099. (2003, July 03). Retrieved 05 01, 2014, from Illinois General Assembly: http://www.ilga.gov/ Robertson, L. S. (2002, December). Bias in estimate of seat belt effectiveness. Injury Prevention, 263. Rodger, E. (2010). Get Involved! Humna Rights Activist. (C. Gleason, Ed.) New York: Crabtree Publishing Company. Schoen, J. W. (2012, April 04). Here's where your federal income tax dollars go. Retrieved May 04, 2014, from NBC NEWS: http://www.nbcnews.com/ Violent Crime. (2012). Retrieved May 09, 2014, from FBI: www.fbi.gov Williams, A. F., & Lund, A. K. (1986). Seat Belt Use Laws and Occupant Crash Protection in the United States. America Journal of Public Health, 1438.
According to Road Skills Web Site, in 2013 wearing seatbelts saves over 2,000 lives a year. “Car crashes are a leading cause of death for people age 54 and under in the United States- in 2012, car crashes killed more than 33,000 people. The injury count from car crashes in that same year was a staggeringly high 2.2 million, resulting in $50 million in work loss and medical costs, which was stated by Centers of Disease Control and Prevention in 2013.
Rear seat passenger’s found seat belts to be 25% effective against fatal injuries, 25% effective against serious injuries and 20% effective against minor injuries.
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the average number of children who die in bus crashes is five. Seatbelts would help to decrease
...d hurt them before and may have broke some of their bones during the wreck anyways and could have actually got in trouble for doing it especially in Minnesota and may only have 65 percent in America that may actually have worn a seatbelt during this time and would help if we could actually get 100 percent to wear them were it isn’t so dangerous during the time that it may actually have happened. But during that time it could have also been 40% of America that doesn’t wear their seat belt and it would help America if they actually did so. For every one percent increase in safety belt use, 172 lives and close to $100 million in annual injury and death costs could be saved. The costs of hospital care for an unbelted driver are 50 percent higher than those for a driver who was wearing a safety belt. Society bears 85 percent of those costs, not the individuals involved”.
The CDC reports that one out of every three children who died in a car crash in 2011 was not using a seat belt or safety child seat. This suggests many more deaths could be prevented. The results were based on a study in the Morbidity and Mortality Report, the agency’s weekly report on death and disease. According to the report, more than 9000 children age 12 and younger died in car crashes from 2002 to 2011. Motor vehicle crashes remain the leading cause of death for children. In 2011 three hundred and thirty eight children were injured each day while riding in cars, SUVS, vans or pickup trucks. Of the children killed, the percentage of unrestrained fatalities with no car seat or seat belt varied by vehicle type with greater percentages of unrestrained fatalities occurring in larger vehicles: SUVS (55percent) pickups (43 percent) vans (40 percent) and cars (24 percent).
In this year so far, there has been 40 people that have died in collisions where they were not buckled up, as well as 347 people over the last five years in Provincial Ontario alone (@citynews.). So this is becoming a growing problem. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, more well known as the NHTSA has used many different ways of getting their message out about the dangers of not wearing a seat belt. The NHTSA has used all forms of social media, but the one of the most influential forms of getting their message out though has been their Public Service Announcements or PSA for short, on the television the NHTSA have a PSA called “Second Chance”. The Click it or Ticket PSA “Second Chance” was created to appeal to the driver’s
The concept of poverty is complex and has many indicators across different disciplines. The prevalence of poverty is growing and the effects of poverty impacts individuals, families and communities across the lifespan. One area of focus is on poverty in relation to mental illness. The impact of poverty on mental health has been shown to affect those of all ages. Many people are unaware of the widespread poverty and its effects on mental health in the United States and many other countries, therefore it is important to analyze the concept of poverty in mental illness. There are often no or limited resources available to help those affected by poverty and mental illness, and those that provide advanced care need to be knowledgeable of the problems in order to help develop and provide assistance to those in need.
Lim, Siew Hoon, and Junwook Chi. "Are Cell Phone Laws in the U.S. Effective in Reducing Fatal Crashes Involving Young Drivers?" Transport Policy 27.(2013): 158-163. Academic Search Complete. Web. 14 Oct. 2013.
All across the country,state laws require drivers to wear seatbelts.I support this claim for many reasons. Reason one not all drivers drive safe and are in their right state of mind when driving . That begin said seatbelts provide drives and their passengers with safety in case there were to be an accident.”Prevention is better than cure”.Evidence to support my claim include people who drink and drive and people who uses a cell phone while in driving. In addition, drunk driving is one of the leading causes of death in the world. Reason two not all drives follows speed regulations which can also cause accidents .Seatbelts keep passengers from hitting windshields which reduces the amount of injury .My second piece of evidence is
Motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of death of people between the ages of 1 and 54 in the United States. Motor vehicle accidents are the leading cause of death in teens. (Seat Belts: Get) Seatbelts are made and designed for saving lives while a person is operating an automobile. It has been proven time after time, that a person’s life could be saved by simply putting a seatbelt on. “According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), more than 15,000 lives are saved each year in the United States because drivers and passengers were wearing their seatbelts when they were in accidents.” The government can try to persuade Americans to wear their seatbelts, but not everyone is very compliant. People who choose not to wear their seatbelt are not only putting their life in danger, but also their passengers (Orenstein, Beth
Author Alva O Ferdinand shares his expertise on this subject in his article, "Impact Of Texting Laws On Motor Vehicular Fatalities In The United States.", expressing the success of new technologies that are already available in the market; however, he also points to the fact that statistics reveal there is still a number of fatalities and that texting is still among the leading causes of accidents involving deaths. It is obvious this will work when relating to such findings as the seat belt law versus statistics that was also created for safer driving.
The effects of poverty can affect a parent’s mental health that can directly impact children. Mental health problems that parents in poverty face can be related to the stress of not having enough money to care for the children. Other mental health problems, like depression, can als...
The responsibility of keeping children safe while riding in any vehicle solely goes to the parents. This includes making children wear their seatbelts properly and keeping them in their car seats or booster seats at all time.
Road safety is one of the most important aspects of daily living. Our vehicle is our main transportation from one place to another. The number of car and motorcycle accidents seem to be increasing because of the many distractions, the lack of safety measures and judgment to road conditions and weather. Not being cautious increases the chances of not only injuring ourselves but hurting others as well. On the road, you see people talking on their cell phones or texting, eating, putting makeup on, changing the radio station, reading or using your GPS while driving. These are all distractions that endanger drivers, passengers and bystanders safety. Safe driving involves off-road precautionary measures such as making sure tires are properly inflated, testing windshield wipers, getting regular oil changes and tune-ups and adjusting the mirrors. All of these actions can help prevent an accident. Unfortunately, not all of us decide to wear our seat belts when driving or turn signal ligh...
The smartest air bag will come when a car can accurately measure the size and weight of an individual and deploy or not deploy accordingly. Human beings also have to simply be more careful when they enter an automobile. They have to be aware that it is a high-speed machine that has the ability to kill. People cannot blame their driving carelessness on the imperfections of a manmade safety device. Also, if each driver or passenger who suffered an air bag injury had read the warning label, each injury could have been avoided. Parents are also seriously responsible if their child is injured from an air bag. A child who is under 12 or under the height requirements should not be placed in the front seat, even for a short drive. The car companies, as well, need to recognize the expenditures for safety are surely worth it, because, in the end, they will be paying millions in law suits if they don't do what they know is best for the consumer. America's obsession with perfection, which ranges from it's scrutiny of physical appearances to the soaring expectations placed on American Presidents, has diminished the positive aspects of the device by the intense publication of it's shortcomings. Americans must once again realize that the air bag is the best car safety advance available in the 21st