Scott Peterson Research Paper

470 Words1 Page

Scott Peterson was convicted of first degree murder against his wife, Laci Peterson, and second degree murder of his unborn son, Connor. Peterson also faces life on death row. Evidence against Peterson was little to none and the jury found him guilty due to his little emotion during the trial. This trial was unfair and Peterson was wrongly convicted. I believe Scott Peterson is innocent.
This trial was not based on facts but based on emotions. “Prosecutors didn't have a murder weapon, cause of death, witness, or a definite motive” (Kristal Hawkins, pg.9). All the evidence pointed to Peterson's innocence and yet the jury decided upon his fate because of his emotions through out the trials. “They cited Peterson's apparent lack of emotion as a factor in their decision” (Hawkins, Pg.10). With lack of evidence against Peterson, the jury should not have convicted an innocent man. …show more content…

“If his intent was to dump a body, a bigger boat would have been better, a cheaper boat would have been fine, and he certainly would not have needed a fish finder or fishing seats getting in the way” (Scott's time line). Others will argue that Peterson definitely killed Laci due to a piece of her hair being found on the boat but that hair could have come from any where. The two were married and living together; Laci was reportedly curling her the very morning Scott went fishing. It could have come from anywhere in the house. That tiny piece of evidence is not enough to convict a person of

Open Document