Science Of Laughter

630 Words2 Pages

It is said in the "Science of Laughter" if laughing or joking didn't serve a purpose in our lives, it would've died out long ago. So why do we joke? The simple answer is to make people laugh. According to Carr and Greeves, our ability to joke is a human property, finding the amusing concept in a story or riddle is just a habit. Humans know how a joke works, and how to get a funny punchline across. For example, the author argues that any type of story or joke doesn't have to have a threat, but it can be suspenseful until it reaches its conclusion. Carr and Greeves state that "your brain responds to this tiny paradigm shift by making a conceptual leap that mirrors the jump from perceived threat to no threat, with the same results- laughter" (Carr and Greeves 41). When we laugh, it's usually at something funny or something we find amusement in, but laughter is also a habit developed at an early age. The essay states that laughter originated from a "threat response or warning" (Carr and Greeves 39). Laughter releases feelings such as tension, stress, pleasure, etc. That's why we laugh when we realize we aren't facing any type of threat. Carr and Greeves explain the "threat diffused" theory of laughter studied a network deep in our limbic system, or the "laughing circuit," that pain, fear, and …show more content…

We think it's just something we do- which is right- but it's a developed habit. I believe this theory of comedy would be helpful in class, during a situation outside the classroom, or a conversation starter. The theory goes into detail of how laughter originated, and why we laugh. Carr and Greeves even mention a study about why we associate fear and laughter with each other. So the theory of laughter could be argued with someone who believes differently. Using the detailed information about the background of laughter supports your part of the argument. Since there are facts supporting your argument, it should be

Open Document