Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of food in schools essay
School lunch needs to be healthier
School lunch needs to be healthier
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of food in schools essay
Imagine coming to work everyday, and you have to buy whatever your company decides to serve. When you go to the cafeteria, you are given a soggy piece of packaged pizza, a rotten apple, and some brown mush. Would you tolerate having to eat food like that on an everyday basis? One recurring problem that students face on an everyday basis is the low quality of the nutrition and taste of their school lunch. While it is still important for schools to place most funding into education, paying attention to the quality of the lunches is just as important. Public schools should be encouraged to use locally grown foods from farmer’s markets for school lunches to promote healthier and more sustainable eating habits in children. The issue of low quality school lunches is important for the local government to solve because it affects the health of the growing youth and helps improve the eating habits of teens. According to Rochelle Davis, Executive Director for the Healthy Schools Campaign, a major problem in the food school serves is that, “One of the biggest deficits is the lack of fruits and vegetables and whole grains”. (citation) If students are not eating the right kind of food at home, then the current school lunch will not help in their habits. Another issue with the school lunch is with the funding because schools typically receive $2.68 per meal …show more content…
For example, eating healthier can improve academic performance and mood of students because naturally grown foods can give students more energy compared to a bag of chips and old spaghetti. In fact, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found a direct relation toward the general health of students and their academic performance, being that the healthier a student is the better they do, and vice versa. If a student can at least eat healthier everyday during lunch, then they may perform better in
Allowing healthier school lunches will decrease obesity in children because it will give them the proper nutrition to reduce the risk of health issues. Since obesity causes many health issues, maintaining a proper nutrition will reduce the risk of health issues. According to Star- Telegram, a daily newspaper that serves Fort Worth and areas of North Texas states, “[School lunches that have] a meal of pizza sticks, a banana, raisins and whole milk has given way to whole wheat spaghetti with meat sauce, a whole wheat roll green beans, broccoli, cauliflower, kiwi and low-fat milk … This change will help more than 2.4 million Texas students who receive a free or reduced- price school lunch to lead healthier, more active lives—in and out of the classroom”(Par. 2 and 4). School lunches are supposed to guarantee students a well balance meal, so they can have the energy to proceed with their classes throughout the day. Meanwhile, students who receive a f...
One reason our school should get a new lunch menu is many students do not like the food served. For example, a survey was taken and of the 31 students 100% said they disliked the food. As student Bryan Huang said, “The lunches are horrible, they need better choices and more choices.” In other words, the food is not delicious and there are not many choices. Also, when children don’t get proper nutrition they have trouble focusing in school. Most students do not buy lunch because they feel it is unappealing and do not like the food served. Many students go to other kids and ask for food. In addition, many students do not eat breakfast so they rely on lunch to fuel them for the day. But, if they do not like the food served they won’t eat so they starve for the rest of the school day, which can
“More than 76 percent of schools sell soft drinks and sweetened fruit drinks, but fewer than half offered bottles water. Fewer than 15 percent sell low-fat or nonfat yogurt, and fewer than one third order skim milk. Only 25 percent of schools say they've reduced fats and oils in recipes.”(Spake, 2). Choices at lunch range from greasy to unidentifiable. Most students eat school lunches five days a week. So most of the food they eat throughout the week comes from the school cafeteria. Although, the schools do tend to offer healthy choices such as salads, subs, skim milk, and unlimited fruits and vegetables. “Each week Phoenix students are served a variety of fruits and vegetables from guava to grapes and jicima to red peppers. School officials hope that by exposing children to fruits and vegetable they may develop a taste for them and request their parents to buy them.”(Bailey, 1). Real meat is becoming an issue in schools. “According to reports issued by the Physicians Committee for responsible Medicine (PCRM) the USDA dumps hundreds of millions of pounds of surplus beef, chicken, cheese, and pork on the National School lunch Program.”(Lord, 42). Chicken isn't whole white meat; some of it doesn't even taste like meat! Let’s move on to unhealthy foods. There are unlimited amounts of un...
For example, after in a student finishes their meal, schools could offer a second serving of protein to their students. In effect, this will add a higher amount of calories to the students’ daily diets. Active students, or students participating in sports, can achieve their nutritional needs by this second serving. On the other hand, less active students nutritional needs are met with the serving size given to them. A broad calorie restriction will not meet the needs of all students. Allowing a greater diversity in lunch choices will, consequently, meet the nutritional needs of more
Fruits and vegetables are now considered two separate groups, with increased servings. Since Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act went into effect School districts have been struggled to executing the program, the backlash from students was almost immediate children began throwing away most of their lunch.”The School Nutrition Association said that 70 percent of school meal programs had taken a significant financial hit since the new mandates went into effect. Cafeteria operators from Los Angeles to New York report discouraging amounts of food waste and declining
States could require schools to serve healthier and more affordable meals than they currently are. They could have meals that all had the recommended amounts of grains, fruits, vegetables and protein for children. They could also ensure that it would be cheap for students to eat wh...
Do you remember your favorite “School Lunch”? I do, I essentially had two favorites; pizza and hamburgers with fries. Think back, wasn’t there at least one school lunch that the lunch ladies made that everyone was so excited to eat. Kids that habitually brought their super hero lunch box with thermos would leave it at home and be in line for pizza or burgers and fries. We could also go back for “seconds”, it was the best meal of the week including what was served at home. The federal government has been involved in the NSLP (National School Lunch Program) since 1946 with the implementation of the National School Lunch Act. These initial programs developed the commodity distribution program for schools, institutions, needy households, summer
Eating a healthy lunch will provide enough nutrients for the whole day. In the article, “ What Are the Benefits of Healthy School Lunches?” It states, “Children who eat a healthy lunch have a higher nutrient intake not only for lunch but also for the entire day -- compared to children who don’t…” This shows how healthy school lunches provide beneficial nutrients throughout the day. In addition, once students realize school lunches can provide many nutrients and protein like vitamin A, C, iron and calcium it will encourage better eating.
Packing lunches isn’t always as easy as it sound. That is time consuming, and parents rely on the schools, the place they send their kids every day, to provide them with what they need. Parents are paying for these lunches along with the food they provide their children at home. If we changed the school lunch program, the majority of students would be happier and more satisfied, parents would be happier because their money is not being wasted on food that’s not getting eaten, and schools would not be losing money from expensive food that is getting wasted. Schools all over struggle with keeping students satisfied with their lunches.
While nutritionists praised the changes, local students were not so pleased. School lunch participation in the district dropped by the thousands, and school administrators said many students were simply throwing away their milk and entrees.” This evidence supports the reason that students would be able to purchase a more appetizing lunch because it shows that students would prefer more unhealthy food options than the healthy food that cafeterias are forcing students to eat, and even though the cafeterias want students to eat healthier food, the plan is not working because students just choose to throw away their lunches instead. Allowing students to purchase off campus lunch would solve their problem of having to eat a disgusting lunch. But wait!
I was not shocked at the results but after seeing the numbers I became aware of the issue at hand. Of the one hundred five responses 42.9% eat lunch at school everyday, while 17.1 % never eat school lunch, and the rest eat it four, three, or two times a week. The data suggest that most people rely on school lunches to fill them up. Some of the reasons that 17.1 % do not eat school lunch can be due to distaste of school lunch, or the less quantity. Of the 42.9% of people that get school lunch 34 said it tastes bad and 10 said it taste very bad.
Lunch programs are often run by the selling money, so “messing with the menu can mean losing money” (Hirsch). In the article “Schools Struggle to Offer Healthy Lunches” J.M Hirsch, who is the Food Editor at The Associated Press, presents a quote from a parent when he writes, “‘Are you kidding? Pizza is our biggest seller. I'm surprised we're not selling it more,’ Gates said a USDA consultant told her and other parents in a meeting two years ago” (Hirsch). This shows that schools are not concerned about their students health as much as they are concerned with the money they make off selling their cafeteria
Due to budget cuts and Obama’s speech school lunches has been impacted, the way they prepare them and the ingredients they are using. Before 2010, students from day cares to high schools had been the once having the meal changes in their schools. Bending machines in schools are been removed, children are not able to buy any junk food
Some say that students already have enough choices of what to eat at lunch. If schools get more lunch choices then that means more money. They might make the same amount of food, but the more variety the more expensive it will get. With more food choices that means that the food will take longer to be prepared. In turn you will need more cooks doing different tasks trying to get the food prepared on time.
Do the new food guidelines really distress your life in a negative way? Majority of students are repulsed with the changes of school lunches. There have been many alterations to the food they serve to kids. There are various reasons of why it’s a good idea that they made the food healthier. The changes are worthy because they give kids the opportunity to select a healthier intake, they help avoid health issues, and to offer kids the nutrients they need.