Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Causes and solutions to child obesity
Essays on nutritional school lunches
How can childhood obesity be prevented proposals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Causes and solutions to child obesity
Not only are all of the food groups being monitored, but the fat content of meals is also being closely censored. The current regulation is that school lunches must have fewer than 10% of their calories from saturated fats; this has not changed from the previous standard (“Comparison of Previous and Current”). Heart disease, heart attack, and stroke are risks of too many saturated fats and the high cholesterol that results from the fats (Moss 214). Saturated fats have also been linked to Type II diabetes (Moss 214). It makes sense that school lunches only have limited amounts of saturated fats; this way, the chance of students suffering from these health risks are lower. To prevent these problems may be difficult, but avoiding saturated fats in school lunches is a smart strategy. Another type of fat, called trans-fat, is not allowed in school lunches at all; this is very different to the past when there was no limit on trans-fat (“Comparison of Previous and Current”). Trans-fats are often put into foods because it does not cost a lot and can make foods last longer (“Trans Fat”). The problem with this type of fat is that it leads to high cholesterol and can eventually lead to coronary heart disease and even death (“Trans Fat”).
To avoid this type of fat at a young age is a proactive move because it can help avoid disease and can lead to a longer, healthier life. As a general standard, the Dietary Guidelines for Americans suggests that less than 30% of the calories in a school meal come from any type of fat; schools are required to follow this guideline (Poppendieck 111). Fats are not being eliminated from student diets completely, but the consumption is being monitored because of the negative consequences that can result ...
... middle of paper ...
...rition, but it is up to the students to take the foods offered and actually consume the proper nutrients. School lunches that abide by the National School Lunch Program guidelines encourage proper nutrition for students because they contain numerous fruits and vegetables, whole grains and meat or meat alternates, low-fat dairy and water, limited amounts of fat, limited sodium, appropriate portion sizes, and healthy calorie amounts. Schools are still able to offer many of the foods they offered in the past; the catch is that they must follow the updated nutritional guidelines of the National School Lunch Program. In conclusion, those slices of pizza, cheeseburgers, chicken strips, chocolate milk, French fries, chocolate chip cookies, and spaghetti, which are served to students for school lunch all around the nation, may not be so bad for students’ health after all.
Government date shows that in the past thirty years, rate of being overweight in six to eleven year olds is up 19% and 6% in age 12 to 19. Without support, school lunches remain high in fat. (Finkelstien) According to the CDCP, obesity is double what it was in children and triple in adolescents since 1980. Many reforms were attempted to help this problem, but many inadvertently caused more problems. (Finkelstien) A 730 calorie lunch should have no more than 24 grams of fat and no more than 8 grams of it saturated yet the average USDA lunch has 31 grams of fat and 14 rams of it is saturated. (Yeoman) These very high levels of fat are why obesity is becoming worse in children. It can be concluded that school food is still extremely high in fat and this can be directly linked to the high rates of obesity in young children and
I don't think our school lunch is healthy because it has fat and too much sodium. Although it is good it is fattening it is the reason for much of the obesity in the U.S. Many kids have no other option to eat the unhealthy school lunches or they will be hungry.
Allowing healthier school lunches will decrease obesity in children because it will give them the proper nutrition to reduce the risk of health issues. Since obesity causes many health issues, maintaining a proper nutrition will reduce the risk of health issues. According to Star- Telegram, a daily newspaper that serves Fort Worth and areas of North Texas states, “[School lunches that have] a meal of pizza sticks, a banana, raisins and whole milk has given way to whole wheat spaghetti with meat sauce, a whole wheat roll green beans, broccoli, cauliflower, kiwi and low-fat milk … This change will help more than 2.4 million Texas students who receive a free or reduced- price school lunch to lead healthier, more active lives—in and out of the classroom”(Par. 2 and 4). School lunches are supposed to guarantee students a well balance meal, so they can have the energy to proceed with their classes throughout the day. Meanwhile, students who receive a f...
It is apparent that living an unhealthy lifestyle, as well as eating poorly, negatively affects one’s health. From a young age it is quickly learned which foods are considered healthful as opposed to junk food. It is a parents responsibility to supervise the intake of their child's food, however there is a higher risk than ever before of childhood obesity.
“Our Schools need to start teaching kids how to be healthy.”- Unknown. School lunches have created a chronic problem in a school setting, and since it hasn't been fixed, 6-11 year olds have had a 17% increased chance of becoming obese (Centers for Disease control and Prevention). Most school districts don't even bother changing the food restrictions just so they can please their students. Unhealthy school lunches are a huge problem among children in the United States, it can cause obesity, stress, and many other problems.
“More than a third of the county's children are overweight or obese.”(Gustin, 1). As shocking as this is, it's true. One of the big reasons that children and teens are overweight is because of the foods that they eat. They are fed these fattening and unhealthy foods by the school system. Their futures can be changed if we change our choices. Having more nutritious lunches can have a positive impact on the health of American teens.
High levels of trans fat, sugar, and salt have become prominent in many processed and fast foods, causing Americans to become addicted to these unhealthy preserving additives. In many school settings, students only have access to junk food when searching for something to eat in either the cafeteria or school vending machines. Many high school students consume three hundred and thirty-six calories a day purely on school vending machine snacks. (Koebler) Possible solutions to the growing childhood obesity problem are to provide healthier options, such as fruit...
Soda’s are leaving vending machines and being be substituted with less-sugary drinks, bread is being substituted for whole wheat and milk is being substituted to fat free milk. First Lady Michelle Obama took it into her own hands to provide the United states children with food that meets nutritional standards. “Through the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act championed by the First Lady and signed by President Obama, USDA made the first major changes in school meals in 15 years, which will help us raise a healthier generation of children.” (Leonard). Healthy Hunger- Free Act went into effect in 2012 some of the changes were that meals needed 5 components: grain, meat, fruit, vegetable, and milk. Students MUST take at least 1/2 cup of fruit OR vegetable for a meal.
Lunch is one of the most important meals of the day and is consumed mostly in school cafeterias for children and adolescence. Wholesome lunches are vital in maintaining a healthy metabolism and give children energy for the rest of the school day. Children are advised to eat healthily but do not always do so because the choices of tastier, fatty foods offered in school cafeterias. The National School Lunch Program, NSLP, which is a federally assisted meal program operating in public and nonprofit private schools set nutritious guidelines for lunches served in school cafeterias (USDA). However, school campuses still offer foods high in fat as well as selling candy, chips, and soda in their vending machines, as well as their school shops. In order
According to the Centers for Disease Control, “Childhood obesity has more than doubled in children and quadrupled in adolescents in the past 30 years,” meaning that America’s children need to start eating healthier, including healthier school lunches. The National School Lunch Act is a fairly recent addition to American society. For, as the world waged war a second time, the United States began to worry about the strength and health of the country’s soldiers. However, in the beginning, selling excess agricultural goods was more important than building a healthy, well-balanced meal for students. Unfortunately, many children coming from poorer families could not afford well-balanced school lunches, so in order to compensate, the School Lunch Program changed its focus to help these students. This program, however, decreased schools’ lunch budgets, and schools had a hard time keeping up with the amount of free meals they had to provide, so they came up with some extra ways to increase revenue. However, in a small town in Massachusetts, one chef makes a difference in the health of the school lunch students eat each day, and proves that hiring a trained chef to cook real, healthy meals can increase profit. Unfortunately, that is not the case in most schools across the nation. The quality of health of the food being served in school lunches is extremely poor and was allowed to decline even more with a new set of rule changes. However, there are some improvements currently being made to increase the quality of health of the food being served to students, including teaching them all about food and its nutritional information, both good and bad. In order for students to eat healthier lunches at school, the USDA needs to implement healthier ...
The founding of the National School Lunch Program in 1946, otherwise known as NSLP, was inspired by investigations placed on men who were rejected from draft during World War II, where a connection was found between their physical impairments as a result of poor nutritional diets in early childhood (National School Lunch Program). Their mission statement being, “ A measure of national security, to safeguard the health and well-being of the Nation’s children.” Later on effecting after school initiatives in which after school activities on school grounds, were required to provide snacks for the students, in 1998 (National School Lunch Program). Throughout the history of government involvement in school lunches, there have been changes made due to new findings. First the purpose of school lunches were to give students food in case they were not receiving any at now, slowly it began to evolve to a nutritional meal that covers the main food groups.
The Health Department has been approached by a small group of fathers who are interested in improving child nutrition in the local schools.
Moreover, the controversy over cafeteria food is whether or not it is healthy for all students from elementary schools to colleges. Numerous factors lead to unhealthy eating in schools and on campuses. Sometimes options with better nutrition are offered, but when there are, they tend to be less appealing than the unhealthy foods which turns to obesity. Many schools are undergoing budget cuts and changes, and healthy food tends to take a back burner when deciding where the limited amounts of money should go (Gupta). Unfortunately, when schools do have healthy ingredients, the food is usually prep...
Today, America is plagued by obesity, heart disease, diabetes, and many other health maladies linked to unhealthy food. Although it is important for American youths to eat healthy, nutritional diets, it is an absolutely bad idea to alter the school menu and cut out students' favorite foods in favor of a "healthier" menu. Schools should have a positive influence on their students' health choices, but they should not be forcing them to eat to their standards. A "healthier" lunch menu would result in negative consequences for both students and their schools. Cutting out unhealthier foods from the cafeteria would not effectively curb teenagers' penchant for unhealthy eating.
The article by Roberto A. Ferdman states that Michelle Obama is arguably the school nutrition movements most public proponent. Also that she has become a symbol of healthier meals. I think that Michelle Obama has created controversy with the school lunches. She is trying to make everyone eat healthier which, in return, is causing the kids to rebel. By taking away the sugar drinks, banning soda, and adding more fruits and vegetables she has angered nearly 75% of the kids at schools who are served the food.