Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relevance of animal farming in the contemporary world
Relevance of animal farming in the contemporary world
Relevance of animal farming in the contemporary world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Throughout every human’s life in the United States, there will portably come a time when they take a trip to an aquarium or zoo. Do not get me wrong; it is incredible to see all those beautiful creatures up close and personal, but most people do not realize what actually is going on. Typically, when the day is spent at the zoo or aquarium, the day usually follows a schedule like this: You spend the day roaming the grounds, moving from habitat to habitat, break for lunch, and then once you’ve seen everything you want to see you return home and are free to do whatever you want to do. The harsh reality of these places is that while it is cool to spend the day there, you would never want to spend your entire life there. The animals are taken from …show more content…
their homes and instead of spending the day at the zoo, they spend their whole life there. There are so many adverse effects and problems centered around animal captivity, including mental, emotional, and physical problems. The confinement of animals has been around for a very long time, dating back to the Romans who held animal’s captive for the purpose of using them in the games. They kept groups of animals at each coliseum and would kill them for fun, once one animal was hunted and killed they would bring out another. A zoo can be described as some sort of public park in which animals are displayed for the purpose of education or entertainment. The first zoos in which we based our current captivity system on were founded in “Vienna, Madrid, and Paris in the eighteenth century and London and Berlin in the nineteenth century.” The first American zoos were founded in the 1870’s and were located in Philadelphia and Cincinnati. Over time, zoos have spread out all across the world and have become very abundant within the United States. While it is wonderful to see these animals up close and personal, there is no justification for it. Being taken from their home, put in an entirely different environment, and being put in a cage for the rest of your life is not something that can be deemed morally sound. Zoos, aquariums, and other places that house animals for education or amusement should not be funded or supported. Captivity of animals causes emotional and physical problems; there is no justification for continually breeding these animals to treat them like show ponies. Breeding is a large concern in the fight against animal captivity.
“For many wildlife biologists and conservationists, breeding and conservation-oriented research on captive wildlife are seen as essential activities that should not be halted on the basis of animal welfare and animal rights objections. The ethical imperative to save threatened species from further decline and extinction in the wild has for them a priority over concerns regarding individual animal welfare.” By breeding animals that are in captivity, these animals give birth to their offspring that are then raised in captivity, even if the breeding works these animals will never be able to return to the wild because they will not be able to fend for themselves. Lack of diversity within DNA in captivity is also a large issue. By breeding animals in captivity that have very similar DNA, you create inbred animals which, in most species, have an “infant mortality rate among inbred animals of 100%.” Another issue with breeding is that the DNA will change from what the animals have that are born in the wild, these animals have different traits that are not at all similar to the same animal that is bred in captivity. The largest issue is that many zoos advocate that they are in business to save the animals and are doing so by breeding, but they are only breeding animals that do not need help. We should be supporting “large scale breeding centers rather than conventional zoos, most of which have neither the staff nor the facilities to run successful breeding
programs.” Many zoos claim that the reason they exist is for the education of the public. They leave little information packets and have information boards at each exhibit, but how many people actually read them? When people go to the zoo, they don’t spend enough time at each exhibit to actually get to know the animals. Most zoos make no real effort to try and educate the public, leaving a short education biography on the animal in the corner of an exhibit without anyone to explain the material does nothing. Unless someone is giving you a tour and telling you the information about the animal, most will spend time taking pictures of the animal, and once they are bored, they leave. For the sake of an argument, let us say that the zoos do present educational benefits. What exactly do the people learn when they go to the zoo? Most of the information that is learned by watching and observing the animals is not correct. Captive animals do not portray the same behaviors and characteristics of wild animals. Is this enough education to justify the capture of these animals? “Couldn't most of the educational benefits of zoos be obtained by presenting films, slides, lectures and so forth? Indeed, couldn't most of the important educational objectives better be achieved by exhibiting empty cages with explanations of why they are empty?” The fact of the matter is that while it is great to see these animals in person, the educational aspect of zoos could very well be done without the capture and confinement of these animals. More education could be done by a presentation on these animals rather than showing a version of the animal that does not act the same as it would if it were wild. Finally, these captured animals are treated as sources of amusement. The animals are put in cages for the purpose of our viewing and in some cases, they are even trained and used to perform unnatural acts for us. SeaWorld and circuses are guilty of training animals to perform for our satisfaction and money, and they force the animals to perform for food. These animals are put in high-pressure situations day in and day out in which they provide entertainment for tourists and humans all around the world. Capturing these creatures and forcing them to perform causes emotional and mental problems, sometimes resulting in animals lashing out and injuring, or even killing, their trainers. There is nothing natural about an animal jumping through a hoop that is in flames, or forcing an animal to do flips and spins for treats. “Animals aren’t actors, spectacles to imprison and gawk at, or circus clowns. Yet thousands of these animals are forced to perform silly, confusing tricks under the threat of physical punishment; are carted across the country in cramped and stuffy boxcars or semi-truck trailers; are kept chained or caged in barren, boring, and filthy enclosures; and are separated from their families and friends—all for the sake of human “entertainment.” Many of these animals even pay with their lives.” By transporting animals all over the country, exposing them to many different environments very quickly, it can cause illness. Besides the physical illnesses, the animals go insane. The term “Zoochosis” has been created and is used to describe when a captive animal goes mad. The characteristics include things such as pacing, walking in circles, swaying, over grooming, and even self-mutilation. In the news, you see articles about captive animals killing humans, but this should be no surprise. By confining them to cages and taking away the stimulation that they would receive in the wild, they become mentally insane and lash out. In 2010, a whale by the name of Tilikum killed its trainer. Tilikum had a past of aggression, killing a trainer in 1997 and 1999, but was still used in performances at SeaWorld. This shows that these creatures are under so much stress that they go insane and become killing machines. Put yourself in these animal’s situation, would you still be sane if you were held in a small enclosure, stuck while people stare at you every day, and there is no way for you to leave? Putting yourself in these animal’s situation changes the entire perspective of captivity. How do we solve the issue of animal captivity? It is very simple. Most people argue that if we just release them into the wild, they will be killed. This is true, which is why you do not completely leave them to fend for themselves. First, we must realize that the animals that are held in captivity currently cannot be set completely free, they cannot last on their own. We open reservations and sanctuaries for these animals in which they are continued to be cared for but not to the extent that occurred in the zoos. We end the capturing of animals in the wild and let the animals that are currently in captivity live out their lives in safety, allowing them to do as they please under the watchful eye of humans. By doing so, the animals can still feel as though they are free, but they are not confined in small cages anymore. By ending captivity, we end a period in which man felt the need to feel inferior and control an entire species for our entertainment and enjoyment. Zoos are finally seeing the error of their ways because the media is exposing their wrongdoings. Zoos are “becoming more naturalistic in environment, focusing on more on species preservation and scientific research and less on entertainment. Zoos in the future, at least better ones, will increasingly become more like parks.” We have a long and hard journey ahead, but this is a light at the end of the tunnel. Humanity can still learn about these beautiful creatures without having to put them in cages. In America, the bald eagle is a sign of our freedom, isn’t it ironic that we are taking away its freedom?
The first point of view from this issue is the side that believes humans, zoos and other facilities should be allowed to keep animals. The places that captivate animals believe that they are doing a favor to the creatures. They believe that they are saving them from being killed by humans. They say that if they would not have taken in these animals they would have died in the wild. They say they’re giving them a fresh new start and a place to live without worry. For example, in this article they state that zoos try and h...
Zoos have been with us throughout our history, and can provide a good barometer of public beliefs and values at any given time. Therefore it seems necessary to explore whether in today’s society contemporary zoos are a means of educating and conserving or still seek to control and exhibit animal others for human benefit. In order to make this assessment there are a number of contributing factors. Firstly it is important to establish context by considering the history of zoos and looking at the changes from the early menageries to contemporary zoos who strive to be institutions of refuge for animals facing twenty-first century global challenges. This links into how the physical space of zoos has changed over time and whether these advancements have made any crucial difference to the welfare of animals. Following this conservation, education and scientific research will be explored in detail in order to assess whether they provide good enough motives for keeping animals in captivity. I will seek to argue that although attempts have been made to point zoos in the direction of conservation and education, in my opinion the concepts of dominance and human superiority are still at the core of modern zoos.
Furthermore, while zoos should conserve and encourage educational experiences within their parks, Allen points out it’s also important to take a compassionate approach in caring for each individual animal. As zoos focus more on education and conservation, they sometimes forget that animals are not alive in terms of population and individual welfare is important. Thus, it appears that Allen is taking a middle ground approach to the ongoing debate about zoos, because she is open to zoos, when they are compassionate, yet fully recognizes the downside of animal cruelty.
Thousands of zoos worldwide are visited by citizens yearly to admire and satisfy their curiosity of the beautiful wild animals that mother nature has to offer. Zoos have been around for hundreds of years and have become a known tradition for numerous school field trips and family outings. The ongoing debate between animal rights activists and zoo officials remains, should wild animals be taken from their natural habitats to live in city zoos for education and entertainment purposes?
The debate on storing animals in zoos became controversial, and I came to the final decision that animals do not deserve to live in zoos. Animals are meant to live in their natural habitat, just as humans thrive in their naturally industrialized environment. Living in captivity can also cause the animal’s lifespan to decrease, and it may be due to the failure to satisfy their emotional needs. Human interaction to wildlife and its animals is every expanding, and this probably makes manmade disasters the main cause of the transaction of wild animals from the wild to zoos. On the other hand, zoos have the potential to raise awareness and the support from public donations to fund animal conservation projects, but people do not need to physically see an animal provide their support. Since there are many solutions to this debate, there is no direct answer. From a wild animal’s point of view, humans may be seen as immoral beings with countless evil intentions. What they do not realize is that we have the potential to do good and make big, positive
Citizens visit thousands of zoos worldwide to admire and satisfy their curiosity of the beautiful wild animals that mother nature has to offer. Zoos have been around for hundreds of years and have become a known tradition for numerous school field trips and family outings. The ongoing debate between animal rights activists along with zoo officials remains to be a question of concern, should wild animals be removed from their natural habitats to live in city zoos for education and entertainment purposes?
The first zoo in the United States was established in 1874 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The Philadelphia zoo first only had 813 animals but has grown today to have 1,300 animals, still having the same forty-two acres as it did when it first opened. Today there are zoos in almost every major city across the country and even more around the world. But along with zoos, there are marine parks and aquariums. The most famous marine park is SeaWorld, which has three different locations in the nation: Orlando, San Diego and San Antonio. Zoos and aquariums were first brought about to learn about the species that we live with on this planet. To be educated about the wild creatures who are so different from ourselves. Zoos and the caging of wild animals have been around for centuries, there is evidence from Egypt of rulers having wild animals as pets, locking them in cages, just like how today people have hamsters but instead, you would have a wild animal. Today, zoos are used for education to teach people about wild animals so that we can learn ways to conserve the planet and the animals’ habitats, in order to prevent more animals from becomin...
It’s always fun to go with your friends and family to see cute and exotic animals when you go to the zoo, right? You may think that they have the best life having people to give them things that want and to protect them, but some of them are actually suffering just for our amusement from being in that small enclosure all day and all night. Animals should not be put in zoos because they can develop many mental and physical health problems due to the absence of some natural necessities and they are not always treated as nice as you think.
For hundreds of years, eager visitors have journeyed to see animals from various parts of the Earth. Zoological institutions have been provided a place where both wild animals and humans can convene in a controlled manor. A zoo’s purpose is to conserve wild animals’ lives, educate visitors, and provide a site where wild life research can readily take place (Demartoto). Many hold a positive view on zoos. Some believe that zoological institutions provide a safe environment for animals and provide the animals with the best care. However, many find zoos to be guilty of stealing animals’ freedom and dignity. Animal welfare has become a major issue within zoological institutions. The question of whether or not zoos are actually
Since approximately 1250 B.C., ancient Egyptians had created and practiced the capture and display of animals in what are now known as zoos (Fravel). Records describe such exotic animals as birds, lions, giraffes, and tigers in captivity (Fravel). Since then, zoos have continued to entertain millions with the exciting chance to view exotic animals up close and personal. Even in ancient Greece, exotic animals were on display in fighting arenas, and in enclosed viewing areas. Originally in America, zoos were just created so that royalty and the wealthy could flaunt their exotic animals to the public (Leolupus). Today, with species threatened and habitats disappearing worldwide, zoos are serving a new purpose other than the mere exhibition of animals – conservation. (Fravel). When you think of a zoo, you either think of a fun, entertaining place that provides close-up and exciting exhibits of wild animals that you would otherwise never get the chance to see, or a place where people keep suffering, unhappy animals captive just for entertainment and display. However, despite whichever view you hold, and despite the stereotypes, some zoos have evolved to serve alternative and helpful purposes. Although some zoos face controversy due to allegations such as lack of space and quality care, neglect, and cruelty, some zoos have programs specifically designed to help and protect animal species. For example, these zoos have programs that help such conservation efforts as breeding.
Some people may argue that zoos protect animals and species under this polluted world, however, do animals in zoos really need our “help”? Yes, but surely not that many. According to Captive Animals Protection Society (CAPS), 79% of animals in United Kingdom zoos and over 70% of elephants in European zoos are wild-caught. It seems that zoos need them rather than they need zoos.
Most Americans have been to a zoo or aquarium at some point in their lives. They spend the whole day outside with their friends and family looking at all the animals from all over the world. For most people, zoos are the only way they will ever be able to see these amazing animals in person. However one animal that lives in zoos across the country may not be there in a couple years.
To begin with, animals love being in their natural habitat. Far too many wild animals are treated poorly in zoos, and do not have the freedom to be who they are. Animals ...
However, educational benefits zoos provide are minimal because animals are in their unnatural environment and behave differently. In his book Wild Animals in Captivity, Rob Laidlaw describes how animal behavior at zoos is completely different from behavior in natural environments. Small spaces and boredom leads to frustration and repetitive actions, such as a monkey rocking back and forth continuously. Laidlaw writes, “At many of the zoos I visit, I see animals doing things their species never do in the wild” (Laidlaw 9). Therefore, what an individual observes at the zoo is untrue to the animal’s natural behavior and the educational experience is false. Moreover, there would be more of an educational benefit from watching documentaries about animals in the wild or reading books on how certain species behave and interact. Even though zoos provide up close interaction with animals, they lack the ability to educate visitors on how animals truly behave. Additionally in a study that further undermines the educational value of zoos, Eric Jenson’s “Evaluating Children 's Conservation Biology Learning at the Zoo” examines the before and after effects surrounding children’s (ages 7-15) knowledge of animals and conservation. He found that the standard unguided zoo experience resulted in negative understanding of animals and their habitats. Only when children were lead by a guide where they more likely to
This article reveals zoos deficient and pathetic contributions to “conservation”. It shows how zoos use the disguise of helping endangered species and providing public education programming to cover up the mere motive of financial profit. This source does not consider the beneficial public experience gained from being able to see animals that you would not be able to see in a specific geographical region. This article could be improved if it expanded on what zoos can do to improve and provided more examples on good zoo practices.