Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Canada healthcare system
Canadian health care system advantages over the usa system
Comparison of the healthcare system in Canada and the United States
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Canada healthcare system
Saskatchewan’s governmental agencies approach to the shortage of doctors in the province favors too much the structuralist approach and would be more effective in the long term if switched to a humanistic approach. Throwing money at a problem may work for a little bit but what happens when the money runs out? So are current programs a true fix or a short-term solution doomed to fail. We look at the possible causes for the shortage of doctors and then examine the governmental responses put in place to deal with the problem, both past and present. We look at which perspectives are more successful between the structuralist approach and the humanist approach when it comes to the Canadian health care system. The Saskatchewan heath care system is made up of several provincial, regional and local organizations, which provide the people their basic right to reasonable health care (“Health Systems,” 2014). Not having enough health care providers seem to be a problem, which Canada as a whole has struggled with (“College of Family,” 2014). The shortages of medical providers have lead to major discrepancies in the level of patient care between major urban centers and rural areas (Howlett, 2013). In the case of Saskatchewan many communities are facing this challenge, not only rural areas but also the capital city of the province (“Saskatchewan ER,” 2013). Stats Canada has showed that the number of physicians is at a historic high, yet Saskatchewan still face shortages (Howlett, 2013). There are many possibilities to consider when looking for a cause of this problem. Typically work force problems are looked at as an issue of supply and demand (Dauphinee, 2005). Workforce numbers in Canada as a whole are monitored from several databases (Dauphinee, 2005). But when predicting future trends its hard to account for everything (Dauphinee, 2005). The population continues to increase (“New Incentive,” 2013). As of January 1, 2014 there are 1, 117, 503 people in Saskatchewan, which is an increase of 20,056 from the previous year (“New Incentive,” 2013). More people means more medical care. This can cause a strain on the current medical professionals (“New Incentive,” 2013). In the 1990s the government made the decision to cut back on physician production because it though that it had enough physicians (Dauphinee, 2005). This lead to the greatest net loss of Canadian physicians to other countries, primarily the united states (Dauphinee, 2005). It was approximated that 508 physicians left in 1996 (Dauphinee, 2005).
Though, Professor Armstrong makes very good connections between health care policy reforms and its impact on women, all of these connections are eclipsed by the values encompassed within the Canada Health Act of 1984. Health care to this day is provided on the basis of need rather than financial means, and is accessible to all that require it. Professor Armstrong’s argument is hinged upon the scope of services provided under the public health insurance system, and the subsequent affect of these reforms on women as the main beneficiaries of these services and as workers in these industries. However, these reforms were made to balance the economy, and the downsizing and cutbacks were necessary steps to be taken with respect to this agenda. Moreover, as aforementioned the access to medical services ultimately comes down to need, and the reforms to date are not conducive to an intentional subordination of female interests in the realm of health care. Therefore, I find Professor Armstrong’s critique on Canada’s public health insurance system to be relatively redundant because the universal access to care encompassed within the Canada Health Act transcends the conditional proponents of her arguments of inequality. In other words, I believe she is
An analysis of the US and Canada’s systems reveals advantages and drawbacks within each structure. While it is apparent that both countries could benefit from the adoption of portions of the others system, Canada’s healthcare system offers several benefits over the US system.
The Canadian health care system promises universality, portability, and accessibility; unfortunately, it faces political challenges of meeting pub...
Physician Outmigration —Unfortunately there is a great outmigration of physicians because they the lack of funding. According to NPR, It comes to no surprise that according to NPR, in 2016, at least one doctor a day leaves the island
There has been a shortage of physicians, lack of inpatient beds, problems with ambulatory services, as well as not having proper methods of dealing with patient overflow, all in the past 10 years (Cummings & francescutti, 2006, p.101). The area of concern that have been worse...
At the beginning of the 20th century healthcare was a necessity in Canada, but it was not easy to afford. When Medicare was introduced, Canadians were thrilled to know that their tax dollars were going to benefit them in the future. The introduction of Medicare made it easier for Canadians to afford healthcare. Medicare helped define Canada as an equal country, with equal rights, services and respect for every Canadian citizen. Medicare helped less wealthy Canadians afford proper healthcare. Canadian citizens who had suffered from illness because they could not afford healthcare, were able to get proper treatment. The hospitals of Canada were no longer compared by their patients’ wealth, but by their amount of service and commitment. Many doctors tried to stop the Medicare act, but the government and citizens outvoted them and the act was passed. The doctors were then forced to treat patients in order of illness and not by the amount of money they had. Medicare’s powerful impact on Canadian society was recognized globally and put into effect in other nations all around the world. Equality then became a definition which every Canadian citizen understood.
Jeffrey Simpson, “The Real Problem with Canadian Health Care,” National Post, accessed February 14, 2014, http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2012/10/04/jeffrey-simpson-the-real-problem-with-canadian-health-care/.
The number of doctors that present in the United States of America directly affects the communities that these doctors serve and plays a large role in how the country and its citizens approach health care. The United States experienced a physician surplus in the 1980s, and was affected in several ways after this. However, many experts today have said that there is currently a shortage of physicians in the United States, or, at the very least, that there will be a shortage in the near future. The nation-wide statuses of a physician surplus or shortage have many implications, some of which are quite detrimental to society. However, there are certain remedies that can be implemented in order to attempt to rectify the problems, or alleviate some of their symptoms.
Health care has become an issue because of the shortage of doctors in Canada. Many of them are either going to the U.S.A. or going to other countries to practice in hospitals and clinics. The earning cap imposed by the government has forced doctors to work fewer hours than are necessary to serve the public. Many Canadians are without a doctor to help them with their needs, and emergency rooms are filled to capacity with no available beds for those who have to be admitted to the hospital. Waiting time for specialist and specialty tests has become so long that someone diagnosed with a major illness may die before they can be properly treated.
Despite the established health care facilities in the United States, most citizens do not have access to proper medical care. We must appreciate from the very onset that a healthy and strong nation must have a proper health care system. Such a health system should be available and affordable to all. The cost of health services is high. In fact, the ...
What Seems To Be The Problem? A discussion of the current problems in the U.S. healthcare system.
Saskatchewan, the vast and rural Canadian province above Montana and North Dakota, is a place farther even than Vermont from centers of power. Barely a million people live in Saskatchewan and its largest city, Saskatoon, would not even be one of the fifteen biggest in California. In 1947, Saskatchewan began paying the hospital bills of everyone who lived there. No province had ever done anything like it. But people loved it and word spread. Three years later Alberta, the larger province next door, began doing the same thing. By the early 1960s, every Canadian province was doing it. In 1966, Canada passed a bill that made the Saskatchewan model national law. Canada had a single payer system.
In a 2012 collection of state workforce studies and reports, each state evidently needs more physicians. There are shortages of primary care physicians and specialists in every health professions: dental, mental health, pharmacy, and many others. Previously to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) passing, a convergence of difficulties had added to labor force problems. The ACA will inflict additional pressures on the health care labor force.
Healthcare sustainability Not only should there be collaboration between the community-based workers but it should also include individuals that provide theses health care providers with the resources needed to treat their patients. With that being said, it is crucial to maintain a form of communication with the Canadian government because their policymakers can act as the tipping point towards providing low-income families more options in obtaining a healthier life. Therefore, without a doubt, the best way to establish this connection is to present them with Canada’s financial numbers for medicine. To reinstate, Canada spends a great deal on purchasing prescription drugs as it ranks 18th in the world.
The article in question is a reflection on the practical solutions applied to the health care needs of the general rural community when the provincial system started in Canada. Phyllis Lyttle provides the basis of the article, delving on the extensive roles aimed at meeting the needs and expectations of the people in Nova Scotia during the pre- and post-world war period. The article begins with a low profile when Lyttle starts her new roles as a public health worker because she was coming to implement a new program, but the local physician Dr. MacMillan had not been notified by the provincial government. The situation appears to be a reflection of the bureaucracies that existed in the public health administration and perceptions that older and experienced players had on new entrants. For the nurse to succeed in Baddeck, she had to seek support from the Dr. MacMillan, although their terms of reference would not be agreeable to the Public Health Department (Mullally, 2009). A critical analysis of the article will focus on how the author achieves the objectives outlined as well as critiques of the structure and inconsistencies in the paper.