Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Existentialism into the wild
The features of existentialism
Existentialism into the wild
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Existentialism is a Humanism, written by French philosopher Jean- Paul Sartre, was written in 1946 based on a lecture that Sartre gave at Club Maintenant in Paris in 1945. Existentialism is defined as “a philosophical theory or approach that emphasizes the existence of the individual person as a free and responsible agent determining their own development through acts of will” (Merriam- Webster Dictionary). In Existentialism is a Humanism, Sartre portrays existentialism as an essentially optimistic philosophy. He uses key existentialist terms such as anguish, abandonment, and despair to defend his view as well as provide examples that help us to analyze his claim. After doing so, we can conclude that Sartre’s claim is wrong and existentialism …show more content…
Humans are born with no purpose and later figure it out, creating their own purpose of life. Sartre uses the example of the paper knife to clearly show us his views on existentialism, and how the example shows us how existence precedes essence. The paper knife was created by someone with an intended purpose before it is created, and its essence is known pre-creation. A human being is created and further develops a meaning after being created. “This object was produced by a craftsman who drew inspiration from a concept: he referred both to the concept of what a paper knife is, and too a known production technique that is a part of that concept and is, by large, a formula” (20-21). He explains to his readers that the paper knife is an object that was created and also serves a purpose. His goal of the example of the paper knife is to show us that “… the essence of the paper knife- that is, the sum of the formulae and properties that enable it to be produced and defined- precedes its existence” (21). Sartre believes that for human beings, existence precedes essence, meaning that we exist and then find our meaning in life after we are created. Nothing can predetermine human being’s life goals or their character, while objects are created with a defined purpose …show more content…
Anguish refers to both the decision making process, and the plan that comes with it. Sartre tells us, “Man is anguish. This is what they mean: a man who commits himself, and who realizes that he is not only the individual that he chooses to be, but also a legislator choosing at the same time what humanity as a whole should be, cannot help but be aware of his own full and profound responsibility” (25). By this, Sartre means that anguish is basically to know what responsibilities are as a whole. It is knowing what they are, how to handle them, and taking care of the things we are held responsible too. When we make decisions, it is important that there is a plan that comes with them. Sartre believes that people try and like to hide their own individual anguish but we all have it inside us. Sartre shows us this through the example of the military leader. When a military leader takes it upon himself to launch an attack and sends a number of men into war to fight to the death, it is his choice to do this. He is making this decision alone. The military leader will feel anguish, he has to deal with the situation and make decisions that will benefit the greater good. He has to make decisions to send his men into a battle where they may lose their lives, but are protecting the greater good of their country. There is responsibility that comes with anguish, and through his responsibilities he will feel bad and have pain.
Existentialism prescribes individuals to adopt their own values and life direction; although Gardner feels this will lead to nihilism. In a PBS television documentary in 1978, Gardner stated Sartre's philosophy as “paranoid and loveless and faithless and egoistic” (The Originals: The Writer in America). Gardner’s remark exemplifies a belief in organized society that benefits its citizens--he most likely wouldn’t be opposed to socialism. This is nothing Gardner fears more than passionless and sacrilegious human beings, per what Grendel
The people are given a sense of forgiveness, something that they do not deserve. Sartre purposefully creates this king and god pair to be the head of the internal force governing and enslaving the Argives. While talking to Aegistheus, Zeus explains this enslavement, but Sartre has him do it in such a way that it appears as a burden, “the bane of gods and kings” (100). Sartre puts Zeus in the form of man to appeal more clearly to Aegistheus about their shared “passion for order” so that Aegistheus maintains rule of his kingdom (101). Sartre’s technique here is to insert a character that manipulates with words. Therefore, all of this is simply an act. Zeus’s true intentions are selfish and corrupt; he only desires praise and suffering from his subjects. He doesn’t want to lose the “profit” of twenty thousand lamenters that he bargained for with the life of Agamemnon (100). Sartre provides the audience with a moment to think about religion in general. If Zeus behaves like this and “[likes] crimes that pay,” then maybe the real god is the same (99). Sartre imparts to the audience that religion is flawed in itself. He continues to have Aegistheus exploit his power
In his lecture, Existentialism is a Humanism, Jean-Paul Sartre discusses common misconceptions people, specifically Communists and Christians, have about existentialism and extentanitalists (18). He wants to explain why these misconceptions are wrong and defend existentialism for what he believes it is. Sartre argues people are free to create themselves through their decisions and actions. This idea is illustrated in the movie 13 Going on Thirty, where one characters’ decision at her thirteenth birthday party and her actions afterwards make her become awful person by the time she turns thirty. She was free to make these decisions but she was also alone. Often the idea of having complete free will at first sounds refreshing, but when people
At the end of Being and Nothingness,Jean-Paul Sartre concedes that he has not overcome one of the key objections to existentialism viz., an outline of ethics, and states that he will do so later. Although Sartre attempted the project of an existential ethics, it was never quite completed. Enter Simone De Beauvoir. In this book, De Beauvoir picks up where Sartre has left us, refusing to answer the question of ethics. For De Beauvoir, human nature involves and ontological ambiguity whose finitude is bound in a duality. This duality of body and consciousness is the ambiguity which remakes nature the way we want it to be as a facticity of transcendence. It is within this understanding that the project of ethics must begin in ambiguity. However,
Many Christians rejected the philosophy of existentialism on the grounds that it denies “the reality and seriousness of human affairs” and that man will “be incapable… of condemning either the point of view or the action of anyone else.” (Sartre 1). Sartre denies this claim later in Existentialism is a Humanism by rejecting the misconception that an existentialist holds no conviction. Rather, he states, existentialists have the most conviction of anyone, because in “choosing for himself he chooses for all men.” (Sartre 4) Sartre claims this to be the “deeper meaning of existentialism.” It is the subjectivity of what is good or evil, the essence that man decides for himself, that has an impact on everyone else; within this subjectivity lies the responsibility for bettering mankind, a responsibility few men would choose to ignore.
Existentialism is a philosophical movement rooted in the work of the Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard, who lived in the mid-1800s. The movement gained popularity in the mid-1900s thanks to the work of the French intellectuals Jean-Paul Sartre, and Albert Camus, including Sartre’s Being and Nothingness (1943). According to existentialists, life has no purpose, the universe is indifferent to human beings, and humans must look to their own actions to create meaning, if it is possible to create meaning at all. Existentialists consider questions of personal freedom and responsibility.Existentialism, better classified as a movement rather than a doctrine of philosophy, emerged in the mid to
the play may be pass to modern society, that one may not learn, or even
May, Rollo. Existence. The. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1958. Sartre, Jean-Paul. A. Essays on Existentialism.
The key belief of existentialists is that existence precedes essence. In order to understand that claim we must first understand what Jean- Paul Sartre means by the term “essence.” He gives an example of a person forging a paper-cutter. When an individual sets out to make any object, he/she has a purpose for it in mind and an idea of what the object will look like before beginning the actual production of it, so this object has an essence, or purpose, before it ever has an existence. The individual, as its creator, has given the paper-cutter its essence. Using the paper cutter example, Sartre argues that human beings cannot have an essence (or purpose) before their “production,” becaus...
Existentialism is a philosophical theory or approach that emphasizes the existence of the individual person as a free and responsible agent determining his or her own development through acts of the will. To Sartre, saying that som...
Existentialism as a distinct philosophical and literary movement belongs to the 19th and 20th centuries. Although existentialism is impossible to define, some of its common themes can be identified. One of the major theme is the stress on concrete individual existence and, consequently, on subjectivity, individual freedom, and choice. 19th century Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard, was the first writer to call himself existential. He wrote in his journal, "I must find a truth that is true for me . . . the idea for which I can live or die.
We choose, act, and take responsibility for everything, and thus we live, and exist. Life cannot be anything until it is lived, but each individual must make sense of it. The value of life is nothing else but the sense each person fashions into it. To argue that we are the victims of fate, of mysterious forces within us, of some grand passion, or heredity, is to be guilty of bad faith. Sartre says that we can overcome the adversity presented by our facticity, a term he designs to represent the external factors that we have no control over, such as the details of our birth, our race, and so on, by inserting nothingness into it.
Man goes through life, waking each day and participating in his own existence without truly existing. He is always in search of a greater meaning, and in the process fails to find one as he is on a constant search for something that cannot be grasped by the normality that is the human psyche. A similar example can be found in the capitalistic work force of modern day. Man works the majority of his life, always training and aiming for more, only to retire and live on a portion of what he was making. During his time working he lost out on his family, his sleep, often times his own enjoyment, for an ideal that often times is never achieved. This is a trivial situation, yet it is painted in a rather angelic light in our society. Why is it, then, that Sartre can be dismissed as trivial when trivialities exist in nearly every day to day life? Quite likely, this is because Existentialism is an “on-paper theory” so to speak, and in theory is looks quite differently than in reality. Man, as in this case, does not realise that he often follows the rules which he opposes. In addition, much of today’s society exists under a form of organized religion, a society with which Existentialism exists in
Sartre, Jean-Paul. “Existentialism is Humanism.” Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre. Ed. Walter Kaufman. Meridian Publishing
Sartre, Jean-Paul. “Existentialism is Humanism.” Existentialism from Dostoevsky to Sartre. Ed. Walter Kaufman. Meridian Publishing