Sarah Koenig's Serial Summary

1046 Words3 Pages

Serial, a true crime podcast known for its thorough and engaging investigations by narrator Sarah Keonig, covers a variety of cases with these themes in common: love, death, justice, and truth. As essential as they seem, Koenig's in-depth and brutally blunt analyses of her cases are not any child's play intended for high schoolers and older. In the first season, a murder mystery involving the death of a high-schooler named Hae Min Lee presents a wide range of suspects, with the major ones narrowed down to Adnan Syed and Jay Wilds. A special request from Rabia Chaudry – Adnan's attorney and family friend – for a further look at this case, mixed with Koenig's personal interest and journalistic curiosity, was a driving factor in exploring this …show more content…

As a result, she recreated the same murder route that Adnan Syed took, according to the story told by the prosecution. Therefore, Koenig, along with the help of podcast producer Dana Chivvis, creates an anecdote they can relate to themselves, allowing them to build their thoughts and reflections on this basis. For example, one of the constraints that Koenig explored in her recreation was the execution of the murder as a whole. According to the prosecution's timeline, supported by Jay's testimony, the murder happened in 21 minutes, from 2:15 p.m. to 2:36 p.m. after school, when he called Jay to pick him up at the end. Sarah says, "It does seem far-fetched because there's no room for error." Any pauses even if it is. The buses, the drive, the strangulation. The movement of the body. The call is on. They all have to happen as quickly as they possibly can for the 2:36 call to work" (Koenig). This anecdote adds a relatable and human element to the situation, explaining its bizarre nature in the first place. By presenting all the facets that have to perfectly line up to contribute to the success of the murder, Koenig describes the situation's small chances of occurring, which she witnessed herself, supporting Adnan's innocence. Additionally, Koenig scrutinizes another overlooked detail involving a phone booth from the prosecution's perspective of the murder: "Weirdly, we have not been able to …show more content…

Within her arguments, she entails some problems with the cell phone towers and call logs provided by the State. In fact, Sarah starts by describing the evidence of the cell phone tower as discreditable due to its inconsistency. Koenig notes, "The problems arise when you're trying to say, 'I can prove you were at such and such at such and such a time because of the cell tower your phone pinged.' You can't do that with certainty, because of the way cell towers get activated, and how much territory they cover. In fact, these kinds of records are mostly useful as a way to say where someone wasn't, rather than where he or she was. Like if a call pings a tower in downtown Baltimore, I'm going to be pretty confident that you're not making that call from Annapolis, or D.C., or Patapsco State Park" (Koenig). Her point is derived from pure logic, as she points out that the audience cannot wholeheartedly trust the State's evidence of the towers due to their functionality. By presenting this logical argument, the author appeals to the reader's sense of reason and logic and reinforces the idea that the cell towers should be used with caution when determining someone's location, ultimately supporting Adnan's innocence. Furthermore, Koenig utilizes the inconsistencies of the call log records: "In fact, he repeatedly says that Adnan called him around 3:40

Open Document