Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The similarities between samurai and knights
The similarities between samurai and knights
Samurai culture in modern japan
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The similarities between samurai and knights
The main idea about this essay is about knights and samurai. The essential question is were the similarities between samurai and knights greater than the differences? The thesis statement is the similarities between samurai and knights were greater than the differences.
The first topic is the characteristics of the samurai. The question is: what were the characteristics of the samurai and samurai culture? The thesis is: the samurai were a warrior culture that was unique in Japan. The samurai follow a code of conduct known as ‘‘Bushido’’. A good and true samurai was loyalty, self sacrifice, justice, sense of shame, refined manners, purity, modesty, frugality, martial spirit, honor and affection. These are conducts that were being given emphasis in Bushido, the ‘‘way of warrior’’. Samurai had to devote their self to duty at all times. Samurai were soldiers who serve nobles to protect their lands. Samurai paid by their feudal lords, the Daimyo, in rice or land. Samurai would work for the employer to protect
…show more content…
his property goods and family. Samurai were warriors who trained to kill everyday. Samurai began training as children. Small samurai began practising the basics of fencing with a wooden sword at the age of 3. Boys were sent to be raised by relatives or to the home of a fencing instructor. There were no special school for samurai daughters. Samurai women did not fight on the battlefield. The second topic is, the characteristics of knighthood.
The question is: what were the characteristics of knighthood. The thesis is: knights were part of a warrior culture that was unique in feudal europe. Knights were expected to follow a code of honor called ‘‘chivalry’’. Knights had to be loyal subjects first, competent warriors second and chivalrous third, adhering to a strict code of conduct that governed their lives. Though most were the noble birth, knights did not have to nobles. Training to become a knight was arduous and lengthy, even for most highly born. Knights were employed as soldiers by the european noble. Knights were professional warriors. Knights had military training. Knights fight to protect their land and people. Knights began training as children. Knights had to learn how to ride a pony. At the age of 14 they were eligible to become a squire. Then they were sented to serve as a page to his father’s
overlord. The third topic is samurai and knights were similar. The question is: were the culture of samurai and knights similar? The thesis is: the culture define samurai and knights. Both samurai and knights follow a code of conduct. Knights follows a code called ‘‘chivalry’’ and samurai had to follow a code called ‘‘bushido’’. The code bushido and chivalry were both codes of honor as well as conduct. These code represented a lot of honor, respect, and loyalty to their lords. Bushido and chivalry helped knights and samurai become better vassals. Samurai and knights both began their training at a young age. Samurai and knights had physical training. Samurai and knights began training at the age 3 or 4. They both had to go through a ceremony. They both worked for powerful land owners. They both go paid for their service. They had to fight to protect their lords land or people. This essay was all about knights and samurai and how they were alike and their differences. It was about the characteristics of knights and samurai. And how young they trained and what they got in return for their service.
Even though knights and samurai have many similarities, they have their differences. Knight’s armor and weapons were different. The knights also had different training. Lastly, they followed different codes. The little differences that set knights and samurai apart give knights an advantage in a one on one
My claims were on how the samurai had a higher possiblity on winning a battle. Both knights and samurais are two warriors with similarities and differences. Those differences have an affect on a battle such as someone defeating the other. Over all with the samurais advantages on their armor, training, and the knights beliefs, they'll have a higher chance to win a
Many people often see little similarity between the country of Japan and Europe. However, there are actually several similarities between these two countries. In fact, Reischauer and Jansen note that Feudal Japan had departed so far from East Asian norms that it was more similar to medieval Europe than it was to China. Thus, the knight of Europe and the samurai of Japan despite a lack of contact with one another shared several common elements. This was a result of many similarities social and cultural influences experienced by the two distant countries.
As learners of Europe and Japan, the question “ who would win a battle-a samurai or knight” is commonly kept in mind. A samurai and knight are similar in many ways. A samurai would mostly win the battle because they have better weapons, armor, and training. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in weapons, armor, and training.
Do you know someone in the military? A loved one, a friend, do you know what they go through? I may not, but I do know about the harsh training and war that occurred for the Samurais and Knights. In Europe and Japan the empires were falling and Clans were taking over Japan. The government came up with an idea to create feudalism. There was an agreement in both Europe and Japan that exchanged land for protection. The similarities between Samurai and Knights were greater than the differences. This can be shown by looking at the three most similar areas: social position, training and armor, and life, honor, and death. The Samurai and Knights has their differences, but were the similarities greater than those differences.
Life during the Middle Ages was full of social change, division, and classism. This feudal society of Britain was divided into three estates. (social classes) Within the second estate was the the knight who was a soldier for the king who fought in many battles. Even though the knight is expected to have the strength and the skills to fight in battle, all knights during the Medieval period additionally had a chivalrous aspect to them. Chivalry was the honor code of a knight which included bravery, courtesy, honor, and gallantry toward women. Within the stories of the “Wife of Bath’s Tale” and “Le Morte d’Arthur”, the code of chivalry was broken by knights which show the corruption of England’s feudal society.
As can be seen above, European knights and Japanese Samurais shared lots of differences including training, armor, weaponry, true values and rules. This is because they both came from different countries, and have different lifestyles, cultures, and religions, which influenced them to develop
Akira Kurosaw’s Seven Samurai is a film that encompasses various ideologies in order to allow the audience to understand the lives of Japanese people during the 1600’s. The film delves deep in social issues of the roles of the people within the society, the expectations as well as the obligations within the respected castes and elements within groups of ; suffering, working together, protecting family and working for the better good of the community.
Musui’s Story is the exciting tale of a low class samurai’s life towards the end of the Tokugawa era. Although one would normally imagine a samurai to be a noble illustrious figure, Musui’s Story portrays the rather ignominious life of an unemployed samurai. Nonetheless, this primary account demonstrates the tenacity of samurai values and privileges present at the end of the Tokugawa shogunate. The social status of samurai had been elevated to such a state that even someone like Musui was easily able to gain influence in everyday affairs with his privileges. Not only that, but he had retained his values as a warrior and still kept great pride for his arts in weaponry.
Essay with Outline Loyalty, courage, honor, purity, and courtesy are all attributes of a knight that displays chivalry. Sir Gawain and the Green Knight is truly a story of the test of these attributes. In order to have a true test of these attributes, there must first be a knight worthy of being tested, meaning that the knight must possess chivalric attributes to begin with. Sir Gawain is self admittedly not the best knight around. He says "I am the weakest, well I know, and of wit feeblest; / and the loss of my life [will] be least of any" (Sir Gawain, l. 354-355). To continue on testing a knight that does not seem worthy certainly will not result in much of a story, or in establishing a theme. Through the use of symbols, the author of Sir Gawain is able to show that Gawain possesses the necessary attributes to make him worthy of being tested. He also uses symbols throughout the tests of each individual attribute, and in revealing where Gawain’s fault lies. The effective use of these symbols enables the author to integrate the test of each individual attribute into a central theme, or rather one overall test, the test of chivalry.
During the Medieval Times, knights hold high status and are seen as sovereign, yet their actions are contradicting. Knights stand for loyalty, justice, and chivalry; however, most are liars, cheaters, and foolish. Throughout medieval literature, authors create characters that contain both attributes and utilize literary elements to highlight this medieval crisis. Many Knights maintain a loyal and noble character because chivalry outlasts hypocrisy.
... in body and mind, to governing of the Emperors, to the study of the martial arts. Their code of honor and loyalty are traditions that all Japanese respect and try to live up to even today. The self sacrifice of ones own life for a common cause was even seen in World War II when Japanese pilots deliberately crashed their planes into United States ships anchored at Pearl Harbor. This was a devastating attack and can show the horror caused by revenge and their belief in sacrifice and honor. They were even called kamikaze pilots after the famous samurai battle of long ago. The influence of the samurai continues to be seen in Japan today in a positive way with the stories and legends of heroic samurai and the bushido as their guide.
Broughton, Bradford B. Dictionary of Medieval Knighthood and Chivalry: Concepts and Terms. New York: Greenwood Press, 1986.
...e respect, honor, and loyalty make this difference for me, but there is something to be said about the comparison. I find that the knights are very efficient, great warriors, and are very similar to samurai’s in a lot of ways. They both wear armor, they both train from a young age, and both are taught about honor, loyalty, and respect; but samurais are taught more effectively in their training, and the Japanese concepts were better. So to answer the essential question of this essay, I would say that there is certainly a large amount of similarities between the two warriors, but if you would consider the samurai’s skills that are better, or enhanced; to be differences, than I would have to conclude with no. The ‘differences’, are far too great in my opinion to say that the similarities are so great that they are almost the same, because they are very different indeed.
We’ve all seen the movies where a minority culture or group is beginning to struggle because of the majority and it takes just one man to save them all. Movies like “Dances With Wolves”, “Avatar”, and, of course, “The Last Samurai”. All are considered to be pretty good movies by most people’s standards but there is just one problem. That savior I was talking about, is always white. This is especially obvious in the “The Last Samurai”.