Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Similarities and differences between feudal Japan and Europe
Samurai vs knights dbq
Knights and samurai dbq
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Who Would Win? Samurai or Knights?
By: Chloe
The European Knights and Japanese Samurai were two talented societies. They could each hold their own ground if anything bad were to happen, but only one could be the best. If we were to put Medieval Europe and the Japanese Samurai geographically right next to each other, the Samurai would emerge victorious. Medieval Japan was a very talented society. Constantly coming up with new technology and fighting styles, however the reason Japan would win the duel was due to, Japan’s lightweight multitude of weapons, intelligent social hierarchy, and its Code of Conduct. Japan had a variety of weapons each of them had a different purpose. The Katana was the Samurais main sword. Having a blade around 3-feet long, which was folded at least a hundred times, so it could easily penetrate through tough armor. If the Samurais and Knights were to have a battle, the Knights in their 100 pound armor, constantly being restricted in many ways, could not dodge the Katana. With the samurais unbelievable skills, they could easily slice through the weak spots made on the the Knights armor. According to Ernle Bradford in his book The Shield and the Sword “it is one of the mysteries in the history of armour how the crusaders can
…show more content…
Meaning you were classified by what job you did, or if you were born into a wealthy family and were automatically put into that class. Japan was very militant in the Medieval Era. They had an Emperor, however the Shogun (militant leader) was the one who was in charge. Compared to Europe, if you did something wrong, or proved unloyal you wouldn’t go pray to god to forgive you of your sins, you would have to face the Shogun or Daimyo. This suggests that Japan didn’t tolerate anybody speaking out or doing something wrong. Meaning, that everyone was in check and doing everything right. Leading up to a good functional
Even though knights and samurai have many similarities, they have their differences. Knight’s armor and weapons were different. The knights also had different training. Lastly, they followed different codes. The little differences that set knights and samurai apart give knights an advantage in a one on one
The question was, who would win in a battle? A samurai? Or a knight? Of Course they both have their advantages and disadvantages but they also both have things in common that they can't do. A samurai warrior was a member of a powerful japanese military. On the other hand a knight warrior was a man of noble birth who after a couple stages, he would be raised to honorable military rank. While knights and samurais have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in their armor, beliefs, and their training techniques.
Many people often see little similarity between the country of Japan and Europe. However, there are actually several similarities between these two countries. In fact, Reischauer and Jansen note that Feudal Japan had departed so far from East Asian norms that it was more similar to medieval Europe than it was to China. Thus, the knight of Europe and the samurai of Japan despite a lack of contact with one another shared several common elements. This was a result of many similarities social and cultural influences experienced by the two distant countries.
As learners of Europe and Japan, the question “ who would win a battle-a samurai or knight” is commonly kept in mind. A samurai and knight are similar in many ways. A samurai would mostly win the battle because they have better weapons, armor, and training. While knights and samurai have many similarities, in a one on one battle, the advantage would be to the samurai and this can be seen in weapons, armor, and training.
Do you know someone in the military? A loved one, a friend, do you know what they go through? I may not, but I do know about the harsh training and war that occurred for the Samurais and Knights. In Europe and Japan the empires were falling and Clans were taking over Japan. The government came up with an idea to create feudalism. There was an agreement in both Europe and Japan that exchanged land for protection. The similarities between Samurai and Knights were greater than the differences. This can be shown by looking at the three most similar areas: social position, training and armor, and life, honor, and death. The Samurai and Knights has their differences, but were the similarities greater than those differences.
As can be seen above, European knights and Japanese Samurais shared lots of differences including training, armor, weaponry, true values and rules. This is because they both came from different countries, and have different lifestyles, cultures, and religions, which influenced them to develop
"(Doc. A) The beliefs Japanese grew up with were that the Emperor was sublime and his empire should be followed everywhere nerveless by everyone. They were trained to be dedicated; willing to do anything to please their superior. “An old order... (European and American)... is now crumbling.
In also shows that the Japanese samurai were warriors of the shogun rulers during feudal times and they were fearsome in combat and were fast on horseback. In the movie the Samurai wore armor made of metal plates and leather, held together by cords and buckles, carrying their sword or bow. The movie shows Samurai were the only people in Japan who could carry swords and they wore their hair tied back at the top of their head in a knot. The brow and crown, at the top of the head, were shaved bare to represent that they were a
...th wore helmets, armor, and worked for their leader, the shoguns or daimyo for the samurai, and for the knights their lord(s). Lastly, they both had peasants. The peasants both had to pay their taxes and had no power. Feudal Japan and Feudal Europe both had a certain social class order for power and how the people lived and worked.
...imply by looking at the length and quality a sword, Kenkichi backed down. The sword was essentially an extension of the samurai body during battle. Katsu not only displays great swordsmanship throughout his story, but he shows deep reverence for his sword, befitting of a samurai warrior.
The top structure of the society includes the Shoguns, Daimyos and Samurais. ‘Shogun’ was the title granted by the Emperor to Japan’s top military commander (Web-japan.org, 2013). Initially Emperors controlled the country but over time Shoguns became more powerful than the Emperor and took over the whole government, the Shogun was generally the real ruler of the country until 1867 when feudalism was abolished (Web-japan.org, 2013). Daimyos were the lords and their roles were to manage and maintain the law, collect taxes and aiding in armed forces for the Shogun (Ask.com, 2013). Samurais were the members of the military class, they were the warriors of traditional Japan. The roles of the Samurais were to protect and serve their daimyos or lords usually in wars (Answers.yahoo.com, 2013).
Today we have military to protect but back thousands of years go the only thing ancient civilizations had were Knights and Samurai, Fierce warriors that were loyal to their leader and fought with honor. Samurais and Knights do have many similarities, however their differences are much greater. Catharina Blomberg proclaims in “The Heart of a Warrior: Origins of and Religious Background of the Samurai System in Feudal Japan”, “The Life of a Samurai was not his own but belonged entirely to his lord, and it was the duty of a (samurai) to consider this at all times”. This proves that knights and samurai are more different because knights did not belong to their lord. A knight had an agreement between them and their lord but the lord did not have
...e respect, honor, and loyalty make this difference for me, but there is something to be said about the comparison. I find that the knights are very efficient, great warriors, and are very similar to samurai’s in a lot of ways. They both wear armor, they both train from a young age, and both are taught about honor, loyalty, and respect; but samurais are taught more effectively in their training, and the Japanese concepts were better. So to answer the essential question of this essay, I would say that there is certainly a large amount of similarities between the two warriors, but if you would consider the samurai’s skills that are better, or enhanced; to be differences, than I would have to conclude with no. The ‘differences’, are far too great in my opinion to say that the similarities are so great that they are almost the same, because they are very different indeed.
Japanese sword history spans several centuries. It is commonly divided into five major periods, the Jokoto and Koto periods or the ancient swords, pre-650 A.D, and the old swords from post-650 A.D. until 1596 A.D. when the Shinto...
There are many historical aspects of the Japanese, but the most interesting is the history of the Samurai. In Japans history war played a large role in the country. Controlling clans fought for parts of the land and overall control of the country. These clans were powerful families that resided in the country and who all wanted power and control of Japan for themselves. The families that would be in control were known as Shoguns. These shoguns would have warriors that fought for them if any of the other clan families would try to attack him in order to overthrow him and take his power from him. The Samurai followed a code that developed from Chinese beliefs when in battle. The Samurais code was known as the Bushido. This code was also known as “The Way of The Warrior” which was the main belief s...