In the film “The Great Debaters”, all of the main characters exhibited qualities of heroism. One character that stood out, in particular, was Samantha Booke. Ms. Booke was the first female member of the Wiley College debate team, and one of the few women in the 1930’s that received an education. Throughout the film, Samantha was forced to overcome loneliness, gender and racial inequality, and saddest of all, heartbreak. Being the true hero she is, she conquered her hardships with flying colors.
Since early civilization, gender inequality has been prevalent, in the workforce and at home. Woman are expected to be the homemaker, not the worker. In a time, when men had a hard time finding employment, Samantha was one of the few women to seek an education, intending to better herself. She was not only looked down upon for receiving an education, but for her race and gender. Booke did not allow others judgments to discourage her aspirations or stray her from future achievements. Regardless of external opinions, Samantha argued her beliefs effectively and passionately, proving that gender and race do not determine ability.
…show more content…
As stated by William Shakespeare “Love is blind, and lovers cannot see”.
In this instance, Samantha Booke was so blinded by love, she did not see the potential wrongdoing, Henry Lowe could commit. Often after a fault in a relationship, heartache and mistrust are common feelings to develop, especially amongst woman. After Lowe was unfaithful to Samantha, she was in a distraught state. In her time of devastation, Samantha Booke exemplified selfless behavior, a quality of heroism, by putting her personal needs aside. She channeled her audacity into productivity, that would benefit her team's argument in the debate. Rather than dwelling on her misfortunes, she made her teammates and wrongly unjust citizens her
priority. One of the hardest challenges Ms. Booke faced was her nonexistent support system. Throughout the film, many of the main characters faced dilemmas. However, those characters had people to refer to for advice, or assist them during their situations. For example, James Farmer Jr. had an amazing role model as a parent, who encouraged him to be excellent. Samantha had no parental figure to model after. As for Mr. Tulsen, his wife was his rock; she supported him through thick and thin. Samantha was on her own in a big city, with no-one and no money. That did not avert her the least bit, rather encourage her to create a secure and happy life for herself; speaking for myself, that is extremely heroic. Through her obstacles and achievements, Samantha Booke has proven she's a hero. She has not only achieved success on her own but assisted her team to victory. With her arguments, Samantha challenged the opinions of her audience and left them in awe of her presence. Ms. Booke paved a path for young female scholars and motivated others to fight for what's right. In my opinion, her efforts were the most heroic in this film.
...welcomed in the public arena.”9 (Staton, 96). Here, by going against what was thought to be socially acceptable, Macphail displayed herself as a role model again. She proved that women were able to be exactly what men were, so they should not sit back, but instead prove themselves to those who opposed.
On a personal level, the author feels as if she is unequal in her society and cites evidences from
“A disadvantage is that as a girl, you’re expected to be feminine and there are certain gender roles you’re expected to conform to,” said Rhoney. My response to her answer was, “Exactly. Why am I always expected to wear a dress and curl my hair? What if I want to roll around in dirt and play football?” We laughed and continued to talk. “My work and time is just as good as a man’s. Why does he get to make ten dollars more than me? I’m probably a lot better at whatever the job may be anyway,” said Rhoney. Being a woman of color also has its disadvantages. “Having attended a predominately white school, my peers didn’t expect me to know as much as them. My intelligence was often overlooked,” said
"Is Sammy a heroic character?" I was asked this question and I'm here to argue it. Sammy isn't heroic because he makes abominable choices.
Women have faced oppression in the literary community throughout history. Whether they are seen as hysterical or unreliable, women writers seem to be faulted no matter the topics of their literature. However, Anne Bradstreet and Margaret Fuller faced their critics head-on. Whether it was Bradstreet questioning her religion or Fuller discussing gender fluidity, these two women did not water down their opinions to please others. Through their writings, Bradstreet and Fuller made great strides for not just women writers, but all women.
In his novel, Cantor's Dilemma, Dr. Djerassi uses female characters to address sexist issues arising from women integrating into the predominantly male science world. The characters, Celestine Price and Professor Arderly, are used to show examples of how women have little voice in the field of science. The female characters suggest how women are often looked upon as sex objects rather than co-workers and they are given little opportunity to balance a scientific career with raising a family. By weaving these issues into his novel, Dr. Djerassi illustrates the following theme: Discrimination against women in the field of science is harmful to the progression of scientific exploration. If women are excluded from science, then an artificial limit is put on human resources. (The field of science will not utilize the potential female minds available.)
As mentioned above, women’s role were unjust to the roles and freedoms of the men, so an advanced education for women was a strongly debated subject at the beginning of the nineteenth century (McElligott 1). The thought of a higher chance of education for women was looked down upon, in the early decades of the nineteenth century (The American Pageant 327). It was established that a women’s role took part inside the household. “Training in needlecraft seemed more important than training in algebra” (327). Tending to a family and household chores brought out the opinion that education was not necessary for women (McElligott 1). Men were more physically and mentally intellectual than women so it was their duty to be the educated ones and the ones with the more important roles. Women were not allowed to go any further than grammar school in the early part of the 1800’s (Westward Expansion 1). If they wanted to further their education beyond grammar, it had to be done on their own time because women were said to be weak minded, academically challenged and could n...
James’ character did what most rebellious young American women would do. She broke free from cultural restrictions and lived her life as she pleased. A woman of passion, she chose to ignore the repressive attitudes of those around her. Women of today are still fighting for equality, but have authors of the past and women like the characters in their stories to thank for the improvements they made.
As a strong feminist, Susan Glaspell wrote “Trifles” and then translated it to a story called “A Jury of Her Peers.” These works express Glaspell’s view of the way women were treated at the turn of the century. Even though Glaspell is an acclaimed feminist, her story does not contain the traditional feminist views of equal rights for both sexes.
In the first half of the book, “Half-changed world”, “Half-changed minds”, the author argues about how social and environmental factors influence the mind on the gender differences. She also includes the history and impact of the gender stereotypes we see and how science has been used to justify the use of sexism. In the first chapter in the “Half-changed world” section of the book she uses an example of if a researcher tapped you on the shoulder and asked you to write down what males and females were like if you would write down things such as compassionate for females and aggressive for males or if you would look at the researcher and tell them that every person is unique.(Fine,3) Based on the information in the book most people would pick up the pencil and write down descriptions of each gender based on the way the world perceives gender. She also talks about marriage and how “the husband is the breadwinner and works outside the home to provide financial resources for the family. In return, his wife is responsible for both the emotional and household labor created by the family…” (Fine,78)
The androcentric view of history often fails to acknowledge the achievements of notable women who have made profound impacts that have revolutionized the way in which we see the world, as well as the universe. Although the modernized 21st century society is more apt to recognize the achievements of women with an equivocal perspective with men, it was not always so. During the early 20th century, women were consistently denied equality with men due to a perverse androcentric, male-dominated perspective that deemed women as subordinate and insignificant. This androcentric perspective limited the opportunities available to women at the time, leaving them only with domestic occupations that were deemed acceptable for women such as nurses, teachers or clerics. Very few women aspired for higher education, and even fewer achieved it. There were very few colleges that accepted women at the time, save for those erected for women alone. It is because of this, women rarely e...
Murray argues that; women’s minds equal those of men, women’s mentality will increase with education, and a Biblical argument is moot. Murray even mentions that strength associated with intelligence fails to discredit women’s intellectual ability because: a) the people working in the fields (such as African American slaves) would then be the most intelligent, and b) masculine women and feminine men exist (Murray 180). Her points, though, come with a caveat. Murray wants education for women, but for women to continue in their same gender defined categories. Women can use their educated minds to occupy themselves during the mundane tasks such as sowing and sweeping. In fact, she argues that women will become more complacent and lose the attributes that annoy men, gossiping and unnecessary visits, and gain characteristics men would prefer, such as discretion and better judgement. Despite her limits on women’s rights, Murray asks a question that rings forth by following generations; “How is one exalted and the other depressed…The one is taught to aspire, and the other is early confined and limited. As their years increase, the sister must be wholly domesticated, while the brother is led by the hand through all the flowery paths of science” (Murry 178). Murray fought for women’s rights through education, and
One important question that needs to be asked is, “what is equal?” Equality between sexes and race has been stressed and made law in the late nineteenth century, but even though laws have been made to protect woman from this discrimination, it still occurs frequently. Equal is being treated the same way and having the same opportunities no matter who one is. Big business has not given women the chance to be equal with men. One does not normally see a woman as the owner, or even the manager of a major corporation, these jobs consistently go to men. Traditi...
Education for women in the 1800s was far different from what we know today. During her life, a girl was taught more necessary skills around the home than the information out of school books. A woman’s formal education was limited because her job opportunities were limited—and vice versa. Society could not conceive of a woman entering a profession such as medicine or the law and therefore did not offer her the chance to do so. It was much more important to be considered 'accomplished' than thoroughly educated. Elizabeth Bennet indicated to her sisters that she would continue to learn through reading, describing education for herself as being unstructured but accessible. If a woman desired to further he education past what her classes would teach her, she would have to do so independently, and that is what most women did.
Most women in Mrs Mallard’s situation were expected to be upset at the news of her husbands death, and they would worry more about her heart trouble, since the news could worsen her condition. However, her reaction is very different. At first she gets emotional and cries in front of her sister and her husbands friend, Richard. A little after, Mrs. Mallard finally sees an opportunity of freedom from her husbands death. She is crying in her bedroom, but then she starts to think of the freedom that she now has in her hands. “When she abandoned herse...