Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of teenage abortion
Literature review on teenager abortions
Literature review on teenager abortions
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Advantages and disadvantages of teenage abortion
“We Do Abortions Here: A Nurse’s Story” According to Sallie Tisdale abortion is necessary for women that shouldn’t be having children.
But her use of pathos and description shows that even she can’t handle the dark moments that experience with young pregnant women. She describes the process of abortion, the way she feels as well as the pregnant victims. Tisdale wants people to be educated in this area, so less abortion have to be performed. As she narrates her stories of teenagers receiving abortions, she believes that in some circumstances abortion is necessary, but it can also be a cruel, and tragic thing to be a part of, and could easily be avoided if people were more educated in the matter. “Soon I am talking to an eighteen-year-old women pregnant for the fourth time” (Tisdale 650). Tisdale’s use of pathos does not help her in this case. As she describes in detail what goes on during abortion, readers come to realizes how terrible and dark it really is. Tisdale describes the emotion pregnant women feel as they are having their child ripped away from them.
In “We Do Abortions Here: A Nurse’s Story” Sallie Tisdale reaches out to parents, schools, pretty much everyone. She tries to persuade them that abortion can be avoided if parents educated their kids about sex, and pregnancy. Tisdale choices her words carefully when
…show more content…
explaining to the pregnant women, what they are about to endure. “Later I describe the procedure to come, using care with my language” (Tisdale 652). She understand how touchy the subject can be for some women, but believes in certain situations it’s necessary. She uses these stories of women, to scare readers, to show them that if they aren’t carful this could be them. In Tisdale’s writing she narrates the struggle the pregnant women go through while receiving abortions. “Some are stoic, some hysterical, a few giggle uncontrollably, many cry” (Tisdale 652). As she tells these story, you try to picture yourself in their shoes. Wondering whether you would be the one crying or even laughing, as your unborn child is slowly slipping away from you. If people were more careful, this wouldn’t happen so often. Throughout Tisdale’s stories, and experiences with pregnant women she tries to get her readers to understand what you might have to go through if you’re not careful.
But she also stresses that it is a cruel, and terrible thing. “Abortion is the narrowest edge between kindness and cruelty. Done as well as it can be, it is still violent- merciful violence, like putting a suffering animal to death” (Tisdale 656). To Tisdale, if you are unfit or incapable of raising a child than, you are helping the suffering child by having them aborted. She relates abortion to putting a suffering animal to death. As if the child would be suffering if it was to come into this
world. She tries to persuade readers that abortion is sometimes necessary, but never essential. For those women that can’t care for children, she believes it’s a way to stop the infant from suffering. But as she shares her own feelings toward the procedure, you come to find out that even she struggles with abortion too. “It requires a willingness to live with conflict, fearlessness
“10 Arguments in Favor of Pro-Choice Policy.” Advocates for Youth. N.p., 2010. Web. 18 Mar. 2010. .
Mary Anne Warren contends that abortion is morally permissible on the grounds that a fetus is not a person. In her eyes, although, fetuses are genetically distinct humans they are not people because they do not have the necessary characteristics for personhood: sentience, reasoning, emotionality, the capacity to communicate, self-awareness, and moral agency. For her, the lack of these characteristics do not necessarily allude that a fetus is not a person only that it belittles the confidence that they are a person- or in other words creates doubt of their personhood. In this essay, I shall argue when it comes to emotionality Warren sets the bar too high and indoingso runs the risk of wrongly overlooking different types of emotionality, which
Pathos is the one of the most that the author use to describe the article. According to “All Abortions Must Be Illegal” Brown writes, “When removing a cancerous uterus, the intent is to save the mother; every effort to save the child should still be made. Thus, even if the child dies, the treatment is still fully justified” (Brown). Thus, Dr. Alan says; “Today it is possible for almost any patient to be brought through pregnancy alive, unless she suffer from a fatal illness such as cancer or leukemia, and if so, abortion would be unlikely to prolong, much less save life”. In others words, for some reason some women choose to abort because if born there child may be disabled, but this is not an excuse for abortion. Most people with any disabilities say that they are happy to be alive and would rather be alive than have been aborted. Also, for any women to choose to abort may be many physical medical complications and they will occur during the abortion they may be low but they can
“She may be unmarried or in a bad marriage. She may consider herself too poor to raise a child. She may think her life is too unstable or unhappy, or she may think that her drinking or drug use will damage the baby’s health” (126). The emotional appeal in this paragraph could make the reader think they are pro-choice. Apart from their use of pathos, the authors do a great job using a mixture of both ethos and logos. Page 130 is an example of both, which were used expertly to help the reader understand their point of view and the
Thomson’s essay was created as a strong, convincing essay. Thomson uses pathos when explaining the example for the mother and child situation. Thomson states “Some won’t even make an exception for a case in which continuation of the pregnancy is likely to shorten the mother’s life; they regard abortion as impermissible even to save the mother’s life.” (Thomson, 50) that even when the mother’s life is endangered, they still regard abortion as impermissible. However the case stated before is extremely rare and many people who are against abortion doesn’t believe in the extreme view. She states that “The extreme view could of course be weakened to say that while abortion is permissible to save the mother’s life, it may not be performed by a third party but only by the mother’s life.” (Thomson) the mother and child share the same body so it should be left in her hands to control the situation. Most up till now mostly showed a mixture of logos and pathos, but it did include the least amount of ethos. She gave an example “Suppose a woman has become pregnant, and learns that she has a cardiac condition such that she will die if she carries the baby to term. What may be done for him? And also if the fetus has the right to live, but as the mother is a person too, so has a right to life, but as the mother is a person
“On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion” by Mary Anne Warren is an in depth analysis of what, in Warren’s opinion, is exactly what defines a person and human being, the moral community, fetal development and the right to life, potential personhood and the right to life, and infanticide. Warren believes that emotion and morality should be entirely separate, and that abortion should be legal for all women, as denial would strip women of basic human rights, the rights that a woman holds over an unborn fetus. I personally agree with her arguments on these topics as I agree that women should be allowed to have abortions on their own terms, without subjection of authority or society telling her what she can and cannot do, as well as I agree for the most part on her view of what a person is, potential personhood not outweighing the choice of abortion, and her reasoning on what defines a person in the moral community. Warren insists that the “moral” sense of human and “genetic” sense of human must be kept separate in this observation. As she defines the two, she goes on to say that the confusion of the two “results in a slide of meaning, which serves to conceal the fallaciousness of the traditional argument that since (1) it is wrong to kill innocent human beings, and (2) fetuses are innocent human beings, then (3) it is wrong to kill fetuses.
When the smoke clears and the dust settles, only the women who experienced such events in their lives should speak on the psychological effects of abortions. However, I do know, as the poet so puts it (Banh, 2014) that, I knew them all though faintly, I loved them all and I will always have an open space in my heart for all my un-born children.
Talking about abortion brings out an emotional response in many women. This is because having an abortion takes a massive emotional toll on some women. As Nanyjo Mann said, three weeks after having an abortion, “I became preoccupied with the thoughts of death. I fantasized about how I would die. My baby struggled for two hours” (Reardon, 1987, p. xviii). In the forward of the book “Aborted Women, Silent No More” Nanyjo, a women telling her story of abortion, goes on to tell about feeling unstable with herself after having an abortion. She wanted to prove to herself that destroying others didn’t hurt, but it does (Reardon, 1987, p. xix-xx). Continuing in reading Nanyjo’s story, she tells all of the effects and feelings she went through after having an abortion including stress, depression and low self esteem. Any girl under the age of 18 would have an even harder time dealing with this type of stress. Teenagers are already seeking their identity and worry about their grades, looks, and peer acceptance. Going through the post abortion stress all by themselves would be overwhelming and potentially put them at risk for mental breakdown.
Imagine in today in America’s hyper-sexualized society, not being provided with any knowledge about contraception or sex education. Before Margaret Sanger’s activism, most women were in this position of oblivion about their own bodies. In “Morality of Birth Control”, Sanger argues effectively for the legalization and acceptance of both birth control and sex education using ethos, pathos, and logos to strengthen her argument.
A major reason why women get abortions is because it is unhealthy or unsafe but Galvan explains why that is not a justifiable reason. Even if the babies genes decide to go against it, the child should still get to experience life even if it isn’t for very long. The author explains that well-time pregnancies are great and give the baby a healthier start
While Pollitt states the claims made by the abortion opponents, she informs the reader on possible solutions to helping pregnant woman, instead of degrading them and making their life worse. Pollitt’s mission is for a woman to have control and rights over their own bodies with no government involvement, no one to say what women can or cannot do with her body, including her husband or family. A woman goes to great lengths to get an abortion and she would not do that if she was not positive on her decision being the right one. Pollitt discusses that instead of the republican’s and anti-abortionist trying to remove abortion availability and make abortion illegal, that the government should increase health care for everybody, birth control should
In “We Do Abortions Here: A Nurse’s Story,” Sallie Tisdale use pathos with specific stories and vivid imagery. She uses imagery as well to convey the moral and psychological conflict that comes with working in an abortion clinic, before finally stating her position on the topic.
For example, a mother who opts to abort lives a life full of misery and guilt following her unethical action. The same issue is explored by Kant, where he argues that frequent abortions would make the human race extinct. Therefore, not irrational or good to the society. Lastly, they argue that abortion denies the fetus the right to life which is granted by the Human Rights Commission. Judith Thomson argument that a human embryo is a person indicates that he or she has the right to life, and no one has a right to terminate it (Baird & Stuart, 78). Therefore, abortion is unacceptable, irrational and immoral action to
Abortion “is an issue that raises questions about life and death, about what a person is and when one becomes a person, about the meaning of life, about the rights of women, and about the duties of men”(Velasquez 485). Abortion is an unresolved ethical issue that has been in doubt for many years because one can argue that you are killing an innocent person/fetus but many argue that is not person because they don’t have a conscious or the characteristics that defines a “person”. John Stuart Mill in a way justifies abortion, Mill is known to be openly speak about women’s rights and about human rights. Although, it might be immortal to end someone’s life one might argued that the individual has the right to choose and have the option. But in
What creates individuality in us is the ability to have the right to our own opinion. As the rape culture and teenage pregnancy becomes a more apparent issue, abortion surfaces itself as a leading topic in today’s society. Although contraception may be an option for everyone, there are still risks involved and mistakes to be made. Females from a wide range of age groups frequently have abortions today because of wrong decisions and special circumstances. We see various advertisements and propaganda emerging all around us. The news media still continue to outline the pros and cons of having an abortion. Abortion has been the subject of debate for centuries between many human rights activists, religious groups, and even health care practitioners.