Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of propaganda during WW 2
The effect of 9/11 on America
Impact of 9/11 attack
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of propaganda during WW 2
Opinion
Sadistic Zealots
The acts of terrorists on September 11, 2001, demolished two important American
buildings and executed thousands of innocent victims. This united Americans, both to
mourn the loss of lives and to fight back against international terrorism. However
unforgivable, this attack was not a senseless act of violence by sadistic zealots.
Apparently, the terrorists were not aware of the long-term consequences of their actions.
The brainwashed crusaders may not have even known the motivation for the attack but
were blindly following a twisted act of eccentric Muslims. In either case, serious short and
long-term reactions will ensue until ultimately, a peaceful resolution will result or the
world will be at war.
The causes of this atrocious terrorism are numerous and date back to biblical
history when freedom fighters were misguided by radical factions, such as the zealots who
fought Roman domination while Christ sought peace. In the present, one of the chief
causes is America’s gift of approximately three billion dollars to Israel each year. This
money and support is then used to help the Israeli Army fight an endless territorial war
against Palestine. The result is anti-US. demonstrations in Palestine and other Arab
countries. The arsenals used by Israelis to attack Palestine were obtained through
American aid. US technology has provided for easy international travel and contemporary
buildings and cities produce easy targets to kill innocent victims with one mighty blow.
Therefore, when people ask today what Americans did to deserve this, the answer would
be simple. America entwined itself into a war over hallowed ground. Hoping to be a
mediator, it did not realize that it is in no place to proctor such a violent bonanza.
Basinger Hickey 2
The reactions of Americans to the terrorism were what everyone expected. An
initial fear of certain doom was followed by remorse and grief for the loss of lives. Next
came the nationwide sacred oath of revenge, one that was shared by the President of the
United States. He vowed vengeance on the perpetrators of the attack. Among the
individual Americans, no consensus is available on what they feel needs to be done.
Extremists feel that the only way to rectify this situation is to sacrifice all Arab countries.
Others hope that there is no need for any more violence, as it can only escalate into even
more trouble for targeted countries. For instance, perhaps the solution will be found by
bringing Osama bin Ladin and his cult of kamikaze bandits to justice other then executing
millions of innocent Arabs with a bomb.
resources to save him from a heart attack and then spend even more money on drugs to execute
The reality that shapes individuals as they fight in war can lead to the resentment they have with the world and the tragedies that they had experienced in the past. Veterans are often times overwhelmed with their fears and sensations of their past that commonly disables them to transgress and live beyond the emotions and apprehensions they witness in posttraumatic experiences. This is also seen in everyday lives of people as they too experience traumatic events such as September 11th and the fall of the World Trade Center or simply by regrets of decisions that is made. Ones fears, emotions and disturbances that are embraced through the past are the only result of the unconscious reality of ones future.
In the novel War and Peace In the Middle East, author Avi Shlaim argues that Arab nations have been unable to escape the post-Ottoman syndrome. In particular he describes how the various powers inside and outside the region have failed to produce peace. While some of Shlaim's arguments hinder the message, I agree with his overall thesis that the Middle East problems were caused and prolonged by the failure of both powers and superpowers to take into account the regional interests of the local states.
The soldiers that fought in the Vietnam War had to endure many incredibly horrifying experiences. It was these events that led to great human emotions. It was those feelings that were the things they carried. Everything they carried affected on them whether it was physical or mental. Every thing they carried could in one-way or another cause them to emotionally or physically break down. Pain, loss, a sense of safety and fear were probably the most challenging emotional, and psychological feelings for them to carry.
After an event of large magnitude, it still began to take its toll on the protagonist as they often “carried all the emotional baggage of men who might die” during the war (O’Brien 1187). The travesties that occurred with the brutality of war did not subside and began to affect those involved in a deeply emotional way. The multitude of disastrous happenings influenced the narrator to develop a psychological handicap to death by being “afraid of dying” although being “even more afraid to show it” (O’Brien 1187). The burden caused by the war creates fear inside the protagonist’s mind, yet if he were to display his sense of distress it would cause a deeper fear for those around him, thus making the thought of exposing the fear even more frightening. The emotional battle taking place in the psyche of the narrator is directly repressed by the war.
When a giant explosion ripped through Alfred P. Murrah federal building April 19,1995, killing 168 and wounding hundreds, the United States of America jumped to a conclusion we would all learn to regret. The initial response to the devastation was all focused of middle-eastern terrorists. “The West is under attack,”(Posner 89), reported the USA Today. Every news and television station had the latest expert on the middle east telling the nation that we were victims of jihad, holy war. It only took a few quick days to realize that we were wrong and the problem, the terrorist, was strictly domestic. But it was too late. The damage had been done. Because America jumped to conclusions then, America was later blind to see the impending attack of 9/11. The responsibility, however, is not to be placed on the America people. The public couldn’t stand to hear any talk of terrorism, so in turn the White House irresponsibly took a similar attitude. They concentrated on high public opinion and issues that were relevant to Americans everyday. The government didn’t want to deal with another public blunder like the one in Oklahoma City. A former FBI analyst recalls, “when I went to headquarters (Washington, D.C.) later that year no one was interested in hearing anything about Arab money connections unless it had something to do with funding domestic groups. We stumbled so badly on pinpointing the Middle East right off the bat on the Murrah bombing. No one wanted to get caught like that again,”(Posner 90). The result saw changes in the counter terrorism efforts; under funding, under manning, poor cooperation between agencies, half-hearted and incompetent agency official appointees and the list goes on. All of these decisions, made at the hands of the faint-hearted, opened the doors wide open, and practically begged for a terrorist attack. So who’s fault is it? The public’s for being
This marked the beginning of the Palestine armed conflict, one of its kinds to be witnessed in centuries since the fall of the Ottoman Empire and World War 1. Characterized by a chronology of endless confrontations, this conflict has since affected not only the Middle East relations, but also the gl...
September 11, 2001 was one of the most devastating and horrific events in the United States history. Americans feeling of a secure nation had been broken. Over 3,000 people and more than 400 police officers and firefighters were killed during the attacks on The World Trade Center and the Pentagon; in New York City and Washington, D.C. Today the term terrorism is known as the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives (Birzer, Roberson). This term was clearly not defined for the United States for we had partial knowledge and experience with terrorist attacks; until the day September 11, 2001. At that time, President George W. Bush, stated over a televised address from the Oval Office, “Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shatter steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve.” President Bush stood by this statement for the United States was about to retaliate and change the face of the criminal justice system for terrorism.
essay I will explain all aspects of why the US got involved and then I
Kretzmer, D. (2005). Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defense. Targeted Killing as Active Self-Defense : Noah Feldman.
religion as the main focal point in American Foreign Policy. It was pride in the state,
The bombs had raised hell on earth for those few minutes and produced a tremendous amount of casualties. The way people had died was shocking...
Fear and panic conquers over especially when things like a bomb go off unexpectedly. In “Soldier Stories”, a collective of journal entries from real life soldiers like Sergeant Timothy J. Gaestel mentions in his letter that an improvised explosive device went off causing severe injury on his back. While Timothy stays calm, his untrained partner starts to panic and begins to fear for the worst of the situation:
Through O’Brien’s “The Things They Carried”, he shows us how constant situations of stress and ambiguity of death, can lead us to be driven to an inhumane behavioral drive. O’Brien’s book is set during the Vietnam war and he’s talking about a fallen Vietnamese soldier. “He knew he would fall dead and wake up in the stories of his village and people.” (O’Brien 124). He says this because he wants to show how everyone is always remembered. He sets a distinct value on life and he wants to make sure people know how serious war is. The claims are relevant because it shows how everyone is affected by traumatic experiences all the time, as in how the soldier or the people who remember him have trauma because of death. “They felt bad for Kiowa. But they also felt a giddiness, a secret joy, because they were alive, and the rain was preferable to being sucked under a shit field, and because it was a ll a matter of luck and happenstance.” (O’Brien
It’s a hard thing to explain to somebody who hasn’t felt it, but the resence of death and danger has a way of bringing you fully awake. It makes things vivid. When you’re afraid, really afraid, you see things you never saw before, you pay attention to the world. You make close friends. You become part of a tribe and you share the same blood – you give it together, you take it together. (O’Brien, 220)