Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Differences between psychological, biological and sociological theories of criminal behavior
Routine activity theory paper
Differences between psychological, biological and sociological theories of criminal behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Differences between psychological, biological and sociological theories of criminal behavior
Description
Texas State University, San Marcos has a notorious reputation as being a party school. The growth of the University has seen increases in the student population in San Marcos, Texas with many students living in off-campus rented accommodation. The increase in the student population has significantly changed the dynamics of the Sagewood neighbourhood with fifty-two, three bedroom duplexes being rented by university students. The Sagewood neighbourhood now consists of single family residences with a high rate of homeownership and duplexes rented by students. Differences in age and lifestyle between the resident home owners and student renters has contributed to increased complaints of noise in the area, mostly from late night
…show more content…
The premise of routine activity theory moves away from the suggestion that crime is caused by social impacts such as unemployment, inequality and low socio economic status, and rather looks at crime occurring when there is a convergence of a motivated offender, a suitable target and a lack of suitable guardians (Cohen & Felson, 2010). Routine activity theory focuses on trends in behaviour, and asserts that crime is specific to space and time (Williams, 2012). Routine activity theory looks at the differing risks that different locations possess, and the correlation between different lifestyles and victimisation (Cohen & Felson, 1979). By identifying the factors that can influence a person or a place being at an increased risk of victimisation, it may be possible to educate residents, increase the number of capable guardians and apply strategies to reduce crime by utilising law enforcement and increasing guardianship (Cullen & Wilcox, …show more content…
Although broken windows theory is based on disorder, this can be further broken down to social disorder and physical disorder (Wilson & Kelling, (2010). Social disorder refers to the violation of social norms, such as drug dealing and prostitution and physical disorder relates to the overall appearance of the area, such as overgrown lawns, rubbish, and vandalism. The lack of local social control can lead to residents fearing victimisation within their neighbourhood; the same lack of social control can also attract offenders to the area. The authors of broken windows theory believed that early intervention from police was a crucial factor in the prevention of more serious crime occurring in these neighbourhoods (Wilson & Kelling,
Burglaries, robberies, and shootings, all of which may leave victims or innocent bystanders severely hurt or dead, are now frequent enough to concern all urban and many suburban residents. Living in a dangerous environment places young people at risk of falling victim to such malicious and aggressive behavior observed and learned from others. Social institution such as education, family, religion, peer groups, etc., play a major role in the influence of crime in the urban neighborhoods that Anderson describes. As said in the essay, "although almost everyone in poor inner-...
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2094589
The broken windows theory, was proposed by James Q. Wilson and George Kelling (1982). This used broken windows to describe disorder within neighbourhoods.Their theory links disorder and unsociable behavior within a community leading to serious crime. Prior to theories such as broken windows, law enforcement and police tended to focus on the serious crime. However, Wilson and Kelling took a different view from this. They saw serious crime as the final result of a chain of events, which emerged from disorder. If we eliminated disorder, then serious crimes would not occur as mentioned by Mckee
Cohen, L. E. & Felson, M. (1979). “Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activities approach,” American Sociological Review 44:588-608.
Many of the traditional criminological theories focused more on biological, psychological and sociological explanations of crime rather than on the cost and benefits of crime. More conservative approaches, including routine actives, lifestyle exposure and opportunity theories have clearly incorporated crime rate patterns as a fundamental part of analyzing the economics of crime. Crime statistics are important for the simple reason that they help put theories into a logical perspective. For example, a prospective home owner may want to look at crime rates in areas of potential occupancy. On a more complex level, it helps law enforcement and legislators create effective crime reduction programs. Furthermore, it also helps these agencies determine if crime prevention programs, that have been in effect, have been successful. There are many factors that influence the rates of crime including socio economic status, geographical location, culture and other lifestyle factors. More specifically, Messner and Blau (1987) used routine activities theory to test the relationship between the indicators of leisure activities and the rate of serious crimes. They discussed two types of leisure actives, the first being a household pastime, which primarily focused on television watching. The second type was a non-household leisure event which was consisted of attendance to sporting events, cinemas, and entertainment districts. The focus of this paper will be to study the effects that substantial amounts of leisure activities have on the offender and the victim. Leisure activities not only make a crime more opportunistic for offenders, it may also provide offenders with motivation to engage in criminal activity. On the other hand, it may also be argue...
more problems with the police, more use of force used by the police, and police misconduct. Because the citizens feel they can’t rely on the police, they often turn to informal ways of handling issues in their community.
Kelling and Catherine Coles, released the definitive work on the broken windows theory: Fixing Broken Windows - Restoring Order and Reducing Crime in Our Communities. In this work, the authors would go further, and demonstrate the causal relationship between violent crime and the not prosecution to misdemeanors. As the disorder leads to crime, tolerance for petty crimes and misdemeanors, inevitably leads to violent crime. The authors attribute the original “growth of disorder” in the 1960’s due the valorization and combination of decriminalization of public drunkenness and deinstitutionalize the mentally ill. The main window for this backspace in America were vagrancy and loitering laws. These both, opened a gap for the drunks and panhandlers take back the streets second the
This theory however as some have argued has emerged from social disorganisation theory, which sees the causes of crime as a matter of macro level disadvantage. Macro level disadvantage are the following: low socioeconomic status, ethnic or racial heterogeneity, these things they believe are the reasons for crime due to the knock on effect these factors have on the community network and schools. Consequently, if th...
Broken Window theory has a familiar ring, perhaps because it mirrors, “Nip it, nip it in the bud” as chimed by the character Barny Fife during the 1960’s television series the Andy Griffith Show. The theory is closely linked with conservatives politically and sociologically as well as concentrating on social cohesion through strict ideologies of law and order. However, Broken Window theory is also based on ecological causes of crime that is known as criminology of place or environmental criminology (Schmalleger, F. 2015). Criminology of place allows that areas, due to ecological features such as architecture or geographic location can induce criminal activity. In 1982 in an article written by Dr. James Q. Wilson and George Kelling called Broken
Ronald V Clarke originally developed the idea of situational crime prevention in the 1980’s (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005). This particular crime prevention theory addresses techniques that increase the effort required to commit the crime, increase the risks involved with committing the crime, reducing the reward gained by the offender after committing the crime, reducing the provocation between the offender and others and remove excuses (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005). Majority of crime is believed to be committed because there are no high risks of being caught and the rewards outweigh the risks (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005). Increasing the effort by controlling access to locations and target hardening can deflect many offenders, as more effort is needed to commit the crime (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005). Another main technique would be to increase the risks; this may be achieved by extending guardianship, creating natural surveillance or artificial surveillance such as CCTV (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005).
“The Broken Windows Theory is a criminological theory of the norm-setting and signaling effect of urban disorder and vandalism on additional crime and antisocial behavior,” wikipedia. The idea relies on a trio of sociological theories - conformity, the effect of monitoring, and the concept of signaling. Conformity is the idea that people tend to do what others around them are doing. Someone walking down the street eating a hamburger, for example, is less likely to throw the wrapper in a trash can if the sidewalk is already strewn with hamburger wrappers from other people who have chosen to litter. An area clean from litter indicates to a person that there are rules against littering and that they are followed, monitored and enforced. In districts
‘In its social and behavioural impact fear of crime may be as potent as victimisation itself’ (Cater and Jones, 1989: 104) relates to the geography of crime, best defined as ‘the relevance of space to the study of criminal offenders, the incidence of crime and the characteristics of victims’ (Smith, 1989). In terms of explaining Cater and Jones’ statement, it means that it is not so much peoples ‘actual’ experience of crime that makes them fear it but the possibility and anxiety they could be a victim rather than have been a victim – the indirect perspective of fear of crime. In today’s society people tailor routes they take avoiding times and places deemed as dangerous and unsafe. This increases anxiety levels as Smith, (1986) says it exposes people to ‘emotional’ stress and constricts their movements. It is argued the elderly and youngest members of our society are the most fearful of crime however, of these age groups the elderly have the lowest risk of becoming victims of crime (James, 1992). Cater and Jones (1989) suggest how in certain respects ‘fear of crime’ is irrational with research by Hough and Mayhew (1983) conclude that fear of crime is not...
Lastly, the Routine Activity Theory explains the rate of victimization through a set of situations that reflect the routines of typical individuals. The availability of suitable targets, the absence of capable guardians, and the presence of motivated offenders. According to this theory, the presence of one or more of these factors creates a higher risk of victimization. Communities with ample police protection, alarms and other security devices, and community watch teams, lower their risk by creating guardianship, which is noted under this theory to reduce crime rates (Seigel,
There are many roles that the NSW Police Force executes in their line of duty, although Crime Prevention is the key and most important role. Crime Prevention is a set of ideas and causes that intervene with the reduction of criminal events and their consequences (Lab 2010). Advancements in sociology and psychological studies in the 20th century have changed the effectiveness and understanding of the aspects of crime and criminal behaviour. The Crime Prevention Model looks at three main areas of intervention that combat crime at its stages of developing; primary, secondary and tertiary. The primary prevention of crime “identifies conditions of the physical and social environment that provide opportunities for or precipitate criminal acts” (Brantingham
Broken Windows theory shows disorder in urban communities instead of capturing criminal offenses. Theories that bring out fear or misperception then solutions will make societies over react and belief they are not safe in their own communities. This brings our society to take crime solving into their own matters which causes kais when it comes to criminality. Social disorder is talked and feared by communities that lack control which individual’s belief that crime will be carried out. In the article these authors Gau, J. M., Corsaro, N., & Brunson, R. K. (2014) expressed that communities whether poor or upper class have their own social norms which keeps the fear of the social environment to a