Rough Draft

684 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: French and Indian war relationships

The death toll in Pontiac’s War was 2,650 people, both British and Native American. Pontiac’s Rebellion was a rebellion that happened in 1763 when the tribes Ottawa, Ojibwa, Shawnee, Miami, Huron, Seneca, and Potawatomi joined together under the leadership of Pontiac, the chief of the Ottawa tribe, and sprung attacks on the British around their area. They captured three major British forts including Fort Pitt and Fort Detroit. Pontiac’s War influenced the American Revolution. Below are the main ideas: Causes, What Happened, Short and Long Term Effects, If It Didn’t Happen, and the Leaders of Pontiac’s War.
One of the causes of Pontiac’s war is that the French had lost the French and Indian War to the British. The French were allies with the Native Americans and treated them with respect. They also gave gifts of gunpowder, guns, animal pelts, and furs, and jewelry to the Native Americans. Britain was not so nice. They invaded the Native Americans’ land without asking; they didn’t exchange gifts because they thought that it was blackmail, and treated them with disrespect. The British had even issued a law that stated that no white man could cross the west side of the Appalachian Mountains without permission. Yet this did not stop the British from crossing the Appalachian Mountains. This angered the Chief Pontiac as he thought they were a threat to daily life. He then brought together the tribes Ottawa, Ojibwa, Shawnee, Miami, Huron, Seneca, and Potawatomi to attack local British settlements and forts.
There are two major things that happened in Pontiac’s Rebellion. They were war and the Proclamation of 1763 was passed. The Native Americans’ goal was to drive out all of the British from the west side of the Appalachian Mountains. ...

... middle of paper ...

...feared they were “interfering with our daily lives”. Chief Pontiac brought together many tribes for a common cause which was to drive away all of the British settlers in the area west of the Appalachian Mountains. Chief Pontiac was rebellious, a great intertribal leader, resistant, brave, helpful, bold, and daring. Jeffrey Amherst was the commander who cut off gifts going to the Native Americans, who so dearly relied upon them. He also captured Canada for Britain in 1758 during the French and Indian War. Amherst was brave, believed in harsh punishment, and was bold about his ideas.
In the end the Native Americans did not drive off the British but they helped the Americans start the American Revolution. An interesting fact is that while trying to capture the Fort Michilimackinac the Sauks and Ojibwas used a stickball game to distract the British troops from the fort.

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Bacon's Rebellion

    228 Words  | 1 Pages

    Bacon’s Rebellion, King Phillip’s War and the Pequot War were similar in that there were conflicts with Natives over land, however they differed in the ways the wars were carried out and the results of the wars. Bacon’s rebellion was a result of the poorer classes moving west to cultivate land, however they encountered natives and the governor refused to protect them. Likewise the Pequot war was a direct effect of puritans moving westward, additionally all three wars resulted in the colonists as victors. During King Phillip’s war the natives destroyed a fifth of the towns in Masseuses and Rhode Island in contrast to the other wars where the natives did not cause as much damage to the colonists. Bacon’s Rebellion was significant because afterwards

    Read More

  • The British and the American Colonists: Tension Prior to Revolutionary War

    1033 Words  | 3 Pages

    After the French and Indian War, the British were unimpressed with the colonial war efforts and generally assumed they were unable to defend the western frontier, whereas the colonists thought they had done well in all of the wars and were confident that they could defend themselves. This led to conflict between the two nations, brought on by the costs of the wars. Landowners in Britain wanted to reduce the taxes placed upon them. King George III and the Whigs supported a colonial policy that would abandon salutary neglect and force the colonies to support the cost of the British empire. In addition to this the British began to be more present in the colonies, beginning with Pontiac’s rebellion where the British sent troops instead of letting the colonial forces respond to the attack, because of their thoughts on the colonists military efforts. The Proclamation o...

    Read More

  • The Treaty Between The Abenaki Indians And The English At Casco Bay

    1284 Words  | 3 Pages

    The terms of the Treaty included the acknowledgement of Indian tribes’ asking for forgiveness and the English dominating Indian trade and commerce. There were other terms that included the English being able to use Indian land for recreational use and any “remedy or redress” (Calloway 174) being brought to justice based on English laws. Overall, the terms and language used in the treaty is used to place blame of past hostilities on the Indians. The English completely twisted the language in the treaty to favor the English and shows the Indian people as rebellious savages that were begging for forgiveness for King George and the English.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Shays Rebellion And Whiskey Rebellion

    919 Words  | 2 Pages

    Between 1763 and 1764, a group of Irish-Scots living in the backcountry of Pennsylvania encountered some conflicts with the neighboring Native American tribes. After the Seven Years’ War, a large number of immigrants rushed into the newly won land from the French. Soon, the population grew too great for the area and colonists were forced to move into the Indians land. The Natives were not a fan of this arrangement. Even though they felt this way, they never attacked the colonists. At the end of 1763, a group colonists attacked the Susquehannock for possible providing aid to the colonists´ enemies. At the end of the

    Read More

  • Eastern Woodland Indians and the Seven Years' War

    871 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... due to a long relationship of trade, alliance, and kinship with the French as well as the promise of "war honors" (Calloway, 2012, p. 174). In 1757, the British troops at Fort William Henry on Lake George surrendered to the French. This victory was short lived as most of the French's Indian allies attacked the surrendered fort because they felt betrayed by the terms of surrender. The native peoples unleashed a slaughter, which included scalps and captives (Calloway, 2012, p. 174). The Indians were severing ties with the French and the British war effort was increasing with vigor. The Native Americans began to side with the British not knowing what this would bring, which was more freedom and land stripped away from them.

    Read More

  • American History in the book White Devil

    1239 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...h and the French and Indians, but shows some of the ironic nature of this conflict: that due to kidnapping and tribal adoption, some Abenaki Indians were likely to have almost as many English ancestors as the frontiersmen they opposed. The English frontiersmen could be as "savage" as the Indians. Brumwell does very well dispelling the clichés and stereotypes that many have become accustomed to. He uses records of the Abenaki Indian oral tradition to give a voice to both sides. It is a great book from start to finish. This is a true history buffs companion and a great addition to any library. The book is as complex in its knowledge as it is simplistic and detailed in its imagery. As a result, this book can be read by both specialists and general readers alike and can be pared with almost any text giving light to the French and Indian War or the aftermath thereof.

    Read More

  • Beyond 1492-Native Reactions to Invasion

    963 Words  | 2 Pages

    “ [They] spent most of the conquest and colonial periods reacting and responding to the European strangers and invaders” (99). Both sides were different in many ways; Their communication, transportation, culture, and the way they survived differentiate the Europeans from the Native Americans. They both acted as wisely as they could when this encounters began after the discovery. “[Tribes] worked mightily and often cleverly to maximize their political sovereignty, cultural autonomy, territorial integrity, power of self identification, and physical nobility” (100). The Europeans were stronger, had better technology, better weapons, and had plenty of experience fighting people like the Native Americans. They could have easily conquer them , but they had a problem of resources, reinforcements and survival. Native American were many but they lacked the knowledge and experience of war and evolution. Europeans were technologically evolved and were experienced at fighting wars, but they ...

    Read More

  • Problems Of 1675

    1138 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the years of 1675 and 1676 the North American colonies experienced conflicts that shaped the dynamics of their colonial life. King Phillip's War would effectively end relations between the New England colonists and the Indians. Also, the rebellion in Virginia led by Nathaniel Bacon stressed the growing discontent of poor frontier farmers for British rule. The consequences of these two events clearly had an impact on different levels that would extend well beyond their time. Therefore, the years 1675 and 1676 played a very significant role in the Northern American colonies.

    Read More

  • Proclamation of 1763

    1002 Words  | 3 Pages

    The British acquired the French territory after the Seven Year War (French and Indian War) and because they did not want another war to start with the colonists and the Indians they issued the Proclamation of 1763 prohibiting colonists to settle in the west passed the Appalachian Mountains. This angered colonists who had either purchased or was given land to the west.

    Read More

  • French and Indian War

    2663 Words  | 6 Pages

    The French and Indian war took place between 1754 and 1763. Here between these nine years would serve as the blue print to America’s history and future. “What began as a struggle over territorial rights between British colonist and French settlers became part of an international war between the great powers” (Schwartz, 1). To truly understand the French and Indian war, many must take a look into the past events that caused the dispute between the British and the French. During the year 1498, the British claims to the continent were based on the London Company and the sailing of the waters under the rule of King James I. This is where the British company in the latter half of the seventeenth century, under the crown established a reign or province, extending from seas to sea.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of The Proclamation Line Of 1763

    844 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...3 was the right thing to do because, first, it was not designed to oppress the colonists at all, but to work out the Indian problems fairly and prevent another bloody eruption, such as Pontiac’s Rebellion (Kennedy). Second, it was used to calm the fears of the Indians, who felt the colonists would drive them from their land as they expanded westward (Proclamation of 1763). Third, it asserted that all of the Indians peoples were thereafter under the protection of the King (Proclamation of 1763). These are all valid arguments of why the proclamation line was put into place and of why the line was needed in order to make sure that the Indians were protected. The Indians really needed the proclamation line to fight for what they had in order to prevent another war where several others would be killed. The government’s goal with this was to keep the Indians protected.

    Read More

  • Jean Jacques Rousseau's Social Conflict

    1189 Words  | 3 Pages

    The colonies became heavily taxed (among other issues that caused the war) and tensions grew so tense that the Boston massacre had occurred. The Boston massacre was a standoff between the colonists and the British officers, the colonists, unarmed, had protested against the officer and it had escalated to the point where the officers shot several colonists. Several more incidents had occurred, ultimately leading up to the American Revolution. The American Revolution lasted many year and even divided colonists. The instability in America could have caused the end of the Americas if at any point of the revolution they had failed to stay united in their

    Read More

  • War of 1812

    1614 Words  | 4 Pages

    The War of 1812 was a war between Britain and the United States fought primarily in Upper Canada. It had many causes, few which involved British North America. The results of the war include the fact that there was no clear winner or loser among them. The only real losers in the situation were the Natives in the region. They were driven out of their lands and customs. None of the borders was changed by the war, though many attempts were made. The Treaty of Ghent, which ended the war, did nothing to advance the state of the countries. It went so far as to end the war and put things back the way that they were, but the main causes of the conflict were not addressed or dealt with. In order to evaluate the significance of this war, Canadian victories and losses, as well as overall results, must be analyzed.

    Read More

  • Causes of the Deterioration of British-Colonial Relations

    784 Words  | 2 Pages

    The beginning of 1763 marked one of the major events that would contribute to the end of British colonial relations. On February 3, 1763 the French and Indian War finally ended in British victory, but while the British celebrated the French’s defeat, colonists feared the oncoming reverberations the war would have on them. The main motive behind the war was for possession over the French fur trade territory in North America. To the colonists, the war was being fought by and for Britain not the colonies. The benefits of the victory only pertained to Britain. The after effect of the war for the colonies was the trampling on their need for expansion. During the war, Native Americans had fought with the French because of how well they treated them. Britain was notorious for abusing the Native Americans, therefore once the French were defeated; they began attacking western settlements of colonists. To avoid confrontation, the Proclamation of 1763 was passed by Parliament. The Proclamation established a limit to the greatly needed colonial expansion. Specifically, the Proclamation forbid settlement beyond the Appalachian Mountains. The passing of the Proclamation of 1763 infuriated colonists ...

    Read More

  • rough draft

    1267 Words  | 3 Pages

    While growing up we learn that the best way to stay healthy and look great is through proper dieting and regular exercise. As we get older and feel the pressure of obtaining perfect looks, the sensationalism of fad dieting can seem like a dream come true. With the desire of a tiny waist plaguing America, it can be difficult to decide between healthy dieting an exercise, or extreme fad diets promising fast results. When choosing which method will work best for you can be stressful, it is important to think about what is really best for your body. Each form of dieting has different long term results, can affect your overall health, and can have an effect on the rest of your appearance.

    Read More

More about Rough Draft

Open Document