Rome's Legacy-Good Or Bad?

498 Words1 Page

Rome - good or bad? Rome legacy - good or bad? Rome has a dark side. Rome is very bad, but some people don’t see that bad side, they only see the good. Learning more about Rome leads to wanting to know more about how it was, and how the war was. The wars got so bad and the taxes lightened and so did the inflation between the rich and the poor. At the same time the Roman empire failed because of labor issues, so they made the slaves work as tradesmen and work on the fields. The republic had worked together so well for a good amount of time, and people took their lives for granted and they didn't care anymore. Augustus assumed he could control the republic for so long with just peace - but instead he had actually voted for violence. Rome attempted to make it …show more content…

They wanted complete control of the government. Rome's slaves began to dry up and not work anymore. The empire was beginning to turn terrible. Rome’s economy looked towards the slaves and for them to be working hard and only working on the fields and the military, but yet the upper class didn’t. The Empire began to lose hope and how hard they thought they could win against Europe. Most people don't remember how bad it was before all of the violence got bad. Rome has a negative legacy. In Rome, the political violence increased in the 80’s B.C.E. They started killing and stealing people's land. Being the Roman emperor is a very dangerous job to work in because of the rules and not everyone agrees with what you believe in and what you like so they trade and go against you. Most of the men in Rome took over the throne and used the emperor as a bodyguard. They would sell off the person with the highest bid. As the situation got worse, they started to lose trust in the leadership. The Romans created the Twelve Tables and the Justinian code. It was Rome’s first attempt at the code of law, and it outlined the punishment of various

Open Document